Naïve definitions of action and inaction: The continuum, spread, and valence of behaviors
Version of Record online: 9 NOV 2011
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
European Journal of Social Psychology
Volume 42, Issue 2, pages 227–234, March 2012
How to Cite
McCulloch, K. C., Li, H., Hong, S. and Albarracin, D. (2012), Naïve definitions of action and inaction: The continuum, spread, and valence of behaviors. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol., 42: 227–234. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.860
- Issue online: 20 FEB 2012
- Version of Record online: 9 NOV 2011
- Manuscript Accepted: 21 SEP 2011
- Manuscript Received: 29 APR 2010
- National Institutes of Health. Grant Numbers: K02-MH01861, R01-NR08325
- action control;
The cohesiveness of a society depends, in part, on how its individual members manage their daily activities with respect to the goals of that society. Hence, there should be a degree of social agreement on what constitutes action and what constitutes inaction. The present research investigated the structure of action and inaction definitions, the evaluation of action versus inaction, and individual differences in these evaluations. Action–inaction ratings of behaviors and states showed more social agreement at the ends of the inaction–action continuum than at the middle, suggesting a socially shared construal of this definition. Action–inaction ratings were also shown to correlate with the valence of the rated behaviors, such that the more active the behavior, the more positive its valence. Lastly, individual differences in locomotion, need for closure, and Christian religious beliefs correlated positively with a preference for action. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.