Potential conflict of interest: Nothing to report.
Article first published online: 22 APR 2011
Copyright © 2011 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases
Volume 53, Issue 5, page 1774, May 2011
How to Cite
Ghouri, N. A., Preiss, D. and Sattar, N. (2011), Reply. Hepatology, 53: 1774. doi: 10.1002/hep.24138
- Issue published online: 22 APR 2011
- Article first published online: 22 APR 2011
We thank Musso and colleagues for their useful comments on our article.We agree that a comprehensive approach to patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, namely one which considers their diabetes and cardiovascular risk, as well as their long-term liver-related risk, is needed. We wish only to make some points of clarification which will help hepatologists to efficiently assess cardiovascular and diabetes risk in their patients. First, there have been recent calls, recently verified by the World Health Organization, to diagnose diabetes by measurement of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and this measure has the advantage of being measurable on nonfasting samples.1 Of interest, HbA1c is at least as good as fasting glucose at assessing microvascular risk and appears to be the best glycemic predictor of macrovascular risk, performing even better than the 2-hour glucose tolerance test.2 We would therefore argue against routine oral glucose tolerance testing in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, because of both clinical and economical concerns. Second, the benefit of testing for insulin as a prognostic factor, we believe, remains to be proven. At present, we would advise against measuring insulin routinely, at least until this approach has been shown to be cost-effective. Third, lipid tests to enhance prediction of cardiovascular disease (as part of national cardiovascular risk guidelines or algorithms) also do not require fasting, as recently shown by the Emerging Risk Factor Collaboration group.3 Rather, nonfasting total cholesterol (or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol or non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol adequately reflect lipid-associated vascular risk and perform as well as fasting lipids3 for risk prediction. Fasting is therefore not required to test for diabetes, or indeed cardiovascular risk, in the majority of patients. Finally, we have recently proposed4 how combined vascular and diabetes screening may be conducted by simply adding a nonfasting HbA1c test to nonfasting lipids as part of a cardiovascular risk screen, a simple process which may be easily added to other routine tests conducted in most hepatology and hepatology-related clinics.
- 1International Expert Committee. International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009; 32: 1327–1334.
- 2Markers of dysglycaemia and risk of coronary heart disease in people without diabetes: Reykjavik prospective study and systematic review. PLoS Med 2011; 7: e1000278., , , , , , et al.
- 3Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration; , , , , , , et al. Major lipids, apolipoproteins, and risk of vascular disease. JAMA 2009; 302: 1993–2000.
- 4Combined cardiovascular and diabetes risk assessment in primary care. Diabet Med 2011; 28: 19–22., , .
Nazim A. Ghouri M.D.*, David Preiss M.D.*, Naveed Sattar M.D.*, * British Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.