Technical Report
Discrete dynamic Bayesian network analysis of fMRI data
Article first published online: 7 NOV 2007
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20490
Copyright © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Additional Information
How to Cite
Burge, J., Lane, T., Link, H., Qiu, S. and Clark, V. P. (2009), Discrete dynamic Bayesian network analysis of fMRI data. Human Brain Mapping, 30: 122–137. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20490
Publication History
- Issue published online: 22 DEC 2008
- Article first published online: 7 NOV 2007
- Manuscript Accepted: 27 AUG 2007
- Manuscript Revised: 14 AUG 2007
- Manuscript Received: 27 MAY 2006
Funded by
- National Institute of Drug Abuse, NIH. Grant Number: 1R01DA12852
- National Institute of Mental Health, NSF/NIH. Grant Number: 1R01MH076282
- The MIND Institute. Grant Number: DE-FG02-99ER62764
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- Bayesian networks;
- dementia;
- nonlinear analysis;
- functional connectivity;
- Talairach atlas;
- amygdala
Abstract
We examine the efficacy of using discrete Dynamic Bayesian Networks (dDBNs), a data-driven modeling technique employed in machine learning, to identify functional correlations among neuroanatomical regions of interest. Unlike many neuroimaging analysis techniques, this method is not limited by linear and/or Gaussian noise assumptions. It achieves this by modeling the time series of neuroanatomical regions as discrete, as opposed to continuous, random variables with multinomial distributions. We demonstrated this method using an fMRI dataset collected from healthy and demented elderly subjects (Buckner, et al., 2000: J Cogn Neurosci 12:24-34) and identify correlates based on a diagnosis of dementia. The results are validated in three ways. First, the elicited correlates are shown to be robust over leave-one-out cross-validation and, via a Fourier bootstrapping method, that they were not likely due to random chance. Second, the dDBNs identified correlates that would be expected given the experimental paradigm. Third, the dDBN's ability to predict dementia is competitive with two commonly employed machine-learning classifiers: the support vector machine and the Gaussian naïve Bayesian network. We also verify that the dDBN selects correlates based on non-linear criteria. Finally, we provide a brief analysis of the correlates elicited from Buckner et al.'s data that suggests that demented elderly subjects have reduced involvement of entorhinal and occipital cortex and greater involvement of the parietal lobe and amygdala in brain activity compared with healthy elderly (as measured via functional correlations among BOLD measurements). Limitations and extensions to the dDBN method are discussed. Hum Brain Mapp, 2009. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

1097-0193/asset/HBM_centre.gif?v=1&s=8ec180dd87bbc24c1b35fbfc48370a4e41c34713)
