Research Article
Measuring primary care patients' attitudes about dementia screening
Article first published online: 30 JAN 2008
DOI: 10.1002/gps.1983
Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Additional Information
How to Cite
Boustani, M., Perkins, A. J., Monahan, P., Fox, C., Watson, L., Hopkins, J., Fultz, B., Hui, S., Unverzagt, F. W., Callahan, C. M. and Hendrie, H. C. (2008), Measuring primary care patients' attitudes about dementia screening. Int. J. Geriat. Psychiatry, 23: 812–820. doi: 10.1002/gps.1983
Publication History
- Issue published online: 24 JUL 2008
- Article first published online: 30 JAN 2008
- Manuscript Accepted: 3 DEC 2007
- Manuscript Received: 21 MAY 2007
Funded by
- National Institute on Aging, the Program on Aging at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the Foundation of Hope. Grant Numbers: P30AG024967, R01AG029884-01
- Paul B. Beeson K23 Career Development Award. Grant Number: 1-K23-AG026770-01
- American Federation for Aging Research, Medical Student Summer Research Training in Aging Scholarship
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- dementia;
- screening;
- attitudes;
- harms
Abstract
Objectives
To develop a questionnaire that will capture patients' attitudes about dementia screening in primary care.
Methods
Cross-sectional study of 315 patients aged 65 and older attending urban and rural primary care clinics in Indianapolis and North Carolina. The Perceptions Regarding Investigational Screening for Memory in Primary Care (PRISM-PC) questionnaire was administered via face-to-face or telephone interview.
Results
The PRISM-PC questionnaire consists of two separate scales: the patient's acceptance of dementia screening scale and the patient's perceived harms and benefits of dementia screening scale. The face validity of the PRISM-PC questionnaire was based on a systematic literature review and the opinions of 16 clinician-investigators with experience in screening for dementia. Exploratory factor analyses for the acceptance scale revealed the presence of two dimensions: knowledge about dementia risk and testing for dementia. For the benefits and harms scale, exploratory factor analyses identified four dimensions: perceived benefits of screening, stigma of screening, suffering from screening, and impact of screening on patients' independence. The internal consistency of each of the above subscales was good with Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.58–0.85.
Conclusion
The PRISM-PC questionnaire captures primary care patients' acceptance, perceived harms, and perceived benefits of dementia screening. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

1099-1166/asset/GPS_left.gif?v=1&s=e98f79f06171f7a5ce63cdd2b50f2949aefc3c24)
1099-1166/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=55acde8f9222d0a98fe4dff78b1dce69edd182d8)