Research Article
Simulations of spatial variability in particle-size emissions during wind erosion events
Article first published online: 25 JUN 2012
DOI: 10.1002/esp.3245
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Additional Information
How to Cite
Butler, H. J., McTainsh, G. H. and Hogarth, W. L. (2012), Simulations of spatial variability in particle-size emissions during wind erosion events. Earth Surf. Process. Landforms, 37: 1362–1375. doi: 10.1002/esp.3245
Publication History
- Issue published online: 2 OCT 2012
- Article first published online: 25 JUN 2012
- Accepted manuscript online: 23 MAR 2012 06:31PM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 13 MAR 2012
- Manuscript Revised: 11 MAR 2012
- Manuscript Received: 20 DEC 2010
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- wind erosion;
- dust plume;
- dust sources;
- dust particle-size
ABSTRACT
This study simulates how spatial variations in particle-size emissions from a playa affect bulk and size-resolved dust concentration profiles during two contrasting wind erosion events (a small local and a large regional event) in the Channel Country, Lake Eyre Basin, Australia. The regional event had higher dust concentration as a result of stronger frontal winds and higher erodibility across the playa. For each event, two emission scenarios are simulated to determine if measured size-resolved dust concentration profiles can be explained by spatial variability in source area emissions. The first scenario assumes that particle-size emissions from source areas occur at a uniform rate, while the second scenario assumes that particle-size emissions vary between and within source areas. The uniform emission scenario, reproduced measured bulk dust concentration profiles (R2 = 0·93 regional and R2 = 0·81 local), however simulated size-resolved dust concentration profiles had poor statistical fits to measured size-resolved profiles for each size class (the highest were R2 = 0·5 regional and R2 = 0·3 local). For the differential particle-size emission scenario, the fit to the measured bulk dust concentration profiles is improved (R2 = 0·97 regional and R2 = 0·83 local). However, the fit to the size-resolved profiles improved dramatically, with the lowest being R2 = 0·89 (regional) and R2 = 0·80 (local). Particle-size emission models should therefore be tested against both bulk and size-resolved dust concentration profiles, since if only bulk dust concentration profiles are used model performance may be over-stated. As the source areas in the first 90 m upwind of the tower were similar for both events, the percentage contributions of each particle-size class to total emissions can be compared. The contribution of each particle-size class was similar even though the wind speed, turbulence and dust concentrations were significantly different; suggesting that the contribution of each particle-size to the total emitted dusts is not related to wind speed and turbulence. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

1096-9837/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=6f22ed741f6945c2ff6a266ae2bfc06c9296b38f)
