SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Hrdy SB. 1986. Empathy, polyandry, and the myth of the coy female. In: BleierR, editor. Feminist approaches to science. New York: Pergamon Press. p 119146.
  • 2
    Gowaty PA. 2004. Sex roles, contests for the control of reproduction, and sexual selection. In: KappelerPM,van SchaikCP, editors. Sexual selection in primates: new and comparative perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 3754.
  • 3
    Gowaty PA. 1997. Sexual dialectics, sexual selection, and variation in reproductive behavior. In: GowatyPA, editor. Feminism and evolutionary biology. New York: Chapman and Hall. p 351384.
  • 4
    Birkhead TR. 2000. Promiscuity: an evolutionary history of sperm competition and sexual conflict. London: Faber & Faber.
  • 5
    Chapman T,Liddle LF,Kalb JM,Wolfner MF,Partridge L. 1995. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373: 241244.
  • 6
    Holland B,Rice WR. 1998. Perspective: chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52: 17.
  • 7
    Dawkins R. 2006. The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 8
    Stumpf RM,Martinez-Mota R,Milich KM,Righini N,Shattuck M. n.d. Sexual conflict: shifting paradigms and the role of biological anthropology. In revision.
  • 9
    Smuts B. 1992. Male aggression against women. Hum Nat 3: 144.
  • 10
    Friedl E. 1989. The women of Deh Koh: lives in an Iranian village. New York: Penguin Books.
  • 11
    Parker GA. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In: BlumMS,BlumNA, editors. Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. New York: Academic Press. p 123166.
  • 12
    Bateman AJ. 1948. Intrasexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2: 349368.
  • 13
    Trivers R. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In: CampbellB, editor. Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971. New York: Aldine de Gruyter. p 139179.
  • 14
    Parker GA. 1970. The reproductive behaviour and the nature of sexual selection in Scatophaga stercoraria L. IV. Epigamic recognition and competition between males for the possession of the females. Behaviour 37: 113139.
  • 15
    Small MF. 1993. Female choices: sexual behavior of female primates. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • 16
    Smuts BB,Smuts RW. 1993. Male aggression and sexual coercion of females in nonhuman primates and other mammals: evidence and theoretical implications. Adv Stud of Behav 22: 163.
  • 17
    WranghamRW,MullerMN, editors. 2009. Sexual coercion in primates and humans: an evolutionary perspective on male aggression against females. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • 18
    Arnqvist G,Rowe L. 2005. Sexual conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • 19
    Kokko H,Jennions MD. 2008. Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. J Evol Biol 21: 919948.
  • 20
    Clutton-Brock TH,Vincent ACJ. 1991. Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females. Nature 351: 5860.
  • 21
    Hosken DJ,Stockley P,Tregenza T,Wedell N. 2009. Monogamy and the battle of the sexes. Annu Rev Entomol 54: 361378.
  • 22
    Clutton-Brock TH,Parker GA. 1995. Sexual coercion in animal societies. Anim Behav 49: 13451365.
  • 23
    Hrdy S. 1997. Raising Darwin's concsciousness: female sexuality and the prehominid origins of patriarchy. Hum Nat 8: 149.
  • 24
    Kokko H,Jennions MD,Brooks R. 2006. Unifying and testing models of sexual selection. Annu Rev Ecol, Evol Syst 37: 4366.
  • 25
    Clutton-Brock T. 2007. Sexual selection in males and females. Science 318: 18821885.
  • 26
    Hauber ME,Lacey EA. 2005. Bateman's principle in cooperatively breeding vertebrates: the effects of non-breeding alloparents on variability in female and male reproductive success. Integr Comp Biol 49: 903914.
  • 27
    Bro-Jørgensen J. 2007. Reversed sexual conflict in a promiscuous antelope. Curr Biol 17: 21572161.
  • 28
    Kokko H,Jennions MD. 2008. Sexual conflict: the battle of the sexes reversed. Curr Biol 18: 121123.
  • 29
    Brown GR,Laland KN,Borgerhoff Mulder M. 2009. Bateman's principles and human sex roles. Trends Ecol and Evol 24: 297304.
  • 30
    Rowe L,Day T. 2006. Detecting sexual conflict and sexually antagonistic coevolution. Philos Trans R Soc London B 361: 277285.
  • 31
    Lavelle M. 1995. Natural-selection and developmental sexual variation in the human pelvis. Am J Phys Anthropol 98: 5972.
  • 32
    Rice WR,Chippindale AK. 2001. Intersexual ontogenetic conflict. J Evol Biol 14: 685693.
  • 33
    Arnqvist G,Rowe L. 2002. Antagonistic co-evolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature 415: 787789.
  • 34
    Kokko H,Brooks R,Jennions MD,Morley J. 2003. The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proc R Soc London B. 270: 653664.
