SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Hood L, Perlmutter RM. 2004. The impact of systems approaches on biological problems in drug discovery. Nat Biotechnol 22: 12151217.
  • 2
    Committee on Toxicity Testing and Assessment of Environmental Agents NRC. 2007. Toxicity testing in the 21st century: A vision and a strategy. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
  • 3
    Bradbury SP, Feijtel TC, Van Leeuwen CJ. 2004. Meeting the scientific needs of ecological risk assessment in a regulatory context. Environ Sci Technol 38: 463A470A.
  • 4
    ECETOC. 2007. I ntelligent testing strategies in ecotoxicology: mode of action approach for specifically acting chemicals. Technical Report 102. Brussels, Belgium.
  • 5
    Ahlers J, Stock F, Werschkun B. 2008. Integrated testing and intelligent assessment: new challenges under REACH. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 15: 565572.
  • 6
    Stokstad E. 2009. Putting chemicals on a path to better risk assessment. Science 325: 694695.
  • 7
    Hartung T. 2009. A toxicology for the 21st century: mapping the road ahead. Toxicol Sci 109: 1823.
  • 8
    Stephenson JB. 2006. Chemical regulation: actions are needed to improve the effectiveness of EPA's chemical review program. U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC, pp 114.
  • 9
    National Research Council. 2006. Toxicity testing for the assessment of environmental agents: interim report. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
  • 10
    Walker JD, de Wolf W. 2003. QSARs on the world wide web: A need for quality assurance to prevent misuse. In WalkerJD, ed, QSARs for Pollution Prevention, Toxicity Screening, Risk Assessment, and Web Applications. SETAC, Pensacola, FL, USA.
  • 11
    Andersen ME, Krewski D. 2009. Toxicity testing in the 21st century: Bringing the vision to life. Toxicol Sci 107: 324330.
  • 12
    Ankley GT, Bennett RS, Erickson RJ, Hoff DJ, Hornung MW, Johnson RD, Mount DR, Nichols JW, Russom CL, Schmieder PK, Serrano JA, Tietge JE, Villeneuve DL. 2010. Adverse outcome pathways: A conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 29: 730741.
  • 13
    Borgert CJ, Quill TF, McCarty LS, Mason AM. 2004. Can mode of action predict mixture toxicity for risk assessment? Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 201: 8596.
  • 14
    Head JA, Hahn ME, Kennedy SW. 2008. Key amino acids in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor predict dioxin sensitivity in avian species. Environ Sci Technol 42: 75357541.
  • 15
    Gunnarsson L, Jauhiainen A, Kristiansson E, Nerman O, Larsson DG. 2008. Evolutionary conservation of human drug targets in organisms used for environmental risk assessments. Environ Sci Technol 42: 58075813.