SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Emans H, Van de Plassche E, Canton J, Okkeman P, Sparenburg P. 1993. Validation of some extrapolation models used for effects assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 12: 21392154.
  • 2
    Stephan CE, Mount DI, Hansen DJ, Gentile JH, Chapman GA, Brungs WA. 1985. Guidelines for deriving numeric national water quality criteria for the protection of aquatic organisms and their uses. PB85–227049. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA, USA.
  • 3
    Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 1989. Report of the OECD workshop on ecological effects assessment. Environmental Monograph 26. Paris, France.
  • 4
    Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 1995. Guidance document for aquatic effects assessment. Environmental Monograph 92. Paris, France.
  • 5
    Hart WB, Doudoroff P, Greenbank J. 1945. The evaluation of the toxicity of industrial wastes, chemicals and other substances to freshwater fishes. Final Report. Waste Control Laboratory, Atlantic Refining, Philadephia, PA, USA.
  • 6
    Henderson C, Tarzwell CM. 1957. Bio-assays for control of industrial effluents. Sewage Ind Wastes 29: 10021017.
  • 7
    Henderson C. 1957. Application factors to be applied to bioassays for the safe disposal of toxic wastes. In TarzwellCM, ed, Biological Problems in Water Pollution. U.S. Public Health Service, Cincinnati, OH, pp 3137.
  • 8
    Aquatic Life Advisory Committee of the Ohio River Valley Water Sanitation Commission. 1955. Aquatic life water quality criteria. First Progress Report. Sewage Ind Wastes 27: 321331.
  • 9
    Warren CE, Doudoroff P. 1958. The development of methods for using bioassays in the control of pulp mill disposal. Tappi 41: 211A216A.
  • 10
    Mount DI. 1977. An assessment of application factors in aquatic toxicology. Proceedings, Recent Advances in Fish Toxicology Symposium, Corvallis OR, USA, January 13–14, pp 183190.
  • 11
    Warner RE. 1976. Bioassays for microchemical environmental contaminants: With special reference to water supplies. Bulletin 36. World Health Organization, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • 12
    National Technical Advisory Committee. 1968. Water quality criteria. U.S. Federal Water Pollution Control Administration, Washington, DC.
  • 13
    Ontario Ministry of Environment. 1984. Water management: Goals, policies, objectives and implementation procedures of the Ministry of Environment. Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • 14
    Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. 1991. A protocol for the derivation of water quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life, Canadian water quality guidelines. Winnipeg, MB, Canada, appendix 9.
  • 15
    Giesy JP Jr, Graney RL. 1989. Recent developments in and intercomparisons of acute and chronic bioassays and bioindicators. Hydrobiologia 188/189: 2160.
  • 16
    Truhaut R. 1991. The concept of the acceptable daily intake: An historical review. Food Addit Contam 8: 151162.
  • 17
    Van Leeuwen K. 1990. Ecotoxicological effects assessment in The Netherlands: Recent developments. Environ Manage 14: 779792.
  • 18
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1991. Technical support document for water quality-based toxics control. EPA/505/2–90–001. Washington, DC.
  • 19
    Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 1992. Report of the OECD workshop on the extrapolation of laboratory aquatic toxicity data to the real environment. Environmental Monograph 58. Paris, France.
  • 20
    Martinez-Jeronimo F, Villasenor R, Espinosa R, Rios G. 1993. Use of life tables and application factors for evaluating chronic toxicity of kraft mill wastes on Daphnia magna. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 50: 377384.
  • 21
    European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals. 1993. Environmental hazard assessment of substances. Technical Report 51. Brussels, Belgium.
  • 22
    Persoone G, Janssen CR. 1994. Field validation of predictions based on laboratory toxicity tests. In HillIR, HeimbachF, LeeuwanghP, MatthiessenP, eds, Freshwater Field Tests for Hazard Assessment of Chemicals. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp 379397.
  • 23
    Lehman AJ, Fitzhugh OG. 1954. 100-Fold margin of safety. Assoc Food Drug Off U S Q Bull 18: 3335.
  • 24
    Zeeman MG. 1995. EPA's framework for ecological effects assessment. OTA-BP-ENV-166. Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, pp 6978.
  • 25
    Zeeman MG. 1995. Ecotoxicity testing and estimation methods developed under section 5 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). In RandGM, ed, Fundamentals of Aquatic Toxicology, 2nd ed. Taylor and Francis, Washington, DC, pp 703715.
  • 26
    Forbes VE, Forbes TL. 1994. Ecotoxicology in Theory and Practice. Chapman and Hall, New York, NY, USA.
  • 27
    European Union. 1996. Environmental risk assessment of new and existing substances. Technical Guidance Document. Brussels, Belgium.
  • 28
    Federal Republic of Germany. 1980. Umweltprobleme der Noordsee. Sondergutachten Juni 1980. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, Germany.
  • 29
    Minister for the Environment. 1986. Umweltpolitik: Guidelines on anticipatory environmental protection. Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, Bonn, Germany.
  • 30
    Von Moltke J. 1992. Commentary: The Precautionary Principle. Environment 34: 34.
  • 31
    London Conference. 1987. Second International Conference on the Protection of the North Sea: Ministerial declaration. London, UK.
  • 32
    United Nations Environmental Protection Governing Council. 1989. Precautionary approach to marine pollution, including waste dumping at sea. Annex 1. UNEP/GC 15/21. United Nations General Council, New York, NY, USA, pp 6365.
  • 33
    Gilbertson M, Schneider RS. 1993. Causality: The missing link between science and policy. J Great Lakes Res 19: 720721.
  • 34
    El-Shaarawi AH. 1994. Commentary: Proving causality is not always necessary and sufficient for regulatory action. J Great Lakes Res 20: 593594.
  • 35
    Gilbertson M. 1994. Reply to Dr. A. H. El-Shaarawi. Inferring causality is sometimes necessary for extraordinary regulatory action—though not sufficient. J Great Lakes Res 20: 594596.
  • 36
    O'Brien MH. 1994. The scientific imperative to move society beyond “just not quite fatal.” Environ Prof 16: 356365.
  • 37
    Earll RC. 1992. Common sense and the Precautionary Principle—An environmentalist's perspective. Mar Pollut Bull 24: 182186.
  • 38
    MacGarvin M, Johnston P. 1993. On precaution, clean production and paradigm shifts. Water Sci Technol 27: 469480.
  • 39
    MacGarvin M. 1995. The implications of the Precautionary Principle for biological monitoring. Helgol Meeresunters 49: 647662.
  • 40
    Stebbing ARD. 1992. Environmental capacity and the Precautionary Principle. Mar Pollut Bull 24: 287295.
  • 41
    Ellis D. 1993. The Precautionary Principle: A taxpayer's revolt. Mar Pollut Bull 216: 170171.
  • 42
    Gray JS. 1995. Science and the Precautionary Principle: A marine perspective. In FreestoneD, HeyE, eds, The Precautionary Principle and International Law: The Challenge of Implementation. Kluwer, The Hague, The Netherlands.
  • 43
    Brewers JM. 1995. The declining influence of science on marine environmental policy. Chem Ecol 10: 923.
  • 44
    Gray JS. 1990. Statistics and the Precautionary Principle. Mar Pollut Bull 21: 174176.
  • 45
    Chapman PM, Thornton I, Persoone G, Janssen C, Godtfredsen K, Z'Graggen MN. 1996. International harmonization related to persistence and bioavailability. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 2: 393404.
  • 46
    Garcia S. 1994. The Precautionary Principle: Its implications in capture fisheries management. Ocean Coast Manage 22: 99125.
  • 47
    McCullagh JR. 1996. Russian dumping of radioactive wastes in the Sea of Japan: An opportunity to evaluate the effectiveness of the London Convention 1972. Pac Rim Law Pollut J 5: 399427.
  • 48
    Gray JS, Brewers JM. 1996. Towards a scientific definition of the Precautionary Principle. Mar Pollut Bull 32: 768771.
  • 49
    Chapman PM. 1997. The Precautionary Principle and ecological quality standards/objectives. Mar Pollut Bull 34: 227228.
  • 50
    Rand GM, Wells PG, McCarty LS. 1995. Introduction to aquatic toxicology. In RandGM, ed, Fundamentals of Aquatic Toxicology, 2nd ed. Taylor and Francis, Washington, DC, pp 367.
  • 51
    Kooijman SALM. 1987. A safety factor for LC50 values allowing for differences in sensitivity among species. J Fish Res Board Can 21: 269276.
  • 52
    Schudoma D. 1994. Derivation of water quality objectives for hazardous substances to protect aquatic ecosystems: Single-species test approach. Environ Toxicol Water Qual 9: 263272.
  • 53
    Wagner C, Lokke H. 1991. Estimation of ecotoxicological protection levels from NOEC toxicity data. Water Res 25: 12371242.
  • 54
    Aldenberg T, Slob W. 1993. Confidence limits for hazardous concentrations based on logistically distributed NOEC toxicity data. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 25: 4863.
  • 55
    Kenaga EE. 1982. Predictability of chronic toxicity from acute toxicity of chemicals in fish and aquatic invertebrates. Environ Toxicol Contam 1: 347358.
  • 56
    Abt Associates. 1995. Technical basis for recommended ranges of uncertainty factors used in deriving wildlife criteria for the Great Lakes water quality initiative. Final Report. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
  • 57
    Fletcher JS, Johnson FL, McFarlane JC. 1990. Influence of greenhouse versus field testing and taxonomic differences on plant sensitivity to chemical treatment. Environ Toxicol Chem 9: 769776.
  • 58
    Sloof W, Van Oers JAM, de Zwar D. 1986. Margins of uncertainty in ecotoxicological hazard assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 5: 841852.
  • 59
    Dourson ML, Stara JF. 1983. Regulatory history and experimental support of uncertainty (safety) factors. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 3: 224238.
  • 60
    Shirazi MA, Bennett RS, Ringer RK. 1994. An interpretation of toxicity response of bobwhite quail with respect to duration of exposure. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 26: 417424.
  • 61
    Davis PH. 1973. Effects of chemical variations in aquatic environments: Vol III. Lead toxicity to rainbow trout and testing application factor concept. EPA-R3–73–011c. Ecological Research Report. Office of Research and Monitoring, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
  • 62
    Chapman PM. 1996. Extrapolating laboratory toxicity results to the field. Environ Toxicol Chem 14: 927930.
  • 63
    Rice EL. 1984. Allelopathy, 2nd ed. Academic, Orlando, FL, USA.
  • 64
    Fuerst EP, Putnam AR. 1983. Separating the competitive and allelopathic components of interference: Theoretical principles. J Chem Ecol 8: 935937.
  • 65
    Persoone G, Van de Vel A, Steertegen M, De Nayer B. 1989. Predictive value of laboratory tests with aquatic invertebrates: Influence of experimental conditions. Aquat Toxicol 14: 149166.
  • 66
    Porter WP, et al. 1984. Toxicant–disease–environment interactions associated with suppression of immune system, growth and reproduction. Science 224: 10141017.
  • 67
    Maguire CC, Williams BA. 1987. Response of thermal stressed juvenile quail to dietary organophosphate exposure. Environ Pollut 47: 2539.
  • 68
    Rattner BA, Fairbrother A. 1991. Biological variability and the influence of stress on cholinesterase activity. In MineauP, ed, Cholinesterase-Inhibiting Insecticides: Their Impact on Wildlife and the Environment. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 89108.
  • 69
    Edge WD, Carey RL, Wolff JO, Ganio LM, Manning T. 1996. Effects of Guthion 2S on Microtus canicaudus: A risk assessment validation. J Appl Ecol 32: 269278.
  • 70
    Bennett RS, Edge WD, Griffis WL, Matz AC, Wolff JO, Ganio LM. 1994. Temporal and spatial distribution of azinphos-methyl applied to alfalfa. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 27: 534540.
  • 71
    Beyer WN, Storm G. 1995. Ecotoxicological damage from zinc smelting at Palmerton, Pennsylvania. In HoffmanD, RattnerBA, BurtonGAJr, CairnsJJr, eds, Handbook of Ecotoxicology. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp 596608.
  • 72
    Cairns J Jr. 1986. The myth of the most sensitive species. Bio Science 36: 670672.
  • 73
    Meek ME. 1998. Perceived precision of risk estimates for carcinogenic versus non-neoplastic effects: Implications for methodology. Hum Ecol Risk Assess (in press).
  • 74
    Brown, D. 1996. Environmental classification and risk assessment. In QuintMD, TaylorD, PurchaseR, eds, Environmental Impact of Chemicals: Assessment and Control. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK, pp 197208.
  • 75
    Sprague JB. 1971. Measurement of pollutant toxicity to fish—III. Sublethal effects and “safe” concentrations. Water Res 5: 245266.
  • 76
    National Academy of Sciences. 1972. Water quality criteria. EPA-R3–73–033. Committee on Water Quality Criteria, Washington, DC.
  • 77
    Chen J-C, Lin C-Y. 1991. Lethal doses of ammonia on Penaeus chinensis larvae. Bull Inst Zool Acad Sin (Taipei) 30: 289297.
  • 78
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Army Corps of Engineers. 1995. Evaluation of dredged material proposed for discharge in waters of the U. S.—Testing manual. EPA-823-B-94–002. Washington, DC.
  • 79
    Chapman PM. 1996. Hazard identification, hazard classification and risk assessment for metals and metal compounds in the aquatic environment. International Council on Metals and the Environment, Ottawa, ON, Canada, p 31.
  • 80
    International Council on Metals and the Environment. 1997. Proceedings, International Workshop on Risk Assessment of Metals and Their Inorganic Compounds, Angers, France, November 13–15, 1996, p 180.
  • 81
    Forbes VE. 1996. Chemical stress and genetic variability in invertebrate populations. Toxicol Ecotoxicol News 3: 136141.
  • 82
    Cairns J Jr, Dickson KL, Maki AW. 1979. Estimating the hazard of chemical substances to aquatic life. Hydrobiologia 64: 157166.
  • 83
    Peterman RM, M'Gonigle M. 1992. Statistical power analysis and the precautionary principle. Mar Pollut Bull 24: 231234.
  • 84
    Suter GW II. 1993. Ecological Risk Assessment. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
  • 85
    Chapman PM. 1996. Presentation and interpretation of sediment quality triad data. Ecotoxicology 5: 327339.
  • 86
    Menzie C, et al. 1996. A weight-of-evidence approach for evaluating ecological risks: Report of the Massachusetts Weight-of-Evidence Workgroup. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 2: 277304.
  • 87
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1997. An SAB Report: Review of the agency's draft ecological risk assessment guideliens. EPA-SAB-EPEC-97–002. Science Advisory Board, Washington, DC.
  • 88
    Risher JF, DeRosa CT. 1997. The precision, uses, and limitations of public health guidance values. Hum Ecol Risk Assess (in press).
  • 89
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1992. An SAB report: Review of a testing manual for evaluation of dredged material proposed for ocean disposal. EPA-SAB-EPEC-92–014. Science Advisory Board, Washington, DC.
  • 90
    Environment Canada. 1997. Guidance document on the interpretation and application of data for environmental toxicology. Report EPS 1/RM/34. Ottawa, ON, Canada.
  • 91
    Abdel-Rahman MS ed. 1995. EPA Uncertainty Factor Workshop. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 1: 512662.
  • 92
    Rees DC, Hattis D. 1994. Developing quantitative strategies for animal to human extrapolation. In HayesAW, ed, Principles and Methods of Toxicology, 3rd ed. Raven, New York, NY, USA, pp 275315.
  • 93
    Chapman PM, Caldwell RS, Chapman PF. 1996. A warning: NOECs are inappropriate for regulatory use. Environ Toxicol Chem 15: 7779.
  • 94
    Dhaliwal BS, Dolan RJ, Batts CW, Kelly JM, Smith RW, Johnson S. 1997. Warning: Replacing NOECs with point estimates may not solve regulatory contradictions. Environ Toxicol Chem 16: 124125.
  • 95
    Chapman PF, Chapman PM. 1997. Author's reply. Environ Toxicol Chem 16: 125126.
  • 96
    Cairns J Jr. 1991. Application factors and ecosystem elasticity: The missing connection. Environ Toxicol Chem 10: 12351236.
  • 97
    Moore DRJ, Caux P-Y. 1997. Estimating low toxic effects. Environ Toxicol Chem 16: 794801.
  • 98
    Pederson F, Petersen GI. 1996. Variability of species sensitivity to complex mixtures. Water Sci Technol 33: 109119.
  • 99
    Jak RG, Maas JL, Scholten MCT. 1996. Evaluation of laboratory derived toxic effect concentrations of a mixture of metals by testing freshwater plankton communities in enclosures. Water Res 30: 12151227.
  • 100
    Kimerle RA, Werner AF, Adams WJ. 1984. Aquatic hazard evaluation principles applied to the development of water quality criteria. In Cardwell RD, Purdy R, Bahner RC, eds, Aquatic Toxicology and Hazard Assessment: Seventh Symposium. STP 85. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, pp 538547.
  • 101
    Farland WH, Tuxen LC. 1997. New directions in cancer risk assessment: Accuracy, precision, credibility, and uncertainty. Hum Ecol Risk Assess (in press).
  • 102
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1997. Evaluation of Superfund ecotox threshold benchmark values for water and sediment. EPA-SAB-EPEC-LTR-97–009. Science Advisory Board, Washington, DC.
  • 103
    International Programme on Chemical Safety. 1994. Assessing human health risks of chemicals: Derivation of guidance values for health-based exposure limits. Environmental Health Criteria 170. Geneva, Switzerland.
  • 104
    Mount DI, Stephan CE. 1969. Chronic toxicity of copper to the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) in soft water. J Fish Res Board Can 26: 24492457.
  • 105
    Walden CC. 1976. The toxicity of pulp and paper mill effluents and corresponding measurement procedures. Water Res 10: 639664.
  • 106
    U.S. National Research Council. 1994. Science and Judgement in Risk Assessment. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
  • 107
    Van Straalen NM, Dennemann CAJ. 1989. Ecotoxicological evaluation of soil quality criteria. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 18: 241251.