SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alkin, M. C. (1991). Evaluation theory development II. In M. McLaughlin & D. Phillips (Eds.), Evaluation and education at quarter century (pp. 91112). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Azzam, T. (2010). Evaluator stakeholder responsiveness. American Journal of Evaluation, 31, 4565. doi:10.1177/1098214009354917
  • Barela, E. (2005, October). How school district evaluators make sense of their practice: A folk theory. Paper presented at the joint conference of the Canadian Evaluation Society and the American Evaluation Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago, IL: Rand-McNally.
  • Christie, C. A. (2003). Understanding evaluation theory and its role in guiding practice: Formal, folk, and otherwise. In C. A. Christie (Ed.), New Directions for Evaluation: No. 97. The practice–theory relationship in evaluation (pp. 9193). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. doi:10.1002/ev.79
  • Christie, C. A., & Rose, M. (2003). The language of evaluation theory: Insights gained from an empirical study of evaluation theory and practice. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 18, 3345.
  • Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Cronbach, L. J., & Associates (1980). Toward reform of program evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281302. doi:10.1037/h0040957
  • Fetterman, D. M. (2001). Foundations of empowerment evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Greene, J. C. (2001, November). Introduction to the panel on understanding evaluators’ practice decisions: The influence of theory, philosophy, values, experience, and individuality. Paper presented at the Annual AEA Conference, St. Louis, MO.
  • Gusfield, J. (1976). The literary rhetoric of science: Comedy and pathos in drinking driver research. American Sociological Review, 41, 1634. doi:10.2307/2094370
  • House, E. R. (1980). Evaluating with validity. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • House, E. R., & Howe, K. R. (1999). Values in evaluation and social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Keats, J. (1909). Ode on a Grecian Urn. In E. de Selincourt (Ed.), The poems of John Keats (pp. 194195). Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?id=h6I/AAAAYAAJ&dq=ode+on+a+grecian+urn+by+john+keats&lr=&source=gbs_navlinks_s (Original work published 1820)
  • Mertens, D. M. (2009). Transformative research and evaluation. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2010). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Rog, D. J., Fitzpatrick, J. L., & Conner, R. F. (Eds.). (2012). New Directions for Evaluation: No. 135. Context: A framework for its influence on evaluation practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Rossi, P. H., Freeman, H. E., & Wright, S. R. (1979). Evaluation: A systematic approach (1st ed.). London, UK: Sage.
  • Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Schön, D. A., & Rein, M. (1995). Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Scriven, M. (1972). Objectivity and subjectivity in educational research. In L. Thomas (Ed.), Philosophical redirection of educational research (71st Yearbook of the NSSE; pp. 94142). Chicago, IL: National Society for the Study of Education.
  • Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP model for evaluation: An improvement/accountability approach. In D. L. Stufflebeam & A. J. Shinkfield (Eds.), Evaluation theory, models, and applications (pp. 325366). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
  • Taut, S., & Alkin, M. (2003). Program staff perceptions of barriers to evaluation implementation. American Journal of Evaluation, 24, 213226. doi:10.1177/109821400302400205
  • Weiss, C. H. (1997). Evaluation: Methods for studying programs and policies (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.