SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Materials and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References
  8. Supporting Information

A key feature in the pathogenesis of liver fibrosis is fibrillar Collagen-I deposition; yet, mediators that could be key therapeutic targets remain elusive. We hypothesized that osteopontin (OPN), an extracellular matrix (ECM) cytokine expressed in hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), could drive fibrogenesis by modulating the HSC pro-fibrogenic phenotype and Collagen-I expression. Recombinant OPN (rOPN) up-regulated Collagen-I protein in primary HSCs in a transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ)–independent fashion, whereas it down-regulated matrix metalloprotease-13 (MMP13), thus favoring scarring. rOPN activated primary HSCs, confirmed by increased α-smooth muscle actin (αSMA) expression and enhanced their invasive and wound-healing potential. HSCs isolated from wild-type (WT) mice were more profibrogenic than those from OPN knockout (Opn−/−) mice and infection of primary HSCs with an Ad-OPN increased Collagen-I, indicating correlation between both proteins. OPN induction of Collagen-I occurred via integrin αvβ3 engagement and activation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/phosphorylated Akt/nuclear factor kappa B (PI3K/pAkt/NFκB)–signaling pathway, whereas cluster of differentiation 44 (CD44) binding and mammalian target of rapamycin/70-kDa ribosomal protein S6 kinase (mTOR/p70S6K) were not involved. Neutralization of integrin αvβ3 prevented the OPN-mediated activation of the PI3K/pAkt/NFκB–signaling cascade and Collagen-I up-regulation. Likewise, inhibition of PI3K and NFκB blocked the OPN-mediated Collagen-I increase. Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) cirrhotic patients showed coinduction of Collagen-I and cleaved OPN compared to healthy individuals. Acute and chronic liver injury by CCl4 injection or thioacetamide (TAA) treatment elevated OPN expression. Reactive oxygen species up-regulated OPN in vitro and in vivo and antioxidants prevented this effect. Transgenic mice overexpressing OPN in hepatocytes (OpnHEP Tg) mice developed spontaneous liver fibrosis compared to WT mice. Last, chronic CCl4 injection and TAA treatment caused more liver fibrosis to WT than to Opn−/− mice and the reverse occurred in OpnHEP Tg mice. Conclusion: OPN emerges as a key cytokine within the ECM protein network driving the increase in Collagen-I protein contributing to scarring and liver fibrosis. (HEPATOLOGY 2012)

Fibrogenesis, or activation of the wound-healing response to persistent liver injury, is characterized by changes in the composition and quantity of extracellular matrix (ECM) deposits distorting the normal hepatic architecture by forming fibrotic scars. Failure to degrade accumulated ECM is a major reason why fibrosis progresses to cirrhosis. Emerging antifibrogenic therapies aim at inhibiting the activation of profibrogenic cells to prevent fibrillar Collagen-I deposition, degrading excessive ECM to recover normal liver architecture and restoring functional liver mass.

Although different cell types contribute to the increase in fibrillar Collagen-I during hepatic fibrogenesis, they all undergo a common process of differentiation and acquisition of a classical myofibroblast-like phenotype. Hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) are considered central ECM-producing cells within the injured liver,1 playing a significant role in Collagen-I deposition when hepatocellular injury is concentrated within the liver lobules and sinusoids. In the healthy liver, they reside in the sinusoidal space of Disse; however, during chronic injury, they activate while acquiring motile, proinflammatory and profibrogenic properties.2 Activated HSCs migrate and accumulate at the sites of tissue repair, secreting large amounts of ECM, mostly Collagen-I and regulating ECM remodeling. Up-regulation of fibrillar Collagen-I is thus a key event leading to scarring, the pathophysiological hallmark of liver fibrosis.

Though some current therapies have proven beneficial, dissecting key profibrogenic mechanisms, pathways and mediators of disease progression is vital. Several studies have identified osteopontin (OPN) as significantly up-regulated during liver injury and in HSCs.3-6 OPN is a soluble cytokine and a matrix-bound protein that can remain intracellular or is secreted, hence allowing autocrine and paracrine signaling.7, 8 OPN, as a matricellular phosphoglycoprotein, functions as an adaptor and modulator of cell-matrix interactions.8 Among its many roles, it regulates cell migration, ECM invasion and cell adhesion resulting from its ability to bind integrins—through its RGD motif–-or to cluster of differentiation (CD)44–-by a cryptic site (SVVYGLR)—exposed after cleavage by thrombin, plasminogen, plasmin, cathepsin B and some matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs).5, 9 OPN expression increases in tumorigenesis, angiogenesis and in response to inflammation, cellular stress and injury.10-14 OPN plays an important role in regulating tissue remodeling and cell survival as well as in chemoattracting inflammatory cells.15 Moreover, osteopontin knockout (Opn−/−) mice show matrix disarrangement and alteration of collagen fibrillogenesis in cartilage, compared to their wild-type (WT) littermates.16

There is limited information on the contribution of OPN to the HSC profibrogenic behavior and the molecular mechanisms and signaling pathways involved in governing Collagen-I protein expression during the fibrogenic response to liver injury.3-6, 17 Because OPN is expressed in HSCs,3-6 we hypothesized that OPN could trigger signals capable of up-regulating Collagen-I per se, hence acting as a feed-forward mechanism promoting scarring. Therefore, the major aim of this work was to determine how OPN could become a profibrogenic “switch” and to characterize the underlying cellular mechanism for this effect. In the present study, we identified a role for intracellular OPN in increasing Collagen-I, the HSC membrane proteins engaged by extracellular OPN, the proximal signaling molecules/stress-sensitive kinases activated upon binding that trigger the profibrogenic cascade, the ability of OPN to respond to oxidant stress, and the effect of Opn ablation or overexpression on Collagen-I deposition in vivo.

Materials and Methods

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Materials and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References
  8. Supporting Information

Please see Supporting Materials for a detailed description of experimental procedures.

Results

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Materials and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References
  8. Supporting Information

Recombinant OPN Slightly Increases HSC Proliferation Rates and Promotes HSC Migration.

