SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Cairns J Jr. 1988. Putting the eco in ecotoxicology. Reg Toxicol Pharmacol 8:226238.
  • 2
    Forbes VE, Calow P. 1999. Is the per capita rate of increase a good measure of population-level effects in ecotoxicology? Environ Toxicol Chem 18:15441556.
  • 3
    Hurlbert SH, Mulla MS, Keith JO, Westlake WE, Düsch ME. 1970. Biological effects and persistence of Dursban in freshwater ponds. J Econ Entomol 63:4352.
  • 4
    Van den Brink PJ. 2006. Letter to the editor: Response to recent criticism on aquatic semifield studies experiments: Opportunities for new developments in ecological risk assessment of pesticides. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2:202203.
  • 5
    Suter GW. 1993. A critique of ecosystem health concepts and indexes. Environ Toxicol Chem 12:15331539.
  • 6
    Maund SJ, Chapman PF, Kedwards TJ, Tattersfield L, Matthiessen P, Warwick RM, Smith EP. 1999. Application of multivariate statistics to ecotoxicological field studies. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:111112.
  • 7
    Van den Brink PJ, Ter Braak CJF. 1999. Principal response curves: Analysis of time-dependent multivariate responses of a biological community to stress. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:138148.
  • 8
    Van den Brink PJ, Ter Braak CJF. 1998. Multivariate analysis of stress in experimental ecosystems by principal response curves and similarity analysis. Aquat Ecol 32:161178.
  • 9
    European Commission. 2002. Guidance document on aquatic toxicology in the context of the Directive 91/414/EEC. Working document of the European Commission Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General. Sanco/3268/2001. Brussels, Belgium.
  • 10
    Organisation for Economic Co-operation Development. 2006. Guidance document on simulated freshwater lentic field tests (outdoor microcosms and mesocosms). OECD Series on Testing and Assessment 53. ENV/JM/MONO (2006) 17. Paris, France.
  • 11
    Galic N, Baveco H, Hengeveld GM, Thorbek P, Bruns E, Van den Brink PJ. 2012. Simulating population recovery of an aquatic isopod: Effects of timing of stress and landscape structure. Environ Poll 163:9199.
  • 12
    Hommen U, Baveco JM, Galic N, Van den Brink PJ. 2010. Potential application of ecological models in the European environmental risk assessment of chemicals: I. Review of protection goals of EU directives. Integr Environ Assess Manag 6:325337.
  • 13
    Bartell SM, Rouse Campbell K, Lovelock CM, Nair SK, Shaw JL. 2000. Characterizing aquatic ecological risks from pesticides using a diquat dibromide case study III. Ecological process models. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:14411453.
  • 14
    Thorbek P, Forbes V, Heimbach F, Hommen U, Thulke H-H, Van den Brink PJ, Wogram J, Grimm V. eds. 2010. Ecological Models for Regulatory Risk Assessments of Pesticides: Developing a Strategy for the Future. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
  • 15
    Grimm V, Ashauer R, Forbes V, Hommen U, Preuss TG, Schmidt A, Van den Brink PJ, Wogram J, Thorbek P. 2009. CREAM: A European project on mechanistic effect models for ecological risk assessment of chemicals. Environ Sci Pollut Res 16:614617.
  • 16
    Schmolke A, Thorbek P, Chapman P, Grimm V. 2010. Ecological models and pesticide risk assessment: Current modeling practice. Environ Toxicol Chem 29:10061012.
  • 17
    Ashauer R. 2010. Toxicokinetic–toxicodynamic modelling in an individual based context—Consequences of parameter variability. Ecol Mod 221:13251328.