Vardit Ravitsky, “Conceived and Deceived: The Medical Interests of Donor-Conceived Individuals,”
Conceived and Deceived: The Medical Interests of Donor-Conceived Individuals
Article first published online: 13 JAN 2012
© 2012 by The Hastings Center
Hastings Center Report
Volume 42, Issue 1, pages 17–22, January-February 2012
How to Cite
RAVITSKY, V. (2012), Conceived and Deceived: The Medical Interests of Donor-Conceived Individuals. Hastings Center Report, 42: 17–22. doi: 10.1002/hast.9
- Issue published online: 13 JAN 2012
- Article first published online: 13 JAN 2012
Effective July 22, 2011, a new law in the state of Washington requires any donor of sperm or eggs to provide a medical history and identifying information to fertility clinics. It also allows donor-conceived individuals to request this information from clinics once they reach the age of eighteen. This is a significant legislative milestone and a promising development in a country that has consistently shied away from regulating the infertility industry in any way.
What do we as a society owe donor-conceived individuals in terms of obtaining access to information about their genetic origins? This essay addresses just one of this set of issues: the regulatory changes required to address the medical interests of donor-conceived individuals, regardless of whether a human right to know one's genetic origins is acknowledged.