Presented at the 1st CARISMA Conference, Progress MEA 2008, La Grande Motte, France, Oct. 2008
Original Research Paper
Magnetotomography and Electric Currents in a Fuel Cell†
Article first published online: 23 JUL 2009
DOI: 10.1002/fuce.200800139
Copyright © 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Issue
1615-6854/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=121463b26a6c8f43c1bd5d410b4c1349fc5d76b6)
Fuel Cells
Special Issue: Progress in MEA Components for Medium and High Temperature Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells (La Grande Motte, September 2008)
Volume 9, Issue 4, pages 474–481, August, 2009
Additional Information
How to Cite
Lustfeld, H., Reißel, M. and Steffen, B. (2009), Magnetotomography and Electric Currents in a Fuel Cell. Fuel Cells, 9: 474–481. doi: 10.1002/fuce.200800139
- †
Publication History
- Issue published online: 7 AUG 2009
- Article first published online: 23 JUL 2009
- Manuscript Accepted: 21 JUN 2009
- Manuscript Received: 31 OCT 2008
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- Current Density Distribution;
- DMFC;
- Fuel Cell;
- Magnetic Field Measurement;
- MEA;
- PEFC;
- PEMFC;
- Tomography
Abstract
Magnetotomography, applied to fuel cells, gives rise to several questions: first, how well can the electric current density in the fuel cell be reconstructed by measuring its external magnetic field? It is quite clear that the connection between magnetic field and current alone will lead to ambiguous results. Two further relations lead to unique reconstruction: the continuity equation and Ohm's law. Second, application of Ohm's law in the membrane electrode assembly (MEA) of a fuel cell – is it not a questionable procedure? We show that in the MEA Ohm's law is not needed, when applying a rather mild approximation, we call it the ‘thin MEA approximation'. The advantage of this is the linear relation between magnetic field and electric current density, not only in the neighbourhood of the operating point but over the whole range. Third, can a functional connection be derived between resolution of the current density and the precision requirements of the measurement devices? We present a procedure leading to a unique relation between the two. This procedure can be extended to finding the optimum measuring positions, thus essentially decreasing the number of measuring points, and thus the time scale of measurable dynamical disturbances, all this without a loss of fine resolution. We present explicit numerical results for two geometries, typical for DMFC and PEMFC fuel cells.

1615-6854/asset/2293_left.gif?v=1&s=092044d3e445f312267161816715241a58c0002f)
1615-6854/asset/2293_centre.gif?v=1&s=9318948bd385307ac9bad27e3da4e412f6c43edb)