Seeking good peer review in geomorphology
Article first published online: 4 JAN 2012
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Volume 37, Issue 1, pages 3–8, January 2012
How to Cite
Lane, S. N. (2012), Seeking good peer review in geomorphology. Earth Surf. Process. Landforms, 37: 3–8. doi: 10.1002/esp.2269
- Issue published online: 4 JAN 2012
- Article first published online: 4 JAN 2012
- Manuscript Revised: 10 NOV 2011
- Manuscript Accepted: 10 NOV 2011
- Manuscript Received: 31 OCT 2011
- Anonymous. 2008. Good review. Nature Cell Biology 10: 371.
- Anonymous. 2011. Reviewing refereeing. Nature Cell Biology 13: 109.
- 2007. The ups and downs of peer review. Advances in Physiology Education 31: 145–152. , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .
- 1998. What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal? Journal of the American Medical Association 280: 231–233. , , , , .
- 2002. Evaluating standards for academic publishing: a q-r theory. Journal of Political Economy 110: 994–1034. .
- 1998. Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association 280: 237–240. , , .
- 2004. Who teaches the referee? Journal of Paediatrics and Health 40: 397–398. .
- 2011. The tragedy of the reviewing commons? Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 36: 1–2. .
- 1990. The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial. Journal of the American Medical Association 263: 1371–1376. , , , .
- 2009. Publishing in accounting journals: a fair game? Accounting, Organizations and Society 34: 285–304. .
- 2011. A quick quide to writing a solid peer review. Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union 92: 233–240. , .
- 2000. Editorial: the poor referee. Marine Pollution Bulletin 40: 1–2. .
- 2007. The Editor's Secrets. Marketing Science 26: 589–595. .
- 2009. After further review. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 119: 1057. .
- 1999a. Effect of open peer review on quality of reviewers and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial. British Medical Journal 318: 23–27. , , , , .
- 1998. Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: a randomized trial. Journal of the American Medical Association 280: 234–237. , , , , .
- 1999b. Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review. Journal of General Internal Medicine 14: 622–624. , , , , .
- 2002. Addictions's refereeing policy. Addiction 97: 7. .