This guideline has been approved by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and represents the position of the Association.
If you can't find a tool you're looking for, please click the link at the top of the page to "Go to old article view". Alternatively, view our Knowledge Base articles for additional help. Your feedback is important to us, so please let us know if you have comments or ideas for improvement.
These guidelines have been written to assist physicians and other health care providers in the recognition, diagnosis, and management of patients chronically infected with the hepatitis B virus (HBV). These recommendations provide a data-supported approach to patients with hepatitis B. They are based on the following: (1) formal review and analysis of published literature on the topic — Medline search up to February 2006 and meeting abstracts in 2003-2005; (2) American College of Physicians Manual for Assessing Health Practices and Designing Practice Guidelines1; (3) guideline policies, including the AASLD Policy on the Development and Use of Practice Guidelines and the AGA Policy Statement on Guidelines2; and (4) the experience of the authors in hepatitis B. In addition, the proceedings of the 2000 and 2006 National Institutes of Health conferences on the “Management of Hepatitis B”, the EASL 2002 International Consensus Conference on Hepatitis B and the Asian-Pacific Consensus Statement on the Management of Chronic Hepatitis B: a 2005 Update, were considered in the development of these guidelines.3–6 The recommendations suggest preferred approaches to the diagnostic, therapeutic, and preventive aspects of care. They are intended to be flexible. Specific recommendations are based on relevant published information. In an attempt to characterize the quality of evidence supporting recommendations, the Practice Guidelines Committee of the AASLD requires a category to be assigned and reported with each recommendation (Table 1). These guidelines may be updated periodically as new information becomes available.
|I||Randomized controlled trials|
|II-1||Controlled trials without randomization|
|II-2||Cohort or case-control analytic studies|
|II-3||Multiple time series, dramatic uncontrolled experiments|
|III||Opinions of respected authorities, descriptive epidemiology|
An estimated 350 million persons worldwide are chronically infected with HBV.7 In the United States, there are an estimated 1.25 million hepatitis B carriers, defined as persons positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) for more than 6 months.8, 9 Carriers of HBV are at increased risk of developing cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).10 Although most carriers will not develop hepatic complications from chronic hepatitis B, 15% to 40% will develop serious sequelae during their lifetime.11 The following guidelines are an update to previous AASLD guidelines and reflect new knowledge and the licensure of new antiviral agents against HBV. Recommendations in these guidelines pertain to the (1) evaluation of patients with chronic HBV infection, (2) prevention of HBV infection, (3) management of chronically infected persons, and (4) treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Management of hepatitis B in patients waiting for liver transplantation and prevention of recurrent hepatitis B post-liver transplant have been covered in a recent review article and will not be discussed in these guidelines.12
Screening High Risk Populations to Identify HBV Infected Persons
The global prevalence of HBsAg varies greatly and countries can be defined as having a high, intermediate and low prevalence of HBV infection based on a prevalence of HBsAg carriers of ≥8%, 2%-7%, and <2% respectively.7, 9, 13, 14 In developed countries, the prevalence is higher among those who immigrated from high or intermediate prevalence countries and in those with high risk behaviors.7, 9
HBV is transmitted by perinatal, percutaneous, and sexual exposure, as well as by close person-to-person contact presumably by open cuts and sores, especially among children in hyperendemic areas.9 HBV can survive outside the body for prolonged periods.15, 16 The risk of developing chronic HBV infection after acute exposure ranges from 90% in newborns of HBeAg-positive mothers to 25% to 30% in infants and children under 5 and to less than 5% in adults.17–21 In addition, immunosuppressed persons are more likely to develop chronic HBV infection after acute infection.22, 23 In countries such as the United States where most of the infants, children, and adolescents have been vaccinated against HBV, the risk of transmitting HBV in daycare centers or schools is extremely low and HBsAg-positive children should not be isolated or prevented from participating in activities including sports.
Table 2 displays the population and high risk groups that should be screened for HBV infection and immunized if seronegative. The tests used to screen persons for HBV should include HBsAg and hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs). Alternatively, hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) can be utilized as long as those who test positive are further tested for both HBsAg and anti-HBs to differentiate infection from immunity.
|• Individuals born in areas of high# and intermediate prevalence rates† for HBV including immigrants and adopted children∧*|
|—South Asia (except Sri Lanka)|
|—South Pacific Islands|
|—Middle East (except Cyprus)|
|—European Mediterranean: Greece, Italy, Malta, Portugal and Spain|
|—The Arctic (indigenous populations)|
|—South America: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Ecuador, Guyana, Suriname, Venezuela and Amazon region of Colombia and Peru|
|—Independent states of former Soviet Union|
|—Eastern Europe, including Russia, except Hungary|
|—Caribbean: Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Granada, Haiti, Jamaica, Puerto Rico, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, St. Vincent and Grenadines, Trinidad and Tobago and Turks and Caicos.|
|• Other high risk groups recommended for screening|
|—Household and sexual contacts of HBsAg-positive persons*|
|—Persons who have ever injected drugs*|
|—Persons with multiple sexual partners or history of sexually transmitted disease*|
|—Men who have sex with men*|
|—Inmates of correctional facilities*|
|—Individuals with chronically elevated ALT or AST*|
|—Individuals infected with HCV or HIV*|
|—Patients undergoing renal dialysis*|
|—All pregnant women|
Some persons may test positive for anti-HBc but not HBsAg or anti-HBs. The finding of isolated anti-HBc can occur for a variety of reasons. (1) Anti-HBc may be an indicator of chronic HBV infection; in these persons, HBsAg had decreased to undetectable levels but HBV DNA often remains detectable, more so in the liver than in serum. This situation is not uncommon among persons from areas with high prevalence of HBV infection and in those with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.24 (2) Anti-HBc may be a marker of immunity after recovery from a prior infection. In these persons, anti-HBs had decreased to undetectable levels but anamnestic response can be observed after one dose of HBV vaccine.25 (3) Anti-HBc may be a false positive test result particularly in persons from low prevalence areas with no risk factors for HBV infection. These individuals respond to hepatitis B vaccination similar to persons without any HBV seromarkers.9, 25, 26 (4) Anti-HBc may be the only marker of HBV infection during the window phase of acute hepatitis B; these persons should test positive for anti-HBc IgM.
Recommendations for Persons Who Should Be Tested for HBV Infection:
1. The following groups should be tested for HBV infection: persons born in hyperendemic areas (Table2), men who have sex with men, persons who have ever used injecting drugs, dialysis patients, HIV-infected individuals, pregnant women, and family members, household members, and sexual contacts of HBV-infected persons. Testing for HBsAg and anti-HBs should be performed, and seronegative persons should be vaccinated. (I)
Counseling and Prevention of Hepatitis B
Patients with chronic HBV infection should be counseled regarding lifestyle modifications and prevention of transmission and the importance of life long monitoring. No specific dietary measures have been shown to have any effect on the progression of chronic hepatitis B. However, heavy use of alcohol (>20 g/d in women and >30 g/d in men) may be a risk factor for the development of cirrhosis.27, 28
Carriers of HBV should be counseled regarding transmission to others (see Table 3). Household members and steady sexual partners are at increased risk of HBV infection and therefore should be vaccinated if they test negative for HBV serologic markers.9 For casual sex partners or steady partners who have not been tested or have not completed the full immunization series, barrier protection methods should be employed. HBsAg-positive women who are pregnant should be counseled to make sure they inform their providers so hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) and hepatitis B vaccine can be administered to their newborn immediately after delivery.9 HBIG and concurrent hepatitis B vaccine have been shown to be 95% efficacious in the prevention of perinatal transmission of HBV, the efficacy is lower for maternal carriers with very high serum HBV DNA levels (>8 log10 IU/ml).9, 29 Transmission of HBV from infected health care workers to patients has also been shown to occur in rare instances.30, 31 For HBV carriers who are health care workers, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that those who are HBeAg-positive should not perform exposure prone procedures without prior counseling and advice from an expert review panel regarding under what circumstances, if any, they should be allowed to perform these procedures.32 These circumstances would include notifying prospective patients of their HBV status prior to procedures. While the CDC does not use serum HBV DNA levels as criteria for restriction of clinical procedures, several European countries use a threshold level varying from 200 to 20,000 IU/ml to determine if HBsAg-positive health care workers are allowed to perform exposure prone procedures.33, 34
|Persons who are HBsAg-positive should|
|• Have sexual contacts vaccinated|
|• Use barrier protection during sexual intercourse if partner not vaccinated or naturally immune|
|• Not share toothbrushes or razors|
|• Cover open cuts and scratches|
|• Clean blood spills with detergent or bleach|
|• Not donate blood, organs or sperms|
|Children and adults who are HBsAg-positive:|
|• Can participate in all activities including contact sports|
|• Should not be excluded from daycare or school participation and should not be isolated from other children|
|• Can share food, utensils or kiss others|
The risk of infection after blood transfusion and transplantation of non-hepatic solid organs (kidneys, lungs, heart) from persons with isolated anti-HBc is low: 0% to 13%.35 The risk of infection after transplantation of liver from HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-positive donors has been reported to be as high as 75% and is related to the HBV immune status of the recipients.36, 37 If anti-HBc-positive donor organs are used for HBV seronegative recipients, antiviral therapy should be administered to prevent de novo HBV infection. While the optimal duration of prophylactic therapy has not been determined, a limited duration such as 6-12 months may be sufficient for transplantation of non-hepatic solid organs. For transplantation of livers, life-long antiviral therapy is recommended, but whether HBIG is necessary is unclear.38
Hepatitis B Vaccination
Recommendations for vaccination are outlined in a recent CDC and Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) guideline.9, 9a Follow-up testing is recommended for those who remain at risk of infection such as health care workers, infants of HBsAg-positive mothers and sexual partners of persons with chronic HBV infection. Furthermore, annual testing of hemodialysis patients is recommended since immunity wanes rapidly in these individuals who are at a high risk of continued exposure to HBV.
Recommendations for Counseling and Prevention of Transmission of Hepatitis B from Individuals with Chronic HBV Infection:
- 2Carriers should be counseled regarding prevention of transmission of HBV (Table3). (III)
- 3Sexual and household contacts of carriers who are negative for HBV seromarkers should receive hepatitis B vaccination. (III)
- 4Newborns of HBV-infected mothers should receive HBIG and hepatitis B vaccine at delivery and complete the recommended vaccination series. (I)
- 5Persons who remain at risk for HBV infection such as infants of HBsAg-positive mothers, health care workers, dialysis patients, and sexual partners of carriers should be tested for response to vaccination. (III)
Postvaccination testing should be performed at 9 to 15 months of age in infants of carrier mothers and 1-2 months after the last dose in other persons. (III)
Follow-up testing of vaccine responders is recommended annually for chronic hemodialysis patients. (III)
- 6Abstinence or only limited use of alcohol is recommended in hepatitis B carriers. (III)
- 7Persons who are positive only for anti-HBc and who are from a low endemic area with no risk factors for HBV should be given the full series of hepatitis B vaccine. (II-2)
Eight genotypes of HBV have been identified labeled A through H.39, 40 The prevalence of HBV genotypes varies depending on the geographical location. All known HBV genotypes have been found in the United States, with the prevalence of genotypes A, B, C, D and E-G being 35%, 22%, 31%, 10%, and 2%, respectively.41
Recent data suggest that HBV genotypes may play an important role in the progression of HBV-related liver disease as well as response to interferon therapy.39 Studies from Asia found that HBV genotype B is associated with HBeAg seroconversion at an earlier age, more sustained remission after HBeAg seroconversion, less active hepatic necroinflammation, a slower rate of progression to cirrhosis, and a lower rate of HCC development compared to genotype C.42–47 The relation between other HBV genotypes and liver disease progression is unclear.
Several studies of standard interferon-alpha (IFN-α) and one study of pegylated IFN-alpha (pegIFN-α) therapy showed that genotypes A and B were associated with higher rates of HBeAg seroconversion compared to genotypes C and D.48–51 Another study of pegIFN-α reported that genotype A but not genotype B was associated with a higher rate of HBeAg seroconversion.52 Studies of nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapies have not shown any relation between HBV genotypes and response. Thus, additional data on the relation between HBV genotypes and treatment response are needed before testing for HBV genotypes in clinical practice is recommended.
Terminology and Natural History of Chronic HBV Infection
The consensus definition and diagnostic criteria for clinical terms relating to HBV infection adopted at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) conferences on Management of Hepatitis B in 2000 and 2006 are summarized in Table 4.3, 4
|Chronic hepatitis B|
|Chronic necroinflammatory disease of the liver caused by persistent infection with hepatitis B virus. Chronic hepatitis B can be subdivided into HBeAg positive and HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B.|
|Inactive HBsAg carrier state|
|Persistent HBV infection of the liver without significant, ongoing necroinflammatory disease|
|Resolved hepatitis B|
|Previous HBV infection without further virologic, biochemical or histological evidence of active virus infection or disease|
|Acute exacerbation or flare of hepatitis B|
|Intermittent elevations of aminotransferase activity to more than 10 times the upper limit of normal and more than twice the baseline value|
|Reactivation of hepatitis B|
|Reappearance of active necroinflammatory disease of the liver in a person known to have the inactive HBsAg carrier state or resolved hepatitis B|
|Loss of HBeAg in a person who was previously HBeAg positive|
|Loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe in a person who was previously HBeAg positive and anti-HBe negative|
|Reappearance of HBeAg in a person who was previously HBeAg negative, anti-HBe positive|
|Chronic hepatitis B|
|1. HBsAg + > 6 months|
|2. Serum HBV DNA >20,000 IU/ml (105copies/ml), lower values 2,000-20,000 IU/ml (104-105 copies/ml) are often seen in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B|
|3. Persistent or intermittent elevation in ALT/AST levels|
|4. Liver biopsy showing chronic hepatitis with moderate or severe necroinflammation|
|Inactive HBsAg carrier state|
|1. HBsAg+ > 6 months|
|2. HBeAg-, anti-HBe+|
|3. Serum HBV DNA <2,000 IU/ml|
|4. Persistently normal ALT/AST levels|
|5. Liver biopsy confirms absence of significant hepatitis|
|Resolved hepatitis B|
|1. Previous known history of acute or chronic hepatitis B or the presence of anti-HBc ± anti-HBs|
|3. Undetectable serum HBV DNA#|
|4. Normal ALT levels|
During the initial phase of chronic HBV infection, serum HBV DNA levels are high and HBeAg is present. The majority of carriers eventually loses HBeAg and develop antibody to HBeAg (anti-HBe).13, 53–56
Among individuals with perinatally acquired HBV infection, a large percent of HBeAg-positive patients have high serum HBV DNA but normal ALT levels.57, 58 These patients are considered to be in the “immune tolerant” phase. Many of these patients develop HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B with elevated ALT levels in later life.56, 59, 60 In sub-Saharan Africa, Alaska, and Mediterranean countries, transmission of HBV usually occurs from person to person during childhood.20, 61–63 In these populations most children who are HBeAg positive have elevated ALT levels and seroconversion to anti-HBe is common near or shortly after the onset of puberty. In developed countries, HBV infection is usually acquired during adulthood through sexual transmission and injecting drug use.8, 9, 64 Very little longitudinal data are available, but liver disease is generally present in persons with high HBV DNA levels.
Among carriers with elevated ALT levels, the rate of clearance of HBeAg averages between 8% and 12% per year53–56, 65 but is much lower in carriers who are in the immune tolerant phase (mostly Asian children and young adults with normal ALT levels)57, 58 and in immunocompromised subjects.23, 66 HBeAg clearance may follow an exacerbation of hepatitis, manifested by an elevation of ALT levels.54, 56 Older age, higher ALT, and HBV genotype B (vs. C) are associated with higher rates of spontaneous HBeAg clearance.
After spontaneous HBeAg seroconversion, 67% to 80% of carriers have low or undetectable HBV DNA and normal ALT levels with minimal or no necroinflammation on liver biopsy — the “inactive carrier state.”13, 53–56, 62, 65, 67 Approximately 4% to 20% of inactive carriers have one or more reversions back to HBeAg. Among those who remain anti-HBe positive, 10% to 30% continue to have elevated ALT and high HBV DNA levels after HBeAg seroconversion, and roughly 10% to 20% of inactive carriers may have reactivation of HBV replication and exacerbations of hepatitis after years of quiescence.56, 60, 65, 67, 68 Therefore, serial testing is necessary to determine if an HBsAg-positive, HBeAg-negative carrier is truly in the “inactive carrier state” and life long follow-up is required to confirm that the inactive state is maintained. Clearance of HBeAg, whether spontaneous or after antiviral therapy, reduces the risk of hepatic decompensation and improves survival.69–77
Moderate or high levels of persistent HBV replication or reactivation of HBV replication following a period of quiescence after HBeAg seroconversion leads to HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B, which is characterized by HBV DNA levels >2,000 IU/ml and continued necroinflammation in the liver.78 Most patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B harbor HBV variants in the precore or core promoter region.79–85 Patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B tend to have lower serum HBV DNA levels than those with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (2,000-20 million vs. 200,000-2 billion IU/ml) and are more likely to run a fluctuating course. These patients are also older and have more advanced liver disease since HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B represents a later stage in the course of chronic HBV infection.78, 83, 86
Approximately 0.5% of HBsAg carriers will clear HBsAg yearly; most will develop anti-HBs.65, 87 However, low levels of HBV DNA remain detectable in the serum in up to half of these persons. The prognosis is improved in carriers who cleared HBsAg but HCC has been reported years after clearance of HBsAg, particularly in those who were older or had progressed to cirrhosis before HBsAg clearance.65, 87–91
Factors Associated with Progression of HBV-related Liver Disease
Host and viral risk factors associated with increased rates of cirrhosis include older age (longer duration of infection), HBV genotype C, high levels of HBV DNA, habitual alcohol consumption, and concurrent infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV), hepatitis D virus (HDV) or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).92, 93 Environmental factors that are associated with an increase risk of cirrhosis or HCC include heavy alcohol consumption, carcinogens such as aflatoxin, and, more recently smoking.
Host and viral risk factors for HCC include male gender, family history of HCC, older age, history of reversions from anti-HBe to HBeAg, presence of cirrhosis, HBV genotype C, core promoter mutation, and coinfection with HCV.65, 69, 92, 93 Although cirrhosis is a strong risk factor for HCC, 30% to 50% of HCC associated with HBV occur in the absence of cirrhosis.11 Recently, several prospective follow-up studies of large cohorts of carriers from Asia found that the presence of HBeAg and high levels of HBV DNA were independent risk factors for the subsequent development of cirrhosis and HCC.47, 94–97 Given that most of the carriers in these studies likely acquired HBV infection perinatally and their mean age at enrollment was around 40 years, these data indicate that high levels of HBV replication persisting for more than 4 decades are associated with an increased risk of HCC. However, due to the fluctuating nature of chronic HBV infection, the accuracy of one high HBV DNA level at a single time point in predicting the prognosis of individual carriers may be limited and the risk of HCC in a younger carrier who is HBeAg-positive with one high HBV DNA level may be substantially lower.
Co-infection with HCV, HDV or HIV
Coexistent HCV infection has been estimated to be present in 10% to 15% of patients with chronic hepatitis B and is more common among injecting drug users.98 Acute coinfection with HBV and HCV may shorten the duration of HBs antigenemia and lower the peak serum aminotransferase concentrations compared with acute HBV infection alone.99, 100 However, acute coinfection of HCV and HBV, or acute HCV on preexisting chronic HBV have also been reported to increase the risk of severe hepatitis and fulminant hepatic failure.101
HDV is a satellite virus, which is dependent on HBV for the production of envelope proteins.104 HBV/HDV coinfection most commonly occurs in the Mediterranean area and parts of South America. The availability of HBV vaccines and public health education on the prevention of transmission of HBV infection has led to a significant decline in the prevalence of HDV infection in the past decade.105 HDV infection can occur in two forms. The first form is caused by the coinfection of HBV and HDV; this usually results in a more severe acute hepatitis with a higher mortality rate than is seen with acute hepatitis B alone,104, 106 but rarely results in chronic infection. A second form is a result of a superinfection of HDV in a HBV carrier and can manifest as a severe “acute” hepatitis in previously asymptomatic HBV carriers or as an exacerbation of underlying chronic hepatitis B. Unlike coinfection, HDV superinfection in HBV carriers almost always results in chronic infection with both viruses. A higher proportion of persons with chronic HBV/HDV coinfection develop cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, and HCC compared to those with chronic HBV infection alone.107, 108
Studies have found that between 6% and 13% of persons infected with HIV are also coinfected with HBV. Coinfection with HIV is more common in persons from regions where both viruses are endemic, such as sub-Saharan Africa.9 Individuals with HBV and HIV coinfection tend to have higher levels of HBV DNA, lower rates of spontaneous HBeAg seroconversion, more severe liver disease, and increased rates of liver related mortality.109–112 In addition, severe flares of hepatitis can occur in HIV co-infected patients with low CD4 counts who experience immune reconstitution after initiation of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART).110 Elevated liver enzymes in patients with HBV/HIV coinfection can be caused by other factors besides HBV including HAART and certain opportunistic infections such as cytomegalovirus and Mycobacterium Avium.
Patients with HIV infection can have high levels of HBV DNA and hepatic necroinflammation with anti-HBc but not HBsAg, so called “occult HBV”.110 Therefore it is prudent to test all HIV infected persons for both HBsAg and anti-HBc and if either is positive, to test for HBV DNA. Persons who are negative for all HBV seromarkers should receive hepatitis B vaccine. If feasible, hepatitis B vaccine should be given when CD4 cell counts are >200/ul as response to vaccine is poor below this level. Persons with CD4 counts below 200 should receive HAART first and HBV vaccine when CD4 counts rise above 200/uL.110,111
Evaluation and Management of Patients with Chronic HBV Infection
The initial evaluation of patients with chronic HBV infection should include a thorough history and physical examination, with special emphasis on risk factors for coinfection, alcohol use, and family history of HBV infection and liver cancer. Laboratory tests should include assessment of liver disease, markers of HBV replication, and tests for coinfection with HCV, HDV, or HIV in those at risk (Table 5). Vaccination for hepatitis A should be administered to persons with chronic hepatitis B as per Centers for Disease Control recommendations.113
|1. History and physical examination|
|2. Family History of liver disease, HCC|
|3. Laboratory tests to assess liver disease—complete blood counts with platelets, hepatic panel and prothrombin time|
|4. Tests for HBV replication—HBeAg/anti-HBe, HBV DNA|
|5. Tests to rule out viral coinfections—anti-HCV, anti-HDV (in persons from countries where HDV infection is common and in those with history of injection drug use), and anti-HIV in those at risk|
|6. Tests to screen for HCC–AFP at baseline and, in high risk patients, ultrasound|
|7. Consider liver biopsy to grade and stage liver disease - for patients who meet criteria for chronic hepatitis|
|Suggested follow-up for patients not considered for treatment|
|HBeAg+, HBV DNA > 20,000 IU/ml and normal ALT|
|• ALT q 3-6 months, more often if ALT becomes elevated|
|• If ALT levels are between 1-2 × ULN, recheck ALT q1-3 months; consider liver biopsy if age>40, ALT borderline or mildly elevated on serial tests. Consider treatment if biopsy shows moderate/severe inflammation or significant fibrosis|
|• If ALT > 2 × ULN for 3-6 months and HBeAg+, HBV DNA > 20,000 IU/ml, consider liver biopsy and treatment.|
|• Consider screening for HCC in relevant population|
|Inactive HBsAg carrier state|
|• ALT q 3 months for 1 year, if persistently normal, ALT q 6-12 months|
|• If ALT > 1-2 × ULN, check serum HBV DNA level and exclude other causes of liver disease. Consider liver biopsy if ALT borderline or mildly elevated on serial tests or if HBV DNA persistently >20,000 IU/ml. Consider treatment if biopsy shows moderate/severe inflammation or significant fibrosis|
|• Consider screening for HCC in relevant population|
HBV DNA Assays
Most HBV DNA assays used in clinical practice are based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification with lower limits of detection of 50-200 IU/ml (250-1,000 copies/ml),114 and a limited dynamic range, up to 4-5 log10 IU/ml. Recently, HBV DNA assays that utilize real-time PCR technology with improved sensitivity (5-10 IU/ml) and wider dynamic range (up to 8-9 log10 IU/ml) have become available.115 Quantification of serum HBV DNA is a crucial component in the evaluation of patients with chronic HBV infection and in the assessment of the efficacy of antiviral treatment.
A major dilemma in the interpretation of serum HBV DNA levels is the determination of cutoff values used to define treatment indications and response. Because HBV DNA persists even in persons who have serological recovery from acute HBV infection,116 low levels of HBV DNA may not be associated with progressive liver disease and viral clearance is an unrealistic treatment endpoint. An arbitrary value of 20,000 IU/ml (>105 copies/ml) was chosen as a diagnostic criterion for chronic hepatitis B at the 2000 NIH conference.3 However, chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis and HCC have been found in patients with lower HBV DNA levels. Also, some patients with chronic hepatitis B have widely fluctuating HBV DNA levels that may vary from undetectable to >2,000,000 IU/ml.117 Thus, serial monitoring of HBV DNA levels is more important than any single arbitrary cutoff value in prognostication and in determining the need for treatment. It is now recognized that lower HBV DNA levels (3-5 log10 IU/ml) may be associated with progressive liver disease and may warrant treatment, particularly in those who are HBeAg-negative or have already developed cirrhosis.
The purpose of a liver biopsy is to assess the degree of liver damage and to rule out other causes of liver disease. However, it must be recognized that liver histology can improve significantly in patients who have sustained response to antiviral therapy or spontaneous HBeAg seroconversion. Liver histology also can worsen rapidly in patients who have recurrent exacerbations or reactivations of hepatitis.
Liver biopsy is most useful in persons who do not meet clear cut guidelines for treatment listed below. Recent studies suggest that the upper limits of normal for ALT and AST should be decreased to 30 U/l for men and 19 U/l for women.118 HBV infected patients with ALT values close to the upper limit of normal may have abnormal histology and can be at increased risk of mortality from liver disease especially those above age 40. Thus, decisions on liver biopsy should take into consideration age, the new suggested upper limits of normal for ALT, HBeAg status, HBV DNA levels, and other clinical features suggestive of chronic liver disease or portal hypertension.
Recommendations for Initial Evaluation of Persons with Chronic HBV Infection:
- 8Initial evaluation of persons newly diagnosed with chronic HBV infection should include history, physical examination and laboratory testing as outlined in Table5. (III)
- 9All persons with chronic hepatitis B not immune to hepatitis A should receive 2 doses of hepatitis A vaccine 6 to 18 months apart. (II-3)
Follow-up of Patients Not Initially Considered for Treatment
HBeAg-Positive Patients with High Serum HBV DNA but Normal ALT Levels.
