Abstract
- Top of page
- Abstract
- The paper explained
- INTRODUCTION
- RESULTS
- DISCUSSION
- MATERIALS AND METHODS
- Author contributions
- Acknowledgements
- References
- Supporting Information
The large difference in phenotypes among tumour populations may stem from the stochastic origin of tumours from distinct cells – tumour cells are assumed to retain the phenotypes of the cells from which they derive. Yet, functional studies addressing the cellular origin of leukaemia are lacking. Here we show that the cells of origin of both, BCR/ABL-induced chronic myeloid (CML) and B-cell acute lymphoid leukaemia (B-ALL), resemble long-term haematopoietic stem cells (LT-HSCs). During disease-maintenance, CML LT-HSCs persist to function as cancer stem cells (CSCs) that maintain leukaemia and require signalling by the transcription factor STAT5. In contrast, B-ALL LT-HSCs differentiate into CSCs that correspond to pro-B cells. This transition step requires a transient IL-7 signal and is lost in IL-7Rα-deficient cells. Thus, in BCR/ABLp185+ B-ALL and BCR/ABLp210+ CML, the final phenotype of the tumour as well as the abundance of CSCs is dictated by diverging differentiation fates of their common cells of origin.
INTRODUCTION
- Top of page
- Abstract
- The paper explained
- INTRODUCTION
- RESULTS
- DISCUSSION
- MATERIALS AND METHODS
- Author contributions
- Acknowledgements
- References
- Supporting Information
The term ‘cells of origin of cancer’ (COCs) refers to the population of cells in which the initial transforming event has occurred, whereas the cancer-propagating ‘cancer stem cells’ (CSCs) describe the cells within an established tumour that sustain tumour growth in vivo (Adams & Strasser, 2008; Wang & Dick, 2005). The phenotype of CSCs varies strongly among cancers—ranging from cells that resemble adult tissue stem cells (Huntly et al, 2004; Passegue et al, 2004), over progenitor-like (Cozzio et al, 2003; Jamieson et al, 2004; Kelly et al, 2007; Krivtsov et al, 2006; Somervaille & Cleary, 2006), to mature cells with rearranged B-cell receptors (Barabe et al, 2007; Kelly et al, 2007).
Two major models are employed in CSC biology in order to explain intratumoural heterogeneity (Dick, 2008). The CSC model postulates that cancers are hierarchically organized and that self-renewal is limited to a highly specialized and immature cell fraction that can be distinguished from other tumour cells by its phenotype. This ‘stem cell-like’ population is functionally capable of differentiating into and reconstituting the entire phenotype of the respective tumour (Al-Hajj et al, 2003; Bonnet & Dick, 1997; Lapidot et al, 1994; Ricci-Vitiani et al, 2007; Singh et al, 2004). On the other hand, the stochastic model attempts to describe cancers lacking a functional hierarchy. Nevertheless, these cancers are not mandatory homogenous; some of these cancers may be phenotypically heterogeneous as a result of intrinsic and/or niche factors. These types of cancer may be propagated by most or all tumour cells (Adams & Strasser, 2008; Kelly et al, 2007; Quintana et al, 2008, 2010; Williams et al, 2007).
Fairly little is known about the COCs from which cancer originally arises. The strong intertumoural diversities led to speculations that tumours may arise stochastically from any cell in a tissue. Thus, the progressing tumour mirrors the phenotype of the cell from which it arose (Visvader, 2011). Accordingly, every cell represents a potential COC and all tumour cells—including CSCs—are derivatives thereof. This concept was recently challenged by the finding that COCs in human prostate cancer (Goldstein et al, 2010) resemble stem/progenitor-like basal cells despite the differentiated appearance of the large bulk of tumour cells.
In leukaemia, both, normal stem and committed progenitor cells, have been implicated as COCs. Whereas murine chronic leukaemia may predominantly originate from HSCs (Huntly et al, 2004; Passegue et al, 2004; Perez-Caro et al, 2009; Somervaille & Cleary, 2006), the situation in acute leukaemia is less clear. MLL-GAS7 acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) arises from c-kit+ cells (So et al, 2003), while MOZ-TIF2 (Huntly et al, 2004), MLL-AF9 (Krivtsov et al, 2006) and MLL-ENL (Cozzio et al, 2003) induced acute leukaemia regardless of the target cell population expressing the respective oncogenes.
Our current knowledge relies on leukaemic mouse models and thus, it is currently unclear how well these studies translate into the human disease. So far, the only available experimental system used to define CSCs in human leukaemia is the xenotransplantation into immune-compromised mice (Barabe et al, 2007; Holyoake et al, 1999; Hope et al, 2004). However, recent studies have revealed that significant differences in the frequencies of CSCs may exist, depending on the xenograft model used (Taussig et al, 2008; Vormoor, 2009). For obvious reasons, it is nearly impossible to study COCs in humans. However, one recent study describes the existence of TEL-AML1 pre-leukaemic clones as early as in utero (Hong et al, 2008).
Attempts to define CSCs in BCR/ABL-induced disease have obtained conflicting results. BCR/ABL, a constitutively active tyrosine kinase (Konopka & Witte, 1985) most commonly exists in two versions—210 or 185 kDa (Nowell & Hungerford, 1960; Rowley, 1973). In patients, BCR/ABLp210 is associated with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), while BCR/ABLp185 is prevalent in B-cell acute lymphoid leukaemia (B-ALL) (Melo, 1996). Here, haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) (Fialkow et al, 1977; Huntly et al, 2004), haematopoietic progenitors (Jaiswal et al, 2003) as well as aberrant precursor cells (Neering et al, 2007) are discussed as prime targets for transformation. In contrast, BCR/ABL+ B-ALL has been reported to arise in committed pro-B cells (Wang et al, 2008; Williams et al, 2006).
To identify the prospective COCs in CML and B-ALL, we dissect the processes of tumour-initiation and tumour-maintenance in BCR/ABLp210- and BCR/ABLp185-induced leukaemia.
DISCUSSION
- Top of page
- Abstract
- The paper explained
- INTRODUCTION
- RESULTS
- DISCUSSION
- MATERIALS AND METHODS
- Author contributions
- Acknowledgements
- References
- Supporting Information
The distinct appearance of BCR/ABLp210-induced CML and BCR/ABLp185-induced B-ALL has led to the belief that CML arises in stem/progenitor cells while B-ALL evolves from precursors restricted to the B-lineage. We show here that BCR/ABLp210- and p185-induced leukaemia arise from a common cellular origin resembling LT-HSCs. The leukaemogenic potential of the infected LT-HSCs depends on the version of BCR/ABL: cells from CML (BCR/ABLp210) are fully capable of inducing leukaemia whereas cells from B-ALL (BCR/ABLp185) are pre-leukaemic and require further differentiation. Thus, not only does evolution from the cell of origin to the CSC depend on a genetic mutation (in our case BCR/ABL), it may also require the presence of additional distinct environmental cues.
For BCR/ABLp210-induced CML, STAT5 signalling is absolutely necessary. Interestingly, caSTAT5 expression in BM cells suffices to induce a multi-lineage leukaemia closely resembling BCR/ABL-induced CML (Moriggl et al, 2005). The similarity is underlined by the fact that in both diseases the COC and the CSC correspond to the LT-HSC compartment. Accordingly, deletion of STAT5 in purified BCR/ABLp210 CSCs suffices to abrogate leukaemia. These findings confirm the role of STAT5 as a critical signalling node in BCR/ABL-induced disease (Hoelbl et al, 2006, 2010). Blocking STAT5 signalling represents a promising novel approach to target CSCs in BCR/ABL+ CML. It is currently unclear whether the direct activation of STAT5 by BCR/ABLp210 (Hantschel et al, 2012) suffices to ensure an adequate STAT5 signal or whether additional cues from the microenvironment, such as cytokines, are required. In the case of BCR/ABLp185-transformed LT-HSCs, an additional signal is needed; only in the presence of IL-7 do the cells differentiate into pro-B cells and become capable of causing disease upon transplantation into mice.
The STAT5 signalling pathway downstream of IL-7 also appears crucial for leukaemogenesis—as BCR/ABLp185-induced B-ALL also requires STAT5 expression for disease initiation and maintenance (Hoelbl et al, 2006, 2010). Our results show that constitutively active STAT5 is not capable of replacing IL-7. Hence, STAT5 activation is required but not sufficient to drive B-ALL development. Intriguingly, our experiments revealed that IL-7Rα-deficient BM is resistant to BCR/ABLp185-induced transformation. We found that about 2% of LT-HSCs express the IL-7Rα chain, indicating that these immature cells are already IL-7 responsive. It is notable that CLMPs can be transformed in vitro in the absence of IL-7, although we cannot rule out that these cells might have received IL-7 from the niche where they reside in vivo. Interestingly, recent findings have also implicated the IL7-signalling as being crucial for development (Zenatti et al, 2011) and for progression of childhood T-ALL (Silva et al, 2011). However, our findings on IL7 still need to be treated with caution, as IL7 seems not to play a role during normal human B-lymphopoiesis (Espeli et al, 2006).
It was previously shown that the chemical agent 5-FU may modulate the appearance of leukaemic phenotypes. Pre-treatment of donor BM with 5-FU influenced the outcome of the disease induced by BCR/ABL oncogenes. Recipient mice develop CML upon transplantation of BM cells from 5-FU pre-treated mice, irrespective of whether these are infected with BCR/ABLp210 or with BCR/ABLp185. In contrast, a mixed phenotype (CML and B-ALL) is induced in the absence of 5-FU pre-treatment (Hu et al, 2004; Li et al, 1999; Roumiantsev et al, 2001). This puzzling finding may be explained in the light of our data: both leukaemia originate from the same cellular origin. As 5-FU is known to shift the composition of BM cells, it can be speculated that 5-FU favours the differentiation of COCs into the myeloid lineage.