  • 35
    Wilson M,Daly M,Scheib JE. 1997. Femicide: an evolutionary psychological perspective. In: GowatyPA, editor. Feminism and evolutionary biology. New York: Chapman Hall. p 431465.
  • 36
    Thornhill R,Thornhill NW. 1983. Human rape: an evolutionary analysis. Ethol Sociobiol 4: 137173.
  • 37
    Buss DM. 1998. Sexual strategies theory: historical origins and current status. J Sex Res 35: 1932.
  • 38
    Andrews PW,Gangestad S,Miller GF,Haselton MG,Thornhill R,Neale MC. 2008. Sex differences in detecting sexual infidelity. Hum Nat 19: 347373.
  • 39
    Gangestad SW,Thornhill R, Garver-Apgar CE. 2005. Adaptations to ovulation. In: BussDM, editor. The handbook of evolutionary psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. p 344371.
  • 40
    Schuster IMG. 1979. New women of Lusaka. Palo Alto: Mayfield Publishing.
  • 41
    Swidler A,Cott Watkins S. 2007. Ties of dependence: AIDS and transactional sex in rural Malawi. Studies in family planning 38: 147162.
  • 42
    Hill K,Hurtado AM. 1996. Aché life history: the ecology and demography of a foraging people. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
  • 43
    Beckerman S,Lizarralde R,Ballew C,Schroeder S,Fingelton C,Garrison A,Smith H. 1998. The Bari partible paternity project: preliminary results. Curr Anthropol 39: 164167.
  • 44
    Borgerhoff Mulder M. 2009. Serial monogamy as polygyny or polyandry? Marriage in the Tanzanian Pimbwe. Hum Nat 20: 130150.
  • 45
    Leonetti DL,Nath DC,Hemam NS. 2007. In-law conflict: women's reproductive lives and the roles of their mothers and husbands among the matrilineal Khasi. Curr Anthropol 48: 861890.
  • 46
    Betzig LL. 1986. Despotism and differential reproduction: a Darwinian view of history. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
  • 47
    Dickemann M. 1981. Paternal confidence and dowry competition. In: AlexanderRD,TinkleDW, editors. Natural selection and social behavior: recent research and new theory. New York: Chiron Press. p 417438.
  • 48
    Draper P. 1992. Room to maneuver: !Kung women cope with men. In: CountsD,BrownJK,CampbellJC, editors. Sanctions and sanctuary: cultural perspectives on the beating of wives. Boulder, CO: Westview. p 4361.
  • 49
    Levinson D. 1989. Family violence in cross-cultural perspective. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • 50
    Bergstrom CT,Real LA. 2000. Towards a theory of mutual mate choice: lessons from two-sided matching. Evol Ecol Res 2: 493508.
  • 51
    Maynard Smith J,Harper D. 2003. Animal signals. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • 52
    Hill GE. 1994. Trait elaboration via adaptive mate choice: sexual conflict in the evolution of signals of male quality. Ethol Ecol Evol 6: 351370.
  • 53
    Strassman BI. 1996. Menstrual hut visits by Dogon women: a hormonal test distinguishes deceit from honest signaling. Behav Ecol 7: 304315.
  • 54
    Andrejevic M. 2005. The work of watching one another: lateral surveillance, risk, and governance. Surveillance Soc 2: 479497.
  • 55
    Candolin U. 2003. The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biol Rev 78: 575595.
  • 56
    Penn DJ,Potts WK. 1999. The evolution of mating preferences and major histocompatibility complex genes. Am Nat 153: 145164.
  • 57
    Tooke W,Camire L. 1991. Patterns of deception in intersexual and intrasexual mating strategies. Ethol Sociobiol 12: 345364.
  • 58
    Keenan JP,Gallup GGJ,Goulet N,Kulkarni M. 1997. Attributions of deception in human mating strategies. J Soc Behav and Personality 12: 4552.
  • 59
    Buss D. 1989. Sex differences in human mate preferences. Brain Behav Sci 12: 149.
  • 60
    Gillespie DOS,Russell AF,Lummaa V. 2008. When fecundity does not equal fitness: evidence of an offspring quantity versus quality trade-off in pre-industrial humans. Proc Trans R London B. 275: 713722.
  • 61
    Skinner GW. 1997. Family systems and demographic processes. In: KertzerDI,FrickeT, editors. Anthropological demography: toward a new synthesis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p 5395.
  • 62
    Penn DJ,Smith KR. 2007. Differential fitness costs of reproduction between the sexes. Proc Nat Aca Sci USA 104: 553558.
  • 63
    Mason KO,Taj AM. 1987. Differences between women's and men's reproductive goals in developing countries. Popul Dev Rev 13: 611638.
  • 64
    Voas D. 2003. Conflicting preferences: a reason fertility tends to be too high or too low. Popul Dev Rev 29: 627646.
  • 65
    Grundy E,Tomassini C. 2008. Fatherhood history and later life health and mortality in England and Wales: a record linkage study. SBS.
  • 66
    Smith HG,Hardling R. 2000. Clutch size evolution under sexual conflict enhances the stability of mating systems. Proc R Soc London B 267: 21632170.
  • 67
    WestneatDF,ShermanPW,MortonML, editors. 1990. The ecology and evolution of extra-pair copulations in birds. New York: Plenum Press.
  • 68
    Nettle D. 2008. Why do some dads get more involved than others? Evidence from a large British cohort. Evol Hum Behav 29: 416423.
  • 69
    Gowaty PA,Anderson WW,Bluhm CK,Drickamer LC,Kim Y-K. 2007. The hypothesis of reproductive compensation and its assumptions about mate preferences and offspring viability. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 104: 1502315027.
  • 70
    Cain M,Khanam SR,Nahar S. 1979. Class, patriarchy and women's work in Bangladesh. Popul Dev Rev 5: 405438.
  • 71
    Safilios-Rothschild C. 1982. Female power, autonomy and demographic change in the third world. In: AnkerR,BuvinikM,YoussefNH, editors. Women's roles and population trends in the third world. London: Croom Helm. p 117132.
  • 72
    Sear R,Mace R,McGreggor I. 2003. The effects of kin of female fertility in rural Gambia. Evol Hum Behav 24: 2542.
  • 73
    Leonetti DL,Nath DC,Hemam NS,Neill DB. 2004. Do women really need marital partners for support of their reproductive success? The case of the matrilineal Khasi of N.E. India. In: AlvardMS, editor. Socioeconomic aspects of human behavioral ecology. Amsterdam: Elsevier. p 147170.
  • 74
    Borgerhoff Mulder M. 2007. Hamilton's rule and kin competition: the Kipsigis case. Evol Hum Behav 28: 299312.
  • 75
    Becker GS. 1981. A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
  • 76
    Murdock GP. 1949. Social structure. New York: Free Press.
  • 77
    Washburn SI,Lancaster CS. 1968. The evolution of hunting. In: LeeRD,DeVoreI, editors. Man the hunter. Chicago: Aldine de Gruyter. p 293303.
  • 78
    Fisher HE. 1989. Evolution of human serial pairbonding. Am J Phys Anthropol 78: 331354.
  • 79
    Sellen DW,Borgerhoff Mulder M,Sieff DF. 2000. Fertility, offspring quality, and wealth in Datoga pastoralists. In: CronkL,ChagnonN,IronsW, editors. Adaptation and human behavior: an anthropological perspective. New York: Aldine de Gruyter. p 91114.
  • 80
    Betzig L. 1989. Causes of conjugal dissolution: a cross-cultural study. Curr Anthropol 30: 654676.
  • 81
    Buckle L,Gallup GG,Rodd ZA. 1996. Marriage as a reproductive contract: patterns of marriage, divorce, and remarriage. Ethol Sociobiol 17: 363377.
  • 82
    Manser M,Brown M. 1980. Marriage and household decisionmaking: a bargaining analysis. Int Econ Rev 21: 3144.
  • 83
    Lundberg S,Pollak RA. 1996. Bargaining and distribution in marriage. J Econ Perspect 10: 139158.
  • 84
    Lehrer EL. 2003. The economics of divorce. In: Grossbard-ShechtmanSA, editor. Marriage and the economy: theory and evidence from advanced industrial society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 5574.
  • 85
    Jones JH,Ferguson B. 2009. Demographic and social predictors of intimate partner violence in Colombia: a dyadic power perspective. Hum Nat 20: 184203.
  • 86
    McNamara JM,Forslund P,Lang A. 1999. An ESS model for divorce strategies in birds. Philos Trans R Soc London B 354: 223236.
  • 87
    Hawkes K. 1991. Showing off: tests of an hypothesis about men's foraging goals. Ethol and Sociobiol 12: 2954.
  • 88
    Smith EA,Bird RB,Bird DW. 2003. The benefits of costly signaling: Meriam turtle hunters. Behav Ecol 14: 116126.
  • 89
    Anderson KG,Kaplan H,Lancaster J. 1999. Paternal care by genetic fathers and stepfathers I: reports from Albuquerque men. Evol Hum Behav 20: 405431.
  • 90
    Marlowe F. 1999. Showoffs or providers? The parenting effort of Hadza men. Evol Hum Behav 20: 391404.
  • 91
    Smith EA. 2004. Why do good hunters have higher reproductive success? Hum Nat 15: 343364.
