Potential conflict of interest: Nothing to report.
Presented, in part, at the Annual Meeting of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), October 2010, San Antonio, TX.
Supported by the American College of Gastroenterology Junior Faculty Career Development Award to Dr. Claudia Zein. Dr. Claudia Zein is also supported by Grant Number KL2 RR024990 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the NIH and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research. This project was supported by Grant Number M01 RR00080 and Grant Number UL1 RR024989 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The contents of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NCRR or NIH.
The primary aim of this study was to compare the effects of pentoxifylline (PTX) versus placebo on the histological features of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). In all, 55 adults with biopsy-confirmed NASH were randomized to receive PTX at a dose of 400 mg three times a day (n = 26) or placebo (n = 29) over 1 year. The primary efficacy endpoint was defined as improvement in histological features of NASH through reduction in steatosis, lobular inflammation, and/or hepatocellular ballooning as reflected by a decrease of ≥2 points in the nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) activity score (NAS). After 1 year, intention-to-treat analysis showed a decrease of ≥2 points in the NAS in 38.5% of patients on PTX versus 13.8% of those on placebo (P = 0.036). Per protocol analysis, a decrease of ≥2 points in the NAS from baseline was observed in 50% of the patients on PTX versus 15.4% of those on placebo (P = 0.01). The mean change in NAS score from baseline was −1.6 in the PTX group, versus −0.1 in the placebo group (P < 0.001). PTX significantly improved steatosis (mean change in score −0.9 versus −0.04 with placebo, P < 0.001) and lobular inflammation (median change −1 versus 0 with placebo, P = 0.02). No significant effects in hepatocellular ballooning were observed. PTX also improved liver fibrosis (mean change in fibrosis score was −0.2 among those on PTX versus +0.4 among those on placebo, P = 0.038). Although not statistically significant (P = 0.17), improvement in fibrosis was observed in a greater proportion (35%) of patients in the PTX group compared to placebo (15%). Adverse effects were similar in both groups. Conclusion: PTX improved histological features of NASH compared to placebo. PTX was well tolerated in patients with NASH (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00590161). (HEPATOLOGY 2011)
Approximately 60 million adults in the United States have nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).1 The histologic spectrum of NAFLD spans from simple steatosis to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), characterized by hepatocellular injury, inflammation, and fibrosis that can eventually progress to cirrhosis.2, 3 Until recently, no therapy has been definitely proven beneficial for patients with NASH. A recent study showed some benefits of therapy with vitamin E in a proportion of patients with NASH4; however, there is still a need for additional and more effective therapies for patients with NASH.
Multiple factors and pathways are involved in the pathogenesis and progression of NAFLD and NASH. Imbalances in inflammatory cytokines, oxidative stress, and insulin resistance are some of the proposed mechanisms involved in NASH pathogenesis and progression.5-8 Cytokines including tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α),9, 10 a proinflammatory cytokine, and adiponectin, an antiinflammatory cytokine,9 are believed to play an important role in hepatocellular damage, inflammation, and fibrogenesis in NASH.11 In mice, fatty liver disease is improved by inhibition of hepatic TNF-α production12 and by infusion of anti-TNF-α neutralizing antibody.13, 14
Pentoxifylline (PTX) is a methylxanthine derivative known to increase red blood cell flexibility, reduce blood viscosity, and decrease platelet aggregation.15, 16 There is evidence supportive of a potential role for PTX in NASH. PTX inhibits a number of pro-inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α.17-19 In addition, PTX may have hepatoprotective effects.17, 20 It increases hepatic glutathione levels in mice with steatohepatitis induced by a methionine choline-deficient diet17 and reduces the production of oxygen radicals induced by prolonged ischemia time in rat livers.21 Potential antifibrogenic effects of PTX have been suggested by in vitro studies on hepatic stellate cells,22, 23 and in a rat model of biliary duct occlusion.24 Therefore, PTX has a number of mechanisms that may provide therapeutic benefit to NASH patients.
Pilot studies of PTX in patients with NASH have been conducted and their results have suggested possible benefits of PTX in NASH.25, 26 However, to date published studies have had significant limitations, predominantly uncontrolled design, small sample sizes, and lack of histological follow-up evaluation.
