SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Patients and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. References
  7. Supporting Information

To comprehensively characterize the contribution of virological factors as well as interleukin-28B (IL28B) single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in determining treatment responses in pegylated-interferon plus ribavirin (Peg-IFN/RBV) therapy for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV)-1b infection, we undertook a retrospective cohort analysis for the pretreatment dominant complete HCV open reading frame (ORF) amino-acid (aa) sequence study in 103 consecutive HCV-1b Japanese patients. The dominant HCV sequences classified by the response were subjected to systematic sliding-window comparison analysis to characterize response-specific viral sequences, along with IL28B SNP analyses (rs8099917). In each comparison of the patients between with and without rapid viral response (RVR), nonearly viral response (nEVR), sustained virological response (SVR), or relapse, the following regions were extracted as most significantly associated with the different responses respectively: nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) aa.2224-2248 (P = 1.2E-07); core aa.70 (P = 4E-04); NS5A aa.2340-2382 (P = 7.0E-08); and NS5A aa.2360-2377 (P = 1.1E-05). Those NS5A regions nearly coincided with the interferon (IFN) sensitivity-determining region (NS5A aa.2209-2248) and the IFN/RBV resistance-determining region (NS5A aa.2339-2379). In a multivariate analysis, the IL28B SNP (odds ratio [OR] = 16.8; P = 0.009) and NS5A aa.2340-2382 (OR = 13.8; P = 0.0003) were extracted as the two most-significant independent variables contributing to the final outcome. Conclusion: In Peg-IFN/RBV therapy, polymorphisms in IL28B, NS5A aa.2224-2248, core aa.70, and, most important, NS5A aa.2340-2382 have a tremendous influence on treatment response in association with viral kinetics, resulting in significantly different outcomes in chronic HCV-1b infection. (HEPATOLOGY 2012;56:1611–1621)

Hepatitis C vrus (HCV) is a major cause of chronic liver disease (CLD) worldwide, causing CLD that may progress to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).1 Treatment response of the conventional pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) therapy is highly variable, and half of the patients cannot eradicate the virus (i.e., sustained virological response; SVR).2 Recently, direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have been under development, and telaprevir and boceprevir have now been included in HCV treatment regimens in the Unites States. However, it has gradually became learned that HCVs showing resistance to Peg-IFN/RBV therapy might demonstrate higher resistance to these new regimens of Peg-IFN/RBV plus DAAs.3 In this background, it is urgent to clarify a comprehensive characterization of viral and host determinants for Peg-IFN/RBV therapy and to determine the most appropriate candidates for the new therapies.

In interferon (IFN)-based therapy, treatment response is influenced by multiple host and viral factors. Among the host factors, younger age, milder fibrosis stage, being nonobese,4 being Asian or Caucasian rather than African,5 and, recently, the interleukin-28B (IL28B) major allele type6-8 are associated with favorable responses. Among the viral factors, low baseline viral load and genotype 2/3, rather than genotype 1/4, show favorable responses.9 On the other hand, the contribution of other viral factors, such as polymorphisms in several restricted viral genetic regions, has long been debated in terms of their association with treatment responses. HCV genetic elements, including the IFN sensitivity-determining region (ISDR) in nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A),10, 11 PKR-binding domain (PKR-BD) in NS5A,12, 13 the V3 region in NS5A,14 the IFN/RBV resistance-determining region (IRRDR) in NS5A,15 the PKR-eIF2 phosphorylation homology domain (PePHD) of E2,16 the C-terminal region of NS5A (G404S and E442G),17 F415Y in NS5B,18 polymerase motif in NS5B,19 and amino acid (aa).70 and 91 in core,20 have been investigated for their correlation with the clinical outcome of IFN-based therapy or RBV in genotype 1 infection. Complete open reading frame (ORF) analyses in Peg-IFN/RBV therapy also revealed the link between treatment response at day 28 or treatment outcome with viral diversities in several viral genomic regions in genotype 1 infection.21, 22 Importantly, most recent studies reported the strong contribution of core aa.70, ISDR, and IL28B polymorphisms in the response of Peg-IFN/RBV therapy in genotype 1b infection.11, 23

Nevertheless, a comprehensive analysis of how these viral elements affect treatment response has not been presented clearly yet, especially along with IL28B single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Moreover, inconsistent results that have been reported on for some of those regions made the association with the response obscure. Under these circumstances, the previous studies had limitations regarding the following points: (1) Viral regions selected for analysis were partial; (2) associations among different viral regions were not evaluated; (3) most studies investigated the associations only with the final SVR rate, although this is influenced by multiple factors, other than a simple virological response; (4) some studies have included patients with different racial backgrounds; and (5) most studies lacked analysis with IL28B polymorphisms.

