SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Snape I, Ferguson SH, Harvey PMA, Riddle MJ. 2006. Investigation of evaporation and biodegradation of fuel spills in Antarctica: II—Extent of natural attenuation at Casey Station. Chemosphere 63: 8998.
  • 2
    Bardgett RD, Bowman WD, Kaufmann R, Schmidt SK. 2005. A temporal approach to linking aboveground and belowground ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 20: 634641.
  • 3
    Brussaard L. 1997. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in soil. Ambio 26: 563570.
  • 4
    Brussaard L, De Ruiter PC, Brown GG. 2007. Soil biodiversity for agricultural sustainability. Agr Ecosyst Environ 121: 233244.
  • 5
    Snape I, Acomb L, Barnes DL, Bainbridge S, Eno R, Filler DM, Plato N, Poland JS, Raymond TC, Rayner JL, Riddle MJ, Rike AG, Rutter A, Schafer AN, Siciliano SD, Walworth JL. 2008. Contamination, regulation, and remediation: An introduction to bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons in cold regions. In Filler DM, Barnes DL, Snape I, eds, Bioremediation of Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Cold Regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, pp 137.
  • 6
    Dagnino A, Sforzini S, Dondero F, Fenoglio S, Bona E, Jensen J, Viarengo A. 2008. A weight-of-evidence approach for the integration of environmental “triad” data to assess ecological risk and biological vulnerability. Integr Environ Assess Manag 4: 314326.
  • 7
    Alexander M. 1995. How toxic are toxic chemicals in soil? Environ Sci Technol 29: 27132717.
  • 8
    Alexander RR, Alexander M. 2000. Bioavailability of genotoxic compounds in soils. Environ Sci Technol 34: 15891593.
  • 9
    Chung N, Alexander M. 1998. Differences in sequestration and bioavailability of organic compounds aged in dissimilar soils. Environ Sci Technol 32: 855860.
  • 10
    White JC, Kelsey JW, Hatzinger PB, Alexander M. 1997. Factors affecting sequestration and bioavailability of phenanthrene in soils. Environ Toxicol Chem 16: 20402045.
  • 11
    Bouchard D, Wood A, Campbell M, Nkedi-Kizza P, Rao P. 1988. Sorption nonequilibrium during solute transport. J Contam Hydrol 2: 209223.
  • 12
    Christensen LB, Larsen TH. 1993. Method for determining the age of diesel oil spills in the soil. Ground Water Monit R 13: 142149.
  • 13
    Booth AM, Sutton PA, Lewis CA, Lewis AC, Scarlett A, Chau W, Widdows J, Rowland SJ. 2007. Unresolved complex mixtures of aromatic hydrocarbons: Thousands of overlooked persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic contaminants in mussels. Environ Sci Technol 41: 457464.
  • 14
    Frysinger GS, Gaines RB, Xu L, Reddy CM. 2003. Resolving the unresolved complex mixture in petroleum-contaminated sediments. Environ Sci Technol 37: 16531662.
  • 15
    Rayner JL, Snape I, Walworth JL, Harvey PMA, Ferguson SH. 2007. Petroleum-hydrocarbon contamination and remediation by microbioventing at sub-Antarctic Macquarie Island. Cold Reg Sci Technol 48: 139153.
  • 16
    Walworth J, Pond A, Snape I, Rayner J, Ferguson S, Harvey P. 2007. Nitrogen requirements for maximizing petroleum bioremediation in a sub-Antarctic soil. Cold Reg Sci Technol 48: 8491.
  • 17
    Deprez PP, Arens M, Locher H. 1994. Identification and preliminary assessment of contaminated sites in the Australian Antarctic Territory. 1. Casey Station. Australian Antarctic Division, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
  • 18
    Booth L, Heppelthwaite V, O'Halloran K. 2005. Effects-based Assays in the Earthworm Aporrectodea caliginosa: Their Utilisation for Evaluation of Contaminated Sites before and after Remediation. J Soils Sediments 5: 8794.
  • 19
    Callaham MA Jr, Stewart AJ, Alarcón C, McMillen SJ. 2002. Effects of earthworm (Eisenia fetida) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) straw additions on selected properties of petroleum-contaminated soils. Environ Toxicol Chem 21: 16581663.
