Microfluidics and Miniaturization
Sample transport and electrokinetic injection in a microchip device for chemical cytometry
Article first published online: 20 OCT 2011
DOI: 10.1002/elps.201100234
Copyright © 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Issue

ELECTROPHORESIS
Special Issue: Microfluidics and Miniaturization
Volume 32, Issue 22, pages 3180–3187, November 2011
Additional Information
How to Cite
Kovarik, M. L., Lai, H.-H., Xiong, J. C. and Allbritton, N. L. (2011), Sample transport and electrokinetic injection in a microchip device for chemical cytometry. ELECTROPHORESIS, 32: 3180–3187. doi: 10.1002/elps.201100234
Publication History
- Issue published online: 18 NOV 2011
- Article first published online: 20 OCT 2011
- Manuscript Accepted: 15 AUG 2011
- Manuscript Revised: 26 JUN 2011
- Manuscript Received: 22 APR 2011
Funded by
- National Institutes of Health: Minority Opportunities in Research division of the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS). Grant Numbers: ♯K12GM000678 (MLK), EB11763 and CA139599 (NLA)
Keywords:
- Chemical cytometry;
- Electrokinetic injection bias;
- Microfluidics;
- Simulation
Abstract
Sample transport and electrokinetic injection bias are well characterized in capillary electrophoresis and simple microchips, but a thorough understanding of sample transport on devices combining electroosmosis, electrophoresis, and pressure-driven flow is lacking. In this work, we evaluate the effects of electric fields from 0 to 300 V/cm, electrophoretic mobilities from 10−4 to 10−6 cm2/Vs, and pressure-driven fluid velocities from 50 to 250 μm/s on sample injection in a microfluidic chemical cytometry device. By studying a continuous sample stream, we find that increasing electric field strength and electrophoretic mobility result in improved injection and that COMSOL simulations accurately predict sample transport. The effects of pressure-driven fluid velocity on injection are complex, and relative concentration values lie on a surface defined by pressure-driven flow rates. For high-mobility analytes, this surface is flat, and sample injection is robust despite fluctuations in flow rate. For lower mobility analytes, the surface becomes steeper, and injection depends strongly on pressure-driven flow. These results indicate generally that device design must account for analyte characteristics and specifically that this device is suited to high-mobility analytes. We demonstrate that for a suitable pair of peptides fluctuations in injection volume are correlated; electrokinetic injection bias is minimized; and electrophoretic separation is achieved.

1522-2683/asset/olbannerleft.jpg?v=1&s=212fcff8f34cb7f7728bda27b64237d82f5bc5d4)