Article
Environmental comparison metrics for life cycle impact assessment and process design
Article first published online: 20 APR 2004
DOI: 10.1002/ep.670190206
Copyright © 2000 American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE)
Additional Information
How to Cite
Pennington, D. W., Norris, G., Hoagland, T. and Bare, J. C. (2000), Environmental comparison metrics for life cycle impact assessment and process design. Environmental Progress, 19: 83–91. doi: 10.1002/ep.670190206
Publication History
- Issue published online: 20 APR 2004
- Article first published online: 20 APR 2004
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Abstract
Metrics (potentials, potency factors, equivalency factors or characterization factors) are available to support the environmental comparison of alternatives in application domains like process design and product life-cycle assessment (LCA). These metrics typically provide relative insights into the implicit concern associated with chemicals, emissions and resource consumption in the context of human health, ecological health and resource depletion. The approaches used to derive the metrics range in their site-specificity, complexity, comprehensiveness, sophistication and uncertainty. It is therefore often necessary to consider the use of more than one approach within the context of a given impact category to help support a decision. In this paper we outline some of the strengths and weaknesses of available approaches in the commonly considered categories of global warming, tratospheric ozone depletion, tropospheric ozone (smog) creation, eutrophication/nutrification, acidification, toxicological impacts and resource depletion.

1944-7450/asset/EP_centre.gif?v=1&s=54597eced499e80b69e1920b721512cc914c8eb4)
1944-7450/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=d2ba8966395c0740d96c9720b9980e70a912aabb)