SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Acornley RM, Sear DA. 1999. Sediment transport and siltation of brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) spawning gravels in chalk streams. Hydrological Processes 13: 447458.
  • Baker VR, Twidale CR. 1991. The re-enchantment of geomorphology. Geomorphology 4: 73100.
  • Baskin Y. 1997. The Work of Nature. How the Biodiversity of Life Sustains Us. Island Press: Washington DC.
  • Booker DJ, Dunbar MJ, Acreman MC, Akande K, Declerk C. 2004. Habitat assessment at the catchment scale: application to the River Itchen, UK. In Hydrology: Science and Practice for the 21st Century, II, WebbB, AcremanM, MaksimovicC, SmithersH, KirbyC (eds). British Hydrological Society: London; 18.
  • Boon PJ. 1992. Essential elements in the case for river conservation. In River Conservation and Management, BoonPJ, CalowP, PettsGE (eds). Wiley: Chichester; 1113.
  • Boon PJ, Holmes NTH, Maitland PS, Rowell TA, Davies J. 1997. A system for evaluating rivers for conservation (SERCON): development, structure and function. In Freshwater Quality: Defining the Indefinable? BoonPJ, HowellDJ (eds). The Stationery Office: Edinburgh; 299326.
  • Bovee KD. 1996. Perpsectives on two-dimensional river habitat models: the PHABSIM experience. In Ecohydraulique 2000: Proceedings of the 2nd IAHR Symposium on Habitat Hydraulics, Quebec, Le ClercM, CapraH, ValentinS, BoudreaultA, CoteY (eds): 150162.
  • Bradshaw AD. 1988. Alternative endpoints for reclamation. In Rehabilitating Damaged Ecosystems, Vol. 2, CairnsJJ (ed.). CRC Press: Boca Raton; 6985.
  • Brierley GJ, Fryirs K. 2000. A geomorphic approach to the identification of river recovery potential. Physical Geography 21( 3): 244277.
  • Brierley GJ, Fryirs K. 2000. River styles, a geomorphic approach to catchment characterisation: implications for river rehabilitation in Bega catchment, New South Wales, Australia. Environmental Management 25( 6): 661679.
  • Brookes A. 1995a. The importance of high flows for riverine environments. In The Ecological Basis for River Management, HarperDM, FergusonAJD (eds). Wiley: Chichester; 3349.
  • Brookes A. 1995b. Challenges and objectives for geomorphology in UK river management. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 20: 593610.
  • Brown JD. 2004. Knowledge, uncertainty and physical geography: towards the development of methodologies for questioning belief. Transactions of the Institute of Bristish Geographers NS29: 367381.
  • Brunke M, Gonser T. 1997. The ecological significance of exchange between rivers and groundwater. Freshwater Biology 37: 133.
  • Burt TP, Warburton J, Allison RJ. 2002. Eroding upland landscapes? Past, Present and Future. In The British Uplands: Dynamics of Change, BurtTP (ed.). Joint Nature Conservation Committee Report 319: Peterborough; 6066.
  • Cairns JR. 2004. Eco-ethical issues: self-regulating versus subsidized ecosystems. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 11: 3647.
  • Cellot B, Dole-Olivier M-J, Bornette G, Patou G. 1994. Temporal and spatial environmental variability in the Upper Rhone River and its floodplain. Freshwater Biology 31: 311325.
  • CEN. 2004. European Standard EN14614. European Committee for Standardization: Brussels.
  • Channin P. 2004. Ecology of the European Otter. Conserving Natura 2000 Rivers Ecology Series, No. 10. English Nature: Peterborough.
  • Clark MJ. 2002. Dealing with uncertainty: adaptive approaches to sustainable river management. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 12: 347363.
  • Clarke SJ, Bruce-Burgess L, Wharton G. 2003. Linking form and function: towards an eco-hydromorphic approach to sustainable river restoration. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 13: 439450.
  • Davenport AJ, Gurnell AM, Armitage PD. 2004. Habitat survey and classification of urban rivers. River Research and Applications 20: 687704.
  • Downs P. 2001. Geomorphological evaluation of river restoration schemes: principles, method, monitoring, evaluation. Progress? In River Restoration in Europe. Practical Approaches, NijlandHJ, CalsMJR (eds). RIZA: Lelystad, Netherlands; 243249.
