The research in this paper was supported by the Netherlands Organization for the Advancement of Pure Research (ZWO) to the first author and by a sabbatical leave from Boston College to the second author.
Categories versus groups as explanatory concepts in intergroup relations†
Article first published online: 22 FEB 2006
Copyright © 1988 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
European Journal of Social Psychology
Volume 18, Issue 2, pages 117–123, April/June 1988
How to Cite
Rabbie, J. M. and Horwitz, M. (1988), Categories versus groups as explanatory concepts in intergroup relations. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol., 18: 117–123. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420180204
- Issue published online: 22 FEB 2006
- Article first published online: 22 FEB 2006
- Manuscript Received: OCT 1987
In this discussion of papers by Doise (1988) and Tajfel (1982) it is argued that a conceptual distinction should be made between social groups and social categories. A social group can be considered as a ‘dynamic whole’ or social system, characterized by the perceived interdependence among its members, whereas a social category can be defined as a collection of individuals who share at least one attribute in common. This distinction is crucial for the understanding of outgroup favouritism in the minimal intergroup situation, the basic similarity between large scale groupings and face-to-face groups, the difference between group identification and social identity and the issue of categorizations versus attributions in intergroup conflict.