SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alkin, M. C., & Christie, C. A. (2004). Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists’ views and influences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Frazier Anderson, P. & Bertrand Jones, T. (2014). An analysis of Love my children: Rose Butler Browne's contributions to culturally responsive evaluation. In S. Hood, R. Hopson, K. Obeidat, & H. Frierson (Eds.), Continuing the journey to reposition culture and cultural context in evaluation theory and practice. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  • Greene, J. (2006). Evaluation, democracy, and social change. In I. Shaw (Ed.), Handbook of evaluation: Policies, programs and practices (pp. 118140). London, UK: Sage.
  • Greene, J., Millett, R., & Hopson, R. K. (2004). Evaluation as democratizing practice. In M. Braverman, N. Constantine, & J. K. Slater (Eds.), Foundations and evaluation: Contexts and practices for effective philanthropy (pp. 96118). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Hays, J., Hopson, R., & LeRoux, W. (2010). Evaluation of the NAMAS supported San Education Project in Tsumke, Otjozondjupa Region, Namibia. Norwegian Association of Namibia San Education Project. Elverum, Norway: NAMAS
  • Hood, S. (2000). Commentary on deliberative democratic evaluation. In K. E. Ryan & L. DeStefano (Eds.), New Directions for Evaluation: No. 85. Evaluation as a democratic process: Promoting inclusion, dialogue, and deliberation (pp. 7783). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. doi:10.1002/ev.1163
  • Hood, S. (2001). Nobody knows my name: In praise of African American evaluators who were responsive. In J. C. Greene & T. A. Abma (Eds.), New Directions for Evaluation: No. 92. Responsive Evaluation (pp. 3144). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. doi:10.1002/ev.33
  • Hood, S., & Hopson, R. K. (2008). Evaluation roots reconsidered: Asa Hilliard, a fallen hero in the “Nobody Knows My Name” project, and African educational excellence. Review of Educational Research, 78, 410426. doi:10.3102/0034654308321211
  • Hood, S., Hopson, R. K., & Frierson, H. T. (2005). The role of culture and cultural context: A mandate for inclusion, the discovery of truth and understanding in evaluative theory and practice. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  • Hood, S., Hopson, R. K., Obeidat, K., & Frierson, H. (Eds.). (2014). Continuing the journey to reposition culture and cultural context in evaluation theory and practice. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  • Hopson, R. K., & Hays, J. (2008). Schooling and education for the San (Ju|’hoansi) in Namibia: Between a rock of colonialism and the hard place of globalization. In R. K. Hopson, C. C. Yeakey, & F. Boakari (Eds.), Power, voice and the public good: Schooling and education in global societies (pp. 171197). Oxford, UK: Emerald.
  • Hopson, R. K., & Hood, S. (2005). An untold story in evaluation roots: Reid E. Jackson and his contributions toward culturally responsive evaluation at three quarters of a century. In S. Hood, R. K. Hopson, & H. Frierson (Eds.), The role of culture and cultural context in evaluation: A mandate for inclusion, the discovery of truth, and understanding in evaluative theory and practice (pp. 85104). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  • Hopson, R. K., Kirkhart, K. E., & Bledsoe, K.L. (2012). Decolonizing evaluation in a developing world: Implications and cautions for equity-focused evaluations. In M. Segone (Ed.), Evaluation for equitable development results (pp. 5983). New York, NY: UNICEF.
  • House, E. R. (1980). Evaluating with validity. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • House, E. R. (1991). Evaluation and social justice: Where are we? In M. W. McLaughlin & D.C. Philips (Eds.), Evaluation and education: At quarter century (90th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II) (pp. 233247). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • House, E. R. (1993). Professional evaluation: Social impact and political consequences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • House, E. R. (1999). Race and policy. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 7, 115. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/551
  • House, E. R. (2001). Unfinished business: Causes and values. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 309315. doi:10.1177/109821400102200304
  • House, E. R. (2004, October). Democracy and evaluation. Keynote presentation presented at the European Evaluation Society, Berlin, Germany.
  • House, E. R., & Howe, K. R. (1999). Values in evaluation and social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • House, E. R., & Howe, K. R. (2002). Deliberative democratic evaluation in practice. Evaluation in Education and Human Services, 49, 409421. doi:10.1007/0-306-47559-6_22
  • Howe, K. R., & Ashcraft, C. (2005). Deliberative democratic evaluation: Successes and limitations of an evaluation of school choice. Teachers College Record, 107, 22742297. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00592.x
    Direct Link:
  • Kawakami, A., Aton, K., Cram, F., Lai, M. K. & Porima, L. (2007). Improving the practice of evaluation through indigenous values and methods: Decolonizing evaluation practice—returning the gaze from Hawai'i and Aotearoa. In P. Brandon & N. L. Smith (Eds.), Fundamental issues in evaluation (pp. 219242.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • King, M. L., Jr. (1968, February). Drum major instinct. Sermon given at Ebenezer Baptist Church, Atlanta, GA. Retrieved from http://mlk-kpp01.stanford.edu/index.php/encyclopedia/documentsentry/doc_the_drum_major_instinct/
  • Kirkhart, K. E. (2010). Eyes on the prize: Multicultural validity and evaluation theory. American Journal of Evaluation, 31, 400413. doi:10.1177/1098214010373645
  • Kushner, S. (2005a). Qualitative control: A review of the framework for assessing qualitative evaluation. Evaluation, 11, 111122. doi:10.1177/1356389005053194
  • Kushner, S. (2005b). Democratic theorizing: From noun to participle. American Journal of Evaluation, 26, 579581. doi:10.1177/1098214005281357
  • Loewen, J. W. (1995). Lies my teacher told me: Everything your American history textbook got wrong. New York, NY: New Press.
  • Madison, A.-M. (1992). Editor's notes. In A.-M. Madison (Ed.), New Directions for Program Evaluation: No. 53. Minority issues in program evaluation (pp. 14). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. doi: 10.1002/ev.1596.
  • Mertens, D. M., & Wilson, A. (2012). Program evaluation, theory, and practice: A comprehensive practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. E. Stake (Ed.), American Educational Research Association monograph series on curriculum evaluation, 1.
  • Segone, M. (Ed.). (2012). Evaluation for equitable development results. New York, NY: UNICEF
  • Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London, UK: Zed Books.
  • Stanfield, J. H. (1999). Slipping through the front door: Relevant social science evaluation in the people of color century. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 415431. doi:10.1177/109821409902000301
  • Stufflebeam, D. (2001). Evaluation models. In G. T. Henry (Ed.), New Directions for Evaluation: No. 89. Evaluation models (pp. 798). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. doi:10.1002/ev.3
  • Yarbrough, D. B., Shulha, L. M., Hopson, R. K., & Caruthers, F. (2011). The program evaluation standards: A guide for evaluators and evaluation users (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.