Potential conflict of interest: Nothing to report.
Treating acute hepatitis B†
Article first published online: 27 JUL 2007
Copyright © 2007 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases
Volume 46, Issue 2, pages 607–608, August 2007
How to Cite
Fazili, J., Bader, T. F. and Tierney, W. (2007), Treating acute hepatitis B. Hepatology, 46: 607–608. doi: 10.1002/hep.21709
- Issue published online: 27 JUL 2007
- Article first published online: 27 JUL 2007
To the Editor:
We read with interest the article by Kumar et al.1 on a randomized controlled trial of lamivudine to treat acute hepatitis B.
The trial of lamivudine versus placebo revealed a greater decrease in HBV DNA levels in the lamivudine-treated group, but this did not translate into a biochemical or clinical improvement in the lamivudine-treated group. This is the first sound evidence to support the prevailing practice of not treating acute hepatitis B patients.
However, the development of antibodies to hepatitis B e antigen (anti-Hbe) and hepatitis B s antigen (anti-HBs) was lower in the lamivudine-treated group relative to placebo (87.5% versus 71 % for anti-HBe and 85% versus 67% for anti-HBs), although this did not reach statistical significance. It is an important observation and its long-term significance in terms of potential flaring of hepatitis B in these patients remains to be determined. It seems plausible that interruption of the protective immune response may be a consequence of pharmacologic therapy. How this translates into future risk of reactivation needs examination. We hope they will follow the groups in the long term to see if any differences evolve.
The second noteworthy outcome from this study is that there was no difference in the 2 groups regarding outcome of severe or fulminant hepatitis B. This suggests that lamivudine treatment of patients with acute hepatitis B may not be harmful in this setting. Clearly, the number of patients is too small to make definitive conclusions. The results may encourage use of lamivudine in a small subset of patients with acute hepatitis B who have a more severe presentation with potential need for liver transplantation. The use of lamivudine in this subset may rescue such patients by increasing chances of spontaneous recovery without liver transplantation. A 2002 German study of fulminant hepatitis B showed that 7 of 8 patients treated with lamivudine (after 2000) avoided death or transplantation compared to a historical group (before 2000) where only 5 of 21 patients not treated with lamivudine avoided death or transplantation.2 Larger prospective studies of lamivudine and other antiviral therapies in liver transplantation would help answer these questions.
- 2Early lamivudine therapy may prevent liver failure in patients with fulminant hepatitis B [Abstract]. HEPATOLOGY 2002; 36:(Suppl)375A., , , , , , et al.
Javid Fazili M.D.*, Teddy F. Bader M.D.*, William Tierney M.D.*, * Section of Gastroenterology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK.