1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Background
  4. Current Issues to Resolve in HCV Classification
  5. Consensus Classification Proposals
  6. Summary
  7. References

International standardization and coordination of the nomenclature of variants of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is increasingly needed as more is discovered about the scale of HCV-related liver disease and important biological and antigenic differences that exist between variants. A group of scientists expert in the field of HCV genetic variability, and those involved in development of HCV sequence databases, the Hepatitis Virus Database (Japan), euHCVdb (France), and Los Alamos (United States), met to re-examine the status of HCV genotype nomenclature, resolve conflicting genotype or subtype names among described variants of HCV, and draw up revised criteria for the assignment of new genotypes as they are discovered in the future. A comprehensive listing of all currently classified variants of HCV incorporates a number of agreed genotype and subtype name reassignments to create consistency in nomenclature. The paper also contains consensus proposals for the classification of new variants into genotypes and subtypes, which recognizes and incorporates new knowledge of HCV genetic diversity and epidemiology. A proposal was made that HCV variants be classified into 6 genotypes (representing the 6 genetic groups defined by phylogenetic analysis). Subtype name assignment will be either confirmed or provisional, depending on the availability of complete or partial nucleotide sequence data, or remain unassigned where fewer than 3 examples of a new subtype have been described. In conclusion, these proposals provide the framework by which the HCV databases store and provide access to data on HCV, which will internationally coordinate the assignment of new genotypes and subtypes in the future. (HEPATOLOGY 2005.)

The VIIIth Report of the International Committee for the Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) currently classifies hepatitis C virus (HCV) and GB virus B as members of the Hepacivirus genus in the virus family, Flaviviridae.1 Although the report recognizes the existence of 6 main genetic groups of HCV and designates them as “clades,” it is beyond the remit of the ICTV to extend classification proposals below the level of species. Thus, separate arrangements are required for the standardization of genotype and subtype assignments of genetic variants of HCV.

A meeting was convened at the 11th International Symposium on HCV and Related Viruses, Heidelberg, Germany, October 2004. This was a successor to the first HCV classification meeting in Santa Fe, New Mexico, in 1997, with a similar membership of scientists from North America, Europe, and Japan working in the field of HCV sequence variation.2 The purpose of the meeting was to analyze the current description, assignment, and nomenclature of HCV genetic variants and to review new developments in studies of HCV genetic variability and epidemiology. A new aim was to formally link genotype nomenclature proposals with the organization and sequences retrieval systems available on three HCV sequence databases that provide a resource to study genetic variability of HCV and its clinical, epidemiological, and therapeutic manifestations. The first database was created in Japan by Prof. Masashi Mizokami and co-workers (, the second in the European Union by Prof. Gilbert Deleage et al.3 (, and the third in the United States by Dr. Carla Kuiken et al.4 ( or The accessibility of these databases and the provision for users to download and analyze annotated sequences make them ideal vehicles for reinforcing a standardized nomenclature system, and their support is an integral part of the outlined proposals. This support entails assisting users to avoid naming conflicts, providing advice and analysis support, ensuring that the nomenclature used in the 3 databases is standardized and follows the guidelines in this paper, and trying to increase awareness of these guidelines in the HCV research community and among journal reviewers and editors.

The meeting was convened with the following broad aims:

  • 1
    Standardize nomenclature for existing variants of HCV:
    • Develop consistent nomenclature for variants within each clade

    • Resolve conflicting subtype and genotype designations

    • Publish a complete list of currently classified recognized genotypes and subtypes, with acknowledgment of originating authors

  • 2
    Formulate agreed criteria for the designation of new HCV variants:
    • New genetic groups/clades/genotypes

    • Subtypes, recognizing that designation of subtypes may only be epidemiologically relevant in certain cases

    • Recombinant forms of HCV

  • 3
    Provide a classification scheme for HCV for research and database use:
    • Standardize nomenclature to provide a common interface for sequence retrieval from HCV databases

    • Provide a relevant classification for investigation of clinical and biological differences between HCV variants


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Background
  4. Current Issues to Resolve in HCV Classification
  5. Consensus Classification Proposals
  6. Summary
  7. References

A standard system for HCV classification is of importance in studies of the epidemiology, evolution, and pathogenesis of HCV. Of particular clinical importance is the need to understand genotype-specific differences in response to interferon-α–based treatments. A classification system has to be robust, based on objective criteria, and able to accommodate new genetic variants and recombinant forms that are discovered in the future. To achieve this, the classification of HCV should be based, as with other biological systems, on its evolutionary history (as far as it is currently understood). The following section reviews current thoughts on the origins and epidemiology underlying the observed genetic diversity of HCV, and how these aspects may be incorporated into the proposed classification scheme.

HCV Sequence Variability.

When the extent of the genetic heterogeneity of HCV was discovered in the early 1990s, a number of different methods were used for classifying variants.5–12 These differed from each other in the methods used to delineate different genotypes (by pairwise distance measurements or by phylogeny), whether they incorporated the two levels of sequence variability in the nomenclature system, and finally, in the letters or numbers assigned to each recognized genetic group. Progress toward resolving these uncertainties in HCV classification was made by publication of a consensus paper in 1994,13 proposing the classification of HCV by phylogenetic methods into 6 genotypes (updated phylogenetic tree shown in Fig. 1). These approximately equidistant genetic groups each contain a variable number of more closely related, genetically (and epidemiologically) distinct “subtypes.” Genotypes differ from each other by 31% to 33% at the nucleotide level, compared with 20% to 25% between subtypes. Despite the sequence diversity of HCV, all genotypes share an identical complement of co-linear genes of similar or identical size in the large open reading frame, and the genetic inter-relationships of HCV variants are remarkably consistent throughout the genome.2 This has enabled many of the currently recognized variants of HCV to be provisionally classified, based on partial sequences from subgenomic regions such as core/E1 or NS5B.14 The most conserved regions of the HCV genome are the 5′ untranslated region, and the terminal 99 bases of the 3′untranslated region. The inferred amino acid sequence of the core gene is also relatively invariant between genotypes. The most variable region of the HCV genome is the hypervariable region of E2.15, 16 Here, the large number of likely immune-selected amino acid changes17–22 distorts the underlying phylogeny of HCV apparent from comparison of other genomic regions.

thumbnail image

Figure 1. Evolutionary tree of available complete open-reading frame sequences for each HCV genotype. Phylogenetic analysis was carried out on complete coding sequences of genotypes of HCV (maximum 2 where multiple sequences available; prioritized as in Table 1). The main identified risk groups for each genotype (IDUs, recipients of unscreened blood or blood products, other parenteral exposures) has been indicated where information is available (filled circles and accompanying text). These represent the main variants believed to have become prevalent in industrialized countries over the course of the 20th century. HCV genotypes 3k, 6d, 6g, 6h, and 6k are the re-assigned names of the previously described genotypes “10a,” “7b,” “11a,” “9a,” and “8b,” respectively (Table 2). The tree was constructed by neighbor-joining as implemented in the MEGA package,97 using Jukes-Cantor corrected distances.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Table 1. Confirmed HCV Genotypes/Subtypes
Genotype*Locus/Isolate(s)Accession number(s)Reference(s)
  • NOTE. Tables 1, 2, and 3 were compiled by a working group of Donald Murphy, Erwin Sablon, and Phillipe Halfon.

  • *

    Consensus proposed genotype/subtype names. For instances in which multiple sequences of a HCV genotype are available, two sequences have been listed, prioritized by (1) publication date, or (2) submission date when unpublished.

  • Locus (or isolate name, if locus is the same as the accession number).

  • Sequence obtained from acute phase plasma of a chimpanzee experimentally infected with (human-derived) isolate SA13.

Genotype 1   
 1aHPCPLYPRE, HPCCGAAM62321, M6746367,68
 1bHPCJCG, HPCHUMRD90208, M5833569,70
 1cHPCCGS, AY051292D14853, AY05129271
Genotype 2   
 2aHPCPOLP, JFH-1D00944, AB04763972,73
 2bHPCJ8G, JPUT971017D10988, AB0309079,74
Genotype 3   
 3aHPCEGS, HPCK3AD17763, D2891776,77
Genotype 4   
Genotype 5   
 5aEUH1480, SA13Y13184, AF06449080,81
Genotype 6   
 6aHCV12083, 6a33Y12083, AY85852682
Table 2. Listing of HCV Variants With Proposed Changes in Genotype Nomenclature
Proposed Designation*Published DesignationStatusIsolateRegion Sequenced§Reference(s)
  • *

    Proposed new name based on revised criteria for genotype designations.

  • Classification status; C: Confirmed; P: Provisional.

  • Example of isolates referred to in associated publications (last column).

  • §

    Regions sequenced (accession numbers in parentheses), prioritized for (1) complete genome; (2) Core/E1 and NS5B regions; (3) other regions where core/E1 and NS5B regions are not both available.

Genotype 2     
 2k2jCRU169NS5B (D86532), 3′UTR (D86532)83
 2j2lPBA047NS5B (D86530), 3′UTR (D86530)83
 2n2ePNL50C/E1 (L39309), NS5B (L44602)84
 2o4f/2fPFR4C/E1 (L38333), NS5B (L38373)84
 2p2fPNL33C/E1, (L39300), BS5B (L44601)84
 2q2kPBA045NS5B (D86529), 3′UTR (D86529)83
Genotype 3     
 3k10aCHPCJK049E1Complete genome (D63821)59
Genotype 4     
 4r4aPZ4C/E1 (U10236/L16652)12,64
   FrSSD120C/E1 (AJ401097), NS5B (AJ291282)93
 4n4 alfaP1359C/E1 (AF271874)65
 4o4 betaP2153C/E1 (AF271882), NS5B (AF271815)65
Genotype 6     
 6c7dPTh846C/E1 (D37843), NS5B (D37857)35
 6d7bCVN235Complete genome (D84263)83
 6e7aPVN540C/E1 (D88474), NS5B (D87361)34
 6f7ePBB7NS5B (D28541)96
 6f7cPTh271C/E1 (D37844), NS5B (D37858)35
 6g11aCHPCJK046EComplete genome (D63822)59
 6h9aCVN004Complete genome (D84265)83
 6i9bPTh555C/E1 (D37849), NS5B (D37863)35
 6j9cPTh553C/E1 (D37848), NS5B (D37862)35
 6k8bCVN405Complete genome (D84264)34
 6l8aPVN507C/E1 (D88470), NS5B (D87357)34
Table 3. Provisionally Assigned HCV Subtypes
 IsolateAccession Number(s)*Reference(s)
  • *

    Accession numbers of sequences from the core/E1 and NS5B regions. Where two examples are listed, a comma divides the accession numbers from the two entries; “n.a.”: not available; “/”: denotes that the core/E1 or NS5B sequences are available from two different accession numbers; (C): only core sequence available; (E): only E1 sequence available.

  • Listing of up to two examples of each provisionally assigned HCV subtype prioritized according to (1) availability of complete or near complete core/E1 and NS5B sequences, (2) publication date, (3) GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ submission date. Where possible, the isolate names referred to in associated publications (last column) are listed for ease of reference.

Genotype 1    
 1dHC1-N15, HC1-N16L39299, L39302L38377, L3837284
 1eCAM1078, QC248L38349(C), AY894555L38361, AY89455362,84
 1g2152, 1382AF271822, AF271820AF271798, AF27179765
 1h98CM1521, QC94AY256790(C), AY434131AY257087, AY43413232,62
 1iFR16, QC77n.a., AY434119L48495, AY43412062,85
 1jQC2, QC89AY434158, AY434128AY434106, AY43412962
 1kQC68, QC82AY434112, AY434122AY434113, AY43412362
 1l98CM1383, 98CM1427AY256789(C), AY256792(C)AY257083, AY25709132
Genotype 2    
 2dNE92, BN177L39294, n.a.L29634, AF03724466,86
 2eJK020, JK025D49745, D49746D49760, D4976159
 2fJK081, JK139D49754, D49757D49769, D4977759
 2iFR13, HN4n.a., X76411/X76415L48492, L4849987,88
 2jBA047, QC106n.a., AY894528D86530, AY89452662,83
 2mQC76, QC104AY434116, AY434143AY434117, AY43414462
Genotype 3    
 3fNE125, PK64D16614, n.a.D14203/D16615, L7884233,87
 3gIND1751, IND1452X91423/X91307, X91306(C)X91417, X9141890
 3hQC29, SOM1U33437(C), AF216792/AF216786AF279120, AF21678991,92
 3iIND674, QC100X91300(C), AY434137X91422, AY43413862,90
Genotype 4    
 4cZ6, GB358U10238/L16678, L29606n.a., L2960712,64,66
 4dDK13, SD006U10192/L16656, n.a.n.a., D8653712,64,83
 4eCAM600, GB809L29589, L29629L29590, L2962666
 4fG22, FR12L29595, L38332L29593, L3837066,84
 4hGB438, FrSSD35L29610, n.a.L29611, AJ29124966,93
 4kB14, FrSSD174L39282, n.a.L44597, AJ29129484,93
 4lSD002, 2116n.a., AF271881D86534, AF27181665,83
 4mSD035, 1797n.a., AF271876D86543, AF27181365,83
 4n1359, QC97AF271874, AY434134n.a., AY43413562,65
 4o2153, QC59AF271882, AY434107AF271815, AY43410862,65
 4pFrSSD158, QC139AJ401099(E), AY434149AJ291285, AY43415062,93
 4qQC86, QC107AY434125, AY434146AY434126, AY43414762
 4rZ4, FrSSD120U10236/L16652, AJ401097(E)n.a., AJ29128212,64,93
 4t98CM1458, QC85AY256808(C), AY706996AY257072, AY70699732,62
Genotype 6    
 6eVN540, VN998D88474, D31971D87361, D3079734
 6fTh271, EUTH36D37844, U31261(C)D37858, U3127624,35
 6iTh555, EUTH100D37849, L50554(C)D37863, L5053535,94
 6jTh553, EUTH1D37848, L49473(C)D37862, L4948135,56
 6lVN507, VN531D88470, D88472D87357, D8735934
 6mEUBUR1, B4/92L49480(C), D63943/D63944L49484, D2854356,95
 6nD86/93, EUTH86D63945, U31259(C)D28545, U3127524,96
 6oVN4, QC33L38341, AY894537L38382, AY89453562,84
 6pVN12, QC123L38340, AY894534L38380, AY89453262,84
 6qQC57, QC176AY754632, AY754617AY754633, AY75461862

Each genetic group of HCV comprises varying numbers of more closely related variants, typically different from each other at 20% to 25% of nucleotides, compared with more than 30% between genotypes (Fig. 1). The most common variants found in Western countries have previously been classified with subtype labels, such as 1a and 1b in genotype 1; and 2a, 2b, and 2c in genotype 2. These variants have become very widely distributed over the past 50 to 70 years as a result of transmission through blood transfusion and various other invasive medical and surgical procedures, and by needle sharing between injection drug users (IDUs). They now represent the vast majority of infections in Western countries encountered clinically, and for which most information has been collected on disease progression and response to α-interferon–based treatment.