The primary aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of PTX over 1 year with placebo in patients with NASH. The primary outcome measure was defined as an improvement of 2 or more points in the NAFLD activity score (NAS).27 Other aims were to compare the effects of PTX compared to placebo on serum transaminases; to assess the effect of PTX on insulin sensitivity; to assess the effect of PTX on hepatocyte apoptosis; and to assess the effect of therapy with PTX on serum levels of TNF-α and adiponectin. We also aimed to compare the rate of adverse events in patients with NASH receiving PTX compared with placebo.
BMI, body mass index; DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; NASH, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; OR odds ratio; PTX, pentoxifylline; SD, standard deviation.
Patients and Methods
Selection of Patients.
Patients were recruited at two medical centers in Cleveland, OH: the Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and the Cleveland Clinic. Patients were considered for the study if they had a well-established diagnosis of NASH based on liver biopsy performed within 6 months of entry into the study.
Other inclusion criteria were (1) daily alcohol intake of <30 g for males and <15 g for females; (2) appropriate exclusion of other liver diseases; (3) age between 18 and 70 years; and (4) the ability to give informed consent. Patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM) were included only if their therapeutic regimen was limited to oral agents including sulfonylureas (e.g., glipizide and glyburide) and/or biguanides (e.g., metformin), was stable (defined by no changes in oral agents or their dose for at least 6 months), and with relatively adequate glucose control as defined by hemoglobin A1C <8%.
Patients were excluded if they had a history of past excessive alcohol drinking (as defined above) for a period longer than 2 years at any time in the past 10 years; positive testing for hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus; any other suspected cause of liver disease by history, blood tests, or clinical findings; patients were also excluded if they were taking medications known to cause steatosis; or taking medications that have shown benefits in previous NASH pilot studies, including vitamin E, Betaine, S-adenosylmethionine (SAM-e), thiazolidinediones, and alpha-glucosidase inhibitors. Patients with cirrhosis defined by stage 4 fibrosis on liver biopsy or by unequivocal clinical evidence consistent with underlying cirrhosis were also excluded. Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to PTX or the methylxanthines (caffeine, theophylline, theobromine) were excluded, as well as those with a history of cerebral or retinal hemorrhage. Patients taking theophylline or coumadin were excluded because of potential interactions with PTX.
Study Design and Organization.
The study was designed as a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards at all involved institutions. The study conduction, progress, and data were overseen by an independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board and an independent Regulatory Compliance and Data Integrity Monitor. Enrollment occurred between December 2006 and February 2009. A computer-generated randomization table was kept by the research pharmacy at each site and only pharmacy study personnel had access to it. Double-blinding was maintained throughout the duration of the randomization phase. The trial was completed in April of 2010.
Patients were assigned to one of two study groups. Patients on the treatment arm received an oral dose of 400 mg three times per day of PTX for 1 year. In the placebo arm, identical placebo was substituted for PTX. Both formulations were white, oblong capsules with no markings, no discernible odor, and no difference to taste.
Evaluation and Monitoring of Patients.
Clinical history and physical examination were completed at entry and at 1 year. Follow-up liver biopsy was obtained after 12 months of taking the study medication and prior to discontinuation. Laboratory studies done at entry and at 12 months included liver enzymes, basic metabolic panel, complete blood count, prothrombin time, hemoglobin A1C, fasting insulin, C-peptide, lipid panel, TNF-α, and adiponectin. Liver enzymes were also tested at 3, 6, and 9 months.
Weight and height for body mass index (BMI) calculation and waist measurement were obtained at entry and at study completion. Individualized nutritional counseling for adequate caloric intake and recommended lifestyle modifications were provided to all study subjects.
Compliance and adverse effects were formally evaluated at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months into the study. Compliance was assessed by direct questioning of the subjects. In addition, patients were asked to return remaining pills at the time of each refill and a pill count was performed.
Assessment of Liver Histology.
Liver pathologists at each center (P.G. at the Cleveland VAMC site, and L.Y. at the Cleveland Clinic site) established the presence of histological diagnosis of NASH required for entry. Adequacy of the liver biopsy specimens for evaluation was performed by the study pathologists and the aggregate biopsy length of the specimens was recorded. Subsequently, all entry and end of study liver biopsies (from both centers) were formally reviewed and scored by a dedicated liver pathologist blinded to treatment arm and who is experienced with the NAS (L.Y.). Per study design, final analysis was based on the results of this formal review. The NAS27 grades NAFLD based on the individual scores for steatosis, inflammation, and ballooning. Fibrosis at entry and at the end of trial was staged 0 to 4 (0: absent; 1: perisinusoidal or portal/periportal only; 2: perisinusoidal and periportal; 3: bridging fibrosis; 4: cirrhosis).
