Hastings Center Report

Cover image for Hastings Center Report

March-April 2011

Volume 41, Issue 2

Pages i–i, 2–49

  1. Field Notes

    1. Top of page
    2. Field Notes
    3. From the Editor
    4. Another Voice
    5. Letter
    6. In Practice
    7. At Law
    8. Policy and Politics
    9. Case Study
    10. Commentary
    11. Essay
    12. Questioning the Quantitative Imperative
    13. Viewing Research Participation as a Moral Obligation
    14. Contributors
    15. Perspective
    1. field notes (page i)

      Daniel Callahan

      Version of Record online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1353/hcr.2011.0034

  2. From the Editor

    1. Top of page
    2. Field Notes
    3. From the Editor
    4. Another Voice
    5. Letter
    6. In Practice
    7. At Law
    8. Policy and Politics
    9. Case Study
    10. Commentary
    11. Essay
    12. Questioning the Quantitative Imperative
    13. Viewing Research Participation as a Moral Obligation
    14. Contributors
    15. Perspective
    1. Psychiatry and Values (page 2)

      Version of Record online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1353/hcr.2011.0028

  3. Another Voice

    1. Top of page
    2. Field Notes
    3. From the Editor
    4. Another Voice
    5. Letter
    6. In Practice
    7. At Law
    8. Policy and Politics
    9. Case Study
    10. Commentary
    11. Essay
    12. Questioning the Quantitative Imperative
    13. Viewing Research Participation as a Moral Obligation
    14. Contributors
    15. Perspective
    1. The Experimental Imperative (page 3)

      PETER A. UBEL

      Version of Record online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1353/hcr.2011.0035

  4. Letter

    1. Top of page
    2. Field Notes
    3. From the Editor
    4. Another Voice
    5. Letter
    6. In Practice
    7. At Law
    8. Policy and Politics
    9. Case Study
    10. Commentary
    11. Essay
    12. Questioning the Quantitative Imperative
    13. Viewing Research Participation as a Moral Obligation
    14. Contributors
    15. Perspective
    1. The Not-So-Tell-Tale Heart (pages 4–5)

      Robert M. Veatch

      Version of Record online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1353/hcr.2011.0030

    2. To the Editor (pages 5–7)

      Michael DeVita

      Version of Record online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1353/hcr.2011.0040

    3. To the Editor (page 7)

      Tom Tomlinson

      Version of Record online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1353/hcr.2011.0041

    4. To the Editor (pages 7–8)

      David Rodríguez-Arias

      Version of Record online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1353/hcr.2011.0042

    5. To the Editor (page 8)

      Robert A. DeWeese

      Version of Record online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1353/hcr.2011.0043

    6. To the Editor (pages 8–9)

      Patrick Lee and Robert P. George

      Version of Record online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1353/hcr.2011.0044

    7. Don Marquis replies (pages 9–11)

      Version of Record online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1353/hcr.2011.0038

    8. Don Marquis replies (page 11)

      Jeffrey M. Sconyers

      Version of Record online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1353/hcr.2011.0046

  5. In Practice

    1. Top of page
    2. Field Notes
    3. From the Editor
    4. Another Voice
    5. Letter
    6. In Practice
    7. At Law
    8. Policy and Politics
    9. Case Study
    10. Commentary
    11. Essay
    12. Questioning the Quantitative Imperative
    13. Viewing Research Participation as a Moral Obligation
    14. Contributors
    15. Perspective
    1. Cynicism, with Consequences (pages 12–13)

      Diane M. Plantz

      Version of Record online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1353/hcr.2011.0023

  6. At Law

    1. Top of page
    2. Field Notes
    3. From the Editor
    4. Another Voice
    5. Letter
    6. In Practice
    7. At Law
    8. Policy and Politics
    9. Case Study
    10. Commentary
    11. Essay
    12. Questioning the Quantitative Imperative
    13. Viewing Research Participation as a Moral Obligation
    14. Contributors
    15. Perspective
  7. Policy and Politics

    1. Top of page
    2. Field Notes
    3. From the Editor
    4. Another Voice
    5. Letter
    6. In Practice
    7. At Law
    8. Policy and Politics
    9. Case Study
    10. Commentary
    11. Essay
    12. Questioning the Quantitative Imperative
    13. Viewing Research Participation as a Moral Obligation
    14. Contributors
    15. Perspective
    1. Dishonesty, Ignorance, or What? (pages 16–17)

      Paul T. Menzel

      Version of Record online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1353/hcr.2011.0033

  8. Case Study

    1. Top of page
    2. Field Notes
    3. From the Editor
    4. Another Voice
    5. Letter
    6. In Practice
    7. At Law
    8. Policy and Politics
    9. Case Study
    10. Commentary
    11. Essay
    12. Questioning the Quantitative Imperative
    13. Viewing Research Participation as a Moral Obligation
    14. Contributors
    15. Perspective
    1. Devotion or Disease? (page 18)

      Version of Record online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1353/hcr.2011.0022

  9. Commentary

    1. Top of page
    2. Field Notes
    3. From the Editor
    4. Another Voice
    5. Letter
    6. In Practice
    7. At Law
    8. Policy and Politics
    9. Case Study
    10. Commentary
    11. Essay
    12. Questioning the Quantitative Imperative
    13. Viewing Research Participation as a Moral Obligation
    14. Contributors
    15. Perspective
    1. Commentary (page 18)

      Catherine Hickey

      Version of Record online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1353/hcr.2011.0037

    2. commentary (page 19)

      Adrienne M. Martin

      Version of Record online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1353/hcr.2011.0039

  10. Essay

    1. Top of page
    2. Field Notes
    3. From the Editor
    4. Another Voice
    5. Letter
    6. In Practice
    7. At Law
    8. Policy and Politics
    9. Case Study
    10. Commentary
    11. Essay
    12. Questioning the Quantitative Imperative
    13. Viewing Research Participation as a Moral Obligation
    14. Contributors
    15. Perspective
    1. Can We Mandate Compassion (pages 20–23)

      RON PATERSON

      Version of Record online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1353/hcr.2011.0036

    2. Rationing: Theory, Politics, and Passions (pages 23–27)

      DANIEL CALLAHAN

      Version of Record online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1353/hcr.2011.0031

    3. Making Sense of the Roman Catholic Directive to Extend Life Indefinitely (pages 28–29)

      LYDIA S. DUGDALE and AUTUMN ALCOTT RIDENOUR

      Version of Record online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1353/hcr.2011.0058

  11. Questioning the Quantitative Imperative

    1. Top of page
    2. Field Notes
    3. From the Editor
    4. Another Voice
    5. Letter
    6. In Practice
    7. At Law
    8. Policy and Politics
    9. Case Study
    10. Commentary
    11. Essay
    12. Questioning the Quantitative Imperative
    13. Viewing Research Participation as a Moral Obligation
    14. Contributors
    15. Perspective
  12. Viewing Research Participation as a Moral Obligation

    1. Top of page
    2. Field Notes
    3. From the Editor
    4. Another Voice
    5. Letter
    6. In Practice
    7. At Law
    8. Policy and Politics
    9. Case Study
    10. Commentary
    11. Essay
    12. Questioning the Quantitative Imperative
    13. Viewing Research Participation as a Moral Obligation
    14. Contributors
    15. Perspective
    1. In Whose Interests? (pages 40–47)

      STUART RENNIE

      Version of Record online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1353/hcr.2011.0025

  13. Contributors

    1. Top of page
    2. Field Notes
    3. From the Editor
    4. Another Voice
    5. Letter
    6. In Practice
    7. At Law
    8. Policy and Politics
    9. Case Study
    10. Commentary
    11. Essay
    12. Questioning the Quantitative Imperative
    13. Viewing Research Participation as a Moral Obligation
    14. Contributors
    15. Perspective
    1. Contributors (page 48)

      Version of Record online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1353/hcr.2011.0024

  14. Perspective

    1. Top of page
    2. Field Notes
    3. From the Editor
    4. Another Voice
    5. Letter
    6. In Practice
    7. At Law
    8. Policy and Politics
    9. Case Study
    10. Commentary
    11. Essay
    12. Questioning the Quantitative Imperative
    13. Viewing Research Participation as a Moral Obligation
    14. Contributors
    15. Perspective
    1. Becoming “Difficult” (page 49)

      NAALLA SCHREIBER

      Version of Record online: 8 FEB 2012 | DOI: 10.1353/hcr.2011.0027

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION