The powerful want to, the powerless have to: perceived constraint moderates causal attributions
Article first published online: 17 JUL 2006
Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
European Journal of Social Psychology
Special Issue: Thematic Issue: Social Power
Volume 36, Issue 4, pages 479–496, July/August 2006
How to Cite
Overbeck, J. R., Tiedens, L. Z. and Brion, S. (2006), The powerful want to, the powerless have to: perceived constraint moderates causal attributions. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol., 36: 479–496. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.353
- Issue published online: 17 JUL 2006
- Article first published online: 17 JUL 2006
- Manuscript Accepted: 26 DEC 2005
- Manuscript Received: 7 JUL 2004
It is popularly believed that powerful people enjoy a nearly-absolute lack of constraints, and that powerless people suffer under overwhelming constraints; in fact, such differences largely define the social categories of ‘powerful person’ and ‘powerless person.’ This association of power-related social categories and constraint constitutes a stereotype that may lead perceivers to overlook other, more diagnostic information when explaining others' behavior. As a result, the actions of powerholders may tend to be seen as dispositionally motivated and those of the powerless as situationally motivated. This should occur because of both real differences in constraint, and bias in the failure to account for other, more diagnostic information about constraint. Two studies support these predictions. In Study 1, participants judged powerless workers as more situationally motivated, especially under coercion, than both controls and powerholders, who were judged as more dispositional. In Study 2, given more fine-grained information about constraints and power, participants' attributions reflected both accurate use of this information and bias. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.