State of Science
Sediment transmission and storage: the implications for reconstructing landform development
Article first published online: 1 JUN 2009
DOI: 10.1002/esp.1806
Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Additional Information
How to Cite
Chiverrell, R. C., Foster, G. C., Thomas, G. S. P. and Marshall, P. (2010), Sediment transmission and storage: the implications for reconstructing landform development. Earth Surf. Process. Landforms, 35: 4–15. doi: 10.1002/esp.1806
Publication History
- Issue published online: 27 JAN 2010
- Article first published online: 1 JUN 2009
- Manuscript Accepted: 2 FEB 2009
- Manuscript Revised: 26 JAN 2009
- Manuscript Received: 17 OCT 2008
Funded by
- English Heritage and the English Heritage Scientific Dating Unit. Grant Number: ALSF Grant: 3928
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- fluvial evolution;
- river terraces;
- connectivity;
- sediment slugs and budgets;
- radiocarbon dating;
- Holocene
Abstract
The late Holocene (last 3000 years) development of the lower Ribble valley (northwest England) displays evidence for a complex response to a sediment recharge event forced by land-use change induced increases in erosion and sediment delivery. The deposition of fluvial sediments during the late Holocene was restricted to a series of reaches or depocenters separated by zones with no sediment accumulation constrained by older glacial and fluvial terrain. Apparent reach-wide correlations of fluvial terraces break down under the scrutiny applied by comprehensive and extensive radiocarbon control. Bayesian testing of relative order models show that large-scale geomorphological changes, e.g. the progression from one terrace level to another, were time transgressive between different depocenters. The different histories of sediment delivery and storage are probably a function of local- and process-scale variations in these depocenters, and reflect (dis)connectivity relationships within a reach in propagating a basin-scale change (superslug) in the sediment regime. Disconnectivity in the depositional regime through a fluvial reach limits what we can reconstruct in terms of sediment budgets, but radiocarbon dating of multiple palaeochannels offers considerable potential for landform-based research to uncover rates of change within individual depocenters. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

1096-9837/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=6f22ed741f6945c2ff6a266ae2bfc06c9296b38f)
1096-9837/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=bb712a47851e481f677a9dd6b03ad800ca8bae1d)