SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Steffen Ahrens, Dennis J. Snower, Envy, guilt, and the Phillips curve, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2014, 99, 69

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Ashleigh Shelby Rosette, Shirli Kopelman, JeAnna Lanza Abbott, Good Grief! Anxiety Sours the Economic Benefits of First Offers, Group Decision and Negotiation, 2014, 23, 3, 629

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Rongjun Yu, Andrew J. Calder, Dean Mobbs, Overlapping and distinct representations of advantageous and disadvantageous inequality, Human Brain Mapping, 2014, 35, 5
  4. 4
    Steven Carter, Michael McBride, Experienced utility versus decision utility: Putting the ‘S’ in satisfaction, The Journal of Socio-Economics, 2013, 42, 13

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Francesca Gino, Shahar Ayal, Dan Ariely, Self-serving altruism? The lure of unethical actions that benefit others, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2013, 93, 285

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Robert Böhm, Klaus Rothermund, Oliver Kirchkamp, Social categorization and group-motivated interindividual–intergroup discontinuity, European Journal of Social Psychology, 2013, 43, 1
  7. 7
    Gokhan Karagonlar, David M. Kuhlman, The role of Social Value Orientation in response to an unfair offer in the Ultimatum Game, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2013, 120, 2, 228

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Sang-June Park, Perception of Competition and Wealth and Social Trust in Korea, Japan, China, and U.S.A., Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, 2012, 37, 1, 61

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Maya Abou-Zeid, Moshe Ben-Akiva, The effect of social comparisons on commute well-being, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2011, 45, 4, 345

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    Sau-Him Paul Lau, Felix Leung, Estimating a Parsimonious Model of Inequality Aversion in Stackelberg Duopoly Experiments, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 2010, 72, 5
  11. 11
    Deepak Malhotra, The desire to win: The effects of competitive arousal on motivation and behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2010, 111, 2, 139

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    David De Cremer, To pay or to apologize? On the psychology of dealing with unfair offers in a dictator game, Journal of Economic Psychology, 2010, 31, 6, 843

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Stefan T. Trautmann, A tractable model of process fairness under risk, Journal of Economic Psychology, 2009, 30, 5, 803

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Rob M.A. Nelissen, Dorien S.I. van Someren, Marcel Zeelenberg, Take it or leave it for something better? Responses to fair offers in ultimatum bargaining, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2009, 45, 6, 1227

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    Daniel Eek, Marcus Selart, The choice between allocation principles: Amplifying when equality dominates, International Journal of Psychology, 2009, 44, 2
  16. 16
    Anthony M. Evans, Joachim I. Krueger, The Psychology (and Economics) of Trust, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2009, 3, 6
  17. 17
    Paul A.M. Van Lange, Collective rationality: The integrative model explains it (as) well, Acta Psychologica, 2008, 128, 2, 405

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Georges Potworowski, Shirli Kopelman, Strategic Display and Response to Emotions: Developing Evidence-based Negotiation Expertise in Emotion Management (NEEM), Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 2008, 1, 4
  19. 19
    Emily Haisley, Romel Mostafa, George Loewenstein, Subjective relative income and lottery ticket purchases, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2008, 21, 3
  20. 20
    Susanne L. Peters, Kees Bos, When Fairness is Especially Important: Reactions to Being Inequitably Paid in Communal Relationships, Social Justice Research, 2008, 21, 1, 86

    CrossRef

  21. 21
    Frans Winden, Affect and Fairness in Economics, Social Justice Research, 2007, 20, 1, 35

    CrossRef

  22. 22
    Steven L. Blader, What determines people’s fairness judgments? Identification and outcomes influence procedural justice evaluations under uncertainty, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2007, 43, 6, 986

    CrossRef

  23. 23
    Max H. Bazerman, Climate Change as a Predictable Surprise, Climatic Change, 2006, 77, 1-2, 179

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    Jared R. Curhan, Hillary Anger Elfenbein, Heng Xu, What do people value when they negotiate? Mapping the domain of subjective value in negotiation., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2006, 91, 3, 493