  • Downs PW, Gregory KJ. 2004. River Channel Management: Towards Sustainable Catchment Hydrosystems. Arnold: London.
  • Downs PW, Skinner KS, Kondolf GM. 2002. Rivers and streams. In Handbook of Ecological Restoration II, PerrowMR, DavyAJ (eds). Cambridge University Press; Cambridge; 267296.
  • Dunbar M, Acreman MC. 2001. Applied hydro-ecological science for the 21st Century. In Hydro-ecology: Linking Hydrology and Aquatic Ecology, AcremanMC (ed.). International Association of Scientific Hydrologists: Wallingford; 117.
  • Elliot R. 1997. Faking Nature. The Ethics of Environmental Restoration. Routledge: London.
  • European Commission. 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23rd October, 2000: establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities: Brussels; 22.12.2000, L327, 172.
  • Eyre MD, Luff ML, Lott DA. 2002. The importance of exposed riverine sediments for phytophagus beetles (Coleoptera) in Scotland and northern England. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 12: 553566.
  • Ferguson RI. 1981. Channel form and channel changes. In British Rivers, LewinJ (ed.). George Allen and Unwin: London; 90125.
  • Fisher SG. 1994. Pattern, process and scale in freshwater ecosystems, some unifying thoughts. In Aquatic Ecology: Scale, Pattern and Process, GillerP, HildrewAG, RafaelliDG (eds). Blackwell: Oxford; 575591.
  • Frissell CA, Liss WJ, Warren CE, Hurley MD. 1986. A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification. Viewing streams in a watershed context. Environmental Management 10: 199214.
  • Fuller IC, Large ARG, Milan DJ. 2003. Quantifying channel development and sediment transfer following chute cutoff in a wandering gravel-bed river. Geomorphology 54: 307323.
  • GeoData Institute. 2004. RHS Geomorphology and Floodplain Module. University of Southampton report to Environment Agency (on CD).
  • Gibbins CN, Soulsby C, Campbell R, Scott E, McEwan I, Malcolm I. 2004. Influence of channel hydraulics and sediment mobility on stream invertebrate drift. In Hydrology: Science and Practice for the 21st Century, II, WebbB, AcremanM, MaksimovicC, SmithersH, KirbyC (eds). British Hydrological Society: London; 9098.
  • Graf WL. 1999. Dam nation: a geographical census of American dams and their large-scale hydrologic impacts. Water Resources Research 35: 13051311.
  • Graf WL. 2001. Damage control: restoring the physical integrity of America's rivers. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 91( 1): 127.
  • Graf WL, Stromberg J, Valentine B. 2002. Rivers, dams and willow flycatchers: summary of their science and policy connections. Geomorphology 47: 169188.
  • Gray M. 2004. Geodiversity: Valuing and Conserving Abiotic Habitats. Wiley: Chichester.
  • Gregory KJ. 1977. River Channel Change. Wiley: Chichester.
  • Gregory KJ, Davis RJ, Downs PW. 1992. Identification of river channel change due to urbanization. Applied Geography 12: 299318.
  • Gregory KJ, Davis RJ, Tooth S. 1993. Spatial distribution of coarse woody debris dams in the Lymington Basin, Hampshire, UK. Geomorphology 6: 207224.
  • Harper D, Smith C, Barham P, Howell R. 1995. The ecological basis for the management of the natural river environment. In The Ecological Basis for River Management, HarperDM, FergusonAJD (eds). Wiley: Chichester; 219238.
  • Harper DM, Kemp JL, Vogel B, Newson MD. 2000. Towards the assessment of ‘ecological integrity’ in running waters of the United Kingdom. Hydrobiologia 422/423: 133142.
  • Harrison S. 2001. On reductionism and emergence in geomorphology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS26: 327339.
  • Hatton-Ellis TW, Grieve N. 2004. Ecology of Watercourses Characterised by Ranunculus fluitans. Conserving Natura 2000 Rivers, Ecology Series, No. 11. English Nature: Peterborough.
  • Heritage GL, Large ARG, Moon BP, Jewitt G. 2004. Channel hydraulics and geomorphic effects of an extreme flood event on the Sabie River, South Africa. Catena 58: 151181.