Recombinant OPN (rOPN) did not alter HSCs viability, but slightly induced proliferation rates, both in rat and in human HSCs (Supporting Fig. 1); however, rOPN caused a 2-fold increase in the invasive potential or chemotaxis (Supporting Fig. 2A, 2B) and enhanced the wound-closure ability of rat HSCs (Supporting Fig. 2C), important functions gained by HSC during their activation that contribute to their profibrogenic ability. Neutralizing antibodies (Abs) to αvβ3 integrin and to OPN blocked the effects on HSC invasion (not shown) and on wound closure ability (Supporting Fig. 2C).

rOPN Induces Profibrogenic Effects in Primary HSCs.

Upon stimulation with rOPN, rat HSCs up-regulated intra- and extracellular Collagen-I in a time-dependent fashion (Fig. 1A, left). Denatured rOPN did not elevate Collagen-I, thus confirming the specificity of the rOPN effect on Collagen-I in HSCs (not shown). rOPN lowered extracellular MMP13 protein by 50%, contributing to extracellular Collagen-I accumulation. Reciprocal modulation of MMP13 and Collagen-I has been previously described in rat HSCs.18 Extracellular pro-, intermediate, and active MMP2 and 9 remained unchanged (Fig. 1A, left). Likewise, tissue inhibitor of MMP1 was comparable (not shown). rOPN induced rat HSC activation, as shown by the increase in Collagen-I and alpha smooth muscle actin (αSMA) proteins (Fig. 1A, right). Analogous results were observed in human HSCs (Fig. 1B).

thumbnail image

Figure 1. Profibrogenic effects of rOPN in primary HSCs. Primary rat HSCs cultured for 7 days were treated with 0-50 nM of rOPN for 6 and 24 hours. Western blotting analysis of intra- and extracellular Collagen-I, extracellular MMP13 and β-tubulin. Gelatine zymography showing extracellular pro-, intermediate, and active MMP2 and 9 (A, left). Western blotting analysis of intracellular Collagen-I, αSMA and actin in rat HSCs treated with 0-50 nM of rOPN for 24 hours (A, right). Human HSCs cultured for 7 days were treated with 0-100 nM of rOPN for 1 and 24 hours. Western blotting analysis of intra- and extracellular Collagen-I, extracellular MMP13 and 1 and β-tubulin. Pro-MMP2 activity was measured by gelatine zymography. Extracellular MMP9 activity was undetectable (not shown) (B). Western blotting analysis of intracellular Collagen-I and actin in HSCs from WT and Opn−/− mice. Extracellular Collagen-I was undetectable (C). Western blotting analysis of intracellular Collagen-I and OPN, as well as extracellular OPN in rat HSCs infected with Ad-LacZ or with Ad-OPN for 48 hours. Extracellular Collagen-I was undetectable (D). Results are expressed as average values. Experiments were performed in triplicates four times. **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 for rOPN, Opn−/− or Ad-OPN versus control, WT or Ad-LacZ, respectively. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.]

Download figure to PowerPoint

Because of the ability of HSCs to secrete transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ),19 along with its well-known profibrogenic effect,20 rat HSCs were treated with anti-TGFβ Ab. Neutralization of TGFβ did not alter the rOPN-mediated induction of Collagen-I, thus implying a mechanism independent of TGFβ production by HSCs (Supporting Fig. 3).

To dissect whether intracellular OPN could play an autocrine role in modulating Collagen-I expression, HSCs were isolated from WT and Opn−/− mice. WT HSCs appeared more profibrogenic than Opn−/− HSCs, because intracellular Collagen-I expression at 7 days of culture was higher in WT HSCs than in Opn−/− HSCs (Fig. 1C). Infection of rat HSCs with an Ad-OPN increased intracellular Collagen-I and intra- and extracellular OPN, compared to HSCs infected with Ad-LacZ (Fig. 1D). Therefore, a novel autocrine role for intracellular OPN in modulating Collagen-I deposition was identified.

Anti-αvβ3 Integrin Blocks the rOPN-Driven Collagen-I Increase.

Because OPN is also a soluble cytokine and a matrix-bound protein, we next evaluated the role of extracellular OPN-mediated signaling (i.e., paracrine role) on Collagen-I induction in HSCs. OPN signals via integrins—mostly integrin αvβ3 highly expressed in HSCs21-23—and via CD44, also expressed in HSCs.24 Incubation with anti-αvβ3 integrin blocked the rOPN-driven total Collagen-I (intra- plus extracellular) increase in rat HSCs, whereas no major effect was observed by anti-CD44 (Fig. 2A). Neutralization of other integrins (i.e., β1, β5 and β6) failed to prevent the increase in Collagen-I by rOPN (not shown). Similar results were observed in human HSCs (not shown).

thumbnail image

Figure 2. Role of αvβ3 integrin and the PI3K/pAkt/NFκB–signaling pathway in the rOPN-mediated effects on Collagen-I. Primary rat HSCs cultured for 7 days were incubated with 0-50 nM of rOPN plus 5 μg/mL of non-immune immunoglobulin G (IgG), anti-αvβ3 or anti-CD44 for 6 hours. Western blotting analysis of intra- and extracellular Collagen-I and actin (A). Western blotting analysis of PI3K, pAkt 473Ser, Akt and β-tubulin up to 3 hours of 0-50 nM of rOPN treatment in rat HSCs (B). Western blotting analysis of pIKKα,β 176/180Ser, IKKα,β, pIκBα 32Ser, IκBα, nuclear and cytosolic p65 and actin up to 30 minutes of 0-50 nM of rOPN treatment in rat HSCs (C). Western blotting analysis of mTOR, p70S6K and actin up to 1 hour of 0-50 nM of rOPN treatment in rat HSCs (D). Results are expressed as average values. Experiments were performed in triplicate four times. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 for rOPN-treated versus control at any given time point. P < 0.05, ••P < 0.01 and •••P < 0.001 for cotreated versus Ab treated.