  • 92
    Grossbard-Shechtman S. 1993. On the economics of marriage. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • 93
    Wooley F. 2003. Control over money in marriage. In: Grossbard-ShechtmanSA, editor. Marriage and the economy: theory and evidence from advanced industrial society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 105128.
  • 94
    Haddad L,Hoddinott J,Alderman H. 1997. Intrahousehold resource allocation in developing countries: models methods and policy. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
  • 95
    Quinlan RJ,Quinlan MB. 2007. Evolutionary ecology of human pair-bonds: cross-cultural tests of alternative hypotheses. Cross-Cultural Res 49: 149169.
  • 96
    Pollet TV,Nettle D. 2007. Driving a hard bargain: sex ratio and male marriage success in a historical U.S. population. Biol Lett 4: 3133.
  • 97
    Blurton Jones NG,Marlowe FW,Hawkes K,O'Connell JF. 2000. Paternal investment and hunter-gatherer divorce rates. In: CronkL,ChagnonN,IronsW, editors. Adaptation and human behavior: an anthropological perspective. New York: Aldine de Gruyter. p 6990.
  • 98
    Winking J,Kaplan H,Gurven M,Rucas S. 2007. Why do men marry and why do theystray? Proc R Soc London B 274: 16431644.
  • 99
    Gurven M,Winking J,Kaplan H,Von Rueden C,McAllister L. 2009. A bargaining approach to marriage and the sexual division of labor. Hum Nat 20: 151183.
  • 100
    Clutton-Brock T. 2009. Sexual selection in females. Anim Behav 77: 311.
  • 101
    Borgerhoff Mulder M. 1990. Kipsigis women's preferences for wealthy men: evidence for female choice in mammals. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27: 255264.
  • 102
    Strassmann BI. 2003. Social monogamy in a human society: marriage and reproductive success among the Dogon. In: ReichardUH,BoeschC, editors. Monogamy: mating strategies and partnerships in birds, humans and other mammals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 177189.
  • 103
    Searcy JWA,Yasukawa K. 1989. Alternative models of territorial polygyny in birds. Am Nat 134: 323343.
  • 104
    Chisholm JS,Burbank VK. 1991. Monogamy and polygyny in Southeast Arnhem Land: Male coercion and female choice. Ethol Sociobiol 12: 291313.
  • 105
    Cordero C,Eberhard WG. 2003. Female choice of sexually antagonistic male adaptations: a critical review of some current research. J Evol Biol 16: 16.
  • 106
    Head ML,Hunt J,Jennions MD,Brooks R. 2005. The indirect costs of mating outweigh the direct costs. PLoS Biol 3: 02890294.
  • 107
    Gavrilets S,Arnqvist G,Friberg U. 2001. The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict. Proc R Soc London B 268: 531539.
  • 108
    Bird R. 1999. Cooperation and conflict: the behavioral ecology of the sexual division of labor. Evol Anthropol 8: 6575.
  • 109
    BirkheadTR,MollerAP, editors. 1998. Sperm competition and sexual selection. London: Academic Press.
  • 110
    Jennions MD,Petrie M. 2000. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev 75: 2164.
  • 111
    Eberhard WG. 1996. Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • 112
    Baker RR,Bellis MA. 1995. Human sperm competition. London: Chapman & Hall.
  • 113
    Thornhill R,Gangestad SW,Comer R. 1995. Human female orgasm and mate fluctuating asymmetry. Anim Behav 50: 16011615.
  • 114
    Shackelford TK,Weekes-Shackelford VA,LeBlanc GJ,Bleske AL,Euler HA,Hoier S. 2000. Female coital orgasm and male attractiveness. Hum Nat 11: 299306.
  • 115
    Pound N,Daly M. 2000. Functional significance of human female orgasm still hypothetical. Behav Brain Sci 23: 620621.
  • 116
    Short RV. 1981. Sexual selection in man and the great apes. In: GrahamCE, editor. Reproductive biology of the great apes. New York: Academic Press. p 319341.
  • 117
    Gallup GG,Burch RL,Zappieri ML,Parvez RA,Stockwell ML,Davis JA. 2003. The human penis as a semen displacement device. Evol Hum Behav 24: 277289.
  • 118
    Shackelford TK,Goetz AT. 2006. Comparative evolutionary psychology of sperm competition. J Com Psychol 120: 139146.
  • 119
    Dingwall EJ. 1959. The girdle of chastity. New York: The Clarion Press.
  • 120
    Reason LL. 2004. The behavioral ecology of female genital cutting in northern Ghana. Res Econ Anthropol 23: 175202.
  • 121
    Borgerhoff Mulder M. 2009. Tradeoffs and sexual conflict over women's fertility preferences in Mpimbwe. Am J Hum Biol 21: 478487.