To overcome these limitations, we have recently determined complete HCV ORF sequences of 88 patients receiving Peg-IFN/RBV, and confirmed that the NS5A-ISDR and core 70 were specifically extracted as regions most significantly correlated to rapid viral response (RVR) and nonearly viral response (nEVR), respectively.24 In the present study, we undertook more comprehensive, detailed analysis to disclose the effect of HCV ORF on determining early viral response (EVR), final outcome, and relapse by extending the previous result through adding the information of IL28B polymorphisms in Japanese patients given Peg-IFN/RBV therapy for genotype 1b HCV.

Patients and Methods

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Patients and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. References
  7. Supporting Information

Study Patients.

We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with chronic HCV-1b infection treated with combination therapy of Peg-IFN/RBV at the Yamanashi University Hospital (Yamanashi, Japan) between December 2004 and July 2008. Eligible patients were 18-75 years of age, seronegative for hepatitis B surface antigen and antibodies against human immunodeficiency virus, and had an absolute neutrophil count ≥1,500/mm3, a normal hemoglobin (Hb) level, and available pretreatment serum sample conserved for HCV-sequence analysis. Patients were excluded if they had decompensated liver cirrhosis or HCC. Consequently, 103 patients were eligible for this study. In addition to those 103 patients, 30 consecutive patients who received the standard length of Peg-IFN/RBV at the Yamanashi University Hospital from August 2008 to April 2011 and were meeting the above-mentioned criteria were also included in the study to perform uni- and multivariate analysis for SVR and relapse. The study was approved by the ethics committees of the University of Yamanashi, and the study protocol conformed to the ethical guidelines of the 2000 Declaration of Helsinki.

Doses and treatment periods were determined according to a standard treatment protocol for Japanese patients, established by a hepatitis study group of the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare, Japan. Patients were treated with Peg-IFN-α-2b (1.5 μg/kg, once-weekly, subcutaneously) and RBV (600-800 mg daily, per os) for 48 weeks. When patients failed to achieve a 2-log reduction of HCV RNA at week 12 (nEVR), or failed to achieve HCV RNA clearance (HCV RNA, <50 IU/mL) at week 24 (null viral response), the therapy was discontinued if they did not desire to continue. For patients without viral clearance by week 13, the therapy period was extended up to 72 weeks if they agreed. For patients having achieved viral clearance (HCV RNA, <50 IU/mL) within 4 weeks (RVR), the therapy could be reduced to 24 weeks if they agreed.

Analytic Methods.

The following patient characteristics were analyzed: age; sex; stage of fibrosis on liver biopsy; body mass index (BMI); alanine aminotransferase (ALT); Hb; gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GTP); total cholesterol (T-Cho); albumin (ALB); platelet counts (PLTs); alpha-fetoprotein (AFP); serum HCV RNA; Peg-IFN dose; and RBV dose. Liver-biopsy specimens were evaluated blindly by an independent interpreter. HCV RNA was determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (Amplicor HCV RNA kit, version 2.0; Roche Diagnostics Corp., Indianapolis, IN).

Viral Response.

Patients were subdivided into four groups according to the initial response at week 12. Each group was defined as follows: RVR (<50 IU/mL at week 4); complete early viral response (cEVR; HCV RNA <50 IU/mL at between weeks 5 and 12); partial EVR (pEVR; HCV RNA ≥2-log reduction, but still detectable [≥50 IU/mL] at week 12); and nEVR (HCV RNA <2-log drop at week 12). SVR was defined as undetectable HCV RNA 24 weeks after completion of therapy. Viral relapse after the achievement of end-of-treatment response (ETR) were also evaluated. In some analysis, cEVR was further divided into two groups of cEVR-8w (HCV RNA <50 IU/mL at between weeks 5 and 8) and cEVR-12w (HCV RNA <50 IU/mL at between weeks 9 and 12).

Complete HCV ORF Sequencing.

Extraction of RNA, complementary DNA synthesis, and nested PCR were performed using patient serum collected before starting therapy, as described previously.25 The full-length HCV genome was amplified by nested PCR with 20 partially overlapping primer sets. Both strands of PCR products were cycle-sequenced with the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Tokyo, Japan), according to the manufacturer's instructions, using an M13 forward as well as reverse primers. Products were sequenced by an automated DNA sequencer (3130 series; Applied Biosystems). Nucleotide and predicted aa sequences of 20 HCV genomic fragments were determined and assembled using vector NTI software (Invitrogen, Tokyo, Japan).

Sliding-Window Analysis.

A sliding-window analysis was introduced to search for HCV polypeptide regions related to treatment response. Briefly, the total number of aa substitutions, compared to the consensus sequence, within a given number of consecutive aas (window) was counted at each aa position in each HCV sequence. The distribution of aa substitutions in the HCV ORF was scanned, applying these windows from aa.1 to aa.3010. The substitution numbers in each window and the treatment response was compared statistically between the two groups, showing different treatment response by Mann-Whitney's U test for each aa window. In each comparison, the length of peptide window was changed from 1 to 100 aas to search for those regions. Consequently, approximately 300,000 windows (100 width × 3,010 aas) were analyzed for each HCV aa sequence. To visualize the result, windows showing significantly low P values were colored in red and nonsignificant P values were colored in green to generate a “heat map” appearance using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA), whereas the window with the lowest P value was colored in white to be distinguished clearly.

IL28B SNP Analysis.

Human genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood using a blood DNA extraction kit (QIAGEN, Tokyo, Japan), according to the manufacturer's protocol. The allele typing of each DNA sample was performed by real-time PCR (model 7500; Applied Biosystems) using fluorescein-amidite–-labeled SNP primer for the locus rs8099917 (purchased from Applied Biosystems).

Statistical Analysis.

Statistical differences in parameters, including all available patient demographic, biochemical, hematological, and virological data, was determined between patients in various groups by the Student t test or Mann-Whitney's U test for numerical variables and Fisher's exact probability test for categorical variables.

Variables with P < 0.05 in univariate analysis were entered into multiple logistic regression analysis to identify significant independent factors with the odds ratios (ORs) as well as 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All P values of <0.05 by the two-tailed test were considered significant.

Results

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Patients and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. References
  7. Supporting Information

Patient Characteristics.

Clinical background factors of the 103 patients are shown in Table 1. Responses at 12 weeks were closely related to the final outcome of therapy. In the standard therapy up to 48 weeks, the SVR rate was 100%, 80%, 20%, and 0% for the RVR, the cEVR, the pEVR, and the nEVR, respectively. Among 103 patients, 27 patients from three groups received extended therapy (5 from cEVR-12w, 18 from pEVR, and 4 from nEVR). Although improvement of SVR was observed in the pEVR (from 20% to 61%), there was no improvement in cEVR or nEVR.

Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of 103 Patients and SVR Rate
VariablesInitial 103 Patients
  • Abbreviation: WBCs, white blood cells.

  • *

    n = 89.

Age, years56 (31-70)
Gender, male (%)64 (62)
Fibrosis, F2-F4 (%)46 (44)
HCV RNA, kIU/mL1,500 (28-8,392)
BMI22.7 (17.5-31.7)
ALB, g/dL)4.1 (3.0-4.9)
γ-GTP, IU/mL43 (11-289)
ALT, IU/mL68 (20-413)
T-Cho, mg/dL165 (104-240)
WBCs, per μL4,450 (2,520-7,850)
Hb, g/dL14.2 (11.2-17.9)
PLT, ×104/μL14.5 (6.5-27.3)
AFP, ng/mL5.8 (0.7-468.4)
IL28B TT (%)65 (73)*
Peg-IFN dose (%)89 (43-147)
RBV dose (%)98 (49-133)
SVR rate (n, %) 
 All (n = 103)55 (53)
 Standard therapy (n = 76) 
  RVR (n = 10)10 (100)
  cEVR (n = 35)28 (80)
  pEVR (n = 15)3 (20)
  nEVR (n = 16)0 (0)
 Extended therapy (n = 27) 
  RVR (n = 0)
  cEVR (n = 5)3 (60)
  pEVR (n = 18)11 (61)
  nEVR (n = 4)0 (0)

Clinical background factors of the 30 patients who were additionally included for uni- and multivariate analysis for SVR and relapse receiving the standard period of Peg-IFN/RBV therapy are also shown (Supporting Table 1).

IL28B SNPs and Their Relationship to Viral Diversity.

To evaluate the contribution of the IL28B polymorphism in the 103-patient study group, we investigated the rs8099917 SNPs in 89 patients available for analysis. The polymorphism was closely related to the viral response at week 12 (Table 2). To clarify the relationship between viral diversity and IL28B SNPs, we compared viral sequences between the major allele groups showing favorable initial response (TT) and the minor allele groups showing poor initial responses (TG or GG). IL28B SNP was significantly correlated with the aa residue at core aa.70 in full HCV ORF analysis (P = 3.4E-06); nonarginine at core aa.70 was closely related to minor IL28B alleles and vice versa (Supporting Fig. 1).

Table 2. IL28B SNPs at rs8099917 and the Initial Viral Responses*
 RVR (%) (n = 8)cEVR-8w (%) (n = 17)cEVR-12w (%) (n = 15)pEVR (%) (n = 31)nEVR (%) (n = 18)
  • *

    n = 89.

TT8 (100)16 (94)13 (87)24 (77)4 (22)
TG0 (0)1 (6)1 (7)7 (23)12 (67)
GG0 (0)0 (0)1 (7)0 (0)2 (11)

HCV Sequences Related to RVR and nEVR.

To characterize the HCV sequences related to RVR and nEVR, we determined the full dominant HCV ORF sequences by direct sequencing and searched for polymorphic aa positions specifically related to the different responses. Though aa.2240 was extracted as the most-different single position between the RVR and the remainder (data not shown), successive sliding-window analysis revealed that aa.2224 to aa.2248 of the NS5A region, being completely included in the ISDR (aa.2209 to aa.2248), was the region most significantly related to the RVR (P = 0.00037; Fig. 1A). On the other hand, when the nEVR and the remainder were compared, core aa.70 was extracted as the most-significant single aa position discriminating the two groups (P = 7.0E-8; Fig. 1B). In this comparison of the nEVR versus the remainder, a sliding-window analysis also extracted regions around aa.70 to be the most significantly different (data not shown).

thumbnail image

Figure 1. The contribution of viral sequences and IL28B SNPs in the treatment response to Peg-IFN/RBV was studied. (A) Sliding-window analysis for RVR versus the remainder (n = 103). (B) Single aa analysis for nEVR versus the remainder (n = 103). (C) Sliding-window analysis for SVR versus non-SVR (n = 76). (D) Sliding-window analysis for relapsers versus nonrelapsers among ETR (n = 57). (E) Sliding-window analysis for SVR versus non-SVR in IL28B TT patients with standard therapy (n = 47).

Download figure to PowerPoint

HCV Sequences Related to Final Outcome.

We also compared the viral sequence between SVR and non-SVR patients. In comparing complete HCV ORFs, we confined this analysis to HCV sequences obtained from the standard therapy (n = 76) to exclude the influence of therapy duration. In the analysis of each single aa, various differences were observed in the HCV ORF, including core aa.70 and NS5B (data not shown). However, a sliding-window analysis disclosed that NS5A region aa.2340 to aa.2382, the region almost coinciding with IRRDR, was extracted as the most clearly related to the final outcome (P = 1.2E-07; Fig. 1C).

HCV Sequences Related to Relapse.

To identify the viral regions related to relapse, we compared SVR patients and non-SVR patients among 57 patients with standard therapy achieving ETR (40 nonrelapsers and 17 relapsers). A sliding-window analysis disclosed that the NS5A region aa.2360 to aa.2377, the region almost coinciding with the V3 region in the IRRDR, could be extracted as the most strongly related to relapse (P = 1.1E-05; Fig. 1D).

Uni- and Multivariate Analyses.

We performed further analyses to extract the factors associated with RVR, nEVR, SVR, and relapse by univariate, as well as multivariate, analyses. For achieving RVR, ISDR aa.2224-2248 and HCV-RNA were extracted as independent variables (Table 3). Because all the RVR patients possessed IL28B TT alleles and OR calculation was impossible, IL28B SNPs were excluded from the analysis. Likewise, core aa.70 and IL28B were extracted as independent variables associated with nEVR (Table 4). In performing the analysis for SVR and relapse, we excluded patients with extended length of therapy to standardize the treatment periods. Because this restriction reduced the number of available patients for the analysis, we included 30 additional patients (Supporting Table 1) with available clinical information, including HCV core, NS5A, and IL28B SNPs. Those 30 patients were consecutively introduced the Peg-IFN/RBV therapy at Yamanashi University Hospital in succession to the initial 103 patients. As a result, 97 patients were available for SVR analysis, and 78 patients were available for relapse analysis. ISDR aa.2224-2248, IRRDR aa.2340-2382, and IL28B SNPs were extracted as the independent variables affecting SVR (Table 5). On the other hand, IRRDR-V3 aa.2360-2377 was extracted as an independent factor for relapse (Supporting Table 2).