Download figure to PowerPoint

rOPN Increases Collagen-I Protein via Activation of the PI3K/pAkt/NFκB–Signaling Pathway.

Given that Collagen-I protein is highly responsive to oxidant stress-sensitive kinases, we analyzed the expression of protein kinases involved in regulating Collagen-I expression, such as phosphorylated p38 (pp38),25, 26 phosphorylated extracellular signal-related kinase (pERK1/2),27 pJNK,28, 29 phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), and phosphorylated Akt (pAkt).26, 30 Only PI3K and the ratio of pAkt 473Ser/Akt were elevated time dependently by rOPN up to 3 hours in rat HSCs (Fig. 2B) and up to 1 hour in human HSCs (Supporting Fig. 4A).

Because PI3K/pAkt are upstream of I kappa B kinase (IKK) and the IKK complex is central for the activation of nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB) to regulate Collagen-I,26, 31 we focused on analyzing this signaling pathway. There was up-regulation of the ratios pIKKα,β 176/180Ser/IKKα,β, pIκBα 32Ser/IκBα as well as of nuclear/cytosolic p65 in OPN-treated rat HSCs (Fig. 2C). However, involvement of the target of rapamycin/70-kDa ribosomal protein S6 kinase (mTOR-p70S6K) cascade, a translational regulatory mechanism downstream of PI3K and pAkt 473Ser for regulating Collagen-I,32 was precluded, because rOPN neither altered mTOR and p706SK expression (Fig. 2D) nor induced mTOR phosphorylation at 2448Ser or 2481Ser in rat HSCs (undetectable).

To further define the molecular mechanism for Collagen-I induction under rOPN challenge, we evaluated the potential role of the activation of these two stress-sensitive kinases (i.e., PI3K and pAkt) and of the NFκB-signaling pathway. Wortmannin, a PI3K inhibitor, neither altered rat HSCs viability (100% by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay), morphology nor proliferation rates (Supporting Fig. 4B and not shown); however, three different doses of wortmannin down-regulated total Collagen-I expression in rat HSCs cotreated with rOPN (Fig. 3A, top). Similar effects were observed by coincubation with LY294002, a second PI3K inhibitor (Fig. 3A, bottom), thus linking OPN, PI3K-pAkt activation and Collagen-I up-regulation in rat HSCs. Comparable results were observed in human HSCs (Supporting Fig. 4C). Last, inhibitors of pp38, pERK1/2 and pJNK signaling did not prevent the increase in Collagen-I by rOPN (not shown).

thumbnail image

Figure 3. Blocking αvβ3 integrin, PI3K-pAkt activation and the NFκB-signaling pathway prevents rOPN-mediated effects on Collagen-I. Primary rat HSCs cultured for 7 days were treated with 0-50 nM of rOPN or cotreated with 0-10 μM of wortmannin, 0-10 μM of LY294002, 0-10 μM of PDTC, 0-5 μM of CAY10512, or with 5 μg/mL of nonimmune IgG or a neutralizing Ab to integrin αvβ3. Western blotting analysis showing that the rOPN-mediated induction of Collagen-I in HSCs was blunted by 0.1, 1 and 10 μM of wortmannin (A, top), LY294002 (A, bottom), PDTC (B, top) and CAY10512 (B, middle). Infection of HSCs with Ad-NFκB-Luc for 48 hours and treatment with 50 nM of rOPN for 24 hours increased luciferase activity over that of nontreated Ad-NFκB-Luc–infected cells (B, bottom). Both integrin αvβ3 Ab and wortmannin blunted the rOPN-mediated induction of the ratios pIKKα,β 176/180Ser/IKKα,β, pIκBα 32Ser/IκBα and nuclear/cytosolic p65 (C). Neutralizing Ab to integrin αvβ3 prevented the induction of PI3K, the ratio pAkt 473Ser/Akt and Collagen-I by rOPN in HSCs (D). Results are expressed as average values. Experiments were performed in triplicate four times. **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 for rOPN-treated versus control. P < 0.05, ••P < 0.01 and •••P < 0.001 for inhibitor or Ab cotreated versus rOPN treated or control.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Addition of pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (PDTC) to block NFκB signaling prevented the rOPN-driven increase in Collagen-I in rat HSCs (Fig. 3B, top). Analogous effects were observed by coincubation with CAY10512—a second inhibitor of NFκB signaling (Fig. 3B, middle). Moreover, HSCs infected with Ad-NFκB-Luc and treated with rOPN for 24 hours showed a 2-fold increase in luciferase activity, compared to non-rOPN-treated Ad-NFκB-Luc-infected cells (Fig. 3B, bottom). Both wortmannin and an αvβ3 integrin neutralizing Ab blunted the rOPN-mediated effect on the ratios pIKKα,β 176/180Ser/IKKα,β, pIκBα 32Ser/IκBα as well as on nuclear/cytosolic p65 (Fig. 3C), suggesting engagement of OPN with integrin αvβ3, PI3K-pAkt activation and NFκB signaling to up-regulate Collagen-I expression in rat HSCs. Last, blocking αvβ3 integrin prevented the increase in PI3K, the ratio pAkt 473Ser/Akt and Collagen-I by rOPN in rat HSCs (Fig. 3D). In summary, these results established a connection among rOPN, αvβ3 integrin, PI3K-pAkt activation and the NFκB-signaling pathway to drive Collagen-I up-regulation in rat HSCs in a paracrine manner.

OPN Expression Is Up-regulated in Liver Fibrosis.

Samples from stage 3 hepatitis C virus (HCV) cirrhotic patients displayed a correlation between elevated Collagen-I and cleaved OPN protein (∼55-, ∼42- and ∼25-kDa isoforms) compared to healthy individuals. Fully modified (glycosylated and phosphorylated) monomeric OPN, typically running at ∼75 kDa, was not detectable (Fig. 4A).

thumbnail image

Figure 4. OPN expression is induced during liver injury and under oxidant stress conditions. Western blotting analysis of cleaved OPN, total Collagen-I and actin in livers from control and from patients with stage 3 HCV-induced cirrhosis (A). Western blotting analysis of cleaved OPN and actin in livers of mice injected with CCl4 for 24 hours (acute liver injury), with CCl4 for 1 month or with TAA for 4 months (chronic liver injury) (B). In (A) and (B), fully modified (glycosylated and phosphorylated) monomeric OPN was not detected. Immunocytochemistry for OPN in primary HSCs isolated from WT mice and cultured for 6 days (C, left). IHC depicting significant OPN expression in HSCs, biliary epithelial cells and hepatocytes at 1 month of CCl4 injection (C, middle) and in HSCs, biliary epithelial cells, oval cells and hepatocytes after 4 months of TAA treatment (C, right). Insets show OPN+ HSCs in both models ([RIGHTWARDS ARROW]). Immunofluorescence showing colocalization of OPN+ with αSMA+ (an HSC activation marker) after 4 months of TAA treatment (D). Western blotting analysis of intracellular OPN and β-tubulin in HSCs in the presence of two prooxidants (H2O2 and BSO) and an antioxidant (GSH-EE) (E). Results are expressed as average values. Experiments were performed in triplicate four times. ***P < 0.001 for HCV, CCl4, TAA or prooxidant treated versus control, mineral oil (MO) or water, respectively. •••P < 0.001 for BSO+GSH-EE cotreated versus BSO treated.

Download figure to PowerPoint

To determine whether OPN also increased during liver injury in mice, we used well-established in vivo models to induce liver fibrosis, such as CCl4 injection and thioacetamide (TAA) treatment.33 These drugs undergo cytochrome P450 metabolism leading to significant oxidant stress, inflammation and hepatocyte necrosis within hours. The ∼25-kDa OPN form was markedly induced in acute and chronic models of liver injury, whereas the ∼55-kDa OPN form was elevated only under chronic CCl4 injection and TAA treatment (Fig. 4B). Hence, there was an association between OPN induction, OPN proteolytic processing and the extent of liver fibrosis, both in humans and in mice.

Next, we evaluated the specific localization of the OPN induction in the liver. Nontreated livers showed OPN+ biliary epithelial cells (not shown). Primary HSCs isolated from WT mice and cultured for 6 days were OPN+ (Fig. 4C, left). Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis revealed OPN expression in HSC,30 biliary epithelial cells,4, 6, 34 oval cells and, mostly, in damaged hepatocytes in WT mice injected with CCl4 for 1 month (Figure 4C, middle). Similar results were observed under TAA treatment, although hepatocytes showed punctated staining (Fig. 4C, right). Insets show OPN+ HSCs in both models. In the early stages of CCl4- and TAA-mediated liver injury, Kupffer cells were also OPN+ (not shown); however, the staining faded with disease progression. Of note, granular OPN+ staining—typical of secreted proteins—appeared in focal-septal hepatocytes (Fig. 4C, middle). There was colocalization of OPN+ staining with αSMA+ (an HSCs activation marker) under TAA treatment (Fig. 4D) and by CCl4 injection (not shown).

Because liver fibrosis is associated with significant oxidant stress, to dissect whether OPN was responsive to reactive oxygen species, HSC were challenged with H2O2—a prooxidant typically generated during CCl4 metabolism—or with L-buthionine sulfoximine (BSO), which depletes glutathione (GSH). Both treatments increased OPN expression in HSCs, whereas cotreatment with glutathione ethyl ester (GSH-EE) to restore GSH levels, blunted this effect (Fig. 4E). To validate the induction of OPN by oxidant stress in vivo, WT mice were CCl4 injected for 1 month in the presence or absence of S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), an antioxidant known to restore GSH levels. Coinjection with SAM lowered OPN protein (Fig. 5A, 5B) and the extent of liver fibrosis (Fig. 5C, 5D) by 50% when compared to mice injected with CCl4 alone. In summary, these data proved the ability of OPN to respond to drug-induced liver injury and to oxidant stress.

thumbnail image

Figure 5. SAM protects WT mice from CCl4-induced chronic liver injury. C57BL/6J WT mice were injected MO, SAM+MO, CCl4 or CCl4+SAM for 1 month. Cotreated mice showed decreased OPN expression (A), which was quantified by morphometry analysis (B). Likewise, fibrosis was less apparent in cotreated mice than in CCl4-injected mice, as shown by Sirius red/fast green staining (C) and morphometry analysis (D). Results are expressed as mean values ± standard error of the mean (SEM). n = 8/group; ***P < 0.001 for CCl4 or CCl4+SAM versus MO or SAM; ••P < 0.01 for CCl4+SAM versus CCl4.

Download figure to PowerPoint

WT Show More CCl4-Induced Chronic Liver Injury and Fibrosis Than Opn−/− Mice.

Fibrosis typically develops as a result of chronic liver injury. To decipher the role of OPN in the progression of liver disease, we tested whether chronic CCl4 injection could lead to differences in the extent of liver fibrosis. CCl4-injected C57BL/6J WT showed greater alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity and more inflammation, hepatocyte-ballooning degeneration and necrosis than Opn−/− mice (Fig. 6A-6E). Cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1) expression was similar in WT and Opn−/− mice, indicating that the extent of liver injury in these mice was not the result of different CCl4 metabolism (Fig. 6F).

thumbnail image

Figure 6. WT mice show more CCl4-induced chronic liver injury than Opn−/− mice. C57BL/6J WT and Opn−/− mice were injected with CCl4 or MO for 1 month. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining revealed more centrilobular necrosis ([RIGHTWARDS ARROW]), centrilobular inflammation ([RIGHTWARDS ARROW]) and hepatocyte-ballooning degeneration ([RIGHTWARDS ARROW]) in CCl4-injected WT than in Opn−/− mice (A). ALT activity (B), centrilobular and parenchymal inflammation scores (C), hepatocyte-ballooning degeneration score (D), centrilobular and parenchymal necrosis scores (E). Western blotting analysis showing similar CYP2E1 expression in WT and Opn−/− mice (F). Results are expressed as mean values ± SEM. n = 8/group; ***P < 0.001 for CCl4 versus MO; P < 0.05, ••P < 0.01 and •••P < 0.001 for Opn−/−+CCl4 versus WT+CCl4.

