Disclaimer: Supplementary materials have been peer-reviewed but not copyedited.


Table S1. Comparison of PRIMUS and other methods on publicly available datasets. Table contains the total number of samples (including related individuals) for each cohort and the sizes of the unrelated sets produced by each method. The HapMap 3 cohort is also separated by population. IBD estimates were generated in PLINK and a pair of individuals was determined to be related if the coefficient of relatedness inline image > = 0.1. In datasets with limited relatedness like the HapMap, all the approaches work well

Figure S1. Heatmaps comparing PRIMUS and three other methods on simulated data.

Figure S2. Heatmaps comparing PRIMUS and three other methods on simulation data when using the binary weighting functions.

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.