• Please log in or register to access this feature.

Hastings Center Report

Copyright © 2013 The Hastings Center

Cover image for Hastings Center Report

January-February 2011

Volume 41, Issue 1

Pages i–i, 2–53

  1. Field Notes

    1. Top of page
    2. Field Notes
    3. From the Editor
    4. Another Voice
    5. Letter
    6. In Practice
    7. Policy and Politics
    8. Case Study
    9. Commentary
    10. Essay
    11. Original Article
    12. Review
    13. Contributors
    14. Perspective
    1. Field notes (page i)

      Jacob Moses

      Article first published online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-146X.2011.tb00081.x

  2. From the Editor

    1. Top of page
    2. Field Notes
    3. From the Editor
    4. Another Voice
    5. Letter
    6. In Practice
    7. Policy and Politics
    8. Case Study
    9. Commentary
    10. Essay
    11. Original Article
    12. Review
    13. Contributors
    14. Perspective
    1. Legal Commentary Society (page 2)

      Article first published online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-146X.2011.tb00082.x

  3. Another Voice

    1. Top of page
    2. Field Notes
    3. From the Editor
    4. Another Voice
    5. Letter
    6. In Practice
    7. Policy and Politics
    8. Case Study
    9. Commentary
    10. Essay
    11. Original Article
    12. Review
    13. Contributors
    14. Perspective
    1. Should We Retire Derek Parfit? (page 3)

      RONALD M. GREEN

      Article first published online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-146X.2011.tb00083.x

  4. Letter

    1. Top of page
    2. Field Notes
    3. From the Editor
    4. Another Voice
    5. Letter
    6. In Practice
    7. Policy and Politics
    8. Case Study
    9. Commentary
    10. Essay
    11. Original Article
    12. Review
    13. Contributors
    14. Perspective
    1. To “Sleep Until Death” (pages 4–6)

      Blair Henry, Mervyn Dean, Victor Cellarius, Larry Librach and Doreen Oneschuk

      Article first published online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-146X.2011.tb00084.x

    2. Jeffrey T. Berger replies (pages 4–5)

      Article first published online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-146X.2011.tb00085.x

    3. Rights vs. Liberty (page 5)

      Maxwell J. Smith

      Article first published online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-146X.2011.tb00086.x

    4. David Orentlicher replies (pages 5–6)

      Article first published online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-146X.2011.tb00087.x

  5. In Practice

    1. Top of page
    2. Field Notes
    3. From the Editor
    4. Another Voice
    5. Letter
    6. In Practice
    7. Policy and Politics
    8. Case Study
    9. Commentary
    10. Essay
    11. Original Article
    12. Review
    13. Contributors
    14. Perspective
    1. The Ghost Print (pages 7–8)

      Mark Gindi

      Article first published online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-146X.2011.tb00088.x

  6. Policy and Politics

    1. Top of page
    2. Field Notes
    3. From the Editor
    4. Another Voice
    5. Letter
    6. In Practice
    7. Policy and Politics
    8. Case Study
    9. Commentary
    10. Essay
    11. Original Article
    12. Review
    13. Contributors
    14. Perspective
    1. The Sausage-Making of Insurance Reform (pages 9–10)

      Mark A. Hall

      Article first published online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-146X.2011.tb00089.x

  7. Case Study

    1. Top of page
    2. Field Notes
    3. From the Editor
    4. Another Voice
    5. Letter
    6. In Practice
    7. Policy and Politics
    8. Case Study
    9. Commentary
    10. Essay
    11. Original Article
    12. Review
    13. Contributors
    14. Perspective
    1. Conjectural Mixed Motives (page 11)

      Article first published online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-146X.2011.tb00090.x

  8. Commentary

    1. Top of page
    2. Field Notes
    3. From the Editor
    4. Another Voice
    5. Letter
    6. In Practice
    7. Policy and Politics
    8. Case Study
    9. Commentary
    10. Essay
    11. Original Article
    12. Review
    13. Contributors
    14. Perspective
    1. Commentary (pages 11–12)

      Matthew DeCamp

      Article first published online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-146X.2011.tb00091.x

    2. Commentary (page 12)

      Jennifer K. Walter and Susan Dorr Goold

      Article first published online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-146X.2011.tb00092.x

  9. Essay

    1. Top of page
    2. Field Notes
    3. From the Editor
    4. Another Voice
    5. Letter
    6. In Practice
    7. Policy and Politics
    8. Case Study
    9. Commentary
    10. Essay
    11. Original Article
    12. Review
    13. Contributors
    14. Perspective
    1. Fable Hospital 2.0: The Business Case for Building Better Health Care Facilities (pages 13–23)

      BLAIR L. SADLER, LEONARD L. BERRY, ROBIN GUENTHER, D. KIRK HAMILTON, FREDERICK A. HESSLER, CLAYTON MERRITT and DEREK PARKER

      Article first published online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-146X.2011.tb00093.x

    2. Case Study: Dublin Methodist Hospital (pages 23–24)

      CHERYL HERBERT

      Article first published online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-146X.2011.tb00094.x

    3. Case Study: Sacred Heart Medical Center (pages 25–26)

      ALAN YORDY

      Article first published online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-146X.2011.tb00095.x

    4. Values Engineering: The Ethics of Design in Community Health Centers (pages 27–28)

      BENJAMIN BOLTINd and NANCY BERLINGER

      Article first published online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-146X.2011.tb00096.x

    5. A Third Seat at the Table: An Insider's Perspective on Patient Representatives (pages 29–31)

      DUANE ROTH

      Article first published online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-146X.2011.tb00097.x

  10. Original Article

    1. Top of page
    2. Field Notes
    3. From the Editor
    4. Another Voice
    5. Letter
    6. In Practice
    7. Policy and Politics
    8. Case Study
    9. Commentary
    10. Essay
    11. Original Article
    12. Review
    13. Contributors
    14. Perspective
    1. A Not-So-New Eugenics : Harris and Savulescu on Human Enhancement (pages 32–42)

      ROBERT SPARROW

      Article first published online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-146X.2011.tb00098.x

    2. REPROGENETICS and the “Parents Have Always Done It” Argument (pages 43–49)

      ERIK MALMQVIST

      Article first published online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-146X.2011.tb00099.x

  11. Review

    1. Top of page
    2. Field Notes
    3. From the Editor
    4. Another Voice
    5. Letter
    6. In Practice
    7. Policy and Politics
    8. Case Study
    9. Commentary
    10. Essay
    11. Original Article
    12. Review
    13. Contributors
    14. Perspective
    1. Nothing's Settled (pages 50–51)

      Sandra H. Johnson

      Article first published online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-146X.2011.tb00100.x

  12. Contributors

    1. Top of page
    2. Field Notes
    3. From the Editor
    4. Another Voice
    5. Letter
    6. In Practice
    7. Policy and Politics
    8. Case Study
    9. Commentary
    10. Essay
    11. Original Article
    12. Review
    13. Contributors
    14. Perspective
    1. Contributors (page 52)

      Article first published online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-146X.2011.tb00101.x

  13. Perspective

    1. Top of page
    2. Field Notes
    3. From the Editor
    4. Another Voice
    5. Letter
    6. In Practice
    7. Policy and Politics
    8. Case Study
    9. Commentary
    10. Essay
    11. Original Article
    12. Review
    13. Contributors
    14. Perspective
    1. The “Real-Life” Death Panel, Reformed (page 53)

      STEPHEN R. LATHAM

      Article first published online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-146X.2011.tb00102.x

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION