SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

To the Editor:

McKinney et al. 1 report in vitro hepatic microsomal preparations from polar bear, beluga whale, ringed seal, and rat did not metabolize decabromodiphenyl ethane (DBDPEthane), decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209), or the lower brominated polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) BDE-99, -100 and -154. The lack of metabolism of the three lower PBDEs is consistent with their potential for bioaccumulation in that metabolism is generally directed toward producing more water soluble and easily excreted metabolites. Substances that are readily metabolized to water soluble metabolites are rarely accumulated. These in vitro results on BDE-209 are also consistent with that of Gebbnick et al. 2 who found no evidence of metabolism by polar bear microsomes. Nevertheless, the low and variable recoveries of BDE-209 (81 ± 9%) and DBDPEthane (49 ± 23%) in controls and the “depletion” observed in the test groups, 14 to 25% for BDE-209 and 44 to 74% for DBDPEthane, in the absence of identified metabolites suggest that other factors may be responsible.

Albemarle Corporation manufactures commercial products based on BDE-209 and DBDPEthane and has extensive experience with both substances. Both are highly insoluble in aqueous media and many organic solvents and are prone to non-specific binding to surfaces and particulates, DBDPEthane even more so than BDE-209. Low solubility compounds are not properly assayed by many in vitro systems due to their precipitation and/or adherence to walls of the vessel, which eliminates interaction with microsomal enzymes 3. We have observed poor solubility in in vitro genetic and bi-directional cell permeability assays with both compounds. In the cell permeability assays 4, DBDPEthane was not detectable in buffer solutions at ≥128 nM while BDE-209 was detectable at 128 nM but not at ≥312 nM. This is consistent with McKinney et al.'s 1 pattern of recovery (higher for BDE-209 than DBDPEthane) and with their test concentration of DBDPEthane (90 nM), which was similar to that in the cell permeability assay. (McKinney et al. erroneously report their assay concentrations to be “pmol.”) Poor solubility, precipitation, and non-specific binding are also consistent with the inability to extract 20% of a BDE-209 dose from feces 5, 6 and the low (60%) recovery reported by Huwe and Smith 7.

McKinney et al. touch on binding as a potential cause of their poor recoveries, but attribute binding to formation of reactive metabolites. Formation of reactive metabolites is inconsistent with multiple mammalian repeated dose toxicity studies with no observable effects levels (NOELs) and no observable adverse effect levels (NOAELs) of ≥ 1,000 mg/kg/d for both BDE-209 and DBDPEthane 8–12. Substances that generate significant amounts of reactive metabolites do not have this toxicology profile.

Both BDE-209 and DBDPEthane are poorly absorbed after oral administration 8–11. Based on this alone, metabolism would not play large role in their pharmacokinetic profile. Conclusions that BDE-209 undergoes significant metabolism 6 were based on extraction profiles and not structural identification 9. Studies using radiolabelled BDE209 or DBDPEthane, mentioned by McKinney et al. as a future possibility, have already been performed 9 or are in progress by Albemarle Corporation. Recognition of these facts within the research community is important so that future research time and money is directed appropriately.

Conflict of Interest—The author is employed by Albemarle Corporation, a specialty chemical manufacturer whose product line includes DBDPEthane and BDE-209.

REFERENCES

  1. Top of page
  2. REFERENCES
  • 1
    McKinney MA, Dietz R, Sonne C, DeGuise S, Skirnisson K, Karlsson K, Steingrimsson , Letcher RJ. 2011. Comparative hepatic microsomal biotransformation of selected PBDES, including decabromodiphenyl ether, and decabromodiphenyl ethane flame retardants in artic marine-feeding mammals. Environ Toxicol Chem 30: 15061514.
  • 2
    Gebbnick WA, Sonne C, Kirkegaard M, Riget FE, Born EW, Letcher RJ. 2006. Chlorinated and brominated contaminants and their metabolic/degradation products: bioaccumulation and distribution in East Greenland polar bears (Ursus maritimus) and ringed seals (Phocahispida). Organohalogen Compd 68: 336339.
  • 3
    Kerns E, Di L. 2008. Drug-like Properties: Concepts, Structure Design and Methods: From ADME to Toxicity Optimization. Academic, Elsevier, Burlington, MA, USA.
  • 4
    Griffin M. 2008. Studies to investigate the absorption, distribution and metabolism of 9161-200A, 9161-200B, 9161-200C and 9161-200D. Cyprotex Discovery, Macclesfield, United Kingdom.
  • 5
    Riu A, Cravedi J-P, Debrauwer L, Garcia A, Canlet C, Jouanin I, Zalko D. 2008. Disposition and metabolic profiling of [14C]-Decabromodiphenyl ether in pregnant Wistar rats. Environ Int 34: 318329.
  • 6
    Morck A, Hakk H, Orn U, Klasson Wehler E. 2003. Decabromodiphenyl ether in the rat: Absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. Drug Metab Dispos 31: 900907.
  • 7
    Huwe J, Smith DJ. 2007. Accumulation, whole body depletion and debromination of decabromodiphenyl ether in male Sprague-Dawley rats following dietary exposure. Environ Sci Technol 41: 23712377. Erratum in: Environ Sci Technol 41: 4486.
  • 8
    National Toxicology Program. 1986. Toxicology and Carcinogenicity Studies of Decabromodiphenyl Oxide (CAS No. 1163-19-5) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Feed Studies). Technical Report Series No. 309. Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
  • 9
    Hardy ML, Banasik M, Stedeford T. 2009. Toxicology and human health assessment of decabromodiphenyl ether. Crit Rev Toxicol 39(S3): 144.
  • 10
    Hardy ML, Margitich D, Ackerman L, Smith RL. 2002. The subchronic oral toxicity of ethane, 1,2-bis(pentabromophenyl) (Saytex 8010) in rats. Int J Toxicol 21: 165170.
  • 11
    Hardy ML, Mercieca MD, Rodwell DE, Stedeford T. 2010. Prenatal developmental toxicity of decabromodiphenyl ethane in the rat and rabbit. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol 89: 139146.
  • 12
    Biesemeier JA, Beck MJ, Silberberg H, Myers NR, Ariano JM, Radovsky A, Freshwater L, Sved DW, Jacobi S, Stump DG, Hardy ML, Stedeford T. 2011. An oral developmental neurotoxicity study of decabromodiphenyl ether (DecaBDE) in Rats. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol 92: 1735.