TC-Biomass 2011 Special Issue
Variation of feedstock in a dual fluidized bed steam gasifier—influence on product gas, tar content, and composition
Article first published online: 27 FEB 2012
DOI: 10.1002/ep.11607
Copyright © 2012 American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE)
Issue

Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy
Special Issue: tcbiomass2011, The International Conference on Thermochemical Conversion Science
Volume 31, Issue 2, pages 205–215, July 2012
Additional Information
How to Cite
Schmid, J. C., Wolfesberger, U., Koppatz, S., Pfeifer, C. and Hofbauer, H. (2012), Variation of feedstock in a dual fluidized bed steam gasifier—influence on product gas, tar content, and composition. Environ. Prog. Sustainable Energy, 31: 205–215. doi: 10.1002/ep.11607
Publication History
- Issue published online: 14 APR 2012
- Article first published online: 27 FEB 2012
Funded by
- Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG)
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- biomass;
- gasification;
- reforming;
- circulating fluidized bed;
- synthesis gas
Abstract
A steam blown dual fluidized bed gasification plant was used to yield a nitrogen (N2) free product gas (synthesis gas) from various biomass fuels. In addition to the variation of process parameters like temperature, steam to carbon ratio, fluidization rate, and the influence of different bed materials, various feedstock inputs affected the generation of the product gas. This study focuses on the gasification of different biomass feedstock. The variation of biomass implies wood chips, wood pellets, sewage sludge pellets, and straw pellets. The chosen evaluated experimental results are all gained from the uniformly operated “classical” 100 kW “DUAL FLUID” gasifier at Vienna University of Technology at constant gasification temperatures between 800°C and 810°C. In the “classical” design, the gasification reactor is a bubbling fluidized bed. The composition and ash melting behavior of each feedstock is displayed, as well as the ranges of the product gas compositions generated. Beside the main gaseous product gas components, typical content ranges of dust and char are highlighted. The content and composition of tar in the product gas is discussed. Further it is possible to present gravimetrical and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry measured tar values. Not less than five significant component-groups of tar will also be outlined for each feedstock. © 2012 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 2012

1944-7450/asset/EP_centre.gif?v=1&s=54597eced499e80b69e1920b721512cc914c8eb4)