Ineffective deception in conformity research: Some causes and consequences

Authors

  • David J. Stang

    1. Queens College, City University of New York
    Search for more papers by this author
    • The author wishes to thank Monte Page and Tanya Shriver for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript. Requests for reprints should be sent to the author at the Department of Psychology, Queens College, City University of New York. Flushing, New York 11367, USA.


Abstract

Suspiciousness of deception threatens the internal validity of the conformity experiment, and analyses suggest it is becoming more widespread. After being led to believe their own ability in a visual judgment task was higher, lower, or the same as the ability of the other group members, 65 undergraduate women made visual and informational judgments in the Crutchfield apparatus. Major findings include treatment effects on suspiciousness, less conformity by suspicious Ss, and ‘significant’ treatment effects on conformity only when suspicious Ss were removed from the analyses. Measures of self-confidence and confidence in others were significantly related to and likely determinants of suspiciousness. Implications for improving deception in conformity research are discussed.

Ancillary