• Azzam, T. (2010). Evaluator responsiveness to stakeholders. American Journal of Evaluation, 31, 4565. doi:10.1177/1098214009354917
  • Azzam, T., & Levine, B. (Forthcoming). Political credibility: An empirical examination of its influence on measurement [Working title]. Manuscript in preparation.
  • Brandon, P. R., Smith, N. L., Trenholm, C., & Devaney, B. (2010). Evaluation exemplar: The critical importance of stakeholder relations in a national, experimental abstinence education evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 31, 517531. doi:10.1177/1098214010382769
  • Campbell, D. T. (1969). Reforms as experimentsAmerican Psychologist24(4), 409429.
  • Chelimsky, E. (1987). The politics of program evaluation. Society, 25, 2432. doi:10.1007/BF02695393
  • Chelimsky, E. (1995). The political environment of evaluation and what it means for the development of the field. American Journal of Evaluation, 16, 215225. doi:10.1177/109821409501600301
  • Chelimsky, E. (2007). Factors influencing the choice of methods in federal evaluation practice. In G. Julnes & D. J. Rog (Eds.), New Directions for Evaluation: No. 113. Informing federal policies on evaluation methodology: Building the evidence base for method choice in government sponsored evaluation (pp. 1333). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. doi:10.1002/ev.213
  • Chelimsky, E. (2013). Balancing evaluation theory and practice in the real worldAmerican Journal of Evaluation, 34(1), 9198.
  • Crano, W. D., & Brewer, M. B. (2002). Principles and methods of social research. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Cronbach, L. J., Ambron, S. R., Dornbusch, S. M., Hess, R. D., Hornik, R. C., Phillips, D. C., … Weiner, S. S. (1980). Toward reform of program evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Datta, L.-E. (2011). Politics and evaluation: More than methodology. American Journal of Evaluation, 32, 273294. doi:10.1177/1098214011400060
  • Greene, J. C. (1990). Technical quality versus responsiveness in evaluation practice. Evaluation and Program Planning, 13, 267274. doi:10.1016/0149-7189(90)90057-4
  • Greene, J. C. (2006). Evaluation, democracy, and social change. In I. F. Shaw, J. C. Greene, & M. M. Mark (Eds.), The sage handbook of evaluation (pp. 118140). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • House, E. R. (1980). Evaluating with validity. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • House, E. R. (1993). Professional evaluation: Social impact and political consequences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Howe, K. R., & Ashcraft, C. (2005). Deliberative democratic evaluation: Successes and limitations of an evaluation of school choice. Teachers College Record, 107, 22752298. doi:10.1177/109821400402500403
    Direct Link:
  • MacDonald, B. (1976). Evaluation and the control of education. In D. Tawney (Ed.), Curriculum evaluation today: Trends and implications (pp. 125136). London, UK: MacMillan Education.
  • Mathison, S. (2008). What is the difference between evaluation and research and why do we care? In N. Smith & P. Brandon (Eds.), Fundamental issues in evaluation (pp. 183196). New York, NY: Gilford Press.
  • Mark, M. M., Henry, G. T., & Julnes, G. (2000). Evaluation: An integrated framework for understanding, guiding, and improving policies and programs. New York, NY: Jossey-Bass.
  • McGrath, J. E., Martin, J., & Kulka, R. A. (1982). Judgment calls in research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Palumbo, D. J. (Ed.). (1987). The politics of program evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Patton, M. Q. (1987). Evaluation's political inherency: Practical implications for design and use. In D. Palumbo (Ed.), The politics of program evaluation (pp. 100145). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2012). A utilization-focused approach to contribution analysis. Evaluation, 18, 364377.
  • Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Leviton, L. C. L. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Trenholm, C., Devaney, B., Fortson, K., Quay, L., Wheeler, J., & Clark, M. (2007). Impacts of four title V, section 510 abstinence education programs. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.
  • Weiss, C. H. (1987). Where politics and evaluation research meet. In D. Palumbo (Ed.), The politics of program evaluation (pp. 4771). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Weiss, C. H. (1997). Evaluation (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Wilson, M. (2013). Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Yarbrough, D. B., Shulha, L. M., Hopson, R. K., & Caruthers, F. A. (2011). The program evaluation standards: A guide for evaluators and evaluation users (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.