Get access

Comparison of pesticides in eight U.S. urban streams

Authors

  • Ryan S. Hoffman,

    1. Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Paul D. Capel,

    Corresponding author
    1. U.S. Geological Survey, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
    • U.S. Geological Survey, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Steven J. Larson

    1. U.S. Geological Survey, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
    Search for more papers by this author

  • The use of firm, trade, and brand names is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey.

Abstract

Little is known of the occurrence of pesticides in urban streams compared to streams draining agricultural areas. Water samples from eight urban streams from across the United States were analyzed for 75 pesticides and seven transformation products. For six of the eight urban streams, paired agricultural streams were used for comparisons. The herbicides detected most frequently in the urban streams were prometon, simazine, atrazine, tebuthiuron, and metolachlor, and the insecticides detected most frequently were diazinon, carbaryl, chlorpyrifos, and malathion. In contrast to similar-sized agricultural streams, total insecticide concentrations commonly exceeded total herbicide concentrations in these urban streams. In general, the temporal concentration patterns in the urban streams were consistent with the characteristics of the local growing season. The insecticides carbaryl and diazinon exceeded criteria for the protection of aquatic life in many of the urban streams in the spring and summer. When the country as a whole is considered, the estimated mass of herbicides contributed by urban areas to streams is dwarfed by the estimated contribution from agricultural areas, but for insecticides, contributions from urban and agricultural areas may be similar. The results of this study suggest that urban areas should not be overlooked when assessing sources and monitoring the occurrence of pesticides in surface waters.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary