The author wishes to thank Robert I. Webb (the editor) and an anonymous referee for very helpful comments, as well as Charles Bartlett from SIFMA for providing part of the data. Financial support from Citi Foundation is gratefully acknowledged.
Cash trading and index futures price volatility†
Article first published online: 20 JUL 2010
© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Journal of Futures Markets
Volume 31, Issue 5, pages 465–486, May 2011
How to Cite
Li, J. (2011), Cash trading and index futures price volatility. J. Fut. Mark., 31: 465–486. doi: 10.1002/fut.20478
- Issue published online: 1 MAR 2011
- Article first published online: 20 JUL 2010
- Manuscript Accepted: JUN 2010
- Manuscript Received: JUL 2009
This study examines the effect of cash market liquidity on the volatility of stock index futures. Two facets of cash market liquidity are considered: (1) the level of liquidity trading proxied by the expected New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) trading volume and (2) the noise composition of trading proxied by the average NYSE trading commission cost. Under the framework of spline–GARCH with a liquidity component, both the quarterly average commission cost and the quarterly expected NYSE volume are negatively associated with the ex ante daily volatility of S&P 500 and NYSE composite index futures. Conversely, liquidity and noise trading in the cash market both dampen futures price volatility, ceteris paribus. This negative association between secular cash trading liquidity and daily futures price volatility is amplified during times of market crisis. These results retain statistical significance and materiality after controlling for bid–ask bounce of futures prices and volume of traded futures contracts. This study establishes empirical evidence to affirm the conventional prediction of a liquidity–volatility relationship: the liquidity effect is secular and persistent across markets. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 31:465–486, 2011