    CrossRef

  25. 25
    Jason Dana, Daylian M. Cain, Robyn M. Dawes, What you don’t know won’t hurt me: Costly (but quiet) exit in dictator games, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2006, 100, 2, 193

    CrossRef

  26. 26
    Rebecca W. Hamilton, When the means justify the ends: effects of observability on the procedural fairness and distributive fairness of resource allocations, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2006, 19, 4
  27. 27
    Jason Dana, Ethics in Groups, 2006,

    CrossRef

  28. 28
    Ilja Van Beest, Eric Van Dijk, Carsten K.W. De Dreu, Henk A.M. Wilke, Do-no-harm in coalition formation: Why losses inhibit exclusion and promote fairness cognitions, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2005, 41, 6, 609

    CrossRef

  29. 29
    Stephen M. Garcia, Avishalom Tor, Max H. Bazerman, Dale T. Miller, Profit maximization versus disadvantageous inequality: the impact of self-categorization, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2005, 18, 3
  30. 30
    Richard H. McAdams, Janice Nadler, Testing the Focal Point Theory of Legal Compliance: The Effect of Third-Party Expression in an Experimental Hawk/Dove Game, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2005, 2, 1
  31. 31
    Erik Hoelzl, George Loewenstein, Wearing out your shoes to prevent someone else from stepping into them: Anticipated regret and social takeover in sequential decisions, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2005, 98, 1, 15

    CrossRef

  32. 32
    David De Cremer, Tom R. Tyler, 2005,

    CrossRef

  33. 33
    Michel J.J. Handgraaf, Eric van Dijk, Henk A.M. Wilke, Riël C. Vermunt, Evaluability of outcomes in ultimatum bargaining, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2004, 95, 1, 97

    CrossRef

  34. 34
    Eric van Dijk, David De Cremer, Michel J.J Handgraaf, Social value orientations and the strategic use of fairness in ultimatum bargaining, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2004, 40, 6, 697

    CrossRef

  35. 35
    Nathan Novemsky, Maurice E. Schweitzer, What makes negotiators happy? The differential effects of internal and external social comparisons on negotiator satisfaction, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2004, 95, 2, 186

    CrossRef

  36. 36
    Bennett Cherry, Lisa D. Ordóñez, Stephen W. Gilliland, Grade expectations: the effects of expectations on fairness and satisfaction perceptions, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2003, 16, 5
  37. 37
    Marcello Gallucci, Marco Perugini, Information seeking and reciprocity: a transformational analysis, European Journal of Social Psychology, 2003, 33, 4
  38. 38
    Tom R. Tyler, Steven L. Blader, The Group Engagement Model: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Cooperative Behavior, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2003, 7, 4, 349

    CrossRef

  39. 39
    Tanya Menon, Sally Blount, THE MESSENGER BIAS: A RELATIONAL MODEL OF KNOWLEDGE VALUATION, Research in Organizational Behavior, 2003, 25, 137

    CrossRef

  40. 40
    Michel J.J. Handgraaf, Eric van Dijk, Henk A.M. Wilke, Riël C. Vermunt, The salience of a recipient’s alternatives: Inter- and intrapersonal comparison in ultimatum games, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2003, 90, 1, 165

    CrossRef

  41. 41
    Paul A. M. Van Lange, Jaap W. Ouwerkerk, Mirjam J. A. Tazelaar, How to overcome the detrimental effects of noise in social interaction: The benefits of generosity., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002, 82, 5, 768

    CrossRef

  42. 42
    Robert Gibbons, Leaf Van Boven, Contingent social utility in the prisoners’ dilemma, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2001, 45, 1, 1

    CrossRef

  43. 43
    David De Cremer, Paul A. M. Van Lange, Why prosocials exhibit greater cooperation than proselfs: the roles of social responsibility and reciprocity, European Journal of Personality, 2001, 15, S1
  44. 44
    Mushin Lee, Wonjun Shin, An empirical analysis of the role of reference point in justice perception in R&D settings in Korea, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2000, 17, 2, 175

    CrossRef

  45. 45
    Marcello Gallucci, Marco Perugini, An experimental test of a game-theoretical model of reciprocity, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2000, 13, 4
  46. 46
    Paul A. M. Van Lange, Beyond Self-interest: A Set of Propositions Relevant to Interpersonal Orientations, European Review of Social Psychology, 2000, 11, 1, 297

    CrossRef

  47. 47
    Eduard Brandstätter, Comparison based satisfaction: contrast and empathy, European Journal of Social Psychology, 2000, 30, 5
  48. 48
    Henrik Kristensen, Does fairness matter in corporate takeovers?, Journal of Economic Psychology, 2000, 21, 1, 43

    CrossRef

  49. 49
    James J. Gillespie, Jeanne M. Brett, Laurie R. Weingart, Interdependence, social motives, and outcome satisfaction in multiparty negotiation, European Journal of Social Psychology, 2000, 30, 6
  50. 50
    Lisa D. Ordóñez, Terry Connolly, Richard Coughlan, Multiple reference points in satisfaction and fairness assessment, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2000, 13, 3
  51. 51
    Eric van Dijk, Riël Vermunt, Strategy and Fairness in Social Decision Making: Sometimes It Pays to Be Powerless, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2000, 36, 1, 1

    CrossRef

  52. 52
    Michael J. Platow, Duncan Mills, Dianne Morrison, The effects of social context, source fairness, and perceived self-source similarity on social influence: a self-categorisation analysis, European Journal of Social Psychology, 2000, 30, 1
  53. 53
    David M. Messick, Alternative logics for decision making in social settings, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1999, 39, 1, 11

    CrossRef

  54. 54
    Don A. Moore, Order Effects in Preference Judgments: Evidence for Context Dependence in the Generation of Preferences, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1999, 78, 2, 146

    CrossRef

  55. 55
    Michael Tsiros, Effect of Regret on Post-choice Valuation: The Case of More Than Two Alternatives, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1998, 76, 1, 48

    CrossRef

  56. 56
    John T. Cacioppo, Wendi L. Gardner, Gary G. Berntson, Beyond Bipolar Conceptualizations and Measures: The Case of Attitudes and Evaluative Space, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1997, 1, 1, 3

    CrossRef

  57. 57
    David M. Messick, Don A. Moore, Max H. Bazerman, Ultimatum Bargaining with a Group: Underestimating the Importance of the Decision Rule, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1997, 69, 2, 87

    CrossRef

  58. 58
    Carsten K. W. De Dreu, Gain–loss-frame in outcome-interdependence: does it influence equality or equity considerations?, European Journal of Social Psychology, 1996, 26, 2
  59. 59
    Jan Bruins, Michael J. Platow, Sik Hung Ng, Distributive and procedural justice in interpersonal and intergroup situations: Issues, solutions, and extensions, Social Justice Research, 1995, 8, 1, 103

    CrossRef

  60. 60
    Michael J. Platow, Roger Shave, Social Value Orientations and the Expression of Achievement Motivation, The Journal of Social Psychology, 1995, 135, 1, 71

    CrossRef

  61. 61
    Carsten K. W De Dreu, Joselito C. Lualhati, Christopher McCusker, Effects of gain—loss frames on satisfaction with self–other outcome-differences, European Journal of Social Psychology, 1994, 24, 4
  62. 62
    Leigh Thompson, George Loewenstein, Egocentric interpretations of fairness and interpersonal conflict, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1992, 51, 2, 176

    CrossRef

  63. 63
    U. Schulz, T. May, The recoding of social orientations with ranking and pair comparison procedures, European Journal of Social Psychology, 1989, 19, 1
  64. 64
    Wim B. G. Liebrand, Charles G. McClintock, The ring measure of social values: A computerized procedure for assessing individual differences in information processing and social value orientation, European Journal of Personality, 1988, 2, 3
  65. 65
    Max H. Bazerman, Jared R. Curhan, Don A. Moore, The Death and Rebirth of the Social Psychology of Negotiation,