Research Article
International round-robin study on the Ames fluctuation test
Article first published online: 4 JAN 2012
DOI: 10.1002/em.21677
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Issue

Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis
Early View (Online Version of Record published before inclusion in an issue)
Additional Information
How to Cite
Reifferscheid, G., Maes, H., Allner, B., Badurova, J., Belkin, S., Bluhm, K., Brauer, F., Bressling, J., Domeneghetti, S., Elad, T., Flückiger-Isler, S., Grummt, H., Gürtler, R., Hecht, A., Heringa, M., Hollert, H., Huber, S., Kramer, M., Magdeburg, A., Ratte, H., Sauerborn-Klobucar, R., Sokolowski, A., Soldan, P., Smital, T., Stalter, D., Venier, P., Ziemann, C., Zipperle, J. and Buchinger, S. (2012), International round-robin study on the Ames fluctuation test. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis. doi: 10.1002/em.21677
Publication History
- Article first published online: 4 JAN 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 17 NOV 2011
- Manuscript Revised: 16 NOV 2011
- Manuscript Received: 14 JUL 2011
Funded by
- A part of the round-robin study was sponsored by the German Federal Environmental Agency. Grant Number: 363 01 276
- The Joint Research Programme of the Dutch water utilities (BTO)
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- mutagenicity;
- genotoxicity;
- ISO;
- standardisation;
- round-robin study;
- Ames fluctuation test
Abstract
An international round-robin study on the Ames fluctuation test [ISO 11350, 2012], a microplate version of the classic plate-incorporation method for the detection of mutagenicity in water, wastewater and chemicals was performed by 18 laboratories from seven countries. Such a round-robin study is a precondition for both the finalization of the ISO standardization process and a possible regulatory implementation in water legislation. The laboratories tested four water samples (spiked/nonspiked) and two chemical mixtures with and without supplementation of a S9-mix. Validity criteria (acceptable spontaneous and positive control-induced mutation counts) were fulfilled by 92–100%, depending on the test conditions. A two-step method for statistical evaluation of the test results is proposed and assessed in terms of specificity and sensitivity. The data were first subjected to powerful analysis of variance (ANOVA) after an arcsine-square-root transformation to detect significant differences between the test samples and the negative control (NC). A threshold (TH) value based on a pooled NC was then calculated to exclude false positive test results. Statistically, positive effects observed by the William's test were considered negative, if the mean of all replicates of a sample did not exceed the calculated TH. By making use of this approach, the overall test sensitivity was 100%, and the test specificity ranged from 80 to 100%. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

1098-2280/asset/olbannerleft.jpg?v=1&s=3478a8df0b409d99c4bf2cd28fbd2a5fa9a66e76)
1098-2280/asset/olbannerright.jpg?v=1&s=eafc0828a2cff1123b4b2066651e896d240d7a9d)