Since the original classification of HCV, further molecular epidemiology studies have revealed the existence of much greater diversity in certain regions of sub-Saharan Africa and in South and Southeast Asia (Fig. 2). Most new variants originate from specific geographical regions; for example, infections in Western Africa are predominantly by genotype 2,23–27 whereas those in Central Africa, such as the Democratic Republic of Congo and Gabon, are by genotypes 1 and 4.12, 24, 28–32 Taking this geographical mapping further, genotypes 3 and 6 show similar genetic diversity in South and Eastern Asia.24, 33–35

thumbnail image

Figure 2. Evolutionary tree of all available NS5B sequences of HCV. This phylogenetic analysis of the NS5B region of all publicly available nucleotide sequences in the region from 8276 to 8615 (numbered as in the H77 reference sequences, AF00960663) demonstrates that HCV variants still fall into 6 distinct genotypes but each contains numerous novel variants discovered in high-diversity areas in sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia. The tree was constructed by neighbor-joining as implemented in the MEGA package,97 using Jukes-Cantor corrected distances. More divergent members of genotype 2 are indicated with an “x.”

Download figure to PowerPoint

These observations indicate the likely long-term presence in human populations in parts of Africa and Asia, distinct from HCV transmission patterns in Western and other non-tropical countries. The relatively recent appearance of new risk groups and routes of spread,32, 36 such as blood transfusion since the 1940s, the medical use of unsterilized needles for injections and vaccinations, and most specifically to industrialized countries, injecting drug use and the sharing of injection equipment,32, 37–39 has allowed the rapid spread and amplification of “founder” viruses. What we now call subtypes 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 3a, and 4a are likely to be the descendants of HCV variants that “seeded” these new, rapidly expanding transmission networks. As discussed later, HCV classification should both recognize the epidemiological associations of these “founder” viruses and incorporate their subtype names into the genotype nomenclature, while acknowledging that such labels are of little or no value in the description of HCV variants in high-diversity areas in sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia.


A recent discovery with implications for HCV classification is recombination between genotypes of HCV.40, 41 Homologous recombination in HCV could clearly be facilitated by the overlap in genotype distributions in many parts of the world. It also may be favored by the nature of HCV risk behavior, in which there may be frequent exposures around the time of primary infection (e.g., repeated needle-sharing between several IDUs), and lack of protective immunity from re-infection during chronic HCV infection. Recently, a viable and rapidly spreading recombinant containing structural genes from genotype 2k and non-structural genes from genotype 1b was found in IDUs in St. Petersburg, Russia.40, 41 Inter-subtype (or intra-genotype) recombinants have also been described, such as a 1a/1b recombinant in Peru.42 The true frequency of recombination may be underestimated because it would be difficult to detect if it occurred between variants of the same subtype. Similarly, it would be difficult to document inter-subtype recombinants where HCV is highly diverse, such as within genotype 2 in West Africa. Finally, although there is a comparative wealth of complete genome sequences of common HCV genotypes, such as 1b, most studies of HCV variability in high diversity areas are based on analysis of single sub-genomic regions, such as NS5B or core/E1, making detection of potential recombination events unlikely.

HCV Genotype Identification.

Genotype identification is clinically important because genotypes 1 and 4 are more resistant than genotypes 2 and 3 to the current standard of care, pegylated interferon-α and ribavirin combination therapy.43 Indeed, most treatment protocols require genotype information to tailor dose and duration of treatment. Genotyping assays are usually based on sequence analysis of an amplified segment of the genome, commonly the 5′untranslated region, because this region is targeted by most diagnostic assays for HCV RNA. Although this region is highly conserved, a well-characterized set of polymorphisms predict genotype and can be conveniently detected by probe hybridization,44, 45 changes in restriction sites46, 47 or by direct sequencing.48

For the purposes for which they are normally used (prediction of treatment response and dose scheduling),43 currently used 5′UTR-based assays are acceptably accurate, with more than 95% concordance with genotypes identified by nucleotide sequencing in NS5B or other coding regions of the genome.49–55 Several factors, however, preclude their use for definitive genotype identification, for identification of subtypes, and more generally, as an HCV classification tool:

  • Although several genotype-specific nucleotide changes in the 5′UTR usually allow each of the 6 main genotypes to be differentiated from each other, there are exceptions. Some genotype 6 variants found in Southeast Asia have 5′UTR sequences identical to those of genotype 1a or 1b.34–36, 56 This illustrates a more general point that, even for genotype identification, the performance of genotyping assays is very much a property of the range of HCV variants tested. The currently used 5′UTR-based assays are unlikely to operate to the published level of accuracy (>95%; see above) in high-diversity areas.

  • Even for well-characterized variants of HCV, such as those circulating in Western countries, sequence differences between subtypes may be variable or non-existent in the 5′UTR. For example, a sequence polymorphism at position 243 (numbered as in the H77 reference sequence), frequently used to differentiate subtypes 1a and 1b, is unreliable. In one of the original surveys, 6 (7.5%) of 80 subtype 1a sequences and 1 of 79 1b sequences would have been incorrectly identified on the basis of this polymorphism.57 A related problem is that although some subtypes may be separately identifiable in the 5′UTR (such as 2a and 2b), others, such as 2c, may not, even though all 3 subtypes are approximately equally divergent from each other elsewhere in the genome (Fig. 1).

  • Even relatively short coding regions of the HCV genome provide more definitive information on the genotype or subtype of an HCV variant than the 5′UTR. Although not necessarily required clinically, the nucleotide sequence of a sub-genomic region (including the conserved core gene) allows definitive identification of genotype and generally of the subtype, as well as being able to predict the existence of HCV variants not yet classified.

  • For all genotyping assays, whether based on the 5′UTR or elsewhere in the genome, there is an intrinsic assumption that the genotype inferred from 1 region reflects that of the genome as a whole. Although few recombinant forms have been described, the spread of HCV variants such as the 2k/1b recombinant and the generation of further hybrid viruses in multiply exposed individuals would increasingly limit the accuracy of genotyping assays, and importantly for their clinical use, attenuate their predictive value for treatment response.

As should be evident from these points, HCV identification is an activity distinct from HCV classification. Classification provides the framework on which the specificity and accuracy of genotyping assays can be assessed, and for this purpose an agreed and consistent set of classification criteria, and a system of assigning genotype names is required. The following section discusses the issues in HCV classification in which consensus is required, and is followed by a series of classification and nomenclature proposals designed to maintain clarity in this field.

Current Issues to Resolve in HCV Classification

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Background
  4. Current Issues to Resolve in HCV Classification
  5. Consensus Classification Proposals
  6. Summary
  7. References

Several problems and uncertainties with current classification schemes for HCV have been identified and cause both inconsistencies with the nomenclature of HCV variants in published papers and difficulties for the organization and retrieval of HCV sequences from the 3 databases. These can be summarized as follows:

Diversity Within Genetic Groups.

Although the primary division of HCV variants into 6 genetic groups is evident from phylogenetic analysis (Figs. 1 and 2), it has been increasingly recognized that there is considerably more genetic diversity within groups 2, 3, and 6 than found between the originally classified subtypes 1a and 1b, and 2a, 2b, and 2c.34 In the past, it had been additionally proposed that more divergent variants within groups 3 and 6 qualify as separate major genotypes of HCV. At the HCV Classification meeting in Santa Fe, genetic group 6 was proposed to be re-designated as “clade 6,” its variants retain their proposed genotype designations as genotypes 6, 7, 8, 9, and 11; similarly, “clade 3” should contain variants classified as genotypes 3 and 10.2 In this scheme, the one-to-one correspondence between genetic group and genotype is lost.

The imposition of an additional tier of variability, however, leads to largely arbitrary classification decisions that compromised the simplicity of the original primary assignment of HCV genetic groups as genotypes. For example, both subtype 3b and the proposed new genotype 10a are both in genetic group 3 but are both highly divergent in sequence from subtype 3a, much more so than other subtypes of genotype 3 (Fig. 1). The decision to classify 10a as a genotype and 3b as a subtype was based on a difference in nucleotide sequence divergence in the coding region of only 3% (23% between 3a and 3b, 26% between 3a and 10a). This is much lower than the 31% to 34% divergence between variants in different genetic groups (such as between 1a and 2a). Divergence between the various proposed genotypes in group 6 is similarly consistently lower (mean, 27%; range, 21%–29%) than between the originally classified genotypes. Genetic group 2 may similarly contain more divergent sequences than the norm for subtypes (marked as “x” in Fig. 2). This might lead to the addition of further, equally arbitrary, genotype designations in a geographical region where otherwise genotype 2 variants are predominant in the population.

Apart from the difficulty in placing this further dividing line between genotype and clade, the resulting classification in a subtype/genotype/clade hierarchy is geographically inconsistent. To many, the scheme has been confusing, because in some cases, a clade contains only 1 genotype and the terms are interchangeable (e.g., genotype 1/clade 1); in others a clade may contain 5 or more genotypes (e.g., clade 6, genotypes 6, 7, 8, 9, and 11). This confusion and lack of consensus has led to continuing nomenclature differences between publications whenever variants from Southeast Asia and elsewhere are described.

Conflicting Subtype Designations.

There are many examples of conflicting nomenclature within currently classified HCV variants. Most of these inconsistencies comprise 2 different subtypes being referred to by the same name, such subtypes “4a” found in Egypt7 and Zaire.12 Conversely, the same variant may be described with different subtype designation, such as VAT96, designated as “2k,”58 and RU169 designated as “2j.”59 These occurrences will have to be resolved in an agreed catalogue of HCV variants, and for retrieval of sequences from the HCV databases.


Currently no method exists for classifying recombinant forms of HCV. For database retrieval and for cataloguing the occurrence of recombinant viruses, a nomenclature system that recorded its genotype composition and provided unique identifiers for pattern of breakpoints would be of value. This system is in place for HIV-1 and might be used as a model for HCV.60 Here, designation of inter-subtype recombinant viruses as (circulating) recombinant forms (RFs) requires detection and complete genome sequences of a recombinant virus from 3 or more independently infected individuals. Each new recombinant should have breakpoints in the same positions in each sequence. Each is then numbered sequentially in order of discovery, with subtype identification letters listed alphabetically to approximately indicate their composition. The HCV recombinant in St. Petersburg40, 41 would therefore be designated as RF 01_1b2k.

Consensus Classification Proposals

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Background
  4. Current Issues to Resolve in HCV Classification
  5. Consensus Classification Proposals
  6. Summary
  7. References

Each of these issues in HCV classification was discussed, and the following consensus decisions were made. These are proposals for standardizing the nomenclature of currently described variants of HCV, and the future designation of new subtypes and genotypes as they are discovered.

Division of HCV Into Clades/Genotypes.

The primary division of HCV variants remains the 6 genetic groups, irrespective of the hugely increased numbers of subtypes or variants since found within these groups. The consensus acknowledges that different levels of within-group diversity are found between genotypes, and different relationships within them. Nevertheless, varying degrees of diversity are becoming apparent in other genotypes (e.g., among the genotype 2 variants from West Africa), and it is difficult and arbitrary to specify a degree of sequence divergence below which a subtype designation is made, and above which a new genotype is assigned. This difficulty is epitomized by the problems with the classifications of 3b and 10a within genotype 3 (see above).

The following points summarize the recommendations concerning the designation of HCV genotypes:

  • 1
    The primary division of HCV will henceforth be based on the 6 genetic groups apparent from Figs. 1, 2, and other published sequence analyses of HCV. Division of HCV variants into the 6 genetic groups of HCV is supported by each of the principal methods of phylogenetic analysis of the core/E1, NS5B, and complete genome sequences (Table 1). These comprise tree-building by: (i) neighbor-joining and unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean from pairwise distances computed with a variety of substitution models, (ii) parsimony, and (iii) maximum likelihood. For distance-based methods, greater than 70% of trees (actually invariably greater than 90%) support the primary division of HCV variants into the 6 genetic groups, with no consistent support for any higher-level grouping. Consistency between phylogenetic methods is required for the assignment of new genotypes (see specific proposals below).
  • 2
    The genetic groups will be termed “genotypes.” The previously proposed term “clade” to describe an HCV genotype might be regarded as an alternative, more descriptive term for genotype, and is currently used in the VIIIth ICTV Report.1 However, for consistency with previous classifications of HCV and current clinical usage, we recommend the use of the term “genotype” for genetic group in HCV sequence databases and publications.
  • 3
    Variants of HCV currently designated with genotype numbers above 6 will be renamed according to the genotype group in which they fall, and with the next available subtype designation (Table 2). For example, genotype 10a will be re-classified as 3k, 7a as 6e, and so forth. The proposed changes to the nomenclature are presented in Table 2.
  • 4
    The identification of new genotypes will henceforth require demonstration of a consistent independent phylogenetic grouping away from any of the currently classified genotypes of HCV (see later discussion).

Classification and Nomenclature of Previously Described Subtypes of HCV.

The group believed the existing nomenclature of HCV genotypes and subtypes provided a valuable framework for ongoing studies of genetic variation. The following points summarize the group's decisions and recommendations for subtype designations:

  • 1
    Existing designations where they are consistent will be retained, irrespective of the criteria agreed for the designation of new subtypes (Tables 1 and 3).
  • 2
    Variants within genotypes 3 and 6 that have been re-designated as subtypes (see previous section) will be incorporated into the updated list.
  • 3
    HCV variants with conflicting names in the literature have been re-designated on consultation with the originating authors (Table 2).

Assignment of New Genotypes of HCV.

Further variants of HCV likely will be discovered that merit their assignment as new genotypes, such as the candidate new genotype obtained from Central Africa.61, 62 To ensure their correct classification, it is essential to demonstrate that there is no significant grouping within any of the existing genotypes. This has to be demonstrated by rigorous phylogenetic analysis of a complete sequence of the coding region of the virus. This analysis will additionally confirm the absence of recombination with sequences from other genotypes.

The following criteria were proposed for identification and designation of a variant of HCV as a new genotype:

  • 1
    Provisional designation. This requires one complete coding region sequence to be obtained, the demonstration of a separate grouping from other genotypes by phylogenetic analysis, and an absence of recombination. The sequence of a candidate new genotype should be independently analyzed by submission to one of the HCV databases. The sequence will be analyzed by a variety of phylogenetic methods described previously. This will allow the sequence to be assigned with the next available genotype number, and the subtype designation “a,” for example, genotype 7a.
  • 2
    Confirmed designation. This requires coding sequences of 2 or more HCV variants from infections that are not directly linked epidemiologically. The sequences should further demonstrate a lack of grouping with current classified genotypes by the above methods. This further analysis, and any available sequences from subgenomic regions such as core/E1 and NS5B (see later discussion), will provide valuable reference information on the genetic heterogeneity within the newly designated genotype, the existence of subtypes, the geographical origins of the variants, and their likely designation in 5′UTR-based genotyping assays.

Assignment of New Subtypes of HCV.

Different issues apply to the assignment of new subtypes. Some geographical regions contain so much diversity within genotypes that it is of little value to continue classifying them as subtypes. Elsewhere, however, subtype labels have particular epidemiological value and are widely used as genetic markers in studies of past and ongoing virus transmission of HCV in different risk groups.

To recognize this distinction, new subtype designations should only be provided where there is evidence for its spread in particular transmission networks, and where its identification would be of epidemiological value. The simplest method to achieve this distinction is to require evidence of infection with a new proposed subtype of HCV in several independently infected individuals.

The following criteria for assignment of new subtypes were proposed:

Provisional designation.

Three or more examples of infection with a new proposed subtype are required for subtype designation. Sequences are required from both the core/E1 region (sequence data available from 90% or more nucleotides corresponding to positions 869 to 1292 in the H77 reference sequences, accession number AF009606)12, 63–65 and the NS5B region (data from 90% or more positions in the region 8276–8615 in H77).7, 8, 66 The sequences of primers suitable for amplification of these regions from a wide range of HCV genotypes will be made available on the public databases.

Sequences will be analyzed by a variety of distance-based, parsimony, and maximum likelihood methods, and evidence sought for consistent phylogenetic grouping together and distinctness from other subtypes. Because currently classified subtypes of HCV differ in nucleotide sequence from each other by more than 15%, at least this level of divergence will be expected from other HCV variants within the genotype. However, as described in the Introduction, the existence of separately identifiable subtypes is primarily an epidemiological phenomenon associated with its recent spread. Because subtype designation are primarily epidemiological labels, it is clearly not appropriate or of value to develop formal criteria for their assignment. Indeed, the varying degrees of sequence divergence of variants within different genotypes would make the development of such criteria extremely difficult.

Candidate subtypes will be provisionally assigned with the next available subtype letter for the genotype on submission to one of the HCV databases. Sequences from the 5′UTR will be of value for assessment of their appearance in commonly used genotyping assays but are not required. Single or pairs of variants of HCV that would otherwise be designated as new subtypes by these criteria will not be assigned a subtype letter in the database.

Confirmed designation.

One or more complete genome sequences will be required for confirmed designation. This will allow the degree of sequence divergence from other subtypes over the whole genome to be assessed as well as confirming an absence of recombination.

Assignment of Recombinant Forms of HCV.

It is important that the classification scheme for HCV genotypes should be able to incorporate HCV recombinants. However, with the current description of only 2 or 3 confirmed or possible recombinants in the literature, it was deemed to be of less immediate importance to classify these formally, and to develop rules for nomenclature. Until review at a subsequent classification meeting, sequences with evidence of recombination will be annotated as such in the databases, with options to include or exclude them from downloads or analyses of sequences.

Interface With HCV Sequence Databases.

The HCV sequence databases are in a unique position to support the effort to make the HCV nomenclature more uniform. By assigning geno/subtypes to the sequences that people retrieve and download, they can influence the commonly used nomenclature of existing sequences, whereas they can have a coordinating role in assigning new geno/subtypes and keeping track of these, especially before journal publication. The databases are also committed to assist in the naming of new geno/subtypes, through helping researchers name proposed new geno/subtypes, by checking existing names for consistency and correcting any inconsistencies that are found, by making it easy for the field to keep track of which geno/subtype names have already been assigned, and by providing tools for genotype or subtype identification and detecting recombinants.

The HCV database websites will provide access to the criteria for assignment of new genotypes and subtypes of HCV developed in this consensus paper, and make HCV researchers, reviewers, and journal editors aware of these guidelines. They will provide the listing of current assigned subtypes and genotypes (based on Tables 1 and 3), but will be automatically updated as sequence data are submitted, showing which designations exist in the databases, but not those that have been given out and not yet published. The distinction between “provisional” and “confirmed” designations will also be implemented in the databases through the provision of a separate field for this category. The genotype name re-assignments in Table 2 will similarly be made available, and the 3 databases will keep in continuous contact to ensure that the nomenclature of currently existing sequences is uniform and free of conflicts.


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Background
  4. Current Issues to Resolve in HCV Classification
  5. Consensus Classification Proposals
  6. Summary
  7. References

This report describes a series of proposals for the classification of HCV variants into genotypes and subtypes. It addresses both current problems with the nomenclature of existing variants, and incorporates our improved understanding of the genetic diversity and epidemiology of HCV into the revised criteria for the designation of new genotypes and subtypes. The consensus meeting provided the opportunity to compile for the first time a full listing of currently described variants of HCV (Tables 1 and 3), and the opportunity to perform the minimum number of genotype and subtype name re-assignments to create consistency in nomenclature (Table 2).

Finally, these proposals serve as a framework for access to the 3 databases, which will follow the revised nomenclature presented here for sequence retrieval, and to use the revised criteria for classification in their coordinating role in the assignment of new genotypes and subtypes; this will be of major value in preventing future inconsistencies in nomenclature.


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Background
  4. Current Issues to Resolve in HCV Classification
  5. Consensus Classification Proposals
  6. Summary
  7. References
  • 1
    Thiel HJ, Collett MS, Gould EA, Heinz FX, Houghton M, Meyers G, et al. Flaviviridae. In: FauquetCM, MayoMA, ManiloffJ, DesselbergerU, BallLA, eds. Virus Taxonomy, VIIIth Report of the ICTV. 2005: 979996.
  • 2
    Robertson B, Myers G, Howard C, Brettin T, Bukh J, Gaschen B, et al. Classification, nomenclature, and database development for hepatitis C virus (HCV) and related viruses: proposals for standardization. Arch Virol 1998; 143: 24932503.
  • 3
    Combet C, Penin F, Geourjon C, Deleage G. HCVDB : Hepatitis C virus sequences database. Appl Bioinformatics 2004; 3: 237240.
  • 4
    Kuiken C, Yusim K, Boykin L, Richardson R. The Los Alamos hepatitis C sequence database. Bioinformatics 2005; 21: 379384.
  • 5
    Cha TA, Beall E, Irvine B, Kolberg J, Chien D, Kuo G, et al. At least five related, but distinct, hepatitis C viral genotypes exist. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992; 89: 71447148.
  • 6
    Chan SW, McOmish F, Holmes EC, Dow B, Peutherer JF, Follett E, et al. Analysis of a new hepatitis C virus type and its phylogenetic relationship to existing variants. J Gen Virol 1992; 73: 11311141.
  • 7
    Simmonds P, Holmes EC, Cha TA, Chan S-W, McOmish F, Irvine B, et al. Classification of hepatitis C virus into six major genotypes and a series of subtypes by phylogenetic analysis of the NS-5 region. J Gen Virol 1993; 74: 23912399.
  • 8
    Enomoto N, Takada A, Nakao T, Date T. There are two major types of hepatitis C virus in Japan. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1990; 170: 10211025.
  • 9
    Okamoto H, Kurai K, Okada S, Yamamoto K, Lizuka H, Tanaka T, et al. Full-length sequence of a hepatitis C virus genome having poor homology to reported isolates: comparative study of four distinct genotypes. Virology 1992; 188: 331341.
  • 10
    Mori S, Kato N, Yagyu A, Tanaka T, Ikeda Y, Petchclai B, et al. A new type of hepatitis C virus in patients in Thailand. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1992; 183: 334342.
  • 11
    Tsukiyama Kohara K, Kohara M, Yamaguchi K, Maki N, Toyoshima A, Miki K, et al. A second group of hepatitis C viruses. Virus Genes 1991; 5: 243254.
  • 12
    Bukh J, Purcell RH, Miller RH. At least 12 genotypes of hepatitis C virus predicted by sequence analysis of the putative E1 gene of isolates collected worldwide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993; 90: 82348238.
  • 13
    Simmonds P, Alberti A, Alter HJ, Bonino F, Bradley DW, Brechot C, et al. A proposed system for the nomenclature of hepatitis C viral genotypes. HEPATOLOGY 1994; 19: 13211324.
  • 14
    Simmonds P, Smith DB, McOmish F, Yap PL, Kolberg J, Urdea MS, et al. Identification of genotypes of hepatitis C virus by sequence comparisons in the core, E1 and NS-5 regions. J Gen Virol 1994; 75: 10531061.
  • 15
    Weiner AJ, Brauer MJ, Rosenblatt J, Richman KH, Tung J, Crawford K, et al. Variable and hypervariable domains are found in the regions of HCV corresponding to the flavivirus envelope and NS1 proteins and the pestivirus envelope glycoproteins. Virology 1991; 180: 842848.
  • 16
    Kato N, Ootsuyama Y, Ohkoshi S, Nakazawa T, Sekiya H, Hijikata M, et al. Characterization of hypervariable regions in the putative envelope protein of hepatitis C virus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1992; 189: 119127.
  • 17
    Kumar U, Brown J, Monjardino J, Thomas HC. Sequence variation in the large envelope glycoprotein (E2/NS1) of hepatitis C virus during chronic infection. J Infect Dis 1993; 167: 726730.
  • 18
    Taniguchi S, Okamoto H, Sakamoto M, Kojima M, Tsuda F, Tanaka T, et al. A structurally flexible and antigenically variable n- terminal domain of the hepatitis C virus e2/NS1 protein: implication for an escape from antibody. Virology 1993; 195: 297301.
  • 19
    Weiner AJ, Geysen HM, Christopherson C, Hall JE, Mason TJ, Saracco G, et al. Evidence for immune selection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) putative envelope glycoprotein variants: potential role in chronic HCV infections. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992; 89: 34683472.
  • 20
    Farci P, Shimoda A, Coiana A, Diaz G, Peddis G, Melpolder JC, et al. The outcome of acute hepatitis C predicted by the evolution of the viral quasispecies. Science 2000; 288: 339344.
  • 21
    Kantzanou M, Lucas M, Barnes E, Komatsu H, Dusheiko G, Ward S, et al. Viral escape and T cell exhaustion in hepatitis C virus infection analysed using class I peptide tetramers. Immunol Lett 2003; 85: 165171.
  • 22
    Penin F, Combet C, Germanidis G, Frainais PO, Deleage G, Pawlotsky JM. Conservation of the conformation and positive charges of hepatitis C virus E2 envelope glycoprotein hypervariable region 1 points to a role in cell attachment. J Virol 2001; 75: 57035710.
  • 23
    Jeannel D, Fretz C, Traore Y, Kohdjo N, Bigot A, Gamy EP, et al. Evidence for high genetic diversity and long-term endemicity of hepatitis C virus genotypes 1 and 2 in West Africa. J Med Virol 1998; 55: 9297.
  • 24
    Mellor J, Holmes EC, Jarvis LM, Yap PL, Simmonds P, International Collaborators. Investigation of the pattern of hepatitis C virus sequence diversity in different geographical regions: implications for virus classification. J Gen Virol 1995; 76: 24932507.
  • 25
    Wansbrough Jones MH, Frimpong E, Cant B, Harris K, Evans MRW, Teo CG. Prevalence and genotype of hepatitis C virus infection in pregnant women and blood donors in Ghana. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1998; 92: 496499.
  • 26
    Ruggieri A, Argentini C, Kouruma F, Chionne P, D'Ugo E, Spada E, et al. Heterogeneity of hepatitis C virus genotype 2 variants in West Central Africa (Guinea Conakry). J Gen Virol 1996; 77: 20732076.
  • 27
    Candotti D, Temple J, Sarkodie F, Allain JP. Frequent recovery and broad genotype 2 diversity characterize hepatitis C virus infection in Ghana, West Africa. J Virol 2003; 77: 79147923.
  • 28
    Fretz C, Jeannel D, Stuyver L, Herve V, Lunel F, Boudifa A, et al. HCV infection in a rural population of the Central African Republic (CAR): evidence for three additional subtypes of genotype 4. J Med Virol 1995; 47: 435437.
  • 29
    Stuyver L, Rossau R, Wyseur A, Duhamel M, Vanderborght B, Van Heuverswyn H, et al. Typing of hepatitis C virus isolates and characterization of new subtypes using a line probe assay. J Gen Virol 1993; 74: 10931102.
  • 30
    Menendez C, Sancheztapias JM, Alonso PL, Gimenez Barcons M, Kahigwa E, Aponte JJ, et al. Molecular evidence of mother-to-infant transmission of hepatitis G virus among women without known risk factors for parenteral infections. J Clin Microbiol 1999; 37: 23332336.
  • 31
    Xu LZ, Larzul D, Delaporte E, Brechot C, Kremsdorf D. Hepatitis c virus genotype 4 is highly prevalent in central Africa (Gabon). J Gen Virol 1994; 75: 23932398.
  • 32
    Ndjomou J, Pybus OG, Matz B. Phylogenetic analysis of hepatitis C virus isolates indicates a unique pattern of endemic infection in Cameroon. J Gen Virol 2003; 84: 23332341.
  • 33
    Tokita H, Shrestha SM, Okamoto H, Sakamoto M, Hirokita M, Iizuka H, et al. Hepatitis C virus variants from Nepal with novel genotypes and their classification into the third major group. J Gen Virol 1994; 75: 931936.
  • 34
    Tokita H, Okamoto H, Tsuda F, Song P, Nakata S, Chosa T, et al. Hepatitis C virus variants from Vietnam are classifiable into the seventh, eighth, and ninth major genetic groups. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994; 91: 1102211026.
  • 35
    Tokita H, Okamoto H, Luengrojanakul P, Vareesangthip K, Chainuvati T, Iizuka H, et al. Hepatitis C virus variants from Thailand classifiable into five novel genotypes in the sixth (6b), seventh (7c, 7d) and ninth (9b, 9c) major genetic groups. J Gen Virol 1995; 76: 23292335.
  • 36
    Simmonds P. 2000 Fleming Lecture. The origin and evolution of hepatitis viruses in humans. J Gen Virol 2001; 82: 693712.
  • 37
    Cochrane A, Searle B, Hardie A, Robertson R, Delahooke T, Cameron S, et al. A genetic analysis of hepatitis C virus transmission between injection drug users. J Infect Dis 2002; 186: 12121221.
  • 38
    Pybus OG, Charleston MA, Gupta S, Rambaut A, Holmes EC, Harvey PH. The epidemic behaviour of hepatitis C virus. Science 2001; 22: 23232325.
  • 39
    Pybus OG, Drummond AJ, Nakano T, Robertson BH, Rambaut A. The epidemiology and iatrogenic transmission of hepatitis C virus in egypt: a bayesian coalescent approach. Mol Biol Evol 2003; 20: 381387.
  • 40
    Kalinina O, Norder H, Mukomolov S, Magnius LO. A natural intergenotypic recombinant of hepatitis C virus identified in St. Petersburg. J Virol 2002; 76: 40344043.
  • 41
    Kalinina O, Norder H, Magnius LO. Full-length open reading frame of a recombinant hepatitis C virus strain from St Petersburg: proposed mechanism for its formation. J Gen Virol 2004; 85: 18531857.
  • 42
    Colina R, Casane D, Vasquez S, Garcia-Aguirre L, Chunga A, Romero H, et al. Evidence of intratypic recombination in natural populations of hepatitis C virus. J Gen Virol 2004; 85: 3137.
  • 43
    Hnatyszyn HJ. Chronic hepatitis C and genotyping: the clinical significance of determining HCV genotypes. Antivir Ther 2005; 10: 111.
  • 44
    Stuyver L, Rossau R, Wyseur A, Duhamel M, Vanderborght B, Van Heuverswyn H, et al. Typing of hepatitis C virus isolates and characterisation of new subtypes using a line probe assay. J Gen Virol 1993; 74: 10931102.
  • 45
    Maertens G, Stuyver L. HCV genotyping by the line probe assay INNO-LiPA HCV II. In: LauJYN, ed. Hepatitis C Protocols. Totawa: Human Press, 1998: 183198.
  • 46
    McOmish F, Chan S-W, Dow BC, Gillon J, Frame WD, Crawford RJ, et al. Detection of three types of hepatitis C virus in blood donors: investigation of type-specific differences in serological reactivity and rate of alanine aminotransferase abnormalities. Transfusion 1993; 33: 713.
  • 47
    Davidson F, Simmonds P. Determination of HCV genotypes by RFLP. In: LauJYN, ed. Hepatitis C Protocols. Totawa: Human Press, 1998: 175181.
  • 48
    Ross RS, Viazov SO, Holtzer CD, Beyou A, Monnet A, Mazure C, et al. Genotyping of hepatitis C virus isolates using CLIP sequencing. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38: 35813584.
  • 49
    Simmonds P, Rose KA, Graham S, Chan SW, McOmish F, Dow BC, et al. Mapping of serotype-specific, immunodominant epitopes in the NS- 4 region of hepatitis C virus (HCV): use of type-specific peptides to serologically differentiate infections with HCV type 1, type 2, and type 3. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31: 14931503.
  • 50
    Tanaka T, Tsukiyamakohara K, Yamaguchi K, Yagi S, Tanaka S, Hasegawa A, et al. Significance of specific antibody assay for genotyping of hepatitis C virus. HEPATOLOGY 1994; 19: 13471353.
  • 51
    Lau JYN, Mizokami M, Kolberg JA, Davis GL, Prescott LE, Ohno T, et al. Application of six hepatitis C virus genotyping systems to sera from chronic hepatitis C patients in the United States. J Infect Dis 1995; 171: 281289.
  • 52
    Bhattacherjee V, Prescott LE, Pike I, Rodgers B, Bell H, Elzayadi AR, et al. Use of NS-4 peptides to identify type-specific antibody to hepatitis C virus genotypes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. J Gen Virol 1995; 76: 17371748.
  • 53
    Zheng X, Pang M, Chan A, Roberto A, Warner D, Yen-Lieberman B. Direct comparison of hepatitis C virus genotypes tested by INNO-LiPA HCV II and TRUGENE HCV genotyping methods. J Clin Virol 2003; 28: 214216.
  • 54
    Gault E, Soussan P, Morice Y, Sanders L, Berrada A, Rogers B, et al. Evaluation of a new serotyping assay for detection of anti-hepatitis C virus type-specific antibodies in serum samples. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41: 20842087.
  • 55
    Dansako H, Naganuma A, Nakamura T, Ikeda F, Nozaki A, Kato N. Differential activation of interferon-inducible genes by hepatitis C virus core protein mediated by the interferon stimulated response element. Virus Res 2003; 97: 1730.
  • 56
    Mellor J, Walsh EA, Prescott LE, Jarvis LM, Davidson F, Yap PL, et al. Survey of type 6 group variants of hepatitis C virus in southeast Asia by using a core-based genotyping assay. J Clin Microbiol 1996; 34: 417423.
  • 57
    Smith DB, Mellor J, Jarvis LM, Davidson F, Kolberg J, Urdea M, et al. Variation of the hepatitis C virus 5' non-coding region: implications for secondary structure, virus detection and typing. J Gen Virol 1995; 76: 17491761.
  • 58
    Samokhvalov EI, Hijikata M, Gylka RI, Lvov DK, Mishiro S. Full-genome nucleotide sequence of a hepatitis C virus variant (isolate name VAT96) representing a new subtype within the genotype 2 (arbitrarily 2k). Virus Genes 2000; 20: 183187.
  • 59
    Tokita H, Okamoto H, Iizuka H, Kishimoto J, Tsuda F, Lesmana LA, et al. Hepatitis C virus variants from Jakarta, Indonesia classifiable into novel genotypes in the second (2e and 2f), tenth (10a) and eleventh (11a) genetic groups. J Gen Virol 1996; 77: 293301.
  • 60
    Robertson DL, Anderson JP, Bradac JA, Carr JK, Foley B, Funkhouser RK, et al. HIV-1 nomenclature proposal. Science 2000; 288: 5556.
  • 61
    Depla E, Maertens G, De Nys K, Blockx H, van Doom LJ, Quint W, et al. A putative new clade 7 of Hepatitis C virus containing at least one type and two subtypes. 10th International Meeting on Hepatitis C Virus and Related Viruses, December 2-6, 2003, Kyoto, Japan.
  • 62
    Murphy D, Willems B, Deschenes M, Hilzenrat N, Mousseau R. Use of nucleotide sequence analysis of the NS5B region for routine genotyping of hepatitis C virus: identification of numerous variants not classifiable among the known HCV genotypes. HEPATOLOGY 2003; 38: 423A.
  • 63
    Kolykhalov AA, Feinstone SM, Rice CM. Identification of a highly conserved sequence element at the 3′ terminus of hepatitis C virus genome RNA. J Virol 1996; 70: 33633371.
  • 64
    Bukh J, Purcell RH, Miller RH. Sequence analysis of the core gene of 14 hepatitis C virus genotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994; 91: 82398243.
  • 65
    Ray SC, Arthur RR, Carella A, Bukh J, Thomas DL. Genetic epidemiology of hepatitis C virus throughout Egypt. J Infect Dis 2000; 182: 698707.
  • 66
    Stuyver L, Vanarnhem W, Wyseur A, Hernandez F, Delaporte E, Maertens G. Classification of hepatitis C viruses based on phylogenetic analysis of the envelope 1 and nonstructural 5b regions and identification of five additional subtypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994; 91: 1013410138.
  • 67
    Choo QL, Richman KH, Han JH, Berger K, Lee C, Dong C, et al. Genetic organization and diversity of the hepatitis C virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1991; 88: 24512455.
  • 68
    Inchauspe G, Zebedee S, Lee DH, Sugitani M, Nasoff M, Prince AM. Genomic structure of the human prototype strain H of hepatitis C virus: comparison with American and Japanese isolates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1991; 88: 1029210296.
  • 69
    Kato N, Hijikata M, Ootsuyama Y, Nakagawa M, Ohkoshi S, Sugimura T, et al. Molecular cloning of the human hepatitis C virus genome from Japanese patients with non-A, non-B hepatitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990; 87: 95249528.
  • 70
    Takamizawa A, Mori C, Fuke I, Manabe S, Murakami S, Fujita J, et al. Structure and organization of the hepatitis C virus genome isolated from human carriers. J Virol 1991; 65: 11051113.
  • 71
    Okamoto H, Kojima M, Sakamoto M, Iizuka H, Hadiwandowo S, Suwignyo S, et al. The entire nucleotide sequence and classification of a hepatitis C virus isolate of a novel genotype from an Indonesian patient with chronic liver disease. J Gen Virol 1994; 75: 629635.
  • 72
    Okamoto H, Okada S, Sugiyama Y, Kurai K, Iizuka H, Machida A, et al. Nucleotide sequence of the genomic RNA of hepatitis C virus isolated from a human carrier: comparison with reported isolates for conserved and divergent regions. J Gen Virol 1991; 72: 26972704.
  • 73
    Kato T, Furusaka A, Miyamoto M, Date T, Yasui K, Hiramoto J, et al. Sequence analysis of hepatitis C virus isolated from a fulminant hepatitis patient. J Med Virol 2001; 64: 334339.
  • 74
    Murakami K, Abe M, Kageyama T, Kamoshita N, Nomoto A. Down-regulation of translation driven by hepatitis C virus internal ribosomal entry site by the 3′ untranslated region of RNA. Arch Virol 2001; 146: 729741.
  • 75
    Nakao H, Okamoto H, Tokita H, Inoue T, Iizuka H, Pozzato G, et al. Full-length genomic sequence of a hepatitis C virus genotype 2c isolate (BEBE1) and the 2c-specific PCR primers. Arch Virol 1996; 141: 701704.
  • 76
    Sakamoto M, Akahane Y, Tsuda F, Tanaka T, Woodfield DG, Okamoto H. Entire nucleotide sequence and characterization of a hepatitis C virus of genotype v/3a. J Gen Virol 1994; 75: 17611768.
  • 77
    Yamada N, Tanihara K, Mizokami M, Ohba K, Takada A, Tsutsumi M, et al. Full-length sequence of the genome of hepatitis C virus type 3a: comparative study with different genotypes. J Gen Virol 1994; 75: 32793284.
  • 78
    Chayama K, Tsubota A, Koida I, Arase Y, Saitoh S, Ikeda K, et al. Nucleotide sequence of hepatitis C virus (type 3b) isolated from a Japanese patient with chronic hepatitis C. J Gen Virol 1994; 75: 36233628.
  • 79
    Chamberlain RW, Adams N, Saeed AA, Simmonds P, Elliott RM. Complete nucleotide sequence of a type 4 hepatitis C virus variant, the predominant genotype in the Middle East. J Gen Virol 1997; 78: 13411347.
  • 80
    Chamberlain RW, Adams NJ, Taylor LA, Simmonds P, Elliott RM. The complete coding sequence of hepatitis C virus genotype 5a, the predominant genotype in South Africa. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1997; 236: 4449.
  • 81
    Bukh J, Apgar CL, Engle R, Govindarajan S, Hegerich PA, Tellier R, et al. Experimental infection of chimpanzees with hepatitis C virus of genotype 5a: genetic analysis of the virus and generation of a standardized challenge pool. J Infect Dis 1998; 178: 11931197.
  • 82
    Adams NJ, Chamberlain RW, Taylor LA, Davidson F, Lin CK, Elliott RM, et al. Complete coding sequence of hepatitis C virus genotype 6a. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1997; 234: 393396.
  • 83
    Tokita H, Okamoto H, Iizuka H, Kishimoto J, Tsuda F, Miyakawa Y, et al. The entire nucleotide sequences of three hepatitis C virus isolates in genetic groups 7–9 and comparison with those in the other eight genetic groups. J Gen Virol 1998; 79: 18471857.
  • 84
    Stuyver L, Wyseur A, Van Arnhem W, Lunel F, Laurent-Puig P, Pawlotsky JM, et al. Hepatitis C virus genotyping by means of 5′-UR/core line probe assays and molecular analysis of untypeable samples. Virus Res 1995; 38: 137157.
  • 85
    Stuyver L, Esquivel C, Boudifa A, Jaulmes D, Azar N, Lunel F, et al. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype analysis in apparently healthy anti-HCV-positive Parisian blood donors. Transfusion 1996; 36: 552558.
  • 86
    Van Doorn LJ, Kleter GEM, Stuyver L, Maertens G, Brouwer JT, Schalm SW, et al. Sequence analysis of hepatitis C virus genotypes 1 to 5 reveals multiple novel subtypes in the Benelux countries. J Gen Virol 1995; 76: 18711876.
  • 87
    Stuyver L, Wyseur A, Van Arnhem W, Hernandez F, Maertens G. Second-generation line probe assay for hepatitis C virus genotyping. J Clin Microbiol 1996; 34: 22592266.
  • 88
    Qu D, Hantz O, Gouy M, Vitvitski L, Li JS, Berby F, et al. Heterogeneity of hepatitis C virus genotypes in France. J Gen Virol 1994; 75: 10631070.
  • 89
    Giannini C, Thiers V, Nousbaum JB, Stuyver L, Maertens G, Brechot C. Comparative analysis of two assays for genotyping hepatitis C virus based on genotype-specific primers or probes. J Hepatol 1995; 23: 246253.
  • 90
    Panigrahi AK, Roca J, Acharya SK, Jameel S, Panda SK. Genotype determination of hepatitis C virus from Northern India: identification of a new subtype. J Med Virol 1996; 48: 191198.
  • 91
    Bernier L, Willems B, Delage G, Murphy DG. Identification of numerous hepatitis C virus genotypes in Montreal, Canada. J Clin Microbiol 1996; 34: 28152818.
  • 92
    Abid K, Quadri R, Veuthey AL, Hadengue A, Negro F. A novel hepatitis C virus (HCV) subtype from Somalia and its classification into HCV clade 3. J Gen Virol 2000; 81: 14851493.
  • 93
    Morice Y, Roulot D, Grando V, Stirnemann J, Gault E, Jeantils V, et al. Phylogenetic analyses confirm the high prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) type 4 in the Seine-Saint-Denis district (France) and indicate seven different HCV-4 subtypes linked to two different epidemiological patterns. J Gen Virol 2001; 82: 10011012.
  • 94
    Simmonds P, Mellor J, Sakuldamrongpanich T, Nuchaprayoon C, Tanprasert S, Holmes EC, et al. Evolutionary analysis of variants of hepatitis C virus found in South-East Asia: comparison with classifications based upon sequence similarity. J Gen Virol 1996; 77: 30133024.
  • 95
    Doi H, Apichartpiyakul C, Ohba KI, Mizokami M, Hotta H. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) subtype prevalence in Chaing Mai, Thailand and identification of novel subtypes of HCV in major type 6. J Clin Microbiol 1996; 34: 569574.
  • 96
    Apichartpiyakul C, Chittivudikarn C, Miyajima H, Homma M, Hotta H. Analysis of hepatitis C virus isolates among healthy blood donors and drug addicts in Chiang Mai, Thailand. J Clin Microbiol 1994; 32: 22762279.
  • 97
    Kumar S, Tamura K, Jakobsen IB, Nei M. MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software. Bioinformatics 2001; 17: 12441245.