Effects of bolus injections and continuous infusions of somatostatin and placebo in patients with cirrhosis: A double-blind hemodynamic investigation

Authors

  • Isabel Cirera,

    1. Hepatic Hemodynamics Laboratory, Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic i Provincíal, University of Barcelona, 08039, Barcelona, Spain
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Faust Feu,

    1. Hepatic Hemodynamics Laboratory, Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic i Provincíal, University of Barcelona, 08039, Barcelona, Spain
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Angelo Luca,

    1. Hepatic Hemodynamics Laboratory, Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic i Provincíal, University of Barcelona, 08039, Barcelona, Spain
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Joan C. García-Pagan,

    1. Hepatic Hemodynamics Laboratory, Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic i Provincíal, University of Barcelona, 08039, Barcelona, Spain
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Mercedes Fernández,

    1. Hepatic Hemodynamics Laboratory, Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic i Provincíal, University of Barcelona, 08039, Barcelona, Spain
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Angels Escorsell,

    1. Hepatic Hemodynamics Laboratory, Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic i Provincíal, University of Barcelona, 08039, Barcelona, Spain
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Jaime Bosch MD,

    Corresponding author
    1. Hepatic Hemodynamics Laboratory, Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic i Provincíal, University of Barcelona, 08039, Barcelona, Spain
    • Hepatic Hemodynamic Laboratory, Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic i Provincial, Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Joan Rodés

    1. Hepatic Hemodynamics Laboratory, Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic i Provincíal, University of Barcelona, 08039, Barcelona, Spain
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

The present double-blind study was aimed at investigating the hemodynamic and humoral effects of somatostatin or placebo in patients with cirrhosis. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either an injection of 250 μg of somatostatin followed by a constant infusion of somatostatin at 250 μg/h (n = 13), an injection of 250 μg of somatostatin followed by a 500 μg/h continuous infusion (n = 10), or an injection of placebo followed by a placebo infusion (n = 9). Placebo had no effect. Somatostatin bolus markedly decreased the hepatic venous pressure gradient: by 52% at 1 minute; P < .001; 19% at 3 minutes, P < .01; and by 13% at 5 minutes, P < .04. Azygos blood flow decreased similarly by 45% at 1 minute, P < .001; 16% at 3 minutes, P < .02; and 9.5% at 5 minutes, P = .05. Mean arterial pressure increased by 25% (P < .001). Continuous somatostatin infusions (250 or 500 μg/h) had no systemic effects, but significantly reduced hepatic venous pressure gradient (250 μg/h: −6.1%, P < .05 and 500 μg/h: −15%P < .01) and hepatic blood flow (250 μg/h: −10%, 500 μg/h: −18%, P < .05). Azygos blood flow was not changed after 250 μg/h infusion but was reduced after 500 μg/h (-23%, P < .02). Somatostatin but not placebo; suppressed glucagon to normal levels. This study shows that a bolus injection of somatostatin caused an immediate and marked decrease of hepatic venous pressure gradient and azygos blood flow. Continuous infusion of somatostatin had a mild but sustained effect on splanchnic hemodynamics; this effect was more pronounced with the higher dose. (HEPATOLOGY 1995; 22:106–111.)

Ancillary