  • House M, Fordham M. 1997. Public perceptions of river corridors and attitudes towards river works. Landscape Research 22( 1): 2544.
  • House MA, Sangster EK. 1991. Public perception of river corridor management. Journal of the Institution of Water and Environmental Management 5: 312317.
  • Jeffers JNR. 1998. Characterization of river habitats and prediction of habitat features using ordination techniques. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8: 529540.
  • Jeffries R, Darby SE, Sear DA. 2003. The influence of vegetation and organic debris on flood-plain sediment dynamics: case study of a low-order stream in the New Forest, England. Geomorphology 51: 6180.
  • Kaika M, Page B. 2004. The making of the EU Water Framework Directive: Shifting Choreographies of Governance and the Effectiveness of Environmental Lobbying. School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford.
  • Kondolf GM, Piegay H. 2003. Tools in Fluvial Geomorphology. Wiley: Chichester.
  • Large ARG, Newson MD. 2005. Hydromorphological quality – a policy template for channel design in river restoration. In Encyclopedia of Hydrological Sciences. AndersonMJ (ed.). Wiley: Chichester.
  • Lenders HJR, Aarts BGW, Strijbosch H, Van der Velde G. 1998. The role of reference and target images in ecological recovery of river systems: lines of thought in the Netherlands. In New Concepts for Sustainable Management of River Systems, NeinhuisPH, LeuvenRSEW, RagasAMJ (eds). Backhuis: Leiden; 3552.
  • McDonald A, Lane SN, Haycock NE, Chalk EA. 2004. Rivers of dreams: on the gulf between theoretical and practical aspects of an upland river restoration. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS29: 257281.
  • Middleton B. 1999. Wetland Restoration, Flood Pulsing and Disturbance Dynamics. Wiley: New York.
  • Montgomery DR, Buffington JM. 1997. Channel reach morphology in mountain drainage basins. Geological Society of America Bulletin 109: 596611.
  • Naura M, Robinson M. 1998. Principles of using River Habitat Survey to predict the distribution of aquatic species: an example applied to the native white-clawed crayfish, Austropotamobius pallipes. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8: 515527.
  • Newson MD. 1992. Geomorphic thresholds in gravel-bed rivers – refinement for an era of environmental change. In Dynamics of Gravel-bed Rivers, BilliP, HeyRD, ThorneCR, TacconiP (eds). Wiley: Chichester; 320.
  • Newson MD. 2002. Geomorphological concepts and tools for sustainable river ecosystem management. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 12: 365379.
  • Newson MD. 2004. Integrating the biophysical and social science frameworks for IWRM/IRBM: rationality and reality. Hydrology: Science and Practice for the 21st Century, II, WebbB, AcremanM, MaksimovicC, SmithersH, KirbyC (eds). British Hydrological Society: London; 439443.
  • Newson MD, Chalk L. 2004. Environmental Capital: an information core to public participation in strategic and operational decisions – the example of river ‘best practice’ projects. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 47( 6): 899920.
  • Newson MD, Newson CL. 2000. Geomorphology, ecology and river channel habitat: mesoscale approaches to basin-scale challenges. Progress in Physical Geography 24( 2): 195217.
  • Newson MD, Orr HG. 2004. Tools for applying the EU habitats Directive to the English River Tweed cSAC. Hydromorphological study of the River Till. Report by University of Newcastle upon Tyne to Environment Agency, North-east Region: Newcastle upon Tyne.
  • Newson MD, Sear DA. 2001. Geomorphological procedures and river restoration: science, survey and sustainability. In River Restoration in Europe. Practical Approaches, NijlandHJ, CalsMJR (eds). RIZA: Lelystad, Netherlands; 251254.
  • Newson MD, Clark MJ, Sear DA, Brookes A. 1998. The geomorphological basis for classifying rivers. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8: 415430.
  • Newson M, Thorne C Brookes A. 2002a. The management of gravel-bed rivers in England and Wales: from geomorphological research to strategy and operations. In Gravel-Bed Rivers V, MoseleyMP (ed.). New Zealand Hydrological Society: Wellington; 581606.
  • Newson MD, Pitlick J, Sear DA. 2002b. Running Water: fluvial geomorphology and river restoration. In Handbook of Ecological Restoration, I. PerrowMR, DavyAJ (eds). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge; 133152.
