Funding: The presented results were conducted within the research project ‘EuroDRG – Diagnosis Related Groups in Europe: towards efficiency and quality’, which was funded by the European Commission under the Seventh Framework Programme. Research area: HEALTH-2007-3.2-8 European System of Diagnosis-Related Groups, Project reference: 223300
Supplement Article
HOW WELL DO DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUPS FOR APPENDECTOMY EXPLAIN VARIATIONS IN RESOURCE USE? AN ANALYSIS OF PATIENT-LEVEL DATA FROM 10 EUROPEAN COUNTRIES
Article first published online: 19 JUL 2012
DOI: 10.1002/hec.2836
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Issue

Health Economics
Supplement: Diagnosis-Related Groups in Europe (EuroDRG): Do they explain variation in hospital costs and length of stay across patients and hospitals?
Volume 21, Issue Supplement S2, pages 30–40, August 2012
Additional Information
How to Cite
Mason, A., Or, Z., Renaud, T., Street, A., Thuilliez, J., Ward, P. and ON BEHALF OF THE EURODRG GROUP (2012), HOW WELL DO DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUPS FOR APPENDECTOMY EXPLAIN VARIATIONS IN RESOURCE USE? AN ANALYSIS OF PATIENT-LEVEL DATA FROM 10 EUROPEAN COUNTRIES. Health Econ., 21: 30–40. doi: 10.1002/hec.2836
- †
Funding: The presented results were conducted within the research project ‘EuroDRG – Diagnosis Related Groups in Europe: towards efficiency and quality’, which was funded by the European Commission under the Seventh Framework Programme. Research area: HEALTH-2007-3.2-8 European System of Diagnosis-Related Groups, Project reference: 223300
Publication History
- Issue published online: 19 JUL 2012
- Article first published online: 19 JUL 2012
Funded by
- Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) by the European Commission. Grant Number: 22330
Keywords:
- diagnosis-related groups;
- cost analyses;
- length of stay;
- appendectomy
ABSTRACT
Appendectomy is a common and relatively simple procedure to remove an inflamed appendix, but the rate of appendectomy varies widely across Europe. This paper investigates factors that explain differences in resource use for appendectomy.
We analysed 106 929 appendectomy patients treated in 939 hospitals in 10 European countries. In stage 1, we tested the performance of three models in explaining variation in the (log of) cost of the inpatient stay (seven countries) or length of stay (three countries). The first model used only the diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) to which patients were coded, the second model used a core set of general patient-level and appendectomy-specific variables, and the third model combined both sets of variables. In stage two, we investigated hospital-level variation.
In classifying appendectomy patients, most DRG systems take account of complex diagnoses and comorbidities but use different numbers of DRGs (range: 2 to 8). The capacity of DRGs and patient-level variables to explain patient-level cost variation ranges from 34% in Spain to over 60% in England and France. All DRG systems can make better use of administrative data such as the patient's age, diagnoses and procedures, and all countries have outlying hospitals that could improve their management of resources for appendectomy. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

1099-1050/asset/HEC_centre.gif?v=1&s=0185bf508eda50f535786bfd8e22b47c50d0e4db)