Assessment of Insulin Sensitivity.
Assessment of insulin sensitivity was done at entry and at study completion by the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIVGTT).28-30 The five study subjects with DM were asked not to take their oral hypoglycemic medications for the 36 hours prior to initiation of the test. The FSIVGTT test was completed by expert nursing personnel at the Clinical Research Units located at University Hospitals Case Medical Center (for patients enrolled at the Cleveland VA) and at the Cleveland Clinic (for patients enrolled at the Cleveland Clinic). Samples were processed by laboratory personnel at the Clinical Research Units. Testing was performed by a skilled team at the Human Specimen Laboratory Core of the Case Western Reserve University Clinical & Translational Science Collaborative located in University Hospitals Case Medical Center. YSI 2300 STAT Plus Glucose analyzer (Yellow Springs, OH) was used to measure glucose. Insulin was measured using the Human Insulin Specific assay, Millipore (Cat. no. HI-14K, Billerica, MA). Insulin sensitivity and insulin secretory capacity were assessed using the MINMOD analysis program30, 31 by a collaborator with expertise (J.K.). In addition, fasting glucose and insulin were used to calculate insulin resistance according to the homeostasis model assessment technique (HOMA-IR) at entry and at study completion.
Assessment of Serum Cytokines.
Serum cytokines were measured by expert personnel at the Human Specimen Laboratory Core. TNF-α in serum at entry and at study completion was measured with the Human TNF-α/TNFSF1A HS assay (R&D Systems, Cat. no. HSTA00C, Minneapolis, MN). Adiponectin was measured using the Human Adiponectin assay (Millipore, Cat. no. EZHADP-61K).
Assessment of Hepatocyte Apoptosis.
Hepatocyte apoptosis in liver sections obtained at baseline and at 1 year were quantitated using the transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay32 by a collaborator with expertise (A.E.F.). Quantitation was done by counting the number of TUNEL-positive cells in 30 random microscopic fields (×400) as described.33 The ApopTag InSitu apoptosis detection kit (Millipore, product S7111) and ApopTag TdT enzyme (Millipore, product S7107) were used.
Sample Size Calculation and Statistical Analyses.
The primary outcome measure was defined as an improvement of ≥2 points in the NAS. A sample size of 52 subjects (26 per study arm) was estimated to provide 80% power to detect a significant difference (delta = 40%) between groups in achieving the primary endpoint at an alpha level of 0.05. To allow for a potential dropout rate of 20%, a sample total sample size of 64 patients was projected. However, study enrollment was stopped at 55 patients. This decision was partly due to slower than projected accrual and prolonged study duration, but also to a significantly lower than expected dropout rate. By the time 55 patients had been enrolled, over 60% of the goal sample size had completed the study timeline and the dropout rate had been 10%. Eventually the dropout rate was 11% overall.
The primary endpoint of the study regarding efficacy was improvement by ≥2 points in the NAFLD activity score (NAS). Intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses and per-protocol analyses of the primary endpoint were performed. For subjects who did not undergo end-of-study liver biopsy the primary endpoint was imputed as treatment failure for the ITT analysis. Analysis of all other efficacy and safety endpoints was performed with subjects for whom data was available. Continuous data were analyzed by the student t test if normally distributed and by non-parametric tests otherwise. Distribution of all continuous and ordinal variables was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test as well as normal probability plots. Categorical data were analyzed by the χ2 test or Fisher exact test. The proportion of subjects in each treatment arm for whom there was improvement in histologic features as assessed by the NAS was compared using Pearson's chi-square tests. The direct estimates of treatment effects were also obtained by calculating the contrast in mean change in NAS and fibrosis stage between treatment groups along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In addition, because the standardized difference of the baseline values for aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) exceeded 15%, an adjusted analysis was performed. Logistic regression models and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) were used for efficacy endpoints. For each model, treatment group and baseline value of the endpoint were included as independent variables. Multivariate modeling was used to adjust for relevant variables when indicated. Given the number of patients who had improvement in the NAS, we were limited to assessing treatment with PTX plus one additional variable at a time. Multivariate analysis was done to adjust for those variables that were of clinical relevance and found to be associated with NAS improvement by univariate analysis. All statistical tests were two-sided. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and all analyses were carried out using SAS v. 9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
Fifty-five patients were enrolled in the study. Twenty-six patients were assigned to the PTX group and 29 to the placebo group (Fig. 1). In the PTX group 23 patients completed the trial and in the placebo group 26 patients completed the trial. Among the three PTX patients who stopped treatment before study completion, one stopped after 4 weeks because he did not wish to continue in the study after his liver tests normalized; the second one stopped after 6 months for personal reasons; and the third was lost to follow-up. Among the three placebo patients who stopped treatment before study completion one stopped after 1 day because she changed her mind; the second stopped after 3 months because could not commit to the study; and the third was lost to follow-up.
