Although the research described in this article was funded wholly or in part by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (contract 68-C4-0034) and Science Applications International Corporation (subcontract 4500145731), it was not reviewed by either entity and therefore does not necessarily reflect their views. No official endorsement should be inferred.
An empirical comparison of effective concentration estimators for evaluating aquatic toxicity test responses†
Article first published online: 2 NOV 2009
Copyright © 2000 SETAC
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Volume 19, Issue 1, pages 141–150, January 2000
How to Cite
Bailer, A. J., Hughes, M. R., Denton, D. L. and Oris, J. T. (2000), An empirical comparison of effective concentration estimators for evaluating aquatic toxicity test responses. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 19: 141–150. doi: 10.1002/etc.5620190117
- Issue published online: 2 NOV 2009
- Article first published online: 2 NOV 2009
- Manuscript Accepted: 20 JUN 1999
- Manuscript Received: 10 FEB 1999
- 1GrotheDR, DicksonKL, Reed-JudkinsDK, eds., 1996. Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing: An Evaluation of Methods and Prediction of Receiving System Impacts. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Pensacola, FL, USA.
- 21988. A robust statistical method for estimating effects concentrations in short-term fathead minnow toxicity tests. Contract 69–03–3534. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC., .
- 31993. A linear interpolation method for sublethal toxicity: The inhibition concentration (ICp) approach. National Effluent Toxicity Assessment Center Technical Report 03–93. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, MN..
- 41993. Modeling reproductive toxicity in Cer-iodaphnia tests. Environ Toxicol Chem 12: 787–791., .
- 51994. Assessing the toxicity of pollutants for aquatic systems. In LangeN, RyanL, BillardL, BrillingerD, ConquestL, GreenhouseJ, eds, Case Studies in Biometry. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, pp 25–40., .
- 61997. Estimating inhibition concentrations for different response scales using generalized linear models. Environ Toxicol Chem 16: 1554–1559., .
- 71989. Generalized Linear Models, 2nd ed. Chapman & Hall, London, UK., .
- 81992. Application of generalized linear models to the analysis of toxicity test data. Environ Monit Assess 23: 153–163..
- 91989. Short-term methods for estimating the chronic toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater organisms, 2nd ed. EPA/600/4–89/001A. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH., et al.
- 101995. Short-term methods for estimating the chronic toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to west coast marine and estuarine organisms. EPA/600/R-95–136. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH., , .
- 111990. Marine Bioassay Project fifth report: Protocol development and interlaboratory toxicity testing with complex effluents. Report 90–13WQ. State Water Resources Control Board, Sacramento, CA, USA., , , , , .
- 121994. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, London, UK., .
- 131985. Advantages of using regression analysis to calculate results of chronic toxicity tests. In BahnerR, HansenD, eds, Aquatic Toxicology and Hazard Assessment (8th Symposium). STP 891. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, pp 328–338., .
- 141993. Upper confidence limits on excess risk for quantitative responses. Risk Anal 13: 177–182., .
- 151995. Calculation of benchmark doses from continuous data. Risk Anal 15: 79–89..
- 16SAS Institute. 1993. SAS® Technical Report P-243, SAS/STAT Software: The GENMOD Procedure, Release 6.09. Cary, NC, USA.
- 17SAS Institute. 1997. SAS® Macro Language: Reference, 1sted. Cary, NC, USA.
- 181996. Applied Linear Statistical Models, 4th ed. Irwin, Chicago, IL, USA., , , .
- 191996. Session 3: Methods and appropriate endpoints. In GrotheDR, DicksonKL, Reed-JudkinsDK, eds, Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing: An Evaluation of Methods and Predictability of Receiving System Impacts. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Pensacola, FL, USA, pp 51–82., et al.