SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article.

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
EM_21682_sm_SuppFile1.xlsx9211KSupporting Information
EM_21682_sm_SuppFile2.xlsx2577KSupporting Information
EM_21682_sm_SuppTab1.doc72KSupporting Information Table 1. Enrichment of annotation terms in up- and down-regulated probes in the dermis. Functional enrichment analysis was performed using DAVID as detailed in Methods. aTotal number of statistically significant probes in the up/down regulated lists at the indicated time point. bActual annotation term from DAVID or a representative term for an annotation cluster with geometric mean (GM) p value ≤ 0.01. The latter are highlighted using an asterisk (*) next to the term. cThe minimum p value is presented for annotation clusters with GM p value ≤ 0.01. The actual p value is presented for all other individual terms (terms with p ≤ 0.01 that belong to clusters with GM p value > 0.01, or orphan terms that are not part of any of the annotation clusters).
EM_21682_sm_SuppTab2.doc50KSupporting Information Table 2. Enrichment of annotation terms in up- and down-regulated probes in the epidermis. Functional enrichment analysis was performed using DAVID as detailed in Methods. See Sup. Table 1 for description of terminology.

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.