Both groups were comparable at entry regarding demographics, anthropomorphic measurements, prevalence of relevant comorbidities, and histological features on liver biopsy (Table 1). Both groups were also comparable at entry regarding most laboratory tests. However, higher AST and ALT at baseline were observed in the PTX group compared to the placebo group. Because of this, appropriate adjustments were made at the time of statistical analysis.
Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of Subjects
N is total subjects with nonmissing data.
Data presented as mean ±SD, median [25th, 75th percentiles] or N (%).
Insulin resistance was calculated using the homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) according to the following formula: [glucose (mg/dL) x insulin (uU/mL)]/405.
NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) was assessed on a scale of 0 to 8 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. NAS is obtained by adding steatosis (assessed on a scale of 0 to 3), inflammation (assessed on a scale of 0 to 3) and ballooning (assessed on a scale of 0 to 2). Fibrosis stage is assessed on a scale of 0 to 4 with higher values indicating more severe disease.
Demographic and metabolic
50.5 ± 12.7
49.6 ± 9.6
50.0 ± 11.1
32.9 ± 4.6
34.0 ± 5.4
33.5 ± 5.0
Waist circumference (cm)
112.4 ± 20.1
111.8 ± 12.7
112.1 ± 16.6
Diabetes type 2
58.0 [37.0, 72.0]
43.0 [34.0, 56.0]
48.0 [35.0, 63.0]
81.5 [58.0, 108.0]
55.0 [44.0, 80.0]
67.0 [50.0, 93.0]
Alkaline phosphate (U/L)
72.5 [56.0, 96.0]
63.0 [51.0, 83.0]
67.0 [53.0, 91.0]
Total bilirubin (mg/dL)
0.7 ± 0.3
0.8 ± 0.4
0.7 ± 0.4
Fasting glucose (mg/dL)
91.0 [83.0, 97.0]
95.0 [85.0, 107.0]
92.0 [83.0, 102.0]
5.3 ± 2.5
6.1 ± 3.0
5.7 ± 2.8
5.8 ± 0.7
5.8 ± 0.5
5.8 ± 0.6
2.8 [1.9, 3.7]
3.4 [2.1, 3.7]
2.9 [1.9, 3.7]
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)
193.5 ± 44.7
184.3 ± 27.3
188.6 ± 36.5
40.5 ± 10.0
41.1 ± 10.4
40.8 ± 10.1
158.5 [123.0, 194.0]
110.5 [96.5, 163.5]
139.5 [102.0, 191.0]
7.6 ± 1.7
7.4 ± 2.0
7.5 ± 1.9
5.9 ± 2.4
5.4 ± 2.3
5.7 ± 2.4
Liver biopsy features
Aggregate biopsy length (mm)
20.0 ± 9.1
23.5 ± 10.2
21.8 ± 9.8
NAFLD activity Score
5.7 ± 1.3
5.4 ± 1.5
5.6 ± 1.4
2.7 [1.3, 3.3]
1.9 [1.0, 2.7]
2.3 [1.0, 3.3]
Nine subjects (six who stopped treatment before study completion and three who completed the study but declined the end of study liver biopsy) did not have end of study liver histology available. For the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, the primary outcome for those nine subjects was imputed as lack of improvement. As shown in Table 2, per ITT analysis, a decrease of ≥2 points in the NAS from baseline was observed in 38.5% of patients on PTX versus 13.8% of those on placebo (P = 0.036). Per protocol (PP) analysis (assessed in subjects with both biopsies available), a decrease of ≥2 points in the NAS from baseline was observed in 50% of the patients on PTX versus 15.4% of those on placebo (P = 0.01).
Table 2. Primary Outcome and Improvement in Histologic Features
Data presented as mean ± SD, median [25th, 75th percentiles] or N (%).
Primary outcome was improvement in NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) by at least 2 points. Nine subjects (6 in pentoxifylline group, 3 in placebo group) did not have end of study biopsy done; primary outcome for these was imputed as lack of improvement in NAS. Other histologic features are assessed in the 46 subjects with both biopsies available. NAS was assessed on a scale of 0 to 8 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Improvement in fibrosis, steatosis, inflammation or ballooning is defined as a decrease of at least 1 point.
P-values for % improvement were calculated using Fisher's Exact test for fibrosis and Pearson's chi-square tests otherwise.
No. of subjects randomly assigned
NAS decreased by 2+ points (ITT)
Other histologic features
No. of subjects with both biopsies
Mean change from baseline
-1.6 ± 1.1
-0.1 ± 1.4
NAS decreased by 2+ points (per-protocol)
Mean change from baseline
-0.85 ± 0.6
-0.04 ± 0.7
Median change from baseline
-1.0 [-1.0, -0.5]
0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
Patients with improvement
Mean change from baseline
-0.45 ± 0.7
0.08 ± 0.8
Median change from baseline
-1.0 [-1.0, 0.0]
0.0 [0.0, 1.0]
Patients with improvement
Mean change from baseline
-0.25 ± 0.7
-0.15 ± 0.5
Median change from baseline
0.0 [-1.0, 0.0]
0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
Patients with improvement
Mean change from baseline
-0.2 ± 0.7
0.4 ± 0.9
Patients with improvement
As shown in Fig. 2, all patients in the PTX group had improvement (n = 17) or no change (n = 3) on the NAS score by the end of the study, whereas the changes on the NAS of those patients on placebo were widely variable. The mean change in NAS score from baseline was −1.6 (±1.1) in the PTX group, compared to a mean change of −0.1 (±1.4) in the placebo group (P < 0.001). The direct estimate of PTX treatment effect on the NAS score was −1.4 (95% CI −2.2, −0.67).
As shown in Table 2, PTX significantly improved steatosis (mean change in score −0.9 versus −0.04 with placebo, P < 0.001) and lobular inflammation (median change in score −1 versus 0 with placebo, P = 0.02). However, no significant effects in hepatocellular ballooning were observed.
PTX was also associated with improvement of fibrosis score. The difference in mean change in fibrosis score was −0.2 among those on PTX compared to +0.4 among those on placebo (P = 0.038). The direct estimate of treatment effect on the fibrosis score was −0.5 (95% CI −1.0, −0.04).
Analyses were performed to investigate and adjust for associations between potentially relevant variables and NAS improvement. No association by univariate analysis was demonstrated between NAS improvement and several variables including gender; age; presence or absence of DM, hypertension, or hyperlipidemia; or changes in HOMA, TNF-α, insulin, acute insulin response to glucose, disposition index, insulin sensitivity index, or glucose effectiveness, among others. Treatment group (PTX), change in BMI, and change in HbA1C were associated with NAS improvement by univariate analysis. At the end of the study a change from baseline in BMI of −0.28 kg/m2 (±1.0) was observed in the PTX group compared to 0.52 kg/m2 (±1.8) in the placebo group (P = 0.052). The final multivariate model (whole model test P < 0.0001) showed that only treatment group (PTX) and change with BMI remained significantly associated with NAS improvement. The effect of PTX on NAS improvement was independent of change in BMI. The odds ratio for NAS improvement (with 95% CI) for PTX treatment was 7.1 (1.5, 34.3), P = 0.015; and for BMI it was 0.49 (0.24, 0.99), P = 0.049.
There was no significant association between change in BMI and improvement in fibrosis. The only variable significantly associated with improvement in fibrosis was treatment with PTX.
Of the 46 NASH study patients who had follow-up biopsies, at the end of the study 40 (87%) still had NASH and 6 (13%) did not have NASH. Among patients on the PTX arm, 5 of 20 (25%) with NASH at entry had no NASH at the end of the study. Among patients on the placebo arm, 1 of 26 (3.9%) with NASH at entry had no NASH at the end of the study (P = 0.03).
Change in Aminotransferases.
