Comparison of in-gel protein separation techniques commonly used for fractionation in mass spectrometry-based proteomic profiling

Authors

  • Mohieddin Jafari,

    1. HSPH Proteomics Resource, Department of Genetics and Complex Diseases, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
    2. Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
    3. School of Computer Science, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran, Iran
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Vincent Primo,

    1. Harvard Catalyst, The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center, Laboratory for Innovative Translational Technologies, Boston, MA, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Gary B. Smejkal,

    1. Harvard Catalyst, The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center, Laboratory for Innovative Translational Technologies, Boston, MA, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Eugene V. Moskovets,

    1. MassTech Inc., Columbia, MD, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Winston P. Kuo,

    1. Harvard Catalyst, The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center, Laboratory for Innovative Translational Technologies, Boston, MA, USA
    2. Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Department of Developmental Biology, Boston, MA, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Alexander R. Ivanov

    Corresponding author
    • HSPH Proteomics Resource, Department of Genetics and Complex Diseases, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
    Search for more papers by this author

  • Colour Online: See the article online to view Figs. 1–5 in colour.

Correspondence: Dr. Alexander R. Ivanov, Barnett Institute of Chemical and Biological Analysis, Northeastern University, 412 TF, 360 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115, USA

E-mail: a.ivanov@neu.edu

Fax: +1-617-373-2855

Abstract

Fractionation of complex samples at the cellular, subcellular, protein, or peptide level is an indispensable strategy to improve the sensitivity in mass spectrometry-based proteomic profiling. This study revisits, evaluates, and compares the most common gel-based protein separation techniques i.e. 1D SDS-PAGE, 1D preparative SDS-PAGE, IEF-IPG, and 2D-PAGE in their performance as fractionation approaches in nano LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis of a mixture of protein standards and mitochondrial extracts isolated from rat liver. This work demonstrates that all the above techniques provide complementary protein identification results, but 1D SDS-PAGE and IEF-IPG had the highest number of identifications. The IEF-IPG technique resulted in the highest average number of detected peptides per protein. The 2D-PAGE was evaluated as a protein fractionation approach. This work shows that the recovery of proteins and resulting proteolytic digests is highly dependent on the total volume of the gel matrix. The performed comparison of the fractionation techniques demonstrates the potential of a combination of orthogonal 1D SDS-PAGE and IEF-IPG for the improved sensitivity of profiling without significant decrease in throughput.

Ancillary