  • Palmer MA. 1997. Biodiversity and ecosystem processes in freshwater sediments. Ambio 26( 8): 571577.
  • Pearce D. (ed.). 1993. Blueprint 3: Measuring Sustainable Development. Earthscan: London.
  • Petersen G, Allen CR, Holling CS. 1998. Ecological resilience, biodiversity and scale. Ecosystems 1: 618.
  • Petts GE, Amoros C. 1996. Fluvial Hydrosystems. Chapman and Hall: London.
  • Poole GC. 2002. Fluvial landscape ecology: addressing uniqueness within the river discontinuum. Freshwater Biology 47: 641660.
  • Raven PJ, Fox PJA, Everard M, Holmes NTH, Dawson FH. 1997. River Habitat Survey: a new system for classifying rivers according to their habitat quality. In Freshwater Quality: Defining the Indefinable? BoonPJ, HowellDL (eds). The Stationery Office: Edinburgh; 215234.
  • Raven PJ, Holmes NTH, Dawson FH, Everard M. 1998. Quality assessment using River Habitat Survey data. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8: 477499.
  • Rice SP, Greenwood MT, Joyce CB. 2001. Tributaries, sediment sources and the longitudinal organisation of macroinvertebrate fauna along river systems. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58: 824840.
  • Rosgen D. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology: Pagova Springs CO.
  • Sear DA. 1994. River restoration and geomorphology. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 4: 169177.
  • Sear DA, Arnell NW. 2006. The application of palaeohydrology in river management. Catena 66( 1–2): 161168.
  • Sear DA, Newson MD. 2004. The hydraulic impact and performance of a lowland rehabilitation scheme based on pool-riffle installation: the River Waveney, Scole, Suffolk, UK. River Research and Applications 20: 117.
  • Sear DA, Armitage PD, Dawson FH. 1999. Groundwater dominated rivers. Hydrological Processes 13: 255276.
  • Sear DA, Newson MD, Thorne CR. 2003. Guidebook of Applied Fluvial Geomorphology. Defra R&D Technical Series FD1914. Defra: London.
  • Skinner KS, Bruce-Burgess L. 2005. Strategic and project level river restoration protocols – key components for meeting the requirements of the Water Framework Directive (WFD). Water and Environment Journal 19( 2): 135142.
  • Smith BJ, Warke PA, Whalley WB. 2002. Landscape development, collective amnesia and the need for integration in geomorphological research. Area 33( 4): 409418.
  • Soulsby C, Malcolm I, Youngson A. 2001a. The hydrochemistry of the hyporheic zone in salmon spawning gravels: a preliminary assessment in a small regulated stream. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 17: 651665.
  • Soulsby C, Youngson A, Moir HJ, Malcolm IA. 2001b. Fine sediment influence on salmonid spawning habitat in a lowland agricultural stream: a preliminary assessment. The Science of the Total Environment 265: 299312.
  • Tapsell SM. 1997. Rivers and river restoration: a child's eye view. Landscape Research 22( 1): 4565.
  • Thomson JR, Taylor MP, Fryirs KA, Brierley GJ. 2001. A geomorphological framework for river characterization and habitat assessment. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 11: 373389.
  • Thorne CR, Hey RD, Newson MD (eds) 1997. Applied Fluvial Geomorphology for River Engineering and Management. Wiley: Chichester.
  • Walker J, Diamond M, Naura M. 2002. The development of Physical Quality Objectives for rivers in England and Wales. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 12: 381390.
  • Ward JV, Tockner K, Uehlinger U, Malard F. 2001. Understanding natural patterns and processes in river corridors as the basis for effective river restoration. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 17: 311323.
  • Water Space Amenity Commission. 1981. Conservation Guidelines. National Water Council: London.
  • Werritty A, Leys KF. 2001. The sensitivity of Scottish rivers and upland valley floors to recent environmental change. Catena 42: 251273.
  • Weston J. 2004. EIA in a risk society. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 47( 2): 313325.
  • White FS, Pickett STA. 1985. Natural disturbance and patch dynamics. In The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics, WhiteFS, PickettSTA (eds). Academic Press: London; 313.
  • Wilby RL, Orr HG, Hedger M, Forrow D, Blackmore M. (in press). Risks posed by climate change to delivery of Water Framework Directive objectives. Environment International.