Download figure to PowerPoint

In addition, CCl4-injected WT mice presented elevated collagenous proteins, portal fibrosis, bridging fibrosis, scar thickness, Brunt fibrosis score and Sirius red and Collagen-I morphometry compared to Opn−/− mice (Fig. 7A-7E). The above-described results were validated in WT and Opn−/− 129sv mice (Supporting Figs. 5 and 6). Transgenic mice overexpressing OPN in hepatocytes (OpnHEP Tg) injected with CCl4 for 1 month showed similar ALT activity, necrosis and inflammation, but significant periportal, bridging and sinusoidal fibrosis, along with increased Collagen-I scar thickness, compared to WT mice (Fig. 8). Moreover, OpnHEP Tg mice developed spontaneous perivenular, perisinusoidal and portal fibrosis over time (1 year) in the absence of any profibrogenic treatment (Supporting Fig. 7). In aggregate, the data suggest that OPN plays a major role in chronic CCl4-induced hepatic fibrosis by regulating scar formation.

thumbnail image

Figure 7. WT mice show more CCl4-induced liver fibrosis than Opn−/− mice. C57BL/6J WT and Opn−/− mice were injected CCl4 or MO for 1 month. Sirius red/fast green staining indicated fibrosis stage ∼3 in CCl4-injected WT and ∼1-2 in CCl4-injected Opn−/− mice (portal [RIGHTWARDS ARROW] and bridging [RIGHTWARDS DOUBLE ARROW] fibrosis) as well as greater scar thickness in WT compared to Opn−/− mice (⟷) (A). Collagen-I IHC confirmed the extent of portal fibrosis ([RIGHTWARDS ARROW]), bridging fibrosis ([RIGHTWARDS DOUBLE ARROW]) and scar thickness (⟷) in CCl4-injected mice (B). Brunt fibrosis score (C), Sirius red morphometry (D) and Collagen-I morphometry analysis (E). Results are expressed as mean values ± SEM. n = 8/group; **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 for CCl4 versus MO; ••P < 0.01 and •••P < 0.001 for Opn−/−+CCl4 versus WT+CCl4.

Download figure to PowerPoint

thumbnail image

Figure 8. OpnHEP Tg mice in C57BL/6J genetic background show more CCl4-induced fibrosis than WT mice. WT and OpnHEP Tg mice were injected with MO or CCl4 for 1 month. H&E staining revealed similar centrilobular necrosis ([RIGHTWARDS ARROW]) and inflammation ([RIGHTWARDS ARROW]) in CCl4-injected OpnHEP Tg and in WT mice (A). ALT activity (B). Necrosis and inflammation scores (C). Sirius red/fast green staining and IHC for Collagen-I demonstrated more portal fibrosis ([RIGHTWARDS ARROW]) bridging fibrosis ([RIGHTWARDS DOUBLE ARROW]) and sinusoidal fibrosis ([RIGHTWARDS ARROW]) in CCl4-injected OpnHEP Tg than in WT mice (D and E). Brunt fibrosis score, Collagen-I and Sirius red/fast green morphometry (F). Results are expressed as mean values ± SEM. n = 8/group; **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 for CCl4 versus MO; ••P < 0.01 for OpnHEP Tg+CCl4 versus WT+CCl4.

Download figure to PowerPoint

WT Mice Show Significant Liver Fibrosis Under Chronic TAA Treatment Compared to Opn−/− Mice.

To confirm the results obtained under chronic CCl4 injection, we used TAA treatment as a second model of chronic drug-induced liver fibrosis. Sirius red/fast green staining and Collagen-I IHC showed stage >3 fibrosis in TAA-treated WT and ∼1-2 in Opn−/− mice with clear induction of Collagen-I deposition in TAA-treated WT compared to Opn−/−, mice, extensive portal fibrosis, bridging fibrosis and a ∼3-fold increase in scar thickness (Supporting Fig. 8A, 8B). Thus, fibrosis was more distinct in TAA-treated WT than in Opn−/− mice, as quantified by Brunt fibrosis score and by Sirius red and Collagen-I morphometry (Supporting Fig. 8C-8E).

Collectively, these results suggest that increased OPN expression per se or after chronic liver injury and oxidant stress can stimulate Collagen-I deposition in vivo. In addition, the in vitro studies demonstrate that intracellular OPN plays an autocrine role in regulating Collagen-I expression in HSCs. Moreover, treatment with rOPN to resemble the paracrine actions of secreted OPN increases HSC invasion, chemotaxis and wound-healing potential and up-regulates Collagen-I via integrin αvβ3 engagement and activation of PI3K-pAkt-NFκB signaling (Supporting Fig. 9).

Discussion

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Materials and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References
  8. Supporting Information

It is becoming clearer that OPN is significantly induced during liver injury, both in humans and in rodents.4-6, 17 In the past few years, work from several groups4-6, 17 studied the potential role of OPN in liver fibrosis, albeit with inconclusive results. Studies by Lee et al.5 demonstrated an OPN increase in the culture medium from culture-activated HSCs and under oral CCl4 administration; however, no mechanistic studies were performed to dissect how OPN regulates Collagen-I protein deposition. Lorena et al.6 suggested increased susceptibility to CCl4 injection in Opn−/− mice. The investigators claimed that the protection observed in WT mice was the result of enhancement of hepatocyte survival and reduction in nitric oxide synthase 2 expression; yet, they neither provided IHC for cell-survival markers nor measured the concentration of NO· or ONOO to support their conclusions and no studies on Collagen-I regulation were performed. Last, a recent publication from Syn et al.4 proposes a role for the Hedgehog-signaling pathway in activating OPN and promoting fibrosis progression in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; however, it is not clear which OPN isoform the investigators were referring to, and it is Gli1, and not Gli2, expression that is widely considered the most reliable readout for cells undergoing active Hedgehog signaling.

Thus, there is a well-timed need for dissecting the molecular mechanism on how this matricellular protein could regulate the fibrogenic response to liver injury and, specifically, Collagen-I protein expression by HSCs. Currently, there are many unresolved questions on how OPN could induce a feed-forward mechanism to promote scarring and among these are the following: Does extracellular OPN have the ability to increase HSC profibrogenic potential and HSC-derived Collagen-I protein?; which HSC receptors are involved in the profibrogenic cascade triggered by OPN?; what intracellular signals are activated upon OPN-receptor binding that drive the Collagen-I increase in HSCs?; is autocrine OPN signaling involved in regulating Collagen-I in HSCs?; is OPN sensitive to oxidant stress?; which OPN isoforms appear during the course of liver fibrosis?; and does OPN induce sinusoidal fibrosis?.

Thus, the overall aim of this work was to address these questions, identify the mechanism for the OPN-driven Collagen-I up-regulation in HSCs, and determine the functional role of OPN in the pathogenesis of liver fibrosis. The idea that OPN mediates liver fibrosis is relevant for several reasons. First, because the observation that OPN is up-regulated in HSCs during hepatic injury provides an excellent conceptual advance in our understanding of liver fibrogenesis, as it appears that OPN up-regulates HSC Collagen-I protein both in an autocrine and paracrine fashion. Second, it supports the clinicopathological finding that injury occurring in the central region is accompanied by fibrosis. Third, it opens the possibility of linking a soluble cytokine/matricellular protein with fibrogenesis. Last, the identification of the mechanism and mediators involved in the profibrogenic actions of OPN could help in devising strategies for therapeutic targeting.

Our in vitro experiments validated the hypothesis of the profibrogenic and proinvasive actions of OPN in HSCs. Mechanistic studies identified the HSC membrane proteins engaged by OPN and the proximal signaling molecules/oxidant stress-sensitive kinases activated upon OPN binding that trigger the fibrogenic cascade. The experimental data identified integrin αvβ3 as an efficient conveyor of the OPN-mediated profibrogenic actions in HSCs and pointed at PI3K-pAkt activation and the NFκB-signaling pathway as highly involved in this process.

Because OPN signals via integrins and CD44, it is feasible that following liver injury, a ligand for αvβ3 integrin, such as OPN, accumulates in the space of Disse and acts in a αvβ3 integrin-dependent manner to maintain Collagen-I induction, HSC activation, invasion and migration. Because OPN binds ECM proteins,35, 36 this binding ability may enhance HSC activation, migration and invasion—key HSC features for the development of fibrosis. The finding that blocking CD44 did not prevent the effect of rOPN on Collagen-I may be related to the ability of hyaluronic acid—a glycosaminglycan synthesized during HSC activation24, 37—to bind CD44; thus, competitive inhibition between hyaluronic acid and rOPN for CD44 binding could occur in HSCs, although this possibility needs further investigation.

Several observations support the role for PI3K-pAkt activation and the NFκB-signaling pathway in the effects mediated by rOPN on Collagen-I. First, rOPN rapidly increased PI3K, the ratios pAkt 473Ser/Akt, pIKKα,β 176/180Ser/IKKα,β and pIκBα 32Ser/IκBα as well as nuclear translocation of p65. Second, inhibitors of PI3K activation and NFκB signaling blunted the rOPN-mediated increase in intra- and extracellular Collagen-I protein. Third, blockade of αvβ3 integrin signaling with a neutralizing Ab and incubation with wortmannin or LY294002 prevented the induction of PI3K, the increase in the ratios pAkt 473Ser/Akt, pIKKα,β 176/180Ser/IKKα,β and pIκBα 32Ser/IκBα, nuclear translocation of p65 and the up-regulation of Collagen-I protein by rOPN. Involvement of the mTOR cascade was ruled out, because rOPN altered neither mTOR-p706SK expression nor mTOR phosphorylation. Therefore, this study linked extracellular and/or secreted OPN (i.e., paracrine effect) with αvβ3 integrin binding, PI3K-pAkt activation, NFκB signaling and scarring.

Work from several laboratories,3-6 including our own, suggests that HSCs are an important source of OPN during liver injury. To date, OPN was believed to exert its effects by binding the RGD motif in integrins and the cell-surface receptor CD44; however, an intracellular function of OPN in liver fibrosis was largely unknown. Because HSCs isolated from Opn−/− mice were less profibrogenic than those from WT mice and infection of HSCs with Ad-OPN increased intracellular Collagen-I, these results suggested a novel autocrine mechanism whereby intracellular OPN could modulate Collagen-I deposition in HSCs. Alternatively, extracellular OPN, either from HSCs or from neighboring cells, may activate HSCs through its receptor (αvβ3 integrin), as suggested above, thus creating a positive feedback loop.

To further validate our hypothesis, we then assessed whether OPN contributed to the fibrogenic response in vivo using two mouse models of drug-induced liver injury. The data from human samples and from the mouse models showed that most of the OPN found in liver injury appeared to have been cleaved at least at the endpoint of the experiments. The role of each cleaved isoform in regulating the fibrogenic response to liver injury, as well as the identification of the proteases that cleave hepatic OPN, is currently under active investigation in our laboratory, because additional integrin-binding sites, other than αvβ3 integrin, are likely to be uncovered by proteolytic processing of the protein.

Upon the onset of liver injury in mice, the increase in OPN likely results from oxidant stress because CCl4 and TAA metabolism via cytochrome P450s generate a considerable amount of free radicals33 and the in vitro data demonstrated the OPN responsiveness to oxidant stress, which was blocked by antioxidant treatment. Furthermore, cotreatment with SAM, known to elevate GSH levels, prevented the increase in OPN and the fibrogenic response in WT mice injected with CCl4 for 1 month.

Although it is possible that the chronic effects of Opn ablation could be secondary to its effects on liver injury itself (i.e., inflammation and ductular reaction, unpublished observations), the data clearly reveal a direct action of OPN on Collagen-I protein expression, a key event in liver fibrosis. Hence, OPN appears to induce scarring per se. This is, indeed, also supported by the finding that though ALT activity and the necrosis and inflammation scores were similar, there was increased portal, bridging and sinusoidal fibrosis, along with enhanced width of the collagenous septa in CCl4-injected OpnHEP Tg mice, compared to their WT littermates. Notably, OpnHEP Tg mice developed spontaneous fibrosis over time, whereas WT mice did not. Last, in line with the results using OpnHEP Tg mice and the in vitro data, fibrilar Collagen-I content and scar thickness was significantly lowered by OPN ablation in vivo. It is likely that secreted OPN allows paracrine signaling to HSCs, whereas endogenous OPN expression in HSCs signals in an autocrine fashion, amplifying fibrogenic response. The cell- and matrix-binding ability of OPN may also facilitate a proper stromal and fibrillar collagen network organization. Overall, it is reasonable to propose that OPN may drive the fibrogenic response, among others, by directly regulating Collagen-I deposition. Thus, OPN emerges as a key soluble cytokine and ECM-bound molecule promoting liver fibrosis.

Acknowledgements

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Materials and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References
  8. Supporting Information

The authors are very grateful to the following investigators: David T. Denhardt (Rutgers University, Newark, NJ) for his generous gift of the 2A1 Ab and for the Opn−/− mice in 129sv background; Satoshi Mochida (Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan) for providing the OpnHEP Tg mice; Andrea D. Branch (Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY) for donating the human liver protein lysates; Toshimitsu Uede (Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan) for the Ad-OPN and Ad-LacZ; John Engelhardt (University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA) for the recombinant Ad expressing the NFκB-Luc reporter; and Feng Hong (Mount Sinai School of Medicine) for supplying the primary human HSC isolated from normal liver margin of patients undergoing hepatic tumor resection.

The authors are also very thankful to all former and current members from the Nieto Laboratory for their helpful comments and suggestions throughout this project as well as for their critical review of the manuscript for this article. Special thanks go to Marcos Rojkind, Arthur I. Cederbaum and David T. Denhardt for their constant support and for their very helpful insight throughout the course of this project.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Materials and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References
  8. Supporting Information
  • 1
    Gäbele E, Brenner DA, Rippe RA. Liver fibrosis: signals leading to the amplification of the fibrogenic hepatic stellate cell. Front Biosci 2003; 8: d69-d77.
  • 2
    Milani S, Herbst H, Schuppan D, Kim KY, Riecken EO, Stein H. Procollagen expression by nonparenchymal rat liver cells in experimental biliary fibrosis. Gastroenterology 1990; 98: 175-184.
  • 3
    De Minicis S, Seki E, Uchinami H, Kluwe J, Zhang Y, Brenner DA, Schwabe RF. Gene expression profiles during hepatic stellate cell activation in culture and in vivo. Gastroenterology 2007; 132: 1937-1946.
  • 4
    Syn WK, Choi SS, Liaskou E, Karaca GF, Agboola KM, Oo YH, et al. Osteopontin is induced by hedgehog pathway activation and promotes fibrosis progression in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. HEPATOLOGY 2011; 53: 106-115.
  • 5
    Lee SH, Seo GS, Park YN, Yoo TM, Sohn DH. Effects and regulation of osteopontin in rat hepatic stellate cells. Biochem Pharmacol 2004; 68: 2367-2378.
  • 6
    Lorena D, Darby IA, Gadeau AP, Leen LL, Rittling S, Porto LC, et al. Osteopontin expression in normal and fibrotic liver. altered liver healing in osteopontin-deficient mice. J Hepatol 2006; 44: 383-390.
  • 7
    Kazanecki CC, Uzwiak DJ, Denhardt DT. Control of osteopontin signaling and function by post-translational phosphorylation and protein folding. J Cell Biochem 2007; 102: 912-924.
  • 8
    Uede T. Osteopontin, intrinsic tissue regulator of intractable inflammatory diseases. Pathol Int 2011; 61: 265-280.
  • 9
    Kazanecki CC, Kowalski AJ, Ding T, Rittling SR, Denhardt DT. Characterization of anti-osteopontin monoclonal antibodies: binding sensitivity to post-translational modifications. J Cell Biochem 2007; 102: 925-935.
  • 10
    El-Tanani MK, Campbell FC, Kurisetty V, Jin D, McCann M, Rudland PS. The regulation and role of osteopontin in malignant transformation and cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2006; 17: 463-474.
  • 11
    Apte UM, Banerjee A, McRee R, Wellberg E, Ramaiah SK. Role of osteopontin in hepatic neutrophil infiltration during alcoholic steatohepatitis. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2005; 207: 25-38.
  • 12
    Banerjee A, Apte UM, Smith R, Ramaiah SK. Higher neutrophil infiltration mediated by osteopontin is a likely contributing factor to the increased susceptibility of females to alcoholic liver disease. J Pathol 2006; 208: 473-485.
  • 13
    Ramaiah SK, Rittling S. Pathophysiological role of osteopontin in hepatic inflammation, toxicity, and cancer. Toxicol Sci 2008; 103: 4-13.
  • 14
    Denhardt DT, Mistretta D, Chambers AF, Krishna S, Porter JF, Raghuram S, Rittling SR. Transcriptional regulation of osteopontin and the metastatic phenotype: evidence for a Ras-activated enhancer in the human OPN promoter. Clin Exp Metastasis 2003; 20: 77-84.
  • 15
    Denhardt DT, Noda M, O'Regan AW, Pavlin D, Berman JS. Osteopontin as a means to cope with environmental insults: regulation of inflammation, tissue remodeling, and cell survival. J Clin Invest 2001; 107: 1055-1061.
  • 16
    Liaw L, Birk DE, Ballas CB, Whitsitt JS, Davidson JM, Hogan BL. Altered wound healing in mice lacking a functional osteopontin gene (spp1). J Clin Invest 1998; 101: 1468-1478.
  • 17
    Fickert P, Stoger U, Fuchsbichler A, Moustafa T, Marschall HU, Weiglein AH, et al. A new xenobiotic-induced mouse model of sclerosing cholangitis and biliary fibrosis. Am J Pathol 2007; 171: 525-536.
  • 18
    Schaefer B, Rivas-Estilla AM, Meraz-Cruz N, Reyes-Romero MA, Hernandez-Nazara ZH, Dominguez-Rosales JA, et al. Reciprocal modulation of matrix metalloproteinase-13 and type I collagen genes in rat hepatic stellate cells. Am J Pathol 2003; 162: 1771-1780.
  • 19
    Cubero FJ, Nieto N. Ethanol and arachidonic acid synergize to activate Kupffer cells and modulate the fibrogenic response via tumor necrosis factor alpha, reduced glutathione, and transforming growth factor beta-dependent mechanisms. HEPATOLOGY 2008; 48: 2027-2039.
  • 20
    Garcia-Trevijano ER, Iraburu MJ, Fontana L, Dominguez-Rosales JA, Auster A, Covarrubias-Pinedo A, Rojkind M. Transforming growth factor beta1 induces the expression of alpha1(I) procollagen mRNA by a hydrogen peroxide-C/EBPbeta-dependent mechanism in rat hepatic stellate cells. HEPATOLOGY 1999; 29: 960-970.
  • 21
    Huang G, Brigstock DR. Integrin expression and function in the response of primary culture hepatic stellate cells to connective tissue growth factor (CCN2). J Cell Mol Med 2010; 15: 1087-1095.
  • 22
    Patsenker E, Popov Y, Stickel F, Schneider V, Ledermann M, Sagesser H, et al. Pharmacological inhibition of integrin alphavbeta3 aggravates experimental liver fibrosis and suppresses hepatic angiogenesis. HEPATOLOGY 2009; 50: 1501-1511.
  • 23
    Zhou X, Murphy FR, Gehdu N, Zhang J, Iredale JP, Benyon RC. Engagement of alphavbeta3 integrin regulates proliferation and apoptosis of hepatic stellate cells. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 23996-24006.
  • 24
    Kikuchi S, Griffin CT, Wang SS, Bissell DM. Role of CD44 in epithelial wound repair: migration of rat hepatic stellate cells utilizes hyaluronic acid and CD44v6. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 15398-15404.
  • 25
    Deng ZY, Li J, Jin Y, Chen XL, Lu XW. Effect of oxymatrine on the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases signalling pathway in rats with CCl4 induced hepatic fibrosis. Chin Med J (Engl) 2009; 122: 1449-1454.
  • 26
    Nieto N. Ethanol and fish oil induce NFkappaB transactivation of the collagen alpha2(I) promoter through lipid peroxidation-driven activation of the PKC-PI3K-Akt pathway. HEPATOLOGY 2007; 45: 1433-1445.
  • 27
    Yuantai W, Tiancai W, Qiu Z. PD98059 inhibits expression of pERK1 protein and collagen alpha1(I) mRNA in rat pancreatic stellate cells activated by platelet-derived growth factor. Indian J Gastroenterol 2005; 24: 100-103.
  • 28
    Anania FA, Womack L, Jiang M, Saxena NK. Aldehydes potentiate alpha(2)(I) collagen gene activity by JNK in hepatic stellate cells. Free Radic Biol Med 2001; 30: 846-857.
  • 29
    Chen A, Davis BH. The DNA binding protein BTEB mediates acetaldehyde-induced, jun N-terminal kinase-dependent alphaI(I) collagen gene expression in rat hepatic stellate cells. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20: 2818-2826.
  • 30
    De Minicis S, Candelaresi C, Marzioni M, Saccomano S, Roskams T, Casini A, et al. Role of endogenous opioids in modulating HSC activity in vitro and liver fibrosis in vivo. Gut 2008; 57: 352-364.
  • 31
    Buttner C, Skupin A, Rieber EP. Transcriptional activation of the type I collagen genes COL1A1 and COL1A2 in fibroblasts by interleukin-4: analysis of the functional collagen promoter sequences. J Cell Physiol 2004; 198: 248-258.
  • 32
    Perez de Obanos MP, Lopez-Zabalza MJ, Arriazu E, Modol T, Prieto J, Herraiz MT, Iraburu MJ. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) mediate the effects of leucine on translation regulation and type I collagen production in hepatic stellate cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 2007; 1773: 1681-1688.
  • 33
    Comporti M. Three models of free radical-induced cell injury. Chem Biol Interact 1989; 72: 1-56.
  • 34
    Fickert P, Thueringer A, Moustafa T, Silbert D, Gumhold J, Tsybrovskyy O, et al. The role of osteopontin and tumor necrosis factor alpha receptor-1 in xenobiotic-induced cholangitis and biliary fibrosis in mice. Lab Invest 2010; 90: 844-852.
  • 35
    Chen Y, Bal BS, Gorski JP. Calcium and collagen binding properties of osteopontin, bone sialoprotein, and bone acidic glycoprotein-75 from bone. J Biol Chem 1992; 267: 24871-24878.
  • 36
    Singh K, DeVouge MW, Mukherjee BB. Physiological properties and differential glycosylation of phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated forms of osteopontin secreted by normal rat kidney cells. J Biol Chem 1990; 265: 18696-18701.
  • 37
    Cho MK, Lee GH, Park EY, Kim SG. Hyaluronic acid inhibits adhesion of hepatic stellate cells in spite of its stimulation of DNA synthesis. Tissue Cell 2004; 36: 293-305.

Supporting Information

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Materials and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References
  8. Supporting Information

Additional Supporting Information could be found in the online version of this article.

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
HEP_24701_sm_SuppInfo.doc252KSupporting Information

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.