Table 3. Factors Associated With RVR Analyzed by Uni- and Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis*
  UnivariateMultivariate
  OR95% CIP ValueOR95% CIP Value
  • Because all RVR patients possessed IL28B TT alleles and OR calculation was impossible, IL28B SNPs were secluded from analysis.

  • Abbreviation: WBC, white blood cell count.

  • *

    n = 103.

  • P < 0.01.

  • P < 0.05.

Age, years60≤0.70.18-2.590.57   
GenderMale1.50.36-6.070.59   
ISDR 2224-22481≤24.64.70-1298.5E-0714.71.10-1980.04
IRRDR 2340-23824≤6.20.76-51.10.06   
Core 70Arg0.70.18-3.070.68   
Fibrosis<23.60.72-17.80.10   
HCV RNA<600 k/UI/mL74.78.55-6538.3E-1051.23.97-6620.003
BMI<231.30.34-4.870.71   
ALB4.1 g/dL≤1.10.30-4.280.85   
γ-GTP50 IU/mL≤0.90.24-3.490.91   
ALT60 IU/mL<0.90.25-3.590.94   
T-Cho<170 mg/dL1.20.33-4.670.76   
WBC4,700/μL≤1.90.47-7.890.36   
Hb14 g/dL≤1.50.37-6.350.55   
PLT150,000/μL≤1.80.48-6.880.37   
AFP10 ng/mL≤0.30.03-2.370.22   
Peg-IFN dose (%)80≤1.30.33-5.550.68   
RBV dose (%)80≤3.00.79-11.40.09   
Table 4. Factors Associated with nEVR Analyzed by Uni- and Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis*
  UnivariateMultivariate
  OR95% CIP ValueOR95% CIP Value
  • Abbreviation: WBC, white blood cell count.

  • *

    n = 103.

  • n = 89.

  • P < 0.01.

  • §

    P < 0.05.

Age, years60≤1.180.42-3.300.75   
GenderMale0.860.31-2.380.77   
ISDR 2224-22481≤0.970.29-3.280.96   
IRRDR 2340-23824≤0.250.09-0.695.0E-030.210.03-1.330.1
Core 70Arg0.030.01-0.162.0E-080.040.00-0.040.008
IL28BMajor allele0.050.01-0.175.4E-080.10.01-0.570.011§
Fibrosis<20.280.08-1.00.04§0.50.03-0.570.55
HCV RNA<600 k/UI/mL0.190.02-1.50.08   
BMI<230.970.36-2.580.95   
ALB4.1 g/dL≤0.690.26-1.850.46   
γ-GTP50 IU/mL≤1.950.73-5.220.18   
ALT60 IU/mL<0.380.14-1.030.05   
T-Cho<170 mg/dL0.340.11-1.030.06   
WBC4,700/μL≤0.640.23-1.760.38   
Hb14 g/dL≤0.820.29-2.260.70   
PLT150,000/μL≤0.420.15-1.190.10   
AFP10 ng/mL≤5.121.82-14.40.0013.50.52-23.20.20
Peg-IFN dose (%)80≤0.370.14-1.010.048§0.90.13-5.930.89
RBV dose (%)80≤0.380.12-1.230.10   
Table 5. Factors Associated With SVR Analyzed by Uni- and Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis*
  UnivariateMultivariate
  OR95% CIP ValueOR95% CIP Value
  • Abbreviation: WBC, white blood cell count.

  • *

    n = 97.

  • P < 0.05.

  • P < 0.01.

Age, years60≤0.80.34-1.780.55   
GenderMale1.40.61-3.220.43   
ISDR 2224-22481≤6.31.98-20.260.00113.41.86-96.50.010
IRRDR 2340-23824≤11.14.07-30.544.08E-0713.83.31-57.40.0003
Core 70Arg3.21.37-7.590.0072.20.43-11.70.34
IL28BMajor allele9.62.92-31.340.0000316.82.04-1390.009
Fibrosis<23.11.33-7.230.0081.40.31-6.640.65
HCV RNA<600 k/UI/mL3.51.39-9.020.0073.50.72-17.30.12
BMI<231.00.44-2.200.97   
ALB4.1 g/dL≤0.90.39-1.960.75   
γ-GTP<50 IU/mL2.61.13-5.880.023.50.90-13.470.07
ALT≤60 IU/mL0.80.35-1.770.57   
T-Cho<170 mg/dL1.70.71-3.940.24   
WBC<4,700/μL0.80.36-1.870.64   
Hb<14 g/dL0.90.35-2.130.75   
PLT150,000/μL≤2.61.06-6.560.033.50.71-16.80.20
AFP<10 ng/mL3.71.49-9.290.0043.40.54-21.20.20
Peg-IFN dose (%)80≤2.20.96-5.130.06   
RBV dose (%)80≤0.80.37-1.920.68   

Contribution of IL28B SNPs and NS5A aa.2340-2382 in Determining Treatment Response.