  • 20
    Dorn PB, Vipond TE, Salanitro JP, Wisniewski HL. 1998. Assessment of the acute toxicity of crude oils in soils using earthworms, Microtox, and plants. Chemosphere 37: 845860.
  • 21
    Saterbak A, Toy RJ, McMain BJ, Williams MP, Dorn PB. 2000. Ecotoxicological and analytical assessment of effects of bioremediation on hydrocarbon containing soils. Environ Toxicol Chem 19: 26432652.
  • 22
    Kula H, Larink O. 1997. Development and standardization of test methods for the prediction of sublethal effects of chemicals on earthworms. Soil Biol Biochem 29: 635639.
  • 23
    Environment Canada. 2003. Tests for Toxicity of Contaminated Soil to Earthworms (Eisenia andrei, Eisenia fetida, or Lumbricus terrestris), EPS 1/RM/43. Environmental Technology Centre, Ottawa, Ontario.
  • 24
    Bindesbøl AM, Holmstrup M, Damgaard C, Bayley M. 2005. Stress synergy between environmentally realistic levels of copper and frost in the earthworm Dendrobaena octaedra . Environ Toxicol Chem 24: 14621467.
  • 25
    International Organization for Standardization. 2008. Avoidance Test for Determining the Quality of Soils and Effects of Chemicals on Behaviour. Part 1: Test with Earthworms (Eisenia foetida and Eisenia andrei). ISO/DIS 17512-1, Paris, France.
  • 26
    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 1984. OECD guildelines for the testing of chemicals. 207, Earthworm Acute Toxicity Test,Paris, France.
  • 27
    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2004. OECD Guideline for the testing of chemicals. 222. Earthworm reproduction test (Eisenia fetida/Eisenia andrei), Paris, France.
  • 28
    Parks and Wildlife Service. 2006. Macquarie Island Nature Reserve and World Heritage Area Management Plan. Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Tourism, Arts and the Environment, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
  • 29
    Greenslade P, Van Klinken R. 2006. The invertebrates of Macquarie island. Australian Antarctic Division, Kingston, Tasmania, Australia.
  • 30
    Rayment GE, Lyons DJ. 2011. Soil Chemical Methods - Australasia. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood Victoria, Australia.
  • 31
    Clesceri L, Greenberg A, Eaton A. 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 20 ed. American Public Health Association, American Water Works, Association, Water Environment Federation, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • 32
    Tang J, Lu X, Sun Q, Zhu W. 2012. Aging effect of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil under different attenuation conditions. Agr Ecosyst Environ 149: 109117.
  • 33
    Laskov C, Herzog C, Lewandowski J, Hupfer M. 2007. Miniaturised photometrical methods for the rapid analysis of phosphate, ammonium, ferrous iron, and sulfate in pore water of freshwater sediments. Limnol Oceanogr-Meth 5: 6371.
  • 34
    Zytner R, Salb A, Stiver W. 2006. Bioremediation of diesel fuel contaminated soil: comparison of individual compounds to complex mixtures. Soil Sediment Contam 15: 277297.
  • 35
    Brils JM, Huwer SL, Kater BJ, Schout PG, Harmsen J, Delvigne GAL, Scholten MCT. 2002. Oil effect in freshly spiked marine sediment on Vibrio fischeri, Corophium volutator, and Echinocardium cordatum . Environ Toxicol Chem 21: 22422251.
  • 36
    Schafer AN, Snape I, Siciliano SD. 2007. Soil biogeochemical toxicity end points for sub-Antarctic islands contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons. Environ Toxicol Chem 26: 890897.
  • 37
    National Environmental Protection Council. 2010. National Environmental Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure (draft variation). Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • 38
    Canadian Council for Ministers of the Environment. 2008. Canada-Wide Standards for Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHC) in Soil. Winnipeg
  • 39
    Hose G, Van den Brink P. 2004. Confirming the species-sensitivity distribution concept for endosulfan using laboratory, mesocosm, and field data. Arch Environ Con Tox 47: 511520.
  • 40
    Forbes VE, Calow P. 2002. Species sensitivity distributions revisited: A critical appraisal. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 8: 473492.