SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 11731182.
  • Becker, H. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Free Press.
  • Bernburg, J. G., Krohn, M. D., & Rivera, C. J. (2006). Official labeling, criminal embeddedness, and subsequent delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43, 6788.
  • Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Braithwaite, V. (2006). Is reintegrative shaming relevant to tax evasion and avoidance? In H.Elffers, P.Verboon, & W.Huisman (Eds.), Managing and maintaining compliance. The Hague: Boom Legal Publishers.
  • Caldwell, M. D. (1976). Communication and sex effects in a five-person Prisoner's Dilemma Game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 273280.
  • Cooter, R. (1998). Expressive law and economics. Journal of Legal Studies, 27, 585608.
  • Darley, J. M., & Pittman, T. S. (2003). The psychology of compensatory and retributive justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 324336.
  • Depoorter, B., & Vanneste, S. (2005). Norms and enforcement: The case against copyright law. Oregon Law Review, 84, 11271179.
  • Depoorter, B., Vanneste, S., & Van Hiel, A. (2005). Gentle nudges versus hard shoves in copyright law: An empirical study on the conflict between norms and enforcement. Ghent: Center for Advanced Studies in Law and Economics.
  • Eek, D., Loukopoulos, P., Fujii, S., & Gärling, T. (2002). Spill-over effects of intermittent costs for defection in social dilemmas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 801813.
  • Fehr, E., & Falk, A. (2001). Psychological foundations of incentives. European Economic Review, 46, 687724.
  • Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003). Third party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 6387.
  • Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415, 137140.
  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Oxford, England: Row, Peterson.
  • Frey, B. S., & Oberholzer-Gee, F. (1997). The cost of price incentives: An empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out. The American Economic Review, 87, 746755.
  • Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2000). A fine is a price. Journal of Legal Studies, 29, 117.
  • Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1986). Fairness and the assumptions of economics. Journal of Business, 59, S285S300.
  • Lemert, E. M. (1967). Human deviance, social problems, and social control. Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  • Masclet, D., Noussair, C., Tucker, S., & Villeval, M.-C. (2003). Monetary and nonmonetary punishment in the voluntary contributions mechanism. The American Economic Review, 93, 366380.
  • McAdams, R. H. (2000). An attitudinal theory of expressive law. Oregon Law Review, 79, 339.
  • McCusker, C., & Carnevale, P. J. (1995). Framing in resource dilemmas: Loss aversion and the moderating effects of sanctions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61, 190201.
  • Mulder, L. B., Van Dijk, E., & De Cremer, D. (2007). When sanctions work if there are alternative options to defect: The role of trust in leaders. Manuscript under review.
  • Mulder, L. B., Van Dijk, E., De Cremer, D., & Wilke, H. A. M. (2006a). Undermining trust and cooperation: The paradox of sanctioning systems in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 147162.
  • Mulder, L. B., Van Dijk, E., De Cremer, D., & Wilke, H. A. M. (2006b). When sanctions fail to increase cooperation in social dilemmas: Considering the presence of an alternative defection option. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 13121324.
  • Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852863.
  • Nyborg, K. (1999). Informational aspect of environment policy deserves more attention: Comment on the paper by Frey. Journal of Consumer Policy, 22, 419427.
  • O'Gorman, R., Wilson, D. S., & Miller, R. R. (2005). Altruistic punishment and helping differ in sensitivity to relatedness, friendship, and future interactions. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 375387.
  • Paternoster, R., & Piquero, A. (1996). Reconceptualizing deterrence: An empirical test of personal and vicarious experiences. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 251286.
  • Paternoster, R., & Simpson, S. (1996). Sanction threats and appeals to morality: Testing a rational choice model of corporate crime. Law and Society Review, 30, 549583.
  • Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185227.
  • Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Messick, D. M. (1999). Sanctioning systems, decision frames, and cooperation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 684707.
  • Thøgersen, J. (2003). Monetary incentives and recycling: Behavioural and psychological reactions to a performance-dependent garbage fee. Journal of Consumer Policy, 26, 197228.
  • Tyler, T. R. (2001). The psychology of public dissatisfaction with government. In J. R.Hibbing, & E.Theiss Morse (Eds.), What is it about government that Americans dislike? Cambridge studies in political psychology and public opinion (pp. 227242). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tyler, T. R., & Degoey, P. (1996). Trust in organizational authorities: The influence of motive attributions on willingness to accept decisions. In R. M.Kramer, & T. R.Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 331356). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications.
  • Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Van Dijk, E., & Vermunt, R. (2000). Strategy and fairness in social decision making: Sometimes it pays to be powerless. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 125.
  • Van Prooijen, J. W., Gallucci, M., & Toeset, G. (in press). Procedural justice in punishment systems: Inconsistent punishment procedures have detrimental effects on cooperation. British Journal of Social Psychology.
  • Van Vugt, M. (1999). Solving natural resource dilemmas through structural change: The social psychology of metering water use. In M.Foddy, M.Smithson, S.Schneider, & M.Hogg (Eds.), Resolving social dilemmas: Dynamic, structural, and intergroup aspects (pp. 121133). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
  • Van Vugt, M., & De Cremer, D. (1999). Leadership in social dilemmas: The effects of group identification on collective actions to provide public goods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 587599.
  • Van Vugt, M., & Samuelson, C. D. (1999). The impact of personal metering in the management of a natural resource crisis: A social dilemma analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 731745.
  • Wenzel, M. (2004). The social side of sanctions: Personal and social norms as moderators of deterrence. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 547567.
  • Williams, K. R., & Hawkins, R. (1986). Perceptual research on general deterrence: A critical review. Law and Society Review, 20, 545572.
  • Wit, A., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1990). The presentation of rewards and punishments in a simulated social dilemma. Social Behaviour, 5, 231245.
  • Yamagishi, T. (1986). The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 110116.
  • Yamagishi, T. (1992). Group size and the provision of a sanctioning system in a social dilemma. In W. B. G.Liebrand, D. M.Messick, & H.Wilke (Eds.), Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings. International series in experimental social psychology (pp. 267287). Elmsford, NY, US: Pergamon Press.