Because multivariate analysis finally extracted IL28B SNPs and IRRDR aa.2340-2382 as the two most-significant variables determining final outcome, the correlation of IL28B SNPs and IRRDR aa.2340-2382 in association with final outcome was further investigated. Alignment of IRRDR aa.2340-2382 in association with SVR was demonstrated (Fig. 2). By this analysis, it was evident that three or more mutations in IRRDR aa.2340-2382 were significantly associated with SVR. Last, to disclose the viral sequence contribution in the determination of final outcome in IL28B TT haplotype patients with the standard therapy (n = 47), sliding-window analysis was performed (Fig. 1E). As demonstrated here, NS5A IRRDR aa.2340-2379 (∼2382) was finally extracted as the most-significant viral region contributing to final outcome (P = 2.47E-05).

thumbnail image

Figure 2. Alignment of NS5A region around IRRDR aa.2340-2382, along with SVR.

Download figure to PowerPoint

The contribution of these three viral regions in the phase-specific treatment responses is schematically illustrated (Fig. 3).

thumbnail image

Figure 3. Roles of three HCV-1b viral regions in the determination of time-dependent treatment response to Peg-IFN/RBV therapy.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Discussion

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Patients and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. References
  7. Supporting Information

In this study, we determined 103 complete HCV ORF sequences in consecutive Japanese patients, infected with genotype 1b HCV and given PEG-IFN/RBV therapy, and systematically searched and investigated the contribution of viral regions associated with the phase-specific treatment responses with IL28B SNP haplotypes. To our knowledge, this study is most comprehensive in the following aspects: (1) complete HCV ORF studied with the largest analyzed number of patients; (2) analyzed according to viral kinetics closely related to outcome; (3) unified to a single genotype (1b); (4) unified background of patients; (5) introduction of a sliding-window method to screen the responsible viral regions systematically; and (6) analysis of IL28B SNPs.

In a recent randomized, controlled study of Peg-IFN/RBV combination therapy, the status of patients according to response to Peg-IFN/RBV therapy at 12 weeks showed a marked correlation with final outcome, and viral response at week 12 has been considered as a useful predictor in early-response–guided therapy.26 In agreement with the previous study, virological responses to Peg-IFN/RBV at week 12 had a distinct correlation with the final outcomes in our study group (SVR rate: 100%, 80%, 20%, and 0% for RVR, cEVR, pEVR, and nEVR in standard therapy). These results demonstrated that classification by viral response at week 12 provides distinct groups with different characteristics.

We first tried to identify regions of the HCV ORF by showing a distinct linkage to RVR and nEVR. We found that HCV substitutions around the ISDR (aa.2224-2248 in RVR) were most significantly correlated with early viral clearance in Peg-IFN/RBV therapy. In contrast, core aa.70 substitution was most significantly correlated with nEVR, demonstrating the association with treatment resistance. According to the results shown here, early HCV dynamics in Peg-IFN/RBV therapy are significantly regulated by the specific viral sequences in core and NS5A (Fig. 1A,B).

Next, we determined that HCV genomic region correlated with SVR of patients with standard therapy. We excluded patients with extended therapy to unify treatment duration. Considering the length of treatment, we first suspected that multiple factors might affect the final outcome of 48 weeks of standard therapy, and that determining viral regions reflecting pure biological response would be difficult. Contrary to our prediction, a region almost identical to the IRRDR (aa.2340-2382) was extracted by systematic sliding analysis as correlated with outcome, with a significantly high P value, demonstrating the remarkable influence of the IRRDR aa.2340-2382 in determining final outcome (Fig. 1C). Importantly, in addition to final outcome, when relapser and nonrelapser in the ETR were compared, aa.2360-2377, the region almost coinciding with the V3 region of the IRRDR, was extracted as the region discriminating these two groups (Fig. 1D).

In the analysis of IL28B SNPs (rs8099917), we observed a significant correlation between IL28B SNP and viral dynamics at week 12; patients with minor/minor or minor/major alleles showed significantly poor responses, as demonstrated in Table 2. On the other hand, because poor response was significantly associated with the substitution of the core aa.70 (as shown in Fig. 1B) in our study, we next tried to unveil the correlation between HCV ORF and IL28B SNPs. The significant link with the single core aa.70 substitution was observed through searching for the complete HCV ORFs (Supporting Fig. 1). The result coincides with recent studies27-29 and, moreover, confirms that this single spot is extraordinarily linked to the initial poor response among the complete 3,010 HCV aa residues. Though the underlying mechanism for the association of IL28B and core aa.70 is unclear, the association would be a reflection of an interaction between the IL28B SNPs and HCV sequences in the development of chronic HCV infection, as discussed by Kurosaki et al.29 Namely, it is possible that HCV sequences within the patient might have been selected during the course of chronic infection, depending on the IL28B SNPs, by selective pressures of unknown mechanism.

By multivariate analysis, IL28B SNP, IRRDR aa.2340-2382, and ISDR aa.2224-2248 were extracted as independent variables related to final outcome in patients with standard length of therapy with the inclusion of an additional 30 patients (Table 5). Among these, IL28B SNPs and IRRDR aa.2340-2382 were the two most-significant variables determining final outcome. Moreover, NS5A IRRDR aa.2340-2379 (∼2382) was the most-significant viral region contributing to final outcome in patients with IL28B TT haplotype (P = 2.47E-05), demonstrating that combined information of the IL28B and IRRDR is significantly important in predicting viral kinetics and treatment outcome (Fig. 1D).

Most of the viral genomic regions identified in this study have already been reported on in previous, independent studies. However, the importance of our study is shown in the result that these specific viral regions of core, ISDR, and IRRDR were extracted all at once through systematic full HCV ORF sequence screening. What is unique in our study is the introduction of the sliding-window analysis; through this analysis, we could effectively confine viral regions of ISDR and IRRDR that were not identified in other previous HCV ORF studies.21, 22 Furthermore, our study also disclosed that the importance of these viral regions was different according to each treatment-phase; RVR, nEVR, SVR, and relapse were mostly related to the ISDR, core aa.70, the IRRDR, and IRRDR, respectively. The ISDR was the first region identified as being related to SVR in the era of IFN monotherapy in Japanese patients, such that multiple mutations in the ISDR were associated with favorable IFN responses.10, 30 The contribution of the core region in treatment response in IFN/RBV therapy was first reported on by Akuta et al., in that the polymorphisms of core aa.70 and 91 were closely related to final outcome.20 The further significance of core polymorphism was reported on in hepatocarcinogenesis as well.31, 32 Our analysis also confirmed the recent studies reporting on the close correlation between viral core and IL28B SNPs.11, 29, 32 The present finding that the core aa.70 is correlated with nEVR independently of IL28B seems to reflect the recent report that core aa.70 is an independent determinant of poor response to the triple therapy of Peg-IFN/RBV and telaprevir in patients with the IL28B minor allele.27 On the other hand, the IRRDR was originally reported on by El-Shamy et al. as being related to the result of Peg-IFN/RBV therapy.15 Importantly, our study revealed that final SVR and relapse were significantly correlated with mutations around the IRRDR. The result indicates its significant role in late-phase viral responses in Peg-IFN/RBV therapy.

Core is a main-component protein of viral nucleocapsid, and it has recently been found that the core located on the surface of lipid droplets associates with NS5A to facilitate virion formation.33 HCV-JFH1 with core R70Q/H and L91M was reported to impair virion formation resulting in the accumulation of intracellular core protein, which causes endoplasmic reticulum stress leading to IFN resistance through suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 up-regulation induced by IL-6.34 NS5A is a phosphoprotein and is considered to play a pivotal role both in viral replication and virion production, depending on its phosphorylation state.35-37 Mutations in centrally located serine residues required for NS5A hyperphosphorylation as well as in its adjacently located ISDR work as adaptive mutations in the HCV replicon, possibly through decreasing the hyperphosphorylated form of NS5A,37-40 which seems to control HCV replication. The conservation of c-terminal serine residual cluster of NS5A, downstream to IRRDR, is required for NS5A basal phosphorylation, interaction with the core protein on the lipid droplet, and thus virion formation.41, 42 Taken together, it can be speculated that the structural changes in core and NS5A protein can coordinately modify HCV replication, especially through virion formation around lipid droplets. However, the precise mechanism through which these modulations of viral proteins lead to the different treatment response should be further investigated.

In conclusion, we have found that polymorphic viral sequences in core aa.70, NS5A-ISDR aa.2224-2248, and NS5A-IRRDR aa.2340-2382 in genotype 1b HCV infection are correlated significantly with the treatment phase-specific viral responses to Peg-IFN/RBV therapy. In addition, these viral responses were also significantly correlated with the polymorphism in IL28B SNP, and this polymorphism was significantly correlated with the polymorphism in the core. More important, combined information of IL28B and IRRDR aa.2340-2382 is significantly important in predicting viral kinetics and treatment outcome. We consider that our comprehensive study provides a new basis for introducing Peg-IFN/RBV therapy as well as a new generation of anti-HCV therapies.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Patients and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. References
  7. Supporting Information
  • 1
    Lavanchy D. The global burden of hepatitis C. Liver Int 2009; 29( Suppl 1): 74-81.
  • 2
    McHutchison JG, Lawitz EJ, Shiffman ML, Muir AJ, Galler GW, McCone J, et al. Peginterferon alfa-2b or alfa-2a with ribavirin for treatment of hepatitis C infection. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 580-593.
  • 3
    Fried MW. The role of triple therapy in HCV genotype 1-experienced patients. Liver Int 2011; 31( Suppl 1): 58-61.
  • 4
    Walsh MJ, Jonsson JR, Richardson MM, Lipka GM, Purdie DM, Clouston AD, Powell EE. Non-response to antiviral therapy is associated with obesity and increased hepatic expression of suppressor of cytokine signalling 3 (SOCS-3) in patients with chronic hepatitis C, viral genotype 1. Gut 2006; 55: 529-535.
  • 5
    Missiha S, Heathcote J, Arenovich T, Khan K; Canadian Pegasys Expanded Access G. Impact of asian race on response to combination therapy with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 2181-2188.
    Direct Link:
  • 6
    Ge D, Fellay J, Thompson AJ, Simon JS, Shianna KV, Urban TJ, et al. Genetic variation in IL28B predicts hepatitis C treatment-induced viral clearance. Nature 2009; 461: 399-401.
  • 7
    Suppiah V, Moldovan M, Ahlenstiel G, Berg T, Weltman M, Abate ML, et al. IL28B is associated with response to chronic hepatitis C interferon- and ribavirin therapy. Nat Genet 2009; 41: 1100-1104.
  • 8
    Tanaka Y, Nishida N, Sugiyama M, Kurosaki M, Matsuura K, Sakamoto N, et al. Genome-wide association of IL28B with response to pegylated interferon- and ribavirin therapy for chronic hepatitis C. Nat Genet 2009; 41: 1105-1109.
  • 9
    Zeuzem S, Rizzetto M, Ferenci P, Shiffman ML. Management of hepatitis C virus genotype 2 or 3 infection: treatment optimization on the basis of virological response. Antivir Ther 2009; 14: 143-154.
  • 10
    Enomoto N, Sakuma I, Asahina Y, Kurosaki M, Murakami T, Yamamoto C, et al. Comparison of full-length sequences of interferon-sensitive and resistant hepatitis C virus 1b. Sensitivity to interferon is conferred by amino acid substitutions in the NS5A region. J Clin Invest 1995; 96: 224-230.
  • 11
    Hayes CN, Kobayashi M, Akuta N, Suzuki F, Kumada H, Abe H, et al. HCV substitutions and IL28B polymorphisms on outcome of peg-interferon plus ribavirin combination therapy. Gut 2011; 60: 261-267.
  • 12
    Murphy MD, Rosen HR, Marousek GI, Chou S. Analysis of sequence configurations of the ISDR, PKR-binding domain, and V3 region as predictors of response to induction interferon-alpha and ribavirin therapy in chronic hepatitis C infection. Dig Dis Sci 2002; 47: 1195-1205.
  • 13
    Sarrazin C, Berg T, Lee JH, Ruster B, Kronenberger B, Roth WK, Zeuzem S. Mutations in the protein kinase-binding domain of the NS5A protein in patients infected with hepatitis C virus type 1a are associated with treatment response. J Infect Dis 2000; 181: 432-441.
  • 14
    Duverlie G, Khorsi H, Castelain S, Jaillon O, Izopet J, Lunel F, et al. Sequence analysis of the NS5A protein of European hepatitis C virus 1b isolates and relation to interferon sensitivity. J Gen Virol 1998; 79: 1373-1381.
  • 15
    El-Shamy A, Nagano-Fujii M, Sasase N, Imoto S, Kim SR, Hotta H. Sequence variation in hepatitis C virus nonstructural protein 5A predicts clinical outcome of pegylated interferon/ribavirin combination therapy. HEPATOLOGY 2008; 48: 38-47.
  • 16
    Taylor DR, Shi ST, Romano PR, Barber GN, Lai MM. Inhibition of the interferon-inducible protein kinase PKR by HCV E2 protein. Science