How may these findings be reconciled with our knowledge of the initiation of leukaemia? Our data raise the question of whether different leukaemia might arise not from distinct haematopoietic lineages but instead from a common cell origin. In this scenario, genetic mutations in stem cells may influence programs for differentiation and/or reinforce programs for self-renewal. In the case of BCR/ABLp185-induced B-ALL, for example, the COC develops into a homogeneous pro-B cell population.
Several documented examples could be explained by this model. For example, MOZ-TIF2, a fusion-protein that causes AML, transforms HSCs but induces leukaemia consisting of mature myeloid progenitors in vivo (Huntly et al, 2004). Similar scenarios might also apply for diseases induced by MLL-AF9 (Krivtsov et al, 2006) and MLL-ENL (Cozzio et al, 2003).
Moreover, CSCs may also change during tumour progression. In the chronic phase of human CML, disease is maintained by a CSC that corresponds to a multipotent stem cell. Upon progression to blast crisis, more differentiated myeloid precursor cells (granulocyte-macrophage progenitor, GMP) are responsible for maintaining leukaemia (Jamieson et al, 2004).
There are currently two models to explain the progression of cancer, the CSC model and the stochastic model (Dick, 2008). The former predicts that a tumour is heterogeneous and hierarchically organized. This model predicts that self-renewing activity can be enriched by sorting stem cells with specific characteristics and distinct phenotypes. In contrast, the stochastic model proposes that tumours are heterogeneous but lack functional hierarchy. In consequence, phenotypic changes would be reversible and all tumour cells would possess both self-renewal and tumour-initiating ability.
Our serial transplantation experiments revealed that CML induced by BCR/ABLp210+ LT-HSCs progresses according to the CSC model, whereas B-ALL induced by BCR/ABLp185+ LT-HSCs does not. However, the stochastic model, as observed in melanoma (Quintana et al, 2010), is also not fully consistent with our findings as neither a functional nor a phenotypical hierarchy exists in B-ALL induced by BCR/ABLp185+ LT-HSCs. In the future, these differences may however turn out to be important considering their therapeutic options, because cells with distinct phenotypical appearances may respond differently to chemotherapeutic agents.
It is important to mention that both models are compatible with the clonal evolution as the CSCs in the CSC model may also progress by clonal evolution, but stochastic tumours should entirely depend on the clonal evolution (Shackleton et al, 2009). Recently, it has been reported that within progressing B-ALL an evolution of successor mutations is taking place, which occurs in functionally defined CSCs (Anderson et al, 2011; Notta et al, 2011). This may explain why patients contain multiple genetic hits at the same time and why some tumours develop towards more aggressive growth and to a poorer outcome. Most importantly, these studies establish the importance of genetical heterogeneity in obviously homogenous B-ALL samples. Theoretically, such a diversity of B-ALL subclones may also occur in mice, but given the short latency (<4 weeks) and the lack of pressure by the immune system, it remains speculative whether similar mutations can be observed in our murine model of tumour initiation. Given that 83% of our secondarily transplanted mice recapitulated B-ALL (Table 1), it becomes difficult to explain how most leukaemic cells might have acquired mutations within a short period of time. Thus, it is unlikely that murine BCR/ABLp185+ B-ALL accumulate secondary mutations at these progression stages. However, it remains possible that aggressive leukaemic clones appear upon numerous serial transplantations. Recently, it has been shown that multiple serial transplantations have led to a reduction of clonality within leukaemia towards few aggressive clones (Barabe et al, 2007; Li et al, 1999).
In the end, our findings have important ramifications for the treatment of leukaemia.
It is obvious that therapies designed to destroy a rare population of CSCs will not be effective in eliminating tumours composed of many CSCs and vice versa. Hence, it is imperative to identify differences between the tumourigenic and the non-tumourigenic populations in all cancers. In BCR/ABLp185+ B-ALL, which is sustained by frequent clones, treatment with Imatinib, Shh-inhibitor cyclopamine, Jak2-inhibitor or Stat3-inhibitor is highly effective and destroys CSCs. Perhaps in the future, a combined inhibition will prove to impair the emergence of successor B-ALL clones bearing more aggressive potential. In contrast, CSCs propagating BCR/ABLp210+ CML can be indirectly eliminated by forcing the cells to undergo terminal differentiation or by a specific abrogation of the STAT5-signalling. Thus, these two strategies might prove to become a tantalizing new therapy for elimination of CSCs in CML.