Normalization or improvement of 30% or more in ALT levels from baseline was observed in 57% of the subjects taking PTX compared to 23% of those taking placebo (P = 0.016). Regarding AST, the difference between treatment groups regarding normalization or improvement of 30% or more from baseline did not reach statistical significance. The decision to incorporate patients who had normalization of values in the group with 30% improvement was made in order to include patients with normalization of transaminases even if it required less than 30% decrease in baseline levels. Regarding ALT, there was no difference between the number of patients who had 30% improvement and those with normalization (all 19 patients had at least 30% improvement). Continuous AST and ALT values were the only relevant laboratory test showing imbalances at baseline between treatment arms and after adjusting for these imbalances the mean changes between groups were not significantly different.
Changes in Insulin Resistance, Serum TNF-α, and Adiponectin, and Hepatocyte Apoptosis.
As shown in Table 3, there was no evidence to suggest a significant association between treatment with PTX and mean changes in several measurements of insulin resistance; serum levels of TNF-α and adiponectin; or hepatocyte apoptosis.
Table 3. Changes from Baseline in Secondary Outcomes*
Data presented as mean ± SD, median [25th, 75th percentiles] or N (%).
Changes in AIRg, DI, SI, and Sg were available for 45 subjects; HOMA and C-peptide for 47; change in TUNEL was available for 36; and TNFα and adiponectin for 46. AIRg, DI, SI and Sg were adjusted for baseline values. P-values were calculated using t tests or Wilcoxon rank sum tests are indicated.
Measurements of insulin resistance/sensitivity
Acute insulin response to glucose (AIRg)
-75.8 ± 77.6
58.1 ± 70.8
Disposition index (DI)
-75.1 ± 142.4
86.2 ± 130.0
Insulin sensitivity index (SI)
0.09 ± 0.24
-0.05 ± 0.22
Glucose effectiveness (Sg)
0.0018 ± 0.001
0.0001 ± 0.001
Change in HOMA-IR
0.8 [-0.2, 3.7]
1.1 [-2.5, 1.7]
Measurement of hepatocyte apoptosis
Change in TUNEL(+) cells/hpf
-0.3 [-1.7, 0.5]
-0.2 [-1.0, 0.5]
Serum cytokines measurements
Change in TNFα
-0.1 ± 0.9
0.2 ± 1.5
Change in adiponectin
0.1 [-1.1, 0.8]
-0.0 [-1.0, 0.2]
Safety and Adverse Events.
The occurrence of adverse experiences was monitored and recorded throughout the study. Table 4 presents the subjects in each treatment arm who experienced side effects during the treatment period. There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of side effects overall between groups. However, nausea and vomiting were reported more frequently by patients on PTX compared to those on placebo. Three (12.5%) subjects on the PTX treatment arm had to decrease the medication dose from three times daily to twice daily because of nausea. With dose change the symptom was adequately controlled. No study drug-related severe adverse events occurred. No patients discontinued therapy as a result of adverse events.
One subject in each treatment arm was lost to follow up and had no information on safety endpoints
P-values were calculated using Pearson's chi-square test for presence of any side effect and Fisher's Exact tests otherwise.
Any side effects
Dose change due to nausea/vomiting
Vasovagal pre/post biopsy
The results of this randomized, placebo-controlled trial show that PTX improved histological features of NASH and liver fibrosis in patients with NASH. The rising prevalence of NAFLD, and therefore NASH, together with the recognition of patient subsets at higher risk of increased severity and progression of disease highlight the need for an effective treatment. Although a recent important study showed benefits of vitamin E in a significant portion of patients with NASH,4 the majority of NASH patients treated with vitamin E in that trial did not respond to the treatment. Also, the possibility that high doses of vitamin E may increase cardiovascular risk and mortality is an additional concern that should be kept in mind.34 Therefore, the need for additional effective therapies for NASH remains.
In this study, therapy with PTX for 1 year resulted in significant improvement of histological features of NASH compared to placebo. Among patients with both biopsies available, achievement of the primary outcome was observed in 50% of the patients on PTX versus 15.4% of those on placebo (P = 0.01). These results substantiate the benefits of PTX in NASH suggested by previous pilot studies.25, 26 The histological improvements associated with PTX treatment in this study were clearly independent of changes on insulin resistance or sensitivity measures. In addition, other potential underlying mechanisms were explored. Although PTX is known to inhibit TNF-α we were unable to demonstrate changes in TNF-α associated with PTX treatment or with histological improvement in patients on PTX. However, we need to acknowledge that the lack of changes in circulating levels of this cytokine may not correlate with hepatic levels.35 Similarly, changes on hepatocyte apoptosis measured by TUNEL were not associated with PTX treatment in this study. However, TUNEL is not a robust test to track changes in apoptosis longitudinally, and it also lacks in specificity and sensitivity.36 Future studies to further investigate the potential underlying mechanistic aspects of these observations, including better characterization of the potential effects of PTX on hepatic TNF-α and on apoptotic pathways in NASH, will be needed. Other potential mechanisms by which PTX may exert its protective effect and that should be investigated in future studies include modulation of the inflammatory response,16, 37 as well as antioxidant effects.21, 38
Interesting observations of this study relate to the results suggesting that PTX may improve liver fibrosis among patients with NASH. This is of particular importance because liver fibrosis is the main histological feature that correlates with adverse clinical outcomes in NASH. Although mechanistic explanations of the observations regarding liver fibrosis are beyond the scope of this article, there are some data that may support this potential effect of PTX. In vitro studies have shown an antifibrogenic effect of PTX on dermal fibroblasts39, 40 and on activated hepatic stellate cells,22, 23 and this effect appears to be partly mediated by extracellular collagen degradation.22 In rats with biliary duct occlusion, PTX reduces liver collagen and key fibrogenic cytokines.24 Interestingly, like caffeine, PTX is also a methylxanthine, and there is recent evidence that increased caffeine intake may be associated with decreased liver fibrosis.41 Future studies may help characterize this further.
There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of adverse events between treatment groups. However, nausea and vomiting were observed at a more clinically significant frequency among patients taking PTX compared to placebo. Nausea and vomiting are well-recognized potential side effects of PTX. These effects are known to be dose-related and dosage-form related, with nausea and vomiting reported more frequently with higher doses and in patients taking immediate-released preparations compared to controlled-release preparations.42 We used a controlled-release preparation for this study. This, together with the lower dose used (1,200 mg per day), may explain the lower rate of nausea and vomiting in our patient cohort compared to previous pilot studies that used a higher dose.25 Although nausea was reported by six (24%) patients on PTX, only three (12.5%) patients had to change the dose from TID to BID in order to control the symptom. No patient on the PTX arm had to stop taking PTX due to drug-related adverse effects. Although this study was not powered to assess safety, the overall safety profile of PTX has been well established for decades, plus our data now indicate that in patients with NASH it appears to be safe and relatively well tolerated. Furthermore, its affordability as a generic drug is an attractive factor for both patients and governments, particularly given the increasing prevalence of NAFLD, and therefore NASH, in the general population, and the knowledge that medical therapy of NASH will likely have to be long term.
Despite the very encouraging results observed regarding the effectiveness of PTX on the liver histology of patients with NASH, we acknowledge the limitations of the study. The limitations regarding the measurement of circulating TNF-α and the use of TUNEL to quantitate apoptosis were acknowledged above. Similarly acknowledged above was the fact that our sample size provided adequate power to assess the main outcomes of interest, but was not designed to formally assess safety measures. An additional limitation of the study is that the number of patients with DM included was very small. This was partly due to strict inclusion criteria that allowed only type 2 DM not on insulin and on stable regimens and well-controlled blood glucose to be included, and also to the fact that a separate trial targeting NASH patients with DM was being conducted simultaneously at one of the recruiting institutions. Because of the resulting small number of DM patients included, no conclusions can be made specifically regarding the response to PTX treatment among NASH patients with coexisting DM. NASH patients with cirrhosis were also excluded from the study; therefore, the conclusions cannot be extrapolated to that patient population. Future studies can study the effects of PTX specifically in the subsets of NASH patients with DM or with cirrhosis. Finally, as with any clinical trial in NASH patients where liver biopsy histology is the main outcome measure, the subjectivity of the interpretation of the liver histology is a limitation. The use of a single pathologist (L.Y.) who has special training and significant experience with the CRN NAS system27 and who was blinded to treatment allocation lessened this limitation.
In conclusion, this trial demonstrated that PTX improves NASH and may impact the progression of liver fibrosis in NASH. PTX was overall well tolerated in patients with NASH. These observations, together with PTX's long-term safety data and its affordability as a generic, may support the use of PTX in patients with NASH, but larger studies will be needed, especially to corroborate the effects on liver fibrosis and to further characterize underlying mechanisms.
The authors thank the nurses, laboratory personnel, nutrition staff, and other personnel at the Clinical Research Units at the University Hospitals Case Medical Center and the Cleveland Clinic for their valuable role as part of this project.