SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Aaker, J. L., & Lee, A. Y. (2001). “I” seek pleasures and “we” avoid pains: The role of self-regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 3349.
  • Allport, G. W. (1935). A handbook of social psychology. Worcester, MA: Clark Universty Press.
  • Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1996). Automatic activation of impression formation and motivation goals: Nonconscious goal priming reproduces effects of explicit task instructions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 464478.
  • Butera, F., & Mugny, G. (2001). Conflicts and social influences in hypothesis testing. In N. K.De Vries, & C. K. W.De Dreu (Eds.), Group consensus and minority influence: Implications for innovation (pp. 160182). Malden, MA, US: Blackwell Publishers; xiv, 324 pp.
  • Brandstätter, V., Ellemers, N., Gaviria, E., Giosue, F., Huguet, P., Kroon, M., et al. (1991). Indirect majority and minority influence: An exploratory study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 199211.
  • Brehm, J. W. (1999). The intensity of emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 222.
  • Cesario, J., Grant, H., & Higgins, E. (2004). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from “feeling right”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 388404.
  • Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In D. T.Gilbert, S. T.Fiske, & G.Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 151192). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  • Crano, W. D., & Alvaro, E. M. (1998). Indirect minority influence: The leniency contract revisited. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 1, 99115.
  • Crowe, E., & Higgins, T. E. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 117132.
  • DeBono, K. G. (1987). Investigating the social-adjustive and value-expressive functions of attitudes: Implications for persuasion processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 279287.
  • DeBono, K. G., & Harnish, R. J. (1988). Source expertise, source attractiveness, and the processing of persuasive information: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 541546.
  • De Dreu, C. K. W., & De Vries, N. K. (2001). Group consensus and minority influence: Implications for innovation. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Demoulin, S., Leyens, J.-P., Désert, M., van den Berck, M., & Vaes, J. (2002). Differentiated effects of color-blind and color-conscious norms of non-discrimination upon performance and feelings. Unpublished manuscript.
  • De Vries, N. K., De Dreu, C. K. W., Gordijn, E., & Schuurman, M. (1996). Majority and minority influence: A dual role interpretation. In W.Stroebe, & M.Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 145172). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Dunton, B. C., & Fazio, R. H. (1997). An individual difference measure of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 316326.
  • Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity management strategies. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 2753.
  • Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In M. P.Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 75109). New York: Academic Press.
  • Festinger, L., Riecken, H. W., & Schachter, S. (1956). When prophecy fails: A social and psychological study of a modern group that predicted the destruction of the world. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Galinsky, A. D., Leonardelli, G. J., Okhuysen, G. A., & Mussweiler, T. (2005). Regulatory focus at the bargaining table: Promoting distributive and integrative success. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 10871098.
  • Gerard, H. B. (1985). When and how minorities prevails. In S.Moscovici, G.Mugny, & E.Van Avermaet (Eds.), Perspectives on minority influence (pp. 171186). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Herek, G. M. (2000). The social construction of attitudes: Functional consensus and divergence in the U.S. public's reaction to AIDS. In G. R.Maio, & J. M.Olson (Eds.), Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes (pp. 249269). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Higgins, E. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 12801300.
  • Higgins, E. (1998). Promotion and prevention regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In M. P.Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 146). New York: Academic Press.
  • Higgins, E. (1999). Promotion and prevention as a motivational duality: Implications for evaluative processes. In S.Chaiken, & Y.Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 503525). New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Higgins, E. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55, 12171230.
  • Higgins, E. T., Shah, J., & Friedman, R. (1997). Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 515525.
  • Jost, J. T. (2001). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 124.
  • Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 163204.
  • Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 5160.
  • Keller, P. (2006). Regulatory focus and efficacy of health messages. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 109114.
  • Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265284.
  • Kruglanski, A. W., & Stroebe, W. (2005). The influence of beliefs and goals on attitudes: Issues of structure, function and dynamics. In D.Albarracin, B. T.Johnson, & M. P.Zanna (Eds.), The Handbook of Attitudes (pp. 323368). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Lavine, H., & Snyder, M. (1996). Cognitive processing and the functional matching effect in persuasion: The mediating role of subjective perceptions of message quality. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 580604.
  • Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1998). Small groups. In D. T.Gilbert, S. T.Fiske, & G.Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. II, pp. 415469). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  • Liberman, N., Idson, L. C., Camacho, C. J., & Higgins, E. T. (1999). Promotion and prevention choices between stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 11351145.
  • Liberman, N., Molden, D. C., Idson, L. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Promotion and prevention focus on alternative hypotheses: Implications for attributional functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 518.
  • Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., & Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 854864.
  • Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R. (1998). Intergroup relations: Insights from a theoretically integrative approach. Psychological Review, 105, 499529.
  • Maio, G. R., & Olson, J. M. (2000a). Emergent themes and potential approaches to attitude function: The function-structure model of attitudes. In G. R.Maio, & J. M.Olson (Eds.), Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes (pp. 417442). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Maio, G. R., & Olson, J. M. (2000b). What is a value-expressive attitude? In G. R.Maio, & J. M.Olson (Eds.), Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes (pp. 249269). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Maitner, A. T., Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R. (2006). Evidence for the regulatory function of intergroup emotion: Emotional consequences of implemented or impeded intergroup action tendencies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 720728.
  • Moscovici, S. (1976). Social influence and social change. London: Academic Press.
  • Moscovici, S. (1980). Toward a theory of conversion behaviour. In L.Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 209239). New York: Academic Press.
  • Mugny, G., & Pérez, J. A. (1991). The social psychology of minority influence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Paris: L.E.P.S.
  • Mullen, B. (1991). Group composition, salience, and cognitive representations: The phenomenology of being in a group. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 297323.
  • Nemeth, C. J. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93, 2332.
  • Oyserman, D., Uskul, A. K., Yoder, N., Nesse, R. M., & Williams, D. R. (2007). Unfair treatment and self-regulatory focus. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 505512.
  • Pérez, J. A., & Mugny, G. (1996). The conflict elaboration theory of social influence. In E.White, & J.Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior: Small group processes and interpersonal relations (Vol. 2). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion. New York: Springer Verlag.
  • Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1998). Matching versus mismatching attitudes functions: Implications for scrutiny of persuasive messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 227240.
  • Plant, E. A., & Devine, P. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 811832.
  • Plutchik, R. (1980). Emotion: A psychoevolutionary synthesis. New York: Random House.
  • Prentice, D. A. (1987). Psychological correspondence of possessions, attitudes, and values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 9931003.
  • Sassenberg, K., & Hansen, N. (2007). The impact of regulatory focus on affective responses to social discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 421444.
  • Sassenberg, K., Kessler, T., & Mummendey, A. (2003). Less negative = more positive? Social discrimination as avoidance or approach. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 4858.
  • Sassenberg, K., Jonas, K. J., Shah, J. Y., & Brazy, P. C. (2007). Why some groups just feel better: The regulatory fit of group power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 249267.
  • Scheepers, D., & Ellemers, N. (2007). When the pressure is up: The assessment of social identity threat in low and high status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 192200.
  • Seligman, C., & Katz, A. N. (1996). The dynamics of value systems. In C.Seligman, J. M.Olson, & M. P.Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 5375). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Shah, J., & Higgins, E. (2001). Regulatory concerns and appraisal efficiency: The general impact of promotion and prevention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 693705.
  • Shah, J., Brazy, P. C., & Higgins, E. (2002). Promotion and prevention forms of ingroup bias. In D. M.Mackie, & E. R.Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 3148). New York: Psychology Press.
  • Shah, J., Brazy, P. C., & Higgins, E. (2004). Promoting us or preventing them: Regulatory focus and manifestations of intergroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 433446.
  • Shavitt, S. (1990). The role of attitude objects in attitudes functions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26, 124148.
  • Simon, B., & Hamilton, D. L. (1994). Self-stereotyping and social context: The effects of relative ingroup size and ingroup status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 699711.
  • Simon, B., Hastedt, C., & Aufderheide, B. (1997). When self-categorization makes sense: The role of meaningful social categorization in minority and majority members' self-perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 310320.
  • Smith, M. B., Bruner, J. S., & White, R. W. (1956). Opinion and personality. Oxford, England: Wiley.
  • Snyder, M., & Cantor, N. (1998). Understanding personality and social behavior: A functionalist strategy. In D. T.Gilbert, S. T.Fiske, & G.Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 151192). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  • Snyder, M., & DeBono, K. G. (1989). Understanding the functions of attitudes: Lessons from personality and social behavior. In A. R.Pratkanis, S. J.Breckler, & A. G.Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and functions (pp. 339359). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Tajfel, H. (1978). The social psychology of minorities (No. 38). London: Minority Rights Group.
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S.Worchel, & W. G.Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 724). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
  • Tykocinski, O., Higgins, E., & Chaiken, S. (1994). Message framing, self-discrepancies, and yielding to persuasive messages: The motivational significance of psychological situations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 107115.
  • Verkuyten, M. (2005). Ethnic group identification and group evaluation among minority and majority groups: Testing the multiculturalism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 121138.
  • Vernet, J. P., & Butera, F. (2005). Women, Women rights, and feminist movements. Social Science Information, 44, 175188.
  • Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2005). Affective Forecasting: Knowing What to Want. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 131134.
    Direct Link:
  • Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Ouellette, J. A., Busceme, M. S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analitical review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 323345.