India Morrison and Patric Bach contributed equally to this work.
Version of Record online: 25 MAR 2012
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Human Brain Mapping
Volume 34, Issue 8, pages 1982–1998, August 2013
How to Cite
Morrison, I., Tipper, S. P., Fenton-Adams, W. L. and Bach, P. (2013), “Feeling” others' painful actions: The sensorimotor integration of pain and action information. Hum. Brain Mapp., 34: 1982–1998. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22040
Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Terms and Conditions set out at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com/onlineopen#OnlineOpen_Terms
- Issue online: 8 JUL 2013
- Version of Record online: 25 MAR 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 20 DEC 2011
- Manuscript Revised: 6 DEC 2011
- Manuscript Received: 5 MAY 2010
- Wellcome Trust Programme
Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article.
|HBM_22040_sm_SuppFig1.tif||522K||Supplementary Figure 1. Tactile detection experiment: a) mean tactile detection calibration results. Detections at stimulus intensity 0% are false alarms, whereas detections from 82-90% are hits. b) Mean correct tactile detections (hits). c) Incorrect tactile detections (false alarms). Tactile control experiment: d) mean reaction times for suprathreshold detection. *Significant difference between means (p < .015). Error bars represent SEM.|
|HBM_22040_sm_SuppFig2.tif||523K||Supplementary Figure 2. Auditory control experiment. a) Mean accurate auditory detection rates (hits). b) Incorrect auditory detections (false alarms) c) Likelihood of reporting auditory stimulation (bias) and d) ability to discriminate no auditory stimulation and auditory stimulation trials (sensitivity/ dprime). Error bars represent SEM.|
|HBM_22040_sm_SuppFig3.TIF||4249K||Supplementary Figure 3. Cortical surface (Panel A) and axial slices (Panel B) showing low threshold maps (p < .05, uncorrected) of the object, action and interaction (appropriateness) contrasts in the regions significantly activated by the contrast of interest in the main analysis. Images shown are in radiological convention (left side of image corresponds to right side of brain).|
|HBM_22040_sm_SuppTab1.doc||28K||Supplementary Table 1. Average across-subject correlation coefficients are shown for regions-of-interest in somatosensory cortex/IPL and MCC, separately for grasps of and withdrawals from painful objects (* p < 0.1; ** p < .05). IPL = inferior parietal lobule, PCG = postcentral gyrus, SI = primary somatosensory cortex, MCC = midcingulate cortex.|
|HBM_22040_sm_SuppTab2.doc||57K||Supplementary Table 2. Comparison of tactile detection and auditory control experiment results. * = p < .1 ** p < .05 *** p < .01.|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.