Environmental Toxicology

Effect of titanium dioxide nanomaterials and ultraviolet light coexposure on African clawed frogs (Xenopus laevis)†

  1. Junling Zhang1,
  2. Mike Wages1,
  3. Stephen B. Cox1,
  4. Jonathan D. Maul1,
  5. Yujia Li2,
  6. Melanie Barnes2,
  7. Louisa Hope-Weeks3,
  8. George P. Cobb1,*

Article first published online: 21 NOV 2011

DOI: 10.1002/etc.718

Issue

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Special Issue: Nanomaterials in the Environment

Volume 31, Issue 1, pages 176–183, January 2012

Additional Information

How to Cite

Zhang, J., Wages, M., Cox, S. B., Maul, J. D., Li, Y., Barnes, M., Hope-Weeks, L. and Cobb, G. P. (2012), Effect of titanium dioxide nanomaterials and ultraviolet light coexposure on African clawed frogs (Xenopus laevis). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 31: 176–183. doi: 10.1002/etc.718

Author Information

  1. 1

    Department of Environmental Toxicology, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA

  2. 2

    Department of Geoscience, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA

  3. 3

    Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA

*Department of Environmental Science, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA.

  1. †

    Presented at Nano 2010: International Conference on the Environmental Effects of Nanomaterials, Clemson University, August, 2010.

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 9 DEC 2011
  2. Article first published online: 21 NOV 2011
  3. Accepted manuscript online: 19 OCT 2011 10:01PM EST
  4. Manuscript Accepted: 14 MAR 2011
  5. Manuscript Revised: 18 JAN 2011
  6. Manuscript Received: 8 NOV 2010

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article with Supporting Information (HTML) Get PDF (549K)

Keywords:

  • Nanotoxicity;
  • FETAX;
  • Amphibian;
  • Titanium dioxide;
  • Ultraviolet light

Abstract

Titanium dioxide nanomaterials (nano-TiO2) exhibit stronger photochemical oxidation/reduction capacity compared with their bulk counterparts, but the effectiveness of nano-TiO2 interaction with ultraviolet (UV) light strongly depends on particle size. In this study, the dependence of nano-TiO2 toxicity on particle size and interaction with UV light were investigated. Toxicity tests with Xenopus laevis included eight concentrations of nano-TiO2 in the presence of either white light or UVA (315–400 nm). We quantified viability and growth of Xenopus laevis. Results showed that, regardless of UV light exposure, increasing TiO2 concentration decreased X. laevis survival (p < 0.05). Coexposure to 5-nm TiO2 and UVA caused near-significant decreases in X. laevis survival (p = 0.08). Coexposure to 10-nm TiO2 and UVA significantly decreased X. laevis survival (p = 0.005). However, coexposure to 32-nm TiO2 and UVA had no statistical effect on X. laevis survival (p = 0.8). For all three particle sizes, whether alone or with UV light, the nano-TiO2 concentrations significantly affected growth of tadpoles as determined by total body length, snout–vent length, and developmental stage. High-concentration TiO2 solutions suppressed tadpole body length and delayed developmental stages. Further research to explore reasons for the growth and mortality in tadpoles is still underway in our laboratory. Given the widespread application of nano-TiO2, our results may be useful in the management of nano-TiO2 released from industrial, municipal, and nonpoint sources. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2012;31:176–183. © 2011 SETAC

View Full Article with Supporting Information (HTML) Get PDF (549K)