Damage-dependent vulnerability curves for existing buildings
Article first published online: 24 AUG 2012
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Volume 42, Issue 6, pages 853–870, May 2013
How to Cite
Polese, M., Di Ludovico, M., Prota, A. and Manfredi, G. (2013), Damage-dependent vulnerability curves for existing buildings. Earthquake Engng. Struct. Dyn., 42: 853–870. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2249
- Issue published online: 12 APR 2013
- Article first published online: 24 AUG 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 26 JUL 2012
- Manuscript Revised: 23 JUL 2012
- Manuscript Received: 25 JAN 2012
- residual capacity;
- collapse fragility;
- vulnerability variation;
Seismic behavior of damaged buildings may be expressed as a function of their REsidual Capacity (REC), which is a measure of seismic capacity, reduced by damage. REC can be interpreted as the median value of collapse vulnerability curves. Its variation owing to damage is a useful indication of increased building vulnerability. REC reduction, indicating the lowering of seismic safety after an earthquake (performance loss, PL), represents an effective index for assessing the need of seismic repair/strengthening after earthquakes. The study investigates the applicability of a pushover-based method in the analysis of damaged structures for the case of existing under-designed RC buildings. The paper presents a systematization of the procedure in an assessment framework that applies the capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra; furthermore, the vulnerability variation of a real building is investigated with a detailed case study. The behavior of damaged buildings is simulated with pushover analysis through suitable modification of plastic hinges (in terms of stiffness, strength and residual drift) for damaged elements. The modification of plastic hinges has been calibrated in tests on nonconforming columns. The case study analysis evidenced that, for minor or moderate damages, the original structural displacement capacity was only slightly influenced, but the ductility capacity was significantly reduced (up to 40%) because of the increased structure deformability. This implied performance loss in the range 10%–20%. For severe damages the PL ranged between 41% and 56%. Local mechanism types exhibit PL nearly double with respect to global mechanism types. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.