These patients should be monitored at 3 to 6 month intervals (Table 5, Fig. 1). More frequent monitoring should be performed when ALT levels become elevated.54, 56, 60, 119 Patients who remain HBeAg positive with HBV DNA levels greater than 20,000 IU/ml after a 3 to 6 month period of elevated ALT levels greater than two times the upper limit of normal should be considered for liver biopsy and antiviral treatment (Fig. 1). Liver biopsy and treatment should also be considered in patients with persistent borderline normal or slightly elevated ALT levels particularly if the patient is above the age of 40. Liver biopsy is usually not necessary in young patients (below 30) who are HBeAg-positive and have persistently normal ALT.
HBeAg-negative, anti-HBe Positive Patients with Normal ALT Levels and HBV DNA <2,000IU/ml (Inactive HBsAg Carriers).
These patients should be monitored with ALT determination every 3 months during the first year to verify that they are truly in the “inactive carrier state” and then every 6-12 months.86, 117 If the ALT level is subsequently found to be elevated, more frequent monitoring is needed. In addition, an evaluation into the cause of ALT elevation, including HBV DNA tests, should be initiated if it persists or recurs (Table 5, Fig. 1).
Recommendations for Monitoring Patients with Chronic HBV Infection (Fig.1):
- 10HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients who meet criteria for chronic hepatitis B (Table4) should be evaluated for treatment. (I)
- 11HBeAg-positive patients:
HBeAg-positive patients with persistently normal ALT should be tested for ALT at 3-6 month intervals. ALT along with HBV DNA should be tested more often when ALT levels become elevated. HBeAg status should be checked every 6-12 months. (III)
Patients who remain HBeAg positive with HBV DNA levels >20,000 IU/ml after a 3-6 month period of elevated ALT levels between 1-2 × ULN, or who remain HBeAg positive with HBV DNA levels >20,000 IU/ml and are >40 years old, should be considered for liver biopsy, and treatment should be considered if biopsy shows moderate/severe inflammation or significant fibrosis. (III) Patients who remain HBeAg positive with HBV DNA levels >20,000 IU/ml after a 3-6 month period of elevated ALT levels >2 × ULN should be considered for treatment. (III).
- 12HBeAg-negative patients:
HBeAg-negative patients with normal ALT and HBV DNA <2,000 IU/ml should be tested for ALT every 3 months during the first year to verify that they are truly in the “inactive carrier state” and then every 6-12 months. (III)
Tests for HBV DNA and more frequent monitoring should be performed if ALT or AST increases above the normal limit. (III)
Periodic Screening for HCC.
A recent AASLD practice guideline on HCC has been published.120 Of the two tests prospectively evaluated as screening tools for HCC, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and ultrasound (US), the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of US are higher than those of AFP. The AASLD Practice Guideline for HCC recommended surveillance of carriers at high risk of HCC with US every 6-12 months and AFP alone when US is not available or cost is an issue.120 Because the interpretation of US findings is operator dependent, clinicians may choose to employ both US and AFP for HCC surveillance.
Recommendations for HCC Screening:
- 13HBV carriers at high risk for HCC such as Asian men over 40 years and Asian women over 50 years of age, persons with cirrhosis, persons with a family history of HCC, Africans over 20 years of age, and any carrier over 40 years with persistent or intermittent ALT elevation and/or high HBV DNA level >2,000 IU/ml should be screened with US examination every 6-12 months. (II-2)
- 14For HBV carriers at high risk for HCC who are living in areas where US is not readily available, periodic screening with AFP should be considered. (II-2)
Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B
The aims of treatment of chronic hepatitis B are to achieve sustained suppression of HBV replication and remission of liver disease. The ultimate goal is to prevent cirrhosis, hepatic failure and HCC. Parameters used to assess treatment response include normalization of serum ALT, decrease in serum HBV DNA level, loss of HBeAg with or without detection of anti-HBe, and improvement in liver histology. At the 2000 and 2006 NIH conferences on Management of Hepatitis B, it was proposed that responses to antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis B be categorized as biochemical (BR), virologic (VR), or histologic (HR), and as on-therapy or sustained off-therapy (Table 6).3, 4 Standardized definitions of primary non-response, breakthrough and relapse were also proposed. Currently, six therapeutic agents have been approved for the treatment of adults with chronic hepatitis B in the United States.
|Category of response|
|Biochemical (BR)||Decrease in serum ALT to within the normal range|
|Virologic (VR)||Decrease in serum HBV DNA to undetectable levels by PCR assays, and loss of HBeAg in patients who were initially HBeAg positive|
|Primary non-response (not applicable to interferon therapy)|
|Decrease in serum HBV DNA by <2 log10 IU/ml after at least 24 weeks of therapy|
|Increase in serum HBV DNA of 1 log10 IU/ml after discontinuation of treatment in at least two determinations more than 4 weeks apart|
|Histologic (HR)||Decrease in histology activity index by at least 2 points and no worsening of fibrosis score compared to pre-treatment liver biopsy|
|Complete (CR)||Fulfill criteria of biochemical and virological response and loss of HBsAg|
|Time of assessment|
|Maintained||Persist throughout the course of treatment|
|End-of-treatment||At the end of a defined course of therapy|
|Off-therapy||After discontinuation of therapy|
|Sustained (SR-6)||6 months after discontinuation of therapy|
|Sustained (SR-12)||12 months after discontinuation of therapy|
While IFNs are administered for predefined durations, NAs are usually administered until specific endpoints are achieved. The difference in approach is related to the additional immune modulatory effects of IFN. For HBeAg-positive patients, viral suppression with currently approved treatments can be sustained in 50%-90% patients if treatment is stopped after HBeAg seroconversion is achieved. For HBeAg-negative patients, relapse is frequent even when HBV DNA has been suppressed to undetectable levels by PCR assays for more than a year; thus, the endpoint for stopping treatment is unclear.
A major concern with long-term NA treatment is the selection of antiviral-resistant mutations. The rate at which resistant mutants are selected is related to pretreatment serum HBV DNA level, rapidity of viral suppression, duration of treatment, and prior exposure to NA therapies.121 The incidence of genotypic resistance also varies with the sensitivity of the methods used for detection of resistant mutations and the patient population being tested. Table 7 summarizes the definition of terms commonly used in describing antiviral resistance.
|Virologic breakthrough||Increase in serum HBV DNA by >1 log10 (10-fold) above nadir after achieving virologic response, during continued treatment|
|Viral rebound||Increase in serum HBV DNA to > 20,000 IU/ml or above pretreatment level after achieving virologic response, during continued treatment|
|Biochemical breakthrough||Increase in ALT above upper limit of normal after achieving normalization, during continued treatment|
|Genotypic resistance||Detection of mutations that have been shown in in vitro studies to confer resistance to the NA that is being administered|
|Phenotypic resistance||In vitro confirmation that the mutation detected decreases susceptibility (as demonstrated by increase in inhibitory concentrations) to the NA administered|
Among the approved NA therapies for hepatitis B, lamivudine is associated with the highest and entecavir with the lowest rate of drug resistance in NA-naïve patients. The first manifestation of antiviral resistance is virologic breakthrough which is defined as a >1 log10 (10-fold) increase in serum HBV DNA from nadir during treatment in a patient who had an initial virologic response (Fig. 2). Up to 30% of virologic breakthrough observed in clinical trials is related to medication non-compliance, thus, compliance should be ascertained before testing for genotypic resistance. Serum HBV DNA levels tend to be low initially because most antiviral-resistant mutants have decreased replication fitness compared with wild-type HBV.122 However, compensatory mutations that can restore replication fitness frequently emerge during continued treatment leading to a progressive increase in serum HBV DNA that may exceed pretreatment levels. Virologic breakthrough is usually followed by biochemical breakthrough, which is defined as elevation in ALT during treatment in a patient who had achieved initial response. Emergence of antiviral-resistant mutations can lead to negation of the initial response, and in some cases hepatitis flares and hepatic decompensation. Antiviral-resistant mutations can be detected months and sometimes years before biochemical breakthrough. Thus, early detection and intervention can prevent hepatitis flares and hepatic decompensation, and this is particularly important in patients who are immunosuppressed and those with underlying cirrhosis. Another potential consequence of antiviral-resistant mutations is cross-resistance with other NAs, thus limiting future treatment options. Recently, there have also been reports of multi-drug resistant mutants in patients who have received sequential NA monotherapy.123, 124
Judicious use of NA in patients with chronic hepatitis B is the most effective prophylaxis against the development of antiviral-resistant HBV. Thus, patients with minimal disease and those who are unlikely to achieve sustained response should not be treated with NA, particularly if they are young (<30 years). When possible, the most potent NA with the lowest rate of genotypic resistance should be administered and compliance reinforced. Although combination therapy has been shown to prevent antiviral resistance in patients with HIV infection, the promise of combination therapy has not yet been fulfilled for patients with HBV infection.
Once antiviral-resistant HBV mutants have been selected, they are archived (retained in the virus population) even if treatment is stopped and lamivudine-resistant HBV mutants had been detected up to four years after withdrawal of lamivudine.124
Interferons (IFNs) have antiviral, antiproliferative, and immunomodulatory effects. IFN-α has been shown to be effective in suppressing HBV replication and in inducing remission of liver disease. However, its efficacy is limited to a small percentage of highly selected patients.
Efficacy in Various Categories of Patients.
- 1HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B with the following (Table 8):
- aPersistent or intermittent elevation in ALT. This pattern is seen frequently in chronic hepatitis B patients. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials found that a significantly higher percentage of IFN-α–treated patients had a virologic response compared with untreated controls.125 High pretreatment ALT (greater than twice the upper limit of normal) and lower levels of serum HBV DNA are the most important predictors of a response to IFN-α therapy.126–128
- bNormal ALT. This pattern is usually seen in children or young adults with perinatally acquired HBV infection. HBeAg seroconversion occurs in less than 10% of these patients.128–131
- cAsian patients. Trials in Asian patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B found that the response in patients with normal ALT was poor,131 but the response in patients with elevated ALT was similar to that in Caucasian patients.128
- dChildren. The efficacy of IFN-α is similar to that in adults.132–135 However, most children, particularly those with perinatally acquired HBV infection have normal ALT and less than 10% of these children who received IFN-α cleared HBeAg.129, 130
- 2HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B (Table 9)Results of four randomized controlled trials of IFN-α showed that the end-of-treatment response ranged from 38% to 90% in treated patients compared with only 0% to 37% of controls.136–139 However, approximately half of the responders relapse when therapy is discontinued, and relapses can occur up to 5 years post-therapy.140 Longer duration of treatment, 24 months verses 6-12 months, may increase the rate of sustained response.136, 141
- 3Nonresponders to IFN-α treatmentMost studies found that retreatment of IFN-α non-responders with IFN-α alone was associated with a very low rate of response. Limited data suggest that 20%-30% HBeAg-negative patients who relapsed or had no response during previous IFN-α treatment had a sustained response after a second course of IFN-α.142
- 4Decompensated cirrhosisApproximately 20% to 40% of patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B develop a flare in their ALT values during IFN-α treatment. In patients with cirrhosis, the flare may precipitate hepatic decompensation. Two studies on IFN-α in patients with Child's class B or C cirrhosis reported minimal benefit. In addition, significant side effects due to bacterial infection and exacerbation of liver disease occurred even with low doses of IFN-α (3 MU every other day).143, 144 However, clinical trials of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis that included patients with clinically and biochemically compensated cirrhosis found that the response was comparable to that in pre-cirrhotic patients and that less than 1% developed hepatic decompensation.127, 128
|Standard IFN-α 5 MU qd or 10 MU tiw 12-24 wk||Control||Lamivudine 100 mg qd 48-52 wk||Placebo||Adefovir 10 mg qd 48 wk||Placebo||Entecavir 0.5 mg qd 48 wk||Telbivudine 600 mg qd 52 wk||PegIFNα 180 mcg qw 48 wk||PegIFNα+ Lamivudine 180 mcg qw+ 100 mg 48 wk|
|Loss of serum HBV DNA*||37%||17%||40-44%||16%||21%||0||67%||60%||25%||69%|
|Loss of HBeAg||33%||12%||17-32%||6-11%||24%||11%||22%||26%||30%/34%@||27%/28%@|
|HBeAg seroconversion||Difference of 18%||16-21%||4-6%||12%||6%||21%||22%||27%/32%@||24%/27%@|
|Loss of HBsAg||7.8%||1.8%||<1%||0||0||0||2%||0%||3%||3%|
|Normalization of ALT||Difference of 23%||41-75%||7-24%||48%||16%||68%||77%||39%||46%|
|Durability of response||80-90%||50-80%#||∼90%#||69%#||∼80%||na|
|Standard IFN-α 5 Mu qd or 10 MU tiw 6-12 mo||Control||Lamivudine 100 mg qd 48-52 wk||Placebo||Adefovir 10 mg qd 48 wk||Placebo||Entecavir 0.5 mg qd 48 wk||Telbivudine 600 mg qd 52 wk||Peg IFNα 180 mcg qw 48 wk||PegIFN-α 180 mcg qw+ Lamivudine 100 mg qd 48 wk|
|Loss of serum HBV DNA*||60-70%||10-20%||60-73%||na||51%||0||90%||88%||63%||87%|
|Normalization of ALT||60-70%||10-20%||60-79%||na||72%||29%||78%||74%||38%||49%|
|Durability of response||10-20%||<10%||∼5%||na||na||∼20%||∼20%|
Durability of Response and Long-term Outcome of IFN-α–treated Patients.
IFN-α–induced HBeAg clearance has been reported to be durable in 80% to 90% of patients after a follow-up period of 4 to 8 years.70, 74–76, 145–148 However, HBV DNA remained detectable in the serum from most of these patients when tested by PCR assays. Studies in Europe and the United States reported that delayed clearance of HBsAg occurred in 12% to 65% of patients within 5 years of HBeAg loss, but delayed HBsAg clearance was not observed in studies on Chinese patients.70, 74–76, 145–148 There has been only one report comparing the outcome of treated patients and controls. An 8-year follow-up of 101 male patients who participated in a controlled trial of IFN-α therapy in Taiwan found that treated patients had a lower incidence of HCC (1.5% vs. 12%, P = 0.04) and a higher survival rate (98% vs. 57%, P = 0.02).75 However, long-term clinical benefits of IFN-α were not observed in another Asian study149 and the incidence of HCC in European or North American patients was not decreased.74, 76 Studies comparing the outcome of responders versus nonresponders found that patients who cleared HBeAg had better overall survival and survival free of hepatic decompensation; the benefit was most apparent in patients with cirrhosis.70, 74, 76, 150
Contrary to HBeAg-positive patients, relapse after cessation of IFN-α treatment is frequent in HBeAg-negative patients, with sustained response rates of only 15%-30%. Among the long-term responders, approximately 20% cleared HBsAg after 5 years of follow-up, and the risks of progression to cirrhosis, HCC, and liver-related deaths were reduced.86, 140–142
IFN-α is administered as subcutaneous injections. The recommended dose for adults is 5 MU daily or 10 MU thrice weekly and for children 6 MU/m2 thrice weekly with a maximum of 10 MU. The recommended duration of treatment for patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B is 16 to 24 weeks. Current data suggest that patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B should be treated for at least 12 months, and one study suggested that 24 months treatment may increase the rate of sustained response.141
Pegylated Interferon alfa (pegIFN-α)
PegIFN-α has the advantages of more convenient administration and more sustained viral suppression. Clinical trials suggest that the efficacy of pegIFN-α is similar to or slightly better than standard IFN-α.
Efficacy in Various Categories of Patients
- 1HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis (Table 8) — In one phase II trial,151 a higher percent of patients who received pegIFN-α had HBeAg seroconversion compared to those who received standard IFN-α. In a subsequent phase III trial, 814 patients were randomized to receive pegIFN-α2a 180 mcg weekly, pegIFN-α2a 180 mcg weekly + lamivudine 100 mg daily, or lamivudine 100 mg daily for 48 weeks.52 At the end of treatment, viral suppression was most marked in the group that received combination therapy. Despite differences in the degree of viral suppression, HBeAg seroconversion was similar in the three groups at the end of treatment: 27%, 24%, and 20%, respectively, but significantly higher in the two groups that received pegIFN-α when response was assessed 24 weeks after treatment was stopped: 32%, 27%, and 19%, respectively. These data indicate that pegIFN-α2a monotherapy was superior to lamivudine monotherapy in inducing sustained HBeAg seroconversion, and comparable to combination therapy of pegIFN-α2a and lamivudine.Similar results were reported in two trials in which pegIFN-α2b was administered. Twenty-four weeks after treatment was stopped, one study reported identical rates (29%) of HBeAg seroconversion in patients who received pegIFN-α2b with and without lamivudine,51 while the other study reported a significantly higher rate of HBeAg seroconversion in those who received the combination of pegIFN-α2b and lamivudine vs. those who received lamivudine only, 36% vs. 14%.152
- 2HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis (Table 9) — In the only published report of peg IFN-α in HBeAg-negative patients, 552 patients were randomized to receive 48 weeks of pegIFN-α2a 180 mcg weekly, the combination of pegIFN-α2a 180 mcg weekly + lamivudine 100 mg daily, or lamivudine 100 mg daily.153 Viral suppression was most marked in the group that received combination therapy. However, sustained response (HBV DNA undetectable by PCR and normalization of ALT at week 72) was comparable in the groups that received pegIFN-α2a alone or in combination with lamivudine, and superior to the group that received lamivudine monotherapy: 15%, 16%, and 6%, respectively.
PegIFN-α2a is the only pegylated interferon approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B in the United States. The recommended dose is 180 mcg weekly for 48 weeks. However, given the similarity in response rates between 90 and 180 mcg doses in the phase II trial, and the comparable response rates between 24 and 48 week treatment in the phase II and phase III trials,52, 151 it is possible that lower doses and/or shorter duration of treatment may suffice for HBeAg-positive patients. Whether longer duration of treatment (>48 week) will result in higher rates of sustained response in HBeAg-negative patients remains to be determined.
Predictors of Response to Standard and PegIFN-α.
In HBeAg-positive patients, the strongest predictor of HBeAg seroconversion to standard and pegIFN-α is the pretreatment ALT level. Other factors include high histologic activity index, low HBV DNA level, and more recently some studies have suggested that persons infected with HBV genotypes A and B respond better than those with genotypes C and D.51, 127, 128 There is no consistent predictor of sustained response among HBeAg-negative patients.
Standard IFN-α and pegIFN-α have similar side effect profiles. The most common side effect is an initial influenza-like illness: fever, chills, headache, malaise and myalgia. Other common side effects include fatigue, anorexia, weight loss and mild increase in hair loss. IFN-α has myelosuppressive effects but significant neutropenia (<1000/mm3) or thrombocytopenia (<50,000/mm3) are uncommon except in patients who have decreased cell counts prior to treatment. IFN-α treatment is accompanied by a flare in ALT in 30%-40% of patients. Hepatitis flares are considered to be an indicator of a favorable response but they can lead to hepatic decompensation, especially in patients with underlying cirrhosis. The most troublesome side effect of IFN-α is emotional lability: anxiety, irritability, depression and even suicidal tendency. IFN-α has been reported to induce the development of a variety of autoantibodies. In most instances, this is not accompanied by clinical illness. However, both hyper- and hypo-thyroidism that require treatment have been reported. Rarely, retinal changes and even impaired vision have been reported.
Lamivudine (Epivir-HBV, 3TC)
Lamivudine is the (−) enantiomer of 2′-3′ dideoxy-3′-thiacytidine. Incorporation of the active triphosphate (3TC-TP) into growing DNA chains results in premature chain termination thereby inhibiting HBV DNA synthesis.
Efficacy in Various Categories of Patients.
Lamivudine monotherapy is effective in suppressing HBV replication and in ameliorating liver disease. HBeAg seroconversion after a 1-year course of lamivudine treatment is similar to that of a 16-week course of standard IFN-α but lower than that of a 1-year course of pegIFN-α.
- 1HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B with the following (Table 8):
- aPersistent or intermittent elevation in ALT. Three clinical trials involving a total of 731 treatment naïve patients who received lamivudine for 1 year reported that HBeAg seroconversion occurred in 16% to 18% of patients compared with 4% to 6% of untreated controls.154–156 Histologic improvement defined as a reduction in necroinflammatory score by ≥2 points was observed in 49% to 56% treated patients and in 23% to 25% of controls. HBeAg seroconversion rates increased with the duration of treatment to 50% after 5 years of continued treatment.157–160
- bNormal ALT levels. In patients with pretreatment ALT levels less than 2 times normal, the HBeAg seroconversion rate is less than 10% after 1 year and 19% after 3 years of treatment.161, 162
- cAsian patients. Asians respond similarly to lamivudine as Caucasian patients.162
- dChildren. In a 52 week randomized-control trial in children HBeAg seroconversion was observed in 22% of the lamivudine-treated children versus 13% placebo controls (P = 0.06).163 HBeAg seroconversion increased to 34% after 2 years of continuous treatment. Lamivudine-resistant HBV mutation was detected in 19%, 49% and 64% of patients after 1, 2 and 3 years of treatment, respectively.164 These data indicate that lamivudine is safe and effective in children but the benefit must be carefully balanced against the risk of selecting drug resistant mutants.
- 2HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B (Table 9)Lamivudine has been shown to benefit patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B.165–169 Several studies have reported that serum HBV DNA is suppressed to undetectable levels by PCR assays in 60% to 70% patients after 1 year of treatment.167, 168, 170, 171 However, the vast majority (≈90%) of patients relapsed when treatment was stopped.166 Extending the duration of treatment resulted in a progressively lower rate of response due to the selection of lamivudine-resistant mutants. In one study of 201 patients, virologic remission (undetectable HBV DNA by PCR assay) decreased from 73% at 12 months to 34% at 48 months while biochemical remission decreased from 84% to 36%.172
- 3Nonresponders to IFN-α treatmentA multicenter trial in IFN-α nonresponders found that patients had a similar HBeAg seroconversion rate to lamivudine alone (18%), a combination of lamivudine and IFN-α (12%) or placebo (13%) indicating that response of IFN-α nonresponders to lamivudine is similar to treatment-naive patients, and that retreatment with combination of IFN-α and lamivudine did not confer any added benefit compared with retreatment with lamivudine monotherapy.173
- 4Bridging Fibrosis and Compensated CirrhosisIn a double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 651 Asian patients who were HBeAg positive or had HBV DNA >105 IU/ml (>700,000 genome equivalents/ml), and bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis on liver biopsy a statistically significant difference was observed between those who received lamivudine vs. placebo for overall disease progression (increase in Child-Turcotte-Pugh score, hepatic decompensation or HCC) (7.8% vs. 17.7% P = 0.001), and for HCC development (3.9% vs. 7.4% P = 0.047). (77) Clinical benefit was observed mainly among the 51% patients who did not have breakthrough infection. These data indicate that antiviral therapy can improve clinical outcomes in patients with advanced fibrosis who have maintained viral suppression.
- 5Decompensated cirrhosisStudies of lamivudine in patients with decompensated cirrhosis showed that lamivudine treatment is well tolerated and can stabilize or improve liver function in patients with decompensated cirrhosis thereby obviating or delaying the need for liver transplant.174–177 However, these studies showed that clinical benefit takes 3-6 months, and that HCC can occur even among patients with clinical improvement. Thus, prompt initiation of treatment and continued HCC surveillance are warranted.
Durability of Response.
A follow-up study in non-Asian countries found that 30 of 39 (77%) patients with HBeAg seroconversion had durable response after a median follow-up of 37 months (range, 5-46 months) and 8 (20%) patients had HBsAg seroconversion.178 Studies from Asia reported lower rates of durability (50%-60%), which may in part be related to a shorter duration of treatment (mean 8-9 months).179, 180 Several factors have been found to be associated with increased durability of lamivudine-induced HBeAg seroconversion including longer duration of consolidation treatment — defined as duration of treatment beyond the time after HBeAg seroconversion, younger age, lower HBV DNA level at the time treatment was stopped, and genotype B vs. C.179–183 Although there are no good direct comparison data, it appears that the durability of lamivudine-induced HBeAg seroconversion is less than that for IFN-α.184
Among HBeAg-negative patients, the durability of viral suppression after 1-year of lamivudine treatment is less than 10%. One small study reported that the durability of virologic response was improved to 50% in patients who had completed 2 years of treatment and had persistently undetectable HBV DNA by PCR assay during year 2.185
Selection of lamivudine-resistant mutations is the main concern with lamivudine treatment. The most common mutation involves substitution of methionine in the tyrosine-methionine-aspartate-aspartate (YMDD) motif of the HBV DNA polymerase for valine or isoleucine rtM204V/I.186, 187 This mutation is frequently accompanied by a leucine to methionine substitution in an upstream region (rtL180M). Genotypic resistance can be detected in 14% to 32% after 1 year of lamivudine treatment154–156 and increases with the duration of treatment to 60% to 70% after 5 years of treatment.159, 160 Factors associated with an increase rate of lamivudine resistance include long duration of treatment, high pretreatment serum HBV DNA level, and a high level of residual virus after initiation of treatment.160, 188 One study reported that the rate of lamivudine resistance was significantly higher in patients whose serum HBV DNA level exceeded ≈200 IU/ml (1,000 copies/ml) after 6 months of treatment compared to those with lower HBV DNA levels (63% vs. 13%).188 The clinical course of patients with lamivudine-resistant mutants is variable. In vitro studies showed that rtM204V/I mutation decreases replication fitness of HBV but compensatory mutations selected during continued treatment can restore replication fitness.122, 189 Virologic breakthrough is usually followed by biochemical breakthrough (increase in ALT after initial normalization), and in some patients may be associated with acute exacerbations of liver disease and rarely hepatic decompensation and death.190–192 Exacerbations of hepatitis associated with the emergence of lamivudine resistance had also been reported to be associated with HBeAg seroconversion, possibly via immune mediated mechanisms.190 Hepatitis flares may also occur after withdrawal of treatment due to rapid outgrowth of wild type virus, but two studies in Asia found that the occurrence of hepatitis flares and hepatic decompensation were similar among patients with lamivudine breakthrough who stopped or continued lamivudine treatment.193, 194
Long-term Outcome of Lamivudine-treated Patients.
Follow-up of patients receiving continued lamivudine treatment showed that the rates of maintained virologic and biochemical response decreased with time due to selection of drug-resistant mutants.160, 171, 172 In patients with maintained viral suppression, necroinflammation is reduced and decrease in fibrosis score as well as regression of cirrhosis was observed.195 However, histologic benefit was negated among patients with breakthrough infection. Several studies reported that patients with maintained viral suppression had lower rates of hepatic decompensation as well as liver-related mortality.172, 196
The recommended dose of lamivudine for adults with normal renal function (creatinine clearance >50 ml/min) and no HIV coinfection is 100 mg orally daily. The recommended dose for children is 3 mg/kg/d with a maximum dose of 100 mg/d. Dose reduction is necessary for patients with renal insufficiency (Table 10a).
|Creatinine clearance (ml/min)||Recommended dose|
|≥50||100 mg qd|
|30-49||100 mg first dose, then 50 mg qd|
|15-29||35 mg first dose, then 25 mg qd|
|5-14||35 mg first dose, then 15 mg qd|
|<5||35 mg first dose, then 10 mg qd|
|≥50||10 mg daily|
|20-49||10 mg every other day|
|10-19||10 mg every third day|
|Hemodialysis patients||10 mg every week following dialysis|
|c. Entecavir||NA naïve||Lamivudine refractory/resistant|
|≥50||0.5 mg qd||1 mg qd|
|30-39||0.25 mg qd||0.5 mg qd|
|10-29||0.15 mg qd||0.3 mg qd|
|<10 or hemodialysis* or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis||0.05 mg qd||0.1 mg qd|
|≥50||600 mg daily|
|30-49||400 mg daily|
|<30||200 mg daily|
|Hemodialysis patients||200 mg daily following dialysis|
The end point of treatment for HBeAg-positive patients is HBeAg seroconversion.154–156 Liver chemistries should be monitored every 3 months and HBV DNA levels every 3-6 months while on therapy, and HBeAg and anti-HBe tested at the end of 1 year of treatment and every 3-6 months thereafter. Treatment may be discontinued in patients who have confirmed HBeAg seroconversion (HBeAg loss and anti-HBe detection on 2 occasions 1-3 months apart) and have completed at least 6 months of consolidation therapy after the appearance of anti-HBe. The durability of response after cessation of treatment is expected to be 70% to 90%. Viral relapse and exacerbations of hepatitis may occur after discontinuation of lamivudine therapy,197 including patients who have developed HBeAg seroconversion, and may be delayed up to 1 year after cessation of treatment. Thus, all patients should be closely monitored after treatment is discontinued (every 1-3 months for the first 6 months, and every 3-6 months thereafter). Reinstitution of lamivudine treatment is usually effective in patients who have not developed resistance. Alternatively, treatment with newer therapies with lower risk of drug resistance may be considered.
Treatment may be continued in patients who have not achieved HBeAg seroconversion and have no evidence of breakthrough infection as HBeAg seroconversion may occur with continued treatment.157–159 However, the benefits of continued treatment must be balanced against the risks of resistant mutants. With the availability of newer therapies with lower risk of drug resistance, a switch to an alternative treatment may be considered particularly in patients who have received lamivudine for more than 2 years.
In patients who have breakthrough infection, testing for lamivudine-resistant mutants should be performed when possible. The vast majority of patients with confirmed lamivudine-resistance should receive rescue therapy with antiviral agents that are effective against lamivudine-resistant HBV mutants. A minority of patients may consider stopping treatment, particularly if they had normal ALT, or if the biopsy showed mild inflammation and no or minimal fibrosis prior to initiation of treatment.193, 194 Patients whose ALT and HBV DNA levels remain significantly lower than pretreatment values may be maintained on lamivudine temporarily without resorting to rescue therapy but it must be recognized that compensatory mutations will be selected during continued treatment leading to subsequent viral rebound and possibly hepatitis flares.
The end point of treatment for HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B is unknown. Post-treatment relapse can occur even in patients with persistently undetectable serum HBV DNA by PCR assay. Because of the need for long durations of treatment, lamivudine is not an optimal first-line treatment for HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B.
Predictors of Response.
Pretreatment serum ALT is the strongest predictor of response among HBeAg-positive patients. Pooled data from 4 studies with a total of 406 patients who received lamivudine for one year found that HBeAg seroconversion occurred in 2%, 9%, 21%, and 47% of patients with ALT levels within normal, 1-2 times normal, 2-5 times normal, and >5 times normal, respectively; the corresponding seroconversion rates for 196 patients in the placebo group were 0%, 5%, 11%, and 14%, respectively.162
In general, lamivudine is very well tolerated. Various adverse events including a mild (2- to 3-fold) increase in ALT level have been reported in patients receiving lamivudine, but these events occurred in the same frequency among the controls.154–156
Adefovir Dipivoxil (bis-POM PMEA, Hepsera)
Adefovir dipivoxil is an orally bioavailable pro-drug of adefovir, a nucleotide analog of adenosine monophosphate. It can inhibit both the reverse transcriptase and DNA polymerase activity and is incorporated into HBV DNA causing chain termination. In vitro and clinical studies showed that adefovir is effective in suppressing wild type as well as lamivudine-resistant HBV.
Efficacy in Various Categories of Patients.
- 1HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B (Table 8) — In a Phase III trial, 515 patients were randomized to receive 10 or 30 mg of adefovir or placebo for 48 weeks. Histologic response was observed in 25% of those on placebo vs. 53% and 59% of patients who received adefovir 10 mg and 30 mg, respectively (P < 0.001, adefovir 10mg or 30mg vs. placebo).198 The corresponding figures for HBeAg seroconversion were 12% and 14% for adefovir 10 mg and 30 mg groups compared to 6% for the placebo group (P = 0.049 and P = 0.011, respectively). Serum HBV DNA levels decreased by a mean of 0.6, 3.5, and 4.8 log10 copies/ml, and normalization of ALT levels was observed in 16%, 48%, and 55% of patients who received placebo, adefovir 10 mg and 30 mg, respectively (P < 0.001 placebo vs. either dose of adefovir). The side effect profiles in the three groups were similar but 8% of patients in the adefovir 30 mg dose group had nephrotoxicity (defined as an increase in serum creatinine by ≥0.5 mg/dl above the baseline value on two consecutive occasions). These data demonstrated that adefovir for 1-year is beneficial in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis and that the 10-mg dose has a more favorable risk-benefit profile. Cumulative HBeAg seroconversion rates appeared to increase during the second and third years but the exact number of patients who achieved HBeAg seroconversion was unclear.Some studies have reported that 20%-50% of patients receiving the 10 mg dose of adefovir have primary non-response indicating that the approved dose of adefovir may be suboptimal.123
- 2HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis (Table 9) — In a Phase III trial, 184 patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive adefovir 10 mg or placebo. At week 48, the treated group had significantly higher rates of response than the placebo group as follows: histologic response, 64% versus 33% (P < 0.001); normalization of ALT, 72% versus 29% (P < 0.001); and undetectable serum HBV DNA by PCR assay, 51% versus 0% (P < 0.001).199 During year 2, patients who received adefovir in year 1 were randomized to continue adefovir 10 mg or to receive placebo.200 At week 96, the proportion of patients with undetectable serum HBV DNA increased to 71% in the group that continued to receive adefovir, and decreased to 8% in the group that stopped therapy. Preliminary data from 55 patients who completed 4 years and 70 patients who completed 5 years of continued adefovir treatment, showed that serum HBV DNA was undetectable in 65% and 67% and ALT normalized in 70% and 69% respectively of the 4- and 5- year cohorts.201
- 3Children — Clinical trials of adefovir in children are ongoing.
- 4Decompensated cirrhosis — Adefovir has not been evaluated as a primary treatment for patients with decompensated cirrhosis.
- 5Lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B —
- aDecompensated cirrhosis and liver transplant recipients—In a compassionate use study involving 128 patients with decompensated cirrhosis and 196 patients with recurrent hepatitis B after liver transplant, addition of adefovir was associated with a 3-4 log10 reduction in serum HBV DNA levels, which was sustained throughout the course of treatment.202 Among the patients who completed 48 weeks of treatment, 81% of the pre- and 34% of the post-transplant patients had undetectable HBV DNA by PCR assay, and 76% and 49%, respectively had normalization of ALT. Child-Turcotte-Pugh score improved in more than 90% of the pre-transplant patients, and 1-year survival was 84% for the pre- and 93% for the post-transplant patients. Follow-up data on 226 pre-transplant patients showed that viral suppression was maintained in 65% of patients after 96 weeks of treatment with accompanying improvement in Child-Turcotte-Pugh scores as well as Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores.203
- bCompensated liver disease — While a pilot study in patients with compensated chronic hepatitis B and lamivudine resistance found no differences in HBV DNA suppression and ALT normalization in persons treated with the combination of lamivudine and adefovir compared to those receiving adefovir alone,204 patients who discontinued lamivudine were more likely to develop ALT flares during the first 12 weeks of adefovir monotherapy. In addition, recent data showed that switching to adefovir in patients with lamivudine-resistant HBV was associated with a higher risk of adefovir-resistance compared to adding adefovir.123, 204
- cHIV and HBV coinfection — Adefovir when added to existing HIV treatment regimens which included lamivudine 150 mg bid has also been shown to be effective in decreasing serum HBV DNA levels in patients with HIV and HBV coinfection and lamivudine-resistant HBV.205
Durability of Response and Long-term Outcome of Adefovir-treated Patients.
The durability of HBeAg seroconversion was examined in 76 patients who had received a median of 80 (range 30-193) weeks of adefovir treatment, and had been followed for a median of 52 (range 5-125) weeks off treatment. HBeAg seroconversion was maintained in 69 (92%) patients. The seemingly high rate of durability of adefovir-related HBeAg seroconversion may be related to a long duration of treatment (median 80 weeks) and more importantly, a long duration of treatment after HBeAg seroconversion (median 41 weeks).206
Among HBeAg-negative patients, viral suppression was sustained in only 8% of patients who stopped adefovir after 1-year of treatment.200 The vast majority of patients who continued treatment up to 5 years maintained their response but there was minimal incremental response after the first year. HBsAg loss was observed in 5% of patients after 4-5 years of continued treatment.201 In addition, long-term treatment was associated with a decrease in fibrosis score. Nonetheless, 2% of patients developed HCC indicating that long-term antiviral treatment does not completely prevent HCC.
Resistance occurs at a slower rate during adefovir treatment compared to lamivudine and no adefovir-resistant mutations were found after 1 year of treatment in the patients who participated in the Phase III trials.207 However, novel mutations conferring resistance to adefovir (asparagine to threonine substitution N236T and alanine to valine or threonine substitution A181V/T) have been described.208, 209 Aggregate data from 5 studies including 3 studies using the combination of lamivudine and adefovir in patients with lamivudine-resistant HBV estimated the cumulative rate of adefovir-resistance to be 15% by 192 weeks.210 The phase III trial in HBeAg-negative patients found that the cumulative probabilities of genotypic resistance to adefovir at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years were 0, 3%, 11%, 18%, and 29%, respectively.201 Recent studies using more sensitive methods have reported detection of adefovir-resistant mutations after 1 year of treatment and rates of genotypic resistance exceeding 20% after 2 years of treatment.123, 211 In these studies, adefovir resistance was predominantly found in patients with prior lamivudine resistance switched to adefovir monotherapy.
In vitro studies showed that adefovir-resistant mutations decrease susceptibility by 3-15 -fold only.208, 209 Nevertheless, clinical studies found that viral rebound, hepatitis flares and even hepatic decompensation can occur.212 Risk factors for adefovir resistance that have been identified include suboptimal viral suppression and sequential monotherapy.123, 211 Sequential treatment with lamivudine followed by adefovir had also been reported to select for dual-resistant HBV mutants.212
In vitro and clinical studies showed that adefovir-resistant HBV mutants are susceptible to lamivudine and entecavir.209 However, in patients with prior lamivudine resistance, who developed adefovir resistance after being switched to adefovir monotherapy, re-emergence of lamivudine-resistant mutations has been reported soon after reintroduction of lamivudine.212 There are anecdotal cases where switching from adefovir to tenofovir resulted in a decrease in serum HBV DNA levels. This may be related to a higher dose of tenofovir being used 300 mg vs. adefovir 10mg. One case series reported that two patients with adefovir-resistant HBV responded to entecavir with a decrease in serum HBV DNA to undetectable levels.123
The recommended dose of adefovir for adults with normal renal function (creatinine clearance >50 ml/min) is 10 mg orally daily. The dosing interval should be increased in patients with renal insufficiency (Table 10b). Adefovir has not been approved for use in children. Adefovir at the 10 mg dose is ineffective in suppressing HIV replication.
For patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B, treatment may be discontinued for those who have confirmed HBeAg seroconversion and have completed an additional 6 months of consolidation treatment. Treatment may be continued in patients who have not achieved HBeAg seroconversion but in whom HBV DNA levels remain suppressed.
For patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B, continued treatment (beyond 1 year) is needed to maintain the response.200
For most patients with lamivudine-resistant mutants, particularly those with decompensated cirrhosis or recurrent hepatitis B post-transplant, long-term treatment will be required. Increasing data indicate that lamivudine should be continued indefinitely after the addition of adefovir to reduce the risk of adefovir resistance.
Approximately 30% of patients who have no prior treatment with NAs have primary nonresponse to adefovir, defined as a <2 log drop in HBV DNA after 6 months of treatment.213 Alternative treatments should be considered for these patients.
Predictors of Response.
Retrospective analyses of data from two phase III clinical trials showed that reduction in serum HBV DNA was comparable across the 4 major HBV genotypes A-D in the groups receiving adefovir.214 Limited data suggest that HBeAg-positive patients with high pretreatment ALT were more likely to undergo HBeAg seroconversion.
Adefovir in 10 mg doses is well tolerated and has a similar side effect profile as placebo in Phase III clinical trials. Nephrotoxicity has been reported in 3% of patients with compensated liver disease after 4-5 years of continued adefovir therapy, and in 12% of transplant recipients and 28% of patients with decompensated cirrhosis during the first year of therapy.201, 202 Whether the higher rate of nephrotoxicity in the latter two groups of patients is related to concomitant use of nephrotoxic medications, progression of decompensated cirrhosis (hepatorenal syndrome) or a direct effect of adefovir is unclear. Regardless, monitoring of serum creatinine every 3 months is necessary for patients with medical conditions that predispose to renal insufficiency and in all patients on adefovir for more than 1 year. More frequent monitoring should be performed in patients with pre-existing renal insufficiency.
Entecavir, a carbocyclic analogue of 2′-deoxyguanosine, inhibits HBV replication at three different steps: the priming of HBV DNA polymerase, the reverse transcription of the negative strand HBV DNA from the pregenomic RNA, and the synthesis of the positive strand HBV DNA. In vitro studies showed that entecavir is more potent than lamivudine and adefovir and is effective against lamivudine-resistant HBV mutants although the activity is lower compared to wild-type HBV.215
Efficacy in Various Categories of Patients.
- 1HBeAg-positive patients (Table 8) — In a phase III clinical trial, 715 patients with compensated liver disease were randomized to receive entecavir 0.5 mg or lamivudine 100 mg daily. At week 48, entecavir resulted in significantly higher rates of histologic (72% vs. 62%), virologic [HBV DNA undetectable by PCR] (67% vs. 36%) and biochemical (68% vs. 60%) responses compared to lamivudine. However, HBeAg seroconversion rates were similar in the two groups: 21% vs. 18%.216 Among the patients who had suppressed HBV DNA but remained HBeAg positive, continuation of treatment in the second year resulted in HBeAg seroconversion in 11% of patients in the entecavir group and in 13% of the lamivudine group. Serum HBV DNA was undetectable by PCR in 81% vs. 39%, and normalization of ALT occurred in 79% vs. 68% of patients who continued entecavir and lamivudine treatment, respectively.217
- 2HBeAg-negative patients (Table 9) — In a phase III clinical trial 648 patients with compensated liver disease were randomized to receive entecavir 0.5 mg or lamivudine 100 mg daily. At week 48, entecavir resulted in significantly higher rates of histologic (70% vs. 61%), virologic (90% vs. 72%) and biochemical (78% vs. 71%) responses compared to lamivudine.218
- 3Decompensated cirrhosis / recurrent hepatitis B after liver transplantation — Studies on the safety and efficacy of entecavir in patients with decompensated cirrhosis are ongoing.
- 4Lamivudine-refractory HBV — In a dose-finding phase II trial, entecavir was shown to be effective in suppressing lamivudine-resistant HBV but a higher dose 1.0 mg was required.219 In a subsequent study, 286 HBeAg-positive patients with persistent viremia while on lamivudine were randomized to receive entecavir 1.0 mg or lamivudine 100 mg daily. At week 48, entecavir resulted in significantly higher rates of histologic (55% vs. 28%), virologic (21% vs. 1%) and biochemical (75% vs. 23%) responses compared to lamivudine.220
- 5Adefovir-resistant HBV — In vitro studies showed that entecavir is effective in suppressing adefovir-resistant HBV mutants.209 There is one case report on the efficacy of entecavir in patients with adefovir-resistant HBV.123
Durability of Response.
Among HBeAg-positive patients who underwent HBeAg seroconversion during the first year and who stopped treatment at week 48, approximately 70% of patients remained HBeAg negative.216, 217 Consolidation therapy was not included in the phase III trial. Data on the durability of response among HBeAg-negative patients are lacking but it is likely that the vast majority of patients will relapse if treatment is stopped after 1 year.
Virologic breakthrough was rare in nucleoside-naïve patients, and was observed in only 3% of patients by Week 96 of entecavir treatment in the two phase III clinical trials. Resistant mutations to lamivudine and entecavir were detected in only two (<1%) patients while resistant mutations to lamivudine only were found in three patients.221 However, virologic breakthrough was detected in 7% of patients after 48 weeks and in 16% after 96 weeks of treatment in the phase III trial of lamivudine refractory patients.220, 221 Resistance to entecavir appears to occur through a two-hit mechanism with initial selection of M204V/I mutation followed by amino acid substitutions at rtI169, rtT184, rtS202, or rtM250.222In vitro studies showed that the mutations at positions 169, 184, 202 or 250 on their own have minimal effect on susceptibility to entecavir, but susceptibility to entecavir is decreased by 10-250-fold when one of these mutations is present with lamivudine-resistant mutations, and by >500-fold when two or more entecavir-resistant mutations are present with lamivudine-resistant mutations. Lamivudine should be discontinued when patients are switched to entecavir to decrease the risk of entecavir resistance. In vitro studies showed that entecavir-resistant mutations are susceptible to adefovir, but there are very little clinical data on the efficacy of adefovir in patients with entecavir-resistant HBV.
The approved dose of entecavir for nucleoside-naïve patients is 0.5 mg daily p.o. and for lamivudine-refractory/resistant patients is 1.0 mg daily p.o. Doses should be adjusted for patients with estimated creatinine clearance <50 ml/min (Table 10c).
Predictors of Response.
Entecavir appears to be equally effective in decreasing serum HBV DNA levels and in inducing histologic improvement in Asians and Caucasians, and across HBV genotypes A-D and a wide range of pretreatment HBV DNA and ALT levels. However, HBeAg seroconversion rates were lower in patients with normal ALT, being 12%, 23%, and 39% among those with pretreatment ALT <2, 2-5, and >5 times normal, respectively.223
Entecavir had a similar safety profile as lamivudine in clinical trials.216, 218 Studies in rodents exposed to doses 3-40 times that in humans found an increased incidence of lung adenomas, brain gliomas and HCCs.224 To date, no difference in the incidence of HCC or other neoplasm has been observed between patients who received entecavir versus lamivudine.
L-deoxythymidine (Telbivudine/LdT, Tyzeka)
Telbivudine is an L-nucleoside analogue with potent antiviral activity against HBV. Clinical trials showed that telbivudine is more potent than lamivudine in suppressing HBV replication.225–228 However, telbivudine is associated with a high rate of resistance and telbivudine-resistant mutations are cross-resistant with lamivudine. Therefore, telbivudine monotherapy has a limited role in the treatment of hepatitis B.
Efficacy in Various Categories of Patients.
- 1HBeAg-positive patients (Table 8) — A Phase III clinical trial involving 921 patients showed that a significantly higher percent of patients who received telbivudine had undetectable HBV DNA by PCR assay compared to those who received lamivudine: 60% vs. 40% and 54% vs. 38%, after 1 and 2 years of treatment, respectively.227, 228 Telbivudine also resulted in a higher percent of patients with normalization of ALT than lamivudine: 77% vs. 75% (NS) and 67% vs. 61% (P < 0.05) after 1 and 2 years of treatment, respectively. However, there was no difference in the rate of HBeAg loss at the end of 1 and 2 years of treatment: 26% vs. 23%, and 34% vs. 29% of patients who received telbivudine and lamivudine, respectively.
- 2HBeAg-negative patients (Table 9) — The Phase III clinical trial which included 446 HBeAg-negative patients showed that a significantly higher percent of patients who received telbivudine had undetectable HBV DNA by PCR assay compared to those who received lamivudine: 88% vs. 71% and 79% vs. 53%, after 1 and 2 years of treatment, respectively.227, 228 Normalization of ALT was observed in: 74% vs. 79% (NS) and 75% vs. 67% (P < 0.05) after 1 and 2 years of telbivudine and lamivudine treatment, respectively.
Telbivudine selects for mutations in the YMDD motif. To date, only M204I (but not M204V) has been observed.225 Although telbivudine is associated with a lower rate of drug resistance than lamivudine, the resistance rate is substantial and increases exponentially after the first year of treatment. In the phase III clinical trial, genotypic resistance after 1 and 2 years of treatment was observed in 4.4% and 21.6% of HBeAg-positive and in 2.7% and 8.6% of HBeAg-negative patients who received telbivudine compared to 9.1% and 35% of HBeAg-positive and 9.8% and 21.9% of HBeAg-negative patients who received lamivudine. The lower resistance rate in the lamivudine group compared to previously reported clinical trials on lamivudine160 may be related to the fact that only patients with virologic breakthrough were tested and a less sensitive method (direct sequencing) was used for detection of resistant mutations.
The approved dose of telbivudine is 600 mg daily. Doses should be adjusted for patients with estimated creatinine clearance <50 ml/min (Table 10d).
Predictors of Response.
Preliminary data suggest that week 24 virologic response was the most important predictor of virologic and biochemical responses as well as resistance at week 96.229 However, even among patients with undetectable HBV DNA by PCR at week 24, telbivudine resistance was observed in 4% of patients by week 96.
Telbivudine is well tolerated and has a safety profile comparable to lamivudine.225
Emtricitabine (Emtriva, FTC)
Emtricitabine is a potent inhibitor of HIV and HBV replication. FTC has been approved for HIV treatment as Emtriva (FTC only) and as Truvada (in combination with tenofovir as a single pill). Because of its structural similarity with lamivudine (3TC), treatment with FTC selects for the same resistant mutants.
In one study of 248 patients (63% were HBeAg positive) FTC 200 mg daily resulted in a significantly higher rate of histologic (62% vs. 25%), virologic [undetectable HBV DNA by PCR assay] (54% vs. 2%) and biochemical (65% vs. 25%) responses at week 48 compared to placebo but HBeAg seroconversion rates were identical — 12% in the two groups.230 FTC-resistant mutations in the YMDD motif were detected in 13% of patients.
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is a nucleotide analogue that has been approved for the treatment of HIV infection as Viread (tenofovir only) or Truvada (tenofovir plus emtricitabine as a single pill). Tenofovir is structurally similar to adefovir. In vitro studies showed that tenofovir and adefovir are equipotent. Because tenofovir appears to be less nephrotoxic, the approved dose is much higher than that of adefovir, 300 mg versus 10 mg daily. This may explain why tenofovir has more potent antiviral activity in clinical studies.
Retrospective analysis of trials in patients with HIV infection that included subsets of patients coinfected with HBV demonstrated that tenofovir was associated with a significant reduction in HBV DNA levels. Several studies, including one prospective randomized study of 52 patients with HIV and HBV coinfection, found that tenofovir led to a greater reduction in serum HBV DNA levels than adefovir.231–235 Similar results have been obtained in HIV-negative patients with lamivudine-resistant HBV.235, 236 There have also been case reports of viral rebound when patients with virologic response were switched from tenofovir to adefovir and further viral reduction when patients with inadequate viral suppression were switched from adefovir to tenofovir.237 Tenofovir is generally well tolerated but it has been rarely reported to cause Fanconi syndrome and renal insufficiency.238
Clevudine (LFMAU, 2′-fluoro-5-methyl-beta-L-arabinofuranosyl uracil)
Clevudine is a pyrimidine nucleoside analogue that is effective in inhibiting HBV replication in in vitro and in animal models. Clinical trials showed that clevudine in doses of 30 mg daily for up to 24 weeks was well tolerated. Serum HBV DNA levels were undetectable by PCR assay at the end of treatment in 59% of HBeAg-positive and in 92% of HBeAg-negative patients.239, 240 A unique feature of clevudine is the durability of viral suppression, persisting for up to 24 weeks after withdrawal of treatment in some patients.226 Nonetheless, clevudine has not been shown to increase the rate of HBeAg seroconversion compared to placebo controls and in vitro studies suggest that it can select for mutations in the YMDD motif.
Thymic-derived peptides can stimulate T-cell function. Clinical trials have shown that thymosin is well tolerated but data on efficacy are conflicting.241–245
Combination therapies have been proven to be more effective than monotherapy in the treatment of HIV and HCV infections. The potential advantages of combination therapies are additive or synergistic antiviral effects, and diminished or delayed resistance. The potential disadvantages of combination therapies are added costs, increased toxicity, and drug interactions. Various combination therapies have been evaluated; to date, none of the combination therapies has been proven to be superior to monotherapy in inducing a higher rate of sustained response. Although several combination therapies have been shown to reduce the rate of lamivudine resistance compared to lamivudine monotherapy, there are as yet no data to support that combination therapies will reduce the rate of resistance to antiviral compounds that have a low risk of drug resistance when used alone.
Standard or PegIFN-α and Lamivudine
Treatment naïve patients.
Five large trials (1 using standard IFN-α and 4 using pegIFN-α, 4 in HBeAg-positive patients and 1 in HBeAg-negative patients) have been conducted comparing the combination of IFN-α and lamivudine to lamivudine alone and/or IFN-α alone.51, 52, 152, 153, 156 All studies found that combination therapy had greater on-treatment viral suppression and higher rates of sustained off-treatment response compared to lamivudine alone, but no difference in sustained off-treatment virologic response compared to IFN-α alone. Although combination therapy was associated with lower rates of lamivudine resistance compared to lamivudine monotherapy, a low rate of lamivudine resistance was encountered compared to none in patients who received IFN-α alone.
Combination therapy of standard IFN-α and lamivudine is not more effective than lamivudine alone in the retreatment of IFN-α non-responders.173
Lamivudine and Adefovir
One trial included 115 patients randomized to receive the combination of lamivudine and adefovir or lamivudine alone. At week 52, there was no difference in HBV DNA suppression, ALT normalization or HBeAg loss.246 Results at week 104 were also comparable in the two groups. Serum HBV DNA was undetectable in 14% versus 26%, ALT normalization in 41% versus 47%, and HBeAg seroconversion in 20% versus 13%, in the groups that received combination therapy and lamivudine monotherapy, respectively.247 Although genotypic resistance was less common in the combination group, a substantial percent had mutation in the YMDD motif (15% versus 43% in the lamivudine monotherapy group). These data indicate that the combination of lamivudine and adefovir as de novo therapy does not have additive or synergistic antiviral effects and resistance to lamivudine is not completely prevented
Patients with Lamivudine-resistant HBV.
One small trial in patients with compensated liver disease showed that the combination of adefovir and lamivudine was not superior to adefovir alone in decreasing serum HBV DNA levels.248 However, hepatitis flares were less frequent during the transition period in the combination therapy group. Furthermore, recent data suggest that continuation of lamivudine reduces the rate of resistance to adefovir123, 204. Thus, increasing evidence support that adding adefovir is better than switching to adefovir monotherapy for patients with lamivudine-resistant HBV.
Lamivudine and Telbivudine
One trial conducted in nucleoside-naïve HBeAg-positive patients demonstrated that the combination of lamivudine and telbivudine was inferior for all parameters of response compared to telbivudine alone.225
Recommendations for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B:Who to treat and what treatment to use (Tables 11 and 12): Current therapy of chronic hepatitis B does not eradicate HBV and has limited long-term efficacy. Thus, careful consideration of the patient's age, severity of liver disease, likelihood of response, and potential adverse events is needed before treatment is initiated. Treatment is indicated if the risk of liver-related morbidity and mortality in the near future (5-10 years) and the likelihood of achieving maintained viral suppression during continued treatment are high. Treatment is also indicated if the risk of liver-related morbidity and mortality in the foreseeable future (10-20 years) and the likelihood of achieving sustained viral suppression after a defined course of treatment are high. Treatment is not indicated if the risk of liver-related morbidity or mortality in the next 20 years and the likelihood of achieving sustained viral suppression after a defined course of treatment are low. Because of the fluctuating nature of chronic HBV infection, the risk of liver-related morbidity and mortality and the likelihood of response may vary as patient progresses through the course of chronic HBV infection. Thus, continued monitoring is essential for risk assessment.
|HBeAg+, normal ALT||Not indicated||Not indicated||Not indicated||Not indicated||Not indicated|
|HBeAg+ chronic hepatitis||Indicated||Indicated†||Indicated||Indicated||Indicated†|
|HBeAg- chronic hepatitis||Indicated||Indicated†||Indicated||Indicated||Indicated†|
|Duration of treatment|
|HBeAg+ chronic hepatitis||4-12 months#||≥1 year**||≥ 1 year**||≥1 year**||≥1 year**|
|HBeAg− chronic hepatitis||1 year||> 1 year||> 1 year||>1 year||>1 year|
|Side effects||Many||Negligible||Potential Nephrotoxicity||Negligible||Negligible|
|Drug resistance||-||∼20%, year 1||None, year 1||<1% up to year 2∧||∼25% up to year 2|
|∼70%, year 5||29%, year 5|
|HBeAg||HBV DNA (PCR)||ALT||Treatment strategy|
|+||>20,000 IU/ml||≤2 × ULN||Low efficacy with current treatment.|
|Observe; consider treatment when ALT becomes elevated.|
|Consider biopsy in persons > 40 years, ALT persistently high normal-2x ULN, or with family history of HCC.|
|Consider treatment if HBV DNA >20,000 IU/ml and biopsy shows moderate/severe inflammation or significant fibrosis|
|+||>20,000 IU/ml||>2 × ULN||Observe for 3-6 months and treat if no spontaneous HBeAg loss|
|Consider liver biopsy prior to treatment if compensated|
|Immediate treatment if icteric or clinical decompensation|
|IFNα/pegIFNα, LAM, ADV, ETV or LdT may be used as initial therapy|
|LAM and LdT not preferred due to high rate of drug resistance|
|End-point of treatment– Seroconversion from HBeAg to anti-HBe|
|Duration of therapy|
|• IFN-α: 16 weeks|
|• PegIFN-α: 48 weeks|
|• LAM/ADV/ETV/LdT: minimum 1 year, continue for at least 6 months after HBeAg seroconversion|
|IFNα non-responders/ contraindications to IFNα → ADV/ETV|
|−||>20,000 IU/ml||> 2 x ULN||IFN-α/peg IFN-α, LAM, ADV, ETV or LdT may be used as initial therapy, LAM and LdT not preferred due to high rate of drug resistance|
|End-point of treatment– not defined|
|Duration of therapy|
|• IFN-α/pegIFN-α: 1 year|
|• LAM/ADV/ETV/LdT: > 1 year|
|IFNα non-responders/ contraindications to IFN-α → ADV/ETV|
|−||>2,000 IU/ml||1->2 x ULN||Consider liver biopsy and treat if liver biopsy shows moderate/severe necroinflammation or significant fibrosis|
|−||≤2,000 IU/ml||≤ULN||Observe, treat if HBV DNA or ALT becomes higher|
|HBV DNA >2,000 IU/ml—Treat, LAM/ADV/ETV/LdT may be used as initial therapy. LAM and LdT not preferred due to high rate of drug resistance|
|HBV DNA <2,000 IU/ml—Consider treatment if ALT elevated|
|Decompensated: Coordinate treatment with transplant center, LAM (or LdT) +ADV or ETV preferred. Refer for liver transplant|
|Decompensated: Refer for liver transplant|
In choosing which antiviral agent to use as the first-line therapy, consideration should be given to the safety and efficacy of the treatment, risks of drug resistance, costs of the treatment (medication, monitoring tests, and clinic visits), as well as patient and provider preferences, and for women — when and whether they plan to start a family. The pros and cons of the approved treatments are summarized in Table 11. Although the efficacy is not substantially different, pegIFN-α is likely to supersede standard IFN-α because of its more convenient dosing schedule. In view of the high rate of drug resistance during long-term treatment, lamivudine and telbivudine are not preferred except where only a short course of treatment is planned. While tenofovir is not yet approved for the treatment of hepatitis B, emerging data suggest that its safety profile is similar to that of adefovir and its antiviral efficacy in wild-type as well as lamivudine-resistant HBV is comparable or superior to adefovir. Finally, while combination therapy seems to be a more logical approach, none of the combination regimens tested to date is clearly superior.
Patients receiving IFN-α therapy should have blood counts and liver panel monitored every 4 weeks, thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) and HBV DNA levels every 12 weeks, and, if initially HBeAg-positive, HBeAg/anti-HBe every 24 weeks during treatment. Blood counts, liver panel, TSH and HBV DNA, and if initially HBeAg positive, HBeAg/anti-HBe should be tested every 12 weeks during the first 24 weeks post-treatment. Patients receiving NA therapy should have liver panel monitored every 12 weeks and HBV DNA levels every 12-24 weeks, and, if initially HBeAg-positive HBeAg/anti-HBe every 24 weeks during treatment. In addition serum creatinine should be tested every 12 weeks for patients receiving adefovir or tenofovir. HBsAg should be tested every 6-12 months in those who are HBeAg negative with persistently undetectable serum HBV DNA by PCR assay.
Recommendations on Whom to Treat and with What Antiviral Agent(Table 12)
- 15Patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B
- aALT greater than 2 times normal or moderate/severe hepatitis on biopsy, and HBV DNA >20,000 IU/ml.These patients should be considered for treatment. (I)
Treatment should be delayed for 3 to 6 months in persons with compensated liver disease to determine if spontaneous HBeAg seroconversion occurs. (II-2)
Patients with icteric ALT flares should be promptly treated. (III)
Treatment may be initiated with any of the 6 approved antiviral medications, but pegIFN-α, adefovir or entecavir are preferred. (I)
- bALT persistently normal or minimally elevated (<2 times normal).These patients generally should not be initiated on treatment. (I)
Liver biopsy may be considered in patients with fluctuating or minimally elevated ALT levels especially in those above 40 years of age. (II-3)
Treatment may be initiated if there is moderate or severe necroinflammation or significant fibrosis on liver biopsy. (I)
- cChildren with elevated ALT greater than 2 times normal.These patients should be considered for treatment if ALT levels remain elevated at this level for longer than 6 months. (I)
Treatment may be initiated with IFN-α or lamivudine. (I)
- aALT greater than 2 times normal or moderate/severe hepatitis on biopsy, and HBV DNA >20,000 IU/ml.These patients should be considered for treatment. (I)
- 16Patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B (serum HBV DNA >20,000 IU/ml and elevated ALT >2 times normal) should be considered for treatment. (I)
Liver biopsy may be considered for HBeAg-negative patients with lower HBV DNA levels (2,000-20,000 IU/ml) and borderline normal or minimally elevated ALT levels. (II-2)
Treatment may be initiated if there is moderate/severe inflammation or significant fibrosis on biopsy. (I)
Treatment may be initiated with any of the 6 approved antiviral medications but pegIFN-α, adefovir or entecavir are preferred in view of the need for long-term treatment. (I for pegIFN-α, adefovir, entecavir and telbivudine and II-1 for IFN-α and lamivudine).
- 17Patients who failed to respond to prior IFN-α (standard or pegylated) therapy may be retreated with nucleoside analogues (NA) if they fulfill the criteria listed above. (I)
- 18Patients who failed to achieve primary response as evidenced by <2 log decrease in serum HBV DNA level after at least 6 months of NA therapy should be switched to an alternative treatment. (III)
- 19Patients who develop breakthrough infection while receiving NA therapy (Table13)
Compliance should be ascertained, and treatment resumed in patients who have had long lapses in medications. (III)
A confirmatory test for antiviral-resistant mutation should be performed if possible to differentiate primary non-response from breakthrough infection and to determine if there is evidence of multi-drug resistance (in patients who have been exposed to more than one NA treatment). (III)
All patients with virologic breakthrough should be considered for rescue therapy. (II-2)
For patients in whom there was no clear indication for hepatitis B treatment and who continue to have compensated liver disease, withdrawal of therapy may be considered but these patients need to be closely monitored and treatment reinitiated if they experience severe hepatitis flares. (III)
- 20Treatment of patients with lamivudine (or telbivudine)-resistant HBV
- aIf adefovir is used, lamivudine (or telbivudine) should be continued indefinitely to decrease the risk of hepatitis flares during the transition period and to reduce the risk of subsequent adefovir resistance. (II-3 for lamivudine-resistant HBV and III for telbivudine-resistant HBV)
- bIf entecavir is used, lamivudine or telbivudine should be stopped as continued presence of lamivudine (or telbivudine)-resistant mutations will increase the risk of entecavir resistance. (II-3 for lamivudine-resistant HBV and III for telbivudine-resistant HBV)
- 21Treatment of patients with adefovir-resistant HBV
- aIn patients with no prior exposure to other NA, lamivudine or entacavir may be added. (III)
- bIn patients with prior lamivudine resistance in whom lamivudine had been stopped when treatment was switched to adefovir, lamivudine may be added but the durability of response is unknown and re-emergence of lamivudine-resistant mutations has been reported. (II-2)
- 22Treatment of patients with entecavir-resistant HBV
- aAdefovir can be used as it has been shown to have activity against entecavir-resistant HBV in in vitro studies, but clinical data are lacking. (II-3)
- 23Patients with compensated cirrhosis — Treatment should be considered for patients with ALT >2 times normal, and for patients with normal or minimally elevated ALT if serum HBV DNA levels are high (>2,000 IU/ml). (II-2)
- aPatients with compensated cirrhosis are best treated with NAs because of the risk of hepatic decompensation associated with IFN-α–related flares of hepatitis. In view of the need for long-term therapy, adefovir or entecavir is preferred. (II-3)
- 24Patients with decompensated cirrhosis — Treatment should be promptly initiated with a NA that can produce rapid viral suppression with low risk of drug resistance. (II-1)
- aLamivudine or adefovir may be used as initial treatment preferably in combination to reduce the risk of drug resistance and to achieve rapid virus suppression. (II-2) Telbivudine may be substituted for lamivudine but clinical data documenting its safety and efficacy in patients with decompensated cirrhosis are lacking.
- bEntecavir would be an appropriate treatment in this setting but clinical data documenting its safety and efficacy in patients with decompensated cirrhosis are lacking. (III)
- cTreatment should be coordinated with a transplant center. (III)
- dIFN-α/pegIFNα should not be used in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. (II-3)
- 25In patients with inactive HBsAg carrier state antiviral treatment is not indicated, but these patients should be monitored (see Recommendation 12). (II-2)
|• Avoid unnecessary treatment|
|• Initiate treatment with potent antiviral that has low rate of drug resistance or with combination therapy|
|• Switch to alternative therapy in patients with primary non-response|
|• Test for serum HBV DNA (PCR assay) every 3-6 months during treatment|
|• Check for medication compliance in patients with virologic breakthrough|
|• Confirm antiviral resistance with genotypic testing|
|Lamivudine-resistance →||Add adefovir or tenofovir|
|Stop lamivudine, switch to Truvada*∧|
|Stop lamivudine, switch to entecavir (preexisting lamivudine-resistant mutation predisposes to entecavir resistance)#|
|Adefovir-resistance →||Add lamivudine#|
|Stop adefovir, switch to Truvada*∧|
|Switch to or add entecavir#∧|
|Entecavir-resistance →||Switch to or add adefovir or tenofovir∧|
|Telbivudine-resistance+ →||Add adefovir or tenofovir|
|Stop telbivudine, switch to Truvada|
|Stop telbivudine, switch to entecavir (pre-existing telbivudine-resistant mutation predisposes to entecavir resistance)|
- 26IFN-α and pegIFN-α are administered as subcutaneous injections.
- aThe recommended dose of standard IFN-α for adults is 5 MU daily or 10 MU thrice weekly. The recommended dose of pegIFN-α2a is 180 mcg weekly. (I)
- bThe recommended IFN-α dose for children is 6 MU/m2thrice weekly with a maximum of 10 MU. (I) PegIFN-α has not been approved for treatment of chronic hepatitis B in children.
- cThe recommended treatment duration for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B is 16 weeks for standard IFN-α and 48 weeks for pegIFN-α. (I)
- dThe recommended treatment duration for HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B is 48 weeks for both standard and peg-IFN-α (II-3)
- 27Lamivudine is administered orally.
- aThe recommended lamivudine dose for adults with normal renal function and no HIV coinfection is 100 mg daily (I). Dose adjustment is needed for patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate <50 ml/min (Table10a). (I)
- bThe recommended lamivudine dose for children is 3 mg/kg/d with a maximum of 100 mg/d. (I)
- cThe recommended dose of lamivudine for persons co-infected with HIV is 150mg twice daily. Lamivudine should only be used in combination with other antiretroviral medications. (I)
- 28Adefovir is administered orally.
- aThe recommended adefovir dose for adults with normal renal function is 10 mg daily. (I) Dose adjustment is needed for patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate <50 ml/min (Table10b).
- 29Entecavir is administered orally.
- aThe recommended entecavir dose for adults with normal renal function is 0.5 mg daily for patients with no prior lamivudine treatment, and 1.0 mg daily for patients who are refractory/resistant to lamivudine. (I) Dose adjustment is needed for patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate <50 ml/min (Table10c).
- 30Telbivudine is administered orally.
- aThe recommended dose for adults with normal renal function is 600 mg daily. (I) Dose adjustment is needed for patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate <50 ml/min (Table10d).
- 31Duration of nucleoside analogue treatment
- aHBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B —Treatment should be continued until the patient has achieved HBeAg seroconversion and completed at least 6 months of additional treatment after appearance of anti-HBe. (I)
Close monitoring for relapse is needed after withdrawal of treatment. (I)
- bHBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B— Treatment should be continued until the patient has achieved HBsAg clearance. (I)
- cCompensated cirrhosis —These patients should receive long-term treatment. However, treatment may be stopped in HBeAg-positive patients if they have confirmed HBeAg seroconversion and have completed at least 6 months of consolidation therapy and in HBeAg-negative patients if they have confirmed HBsAg clearance. (II-3)
Close monitoring for viral relapse and hepatitis flare is mandatory if treatment is stopped. (II-3)
- dDecompensated cirrhosis and recurrent hepatitis B post-liver transplantation —Life-long treatment is recommended. (II-3)
- aHBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B —Treatment should be continued until the patient has achieved HBeAg seroconversion and completed at least 6 months of additional treatment after appearance of anti-HBe. (I)
Coinfection with HBV and HCV
There is scanty information on the treatment of HBV/HCV coinfection and recommendations on treatment for HBV/HCV coinfection cannot be made at this time.249–251 Two studies on standard IFN-α and ribavirin showed no difference in sustained virologic response to HCV infection in patients with HBV/HCV co-infection compared to patients with HCV infection only. However, rebound in serum HBV DNA levels after an initial decline, and reactivation of HBV replication in patients who had undetectable HBV DNA prior to treatment have been reported.
Coinfection with HBV and HDV
The primary endpoint of treatment is the suppression of HDV replication, which is usually accompanied by normalization of ALT level and decrease in necroinflammatory activity on liver biopsy. The only approved treatment of chronic hepatitis D is IFN-α. One study found that high dose (9 MU 3 times a week) IFN-α had higher rates of virologic and biochemical as well as histologic response than those who received IFN-α 3 MU 3 times a week or placebo.252 Although most patients had viral relapse, improvement in liver histology was maintained 10 years post-treatment among the patients who received high-dose IFN-α.253 Two recent trials support the use of pegIFN-α in chronic hepatitis D, one study showed that addition of ribavirin did not improve the response.254, 255
Lamivudine has been evaluated in a small number of patients and found to be ineffective in inhibiting HDV replication.256
Based on available data, high-dose IFN-α (9 MU 3 times a week) or pegIFN-α for 1 year appears to have long-term beneficial effects in patients with chronic hepatitis D.
Co-Infection with HBV and HIV
Clinical studies in patients with HBV/HIV coinfection reported lower response rates to standard IFN-α treatment than those with HBV monoinfection.257 Responders tend to have a higher mean CD4 cell count than nonresponders. It is expected that pegIFN-α will have similar or better efficacy than standard IFN-α.
Lamivudine, emtricitabine and tenofovir are NAs with activity against both HIV and HBV.234, 258, 259 However, the rate of HBV resistance to lamivudine in HBV/HIV coinfected patients is high, reaching 90% at 4 years.259 Tenofovir plus lamivudine or emtricitabine are commonly prescribed as components of HAART in HBV/HIV coinfected patients. Furthermore, tenofovir is effective against lamivudine-resistant HBV233 and appears to reduce the rate of lamivudine resistance when the combination is used.260
Adefovir at the approved dose for HBV (10 mg) has negligible activity against HIV. To date, no resistance to HIV has been detected up to 144 weeks in small studies.261 Entecavir has no activity against HIV. Telbivudine also has no activity against HIV but it should not be used in HBV/HIV coinfected patients because of the risk of selection of M204I mutation in the YMDD motif.
Given that antiretroviral regimens may include drugs with activity against HBV, it is reasonable to base HBV treatment decisions on whether or not HIV treatment is ongoing or planned. In HBeAg-positive patients who are not in need of HAART, or who are already well-controlled on HAART that does not include a drug with activity against HBV, pegIFN-α may be considered as a first-line option given its limited duration, but adefovir or entecavir can also be used in this setting. It is generally recommended that candidates for IFN-α therapy have CD4 cell counts >500 cells/uL. Patients who have lower CD4 cell counts or who are HBeAg-negative may be appropriate candidates for adefovir or entecavir. Finally, in HBeAg-negative patients who are likely to need HIV treatment in the future, earlier initiation of HAART may be considered.
For patients in whom HAART initiation is planned, it is best to use a regimen that includes a drug/drugs with activity against HBV. Most experts recommend using two drugs, while others suggest that a single agent may be sufficient in those with low HBV DNA levels. In patients with cirrhosis who are newly started on HAART, two drugs are preferred given the risk of a clinically significant hepatitis flare in the setting of immune reconstitution. In the setting of confirmed lamivudine resistance in patients who are already on HAART, adding tenofovir is generally preferred, but adding adefovir is also an option.
Hepatitis flares may occur when HBV treatment is discontinued, particularly in the absence of HBeAg seroconversion. Thus, when HAART regimens are altered, drugs that are effective against HBV should not be discontinued without substituting another drug that has activity against HBV, unless the patient has achieved HBeAg seroconversion and has completed an adequate course of consolidation treatment.
Recommendations for Treatment of Patients with HBV/HIV Coinfection
- 32Patients who meet criteria for chronic hepatitis B should be treated. (III)
Liver biopsy should be considered in patients with fluctuating or mildly elevated ALT (1-2 x normal). (II-3)
- 33Patients who are not on HAART and are not anticipated to require HAART in the near future should be treated with an antiviral therapy that does not target HIV, such as pegIFN-α, adefovir or entecavir. Although telbivudine does not target HIV, it should not be used in this circumstance. (II-3)
- 34Patients in whom treatment for both HBV and HIV is planned should receive therapies that are effective against both viruses: lamivudine plus tenofovir or emtricitabine plus tenofovir are preferred. (II-3)
- 35Patients who are already on effective HAART that does not include a drug active against HBV may be treated with pegIFNα, adefovir or entecavir. (II-3)
- 36In patients with lamivudine resistance, tenofovir or adefovir should be added. (III)
- 37When HAART regimens are altered, drugs that are effective against HBV should not be discontinued without substituting another drug that has activity against HBV, unless the patient has achieved HBeAg seroconversion and has completed an adequate course of consolidation treatment. (II-3)
Antiviral Prophylaxis of Hepatitis B Carriers Who Receive Immunosuppressive or Cytotoxic Chemotherapy
Reactivation of HBV replication with increase in serum HBV DNA and ALT level has been reported in 20% to 50% of hepatitis B carriers undergoing immunosuppressive or cancer chemotherapy. In most instances, the hepatitis flares are asymptomatic, but icteric flares, and even hepatic decompensation and death have been observed.262–264 Reactivation of HBV replication is more common when chemotherapeutic regimens that include corticosteroids are used.265 In addition, reactivations have been reported in HBsAg-positive persons after intra-arterial chemoembolization for HCC and other immunosuppressive therapies such as rituximab for lymphoma as well as infliximab and other anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapies for rheumatoid arthritis or inflammatory bowel disease.264, 266, 267 Clinical studies including one controlled trial showed that prophylactic therapy with lamivudine can reduce the rate of HBV reactivation, severity of associated hepatitis flares and mortality.264, 268–271 HBsAg testing should be performed in persons who have high risk of HBV infection (see Table 2), prior to initiation of chemo- or immunosuppressive therapy. Prophylactic antiviral therapy should be administered to hepatitis B carriers at the onset of cancer chemotherapy or a finite course of immunosuppressive therapy, and maintained for 6 months afterwards. Viral relapse after withdrawal of lamivudine has been reported in patients with high pre-chemotherapy DNA level,272 HBsAg-positive persons with serum HBV DNA levels >2,000 IU/ml prior to undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy should continue antiviral therapy until they reach therapeutic endpoints for chronic hepatitis B.
In the renal transplant setting, a small study found that most HBsAg positive patients had increase in serum HBV DNA levels necessitating lamivudine treatment.271 While studies to date have focused on lamivudine, adefovir or entecavir could be used as an alternate treatment, particularly in patients who are anticipated to require more than 12 months of therapy in whom there is a higher risk of resistance to lamivudine. In general, lamivudine and entecavir are preferred because of their rapid onset of action and lack of nephrotoxicity. IFN-α should not be used in this setting because of its bone marrow suppressive effects and the risk of hepatitis flares.
While HBV reactivation can occur in persons who are HBsAg negative but anti-HBc and anti-HBs positive and in those with isolated anti-HBc, this is infrequent, and there is not enough information to recommend routine prophylaxis for these individuals.262, 264
Recommendations for Treatment of Hepatitis B carriers Who Require Immunosuppressive or Cytotoxic Therapy
- 38HBsAg testing should be performed in patients who are at high risk of HBV infection (see recommendation number 1), prior to initiation of chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy. (II-3)
- 39Prophylactic antiviral therapy is recommended for HBV carriers at the onset of cancer chemotherapy or of a finite course of immunosuppressive therapy.
- aPatients with baseline HBV DNA <2,000 IU/ml level should continue treatment for 6 months after completion of chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy. (III)
- bPatients with high baseline HBV DNA (>2,000 IU/ml) level should continue treatment until they reach treatment endpoints as in immunocompetent patients. (III)
- cLamivudine or telbivudine can be used if the anticipated duration of treatment is short (≤12 months). (I for lamivudine and III for telbivudine)
- dAdefovir or entecavir is preferred if longer duration of treatment is anticipated. Entecavir has more rapid onset of action than adefovir and may be more appropriate in this setting. (III)
- eIFN-α should be avoided in view of the bone marrow suppressive effect. (II-3)
Symptomatic Acute Hepatitis B
Antiviral therapy is generally not necessary in patients with symptomatic acute hepatitis B because >95% of immunocompetent adults with acute hepatitis B recover spontaneously. Small case series with or without comparisons to historical untreated controls have reported that lamivudine improves survival in patients with severe or fulminant hepatitis B.273, 274 Limited data including one prospective randomized controlled trial of IFN-α showed that antiviral therapy did not decrease the rate of progression to chronic infection because all the study subjects had resolution of infection.275
Despite the lack of properly designed studies, an argument can be made for treating all patients with fulminant hepatitis B using a NA given its safety and the fact that many of these patients will ultimately need liver transplantation. At the 2006 NIH HBV Meeting, it was also proposed patients with protracted, severe acute hepatitis B (increase in INR and deep jaundice persisting for >4 weeks) be treated. (4) Lamivudine or telbivudine would be a reasonable choice given their safety and rapidity of action, and the short anticipated duration of therapy except in patients who proceed to transplant. Entecavir can also be used but adefovir may not be optimal because of its slow action and potential for nephrotoxicity. IFN-α is contraindicated because of the risks of worsening hepatitis and the frequent side effects.
Recommendations for Treatment of Patients with Acute Symptomatic Hepatitis B
- 40Treatment is only indicated for patients with fulminant hepatitis B and those with protracted, severe acute hepatitis B. (III)
- 41Lamivudine, telbivudine or entecavir is preferred. (II-3)
- aTreatment should be continued until HBsAg clearance is confirmed or indefinitely in those who undergo liver transplantation. (II-1)
- bIFN-α is contraindicated. (III)
This guideline was produced in collaboration with the Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. This committee provided extensive peer review of the manuscript. Members of the Practice Guidelines Committee include Margaret C. Shuhart, M.D., M.S., (Chair), Andres Cardenas, M.D., M.M.Sc., Stanley M. Cohen, M.D., Timothy J. Davern, M.D., Steven L. Flamm, M.D., Steven-Huy B. Han, M.D., Charles D. Howell, M.D., David R. Nelson, M.D., K. Rajender Reddy, M.D., Bruce A. Runyon, M.D., John B. Wong, M.D., and Nizar N. Zein, M.D.