SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Aron, A., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2001). Including others in the self. In C.Sedikides, & M.Brewer (Eds.), Individual self, relational self, collective self (pp. 89108). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Batson, C. D., Ahmad, N., & Stocks, E. L. (2004). Benefits and liabilities of empathy-induced altruism. In A. G.Miller (Ed.), The social psychology of good and evil (pp. 359385). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Batson, C. D., Early, S., & Salvarani, G. (1997). Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imaging how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 751758.
  • Batson, C. D., Lishner, Cook, J., & Sawyer, S. (2005). Similarity and nurturance: Two possible sources of empathy for strangers. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1525.
  • Batson, C. D., Polycarpou, M. P., Harmon-Jones, E., & Imhoff, H. J. (1997). Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 105118.
  • Blascovich, J., Mendes, W. B., Hunter, S. B., Lickel, B., & Kowai-Bell, N. (2001). Perceiver threat in social interactions with stigmatized others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 253267.
  • Brown, R., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 255343.
  • Butler, J. S., & Wilson, K. L. (1978). The American Soldier revisited: Race relations and the military. Social Science Quarterly, 59, 451467.
  • Christ, O., Mansel, J., Wagner, U., Asbrock, F., Schleuter, E., & Pettigrew, T. F. (submitted). Emotions as determinants of prejudice and discrimination.
  • Cook, T. D. Cooper, H. Cordray, D. S. Hartman, H. Hedges, L. V. Light, R. J. & et al. (Eds.), (1992). Some generic issues and problems for meta-analysis. Meta-analysis for explanation: A casebook (pp. 283320). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Cooper, H. (1998). Synthesizing research 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Coursol, A., & Wagner, E. E. (1986). Effect of positive findings on submission and acceptance rates: A note on meta-analysis bias. Professional Psychology, 17, 136137.
  • Dickersin, K. (1997). How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data. AIDS Education and Prevention, 9, 1521.
  • Esses, V. M., & Dovidio, J. F. (2002). The role of emotions in determining willingness to engage in intergroup contact. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 12021214.
  • Festinger, L., & Kelley, H. (1951). Changing attitudes through social contact. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
  • Fritz, M. S., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18, 233239.
    Direct Link:
  • Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
  • Hedges, L. V. (1994). Fixed effects models. In H.Cooper, & L. V.Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 285299). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.
  • Hewstone, M. BrownR. (Eds.), (1986). Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Irish, D. P. (1952). Reactions of Caucasian residents to Japanese-American neighbors. Journal of Social Issues, 8, 1017.
  • Islam, M. R., & Hewstone, M. (1993). Dimensions of contact as predictors of intergroup anxiety, perceived out-group variability, and out-group attitude: An integrative model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 700710.
  • Johnson, B. T. (1993). DSTAT: Software for the meta-analytic review of research literatures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Johnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Quantitative synthesis of social psychological research. In H. T.Reis, & C. M.Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social psychology (pp. 496528). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Levin, S., van Laar, C., & Sidanius, J. (2003). The effects of ingroup and outgroup friendships on ethnic attitudes in college: A longitudinal study. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 7692.
  • Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 48, 11811209.
  • Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • McFarland, S. (1999). Is authoritarianism sufficient to explain individual differences in prejudice? Unpublished paper delivered at the 1999 meeting of the European Association for Experimental Social Psychology held at Oxford, England.
  • Miller, D. A., Smith, E. R., & Mackie, D. M. (2004). Effects of intergroup contact and political predispositions on prejudice: The role of intergroup emotions. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 7, 221237.
  • Mosteller, F., & Colditz, G. A. (1996). Understanding research synthesis (meta-analysis). Annual Review of Public Health, 17, 123.
  • Oaker, G., & Brown, R. (1986). Intergroup relations in a hospital setting: A further test of social identity theory. Human Relations, 39, 767778.
  • Page-Gould, E., Mendoza-Denton, R., & Tropp, L. R. (submitted). With a little help from my cross-group friend: Reducing anxiety in intergroup contexts through cross-group friendship. Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
  • Paolini, S., Hewstone, M., Cairns, & Voci, A. (2004). Effects of direct and indirect cross-group friendships on judgments of Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland: The mediating role of an anxiety-reduction mechanism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 770786.
  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 173185.
  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 6585.
  • Pettigrew, T. F. (2004). The social science study of American race relations in the 20th century. In C. S.Crandall, & M.Schaller (Eds.), The social psychology of prejudice: Historical and contemporary issues (pp. 132). Seattle, WA: Lewinian Press.
  • Pettigrew, T. F., Christ, O., Wagner, U., & Stellmacher, J. (2007). Direct and indirect intergroup contact effects on prejudice: A normative interpretation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31, 411425.
  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751783.
  • Powers, D. A., & Ellison, C. G. (1995). Interracial contact and Black racial attitudes: The contact hypothesis and selectivity bias. Social Forces, 74, 205226.
  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717731.
  • Preacher, K. J., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2006). Calculation for the Sobel test: An interaction calculation tool for mediation tests. Retrieved August 21, 2006 at http://www.psych.ku/preacher/sobel.
  • Premack, S. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1988). Individual unionization decisions. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 223234.
  • Raudenbush, S. W. (1994). Random effects models. In H.Cooper, & L. V.Hedges (Eds.), Handbook of research synthesis (pp. 301321). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Shadish, W. R. (1996). Meta-analysis and the exploration of causal mediating processes: A primer of examples, methods, and issues. Psychological Methods, 1, 4765.
  • Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S.Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological Methodology 1982 (pp. 290312). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Stephan, W. G. (1987). The contact hypothesis in intergroup relations. In C.Hendrick (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology. Group processes and intergroup relations (Vol. 9, pp. 1340). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Stephan, W. G., Boniecki, K. A., Ybarra, O., Bettencourt, A., Ervin, K. S., Jackson, L. A., & et al. (2002). The role of threats in the racial attitudes of Blacks and Whites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 12421254.
  • Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 157175.
  • Stephan, W. G., Stephan, C. W., & Gudykunst, W. B. (1999). Anxiety in intergroup relations: A comparison of anxiety/uncertainty management theory and integrated threat theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23, 613628.
  • Tausch, N., Hewstone, M., Kenworthy, J., Cairns, E., & Christ, O. (2007). Cross- community contact, perceived status differences, and intergroup Attitudes in Northern Ireland: The mediating roles of individual-level vs. group-level threats and the moderating role of social identification. Political Psychology, 28, 5368.
  • Tropp, L. R. (2007). Perceived discrimination and interracial contact: Predicting interracial closeness among Black and White Americans. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70, 7081.
  • Tropp, L. R., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2004). Intergroup contact and the central role of affect in intergroup prejudice. In C. W.Leach, & L.Tiedens (Eds.), Social life of emotion (pp. 246269). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tropp, L. R., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2005a). Differential relationships between intergroup contact and affective and cognitive dimensions of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 11451158.
  • Tropp, L. R., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2005b). Relationships between intergroup contact and prejudice among minority and majority status groups. Psychological Science, 16, 651653.
    Direct Link:
  • Turner, R., Hewstone, M., & Voci, A. (2005). Reducing explicit and implicit prejudice via direct and extended contact: The mediating role of self- disclosure and intergroup anxiety. Unpublished paper. Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
  • Van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Pettigrew, T. F., Christ, O., Wolf, C., Petzel, T., & et al. (2004). The role of perceived importance in intergroup contact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 211227.
  • Vescio, T. K., Sechrist, G. B., & Paolucci, M. P. (2003). Perspective taking and prejudice reduction: The mediational role of empathy arousal and situational attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 455472.
  • Voci, A., & Hewstone, M. (2003). Intergroup contact and prejudice toward immigrants in Italy: The mediational role of anxiety and the moderational role of group salience. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 3754.
  • Wagner, U., Christ, O., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2008). Prejudice and group-related behavior in Germany. Journal of Social Issues (in press).
  • Wagner, U., Christ, O., Pettigrew, T. F., Stellmacher, J., & Wolf, H. (2006). Prejudice and minority proportion: Contact instead of threat effects. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69, 380390.
  • Wilson, D. B. (2002). SPSS macros for meta-analytic data. Retrieved from http://mason.gmu.edu/∼dwilsonb/ma.html. Retrieved January 14, 2002.
  • Wilson, T. C. (1996). Prejudice reduction or self-selection? A test of the contact hypothesis. Sociological Spectrum, 16, 4360.
  • Wright, S. C., Aron, A., & Brody, S. (in press). Extended contact and including others in the self: Building on the Allport/Pettigrew legacy. To appear In U.Wagner, L.Tropp, G.Finchilescu, & C.Tredoux (Eds.), Improving intergroup relations: Building on the legacy of Thomas F. Pettigrew. Oxford: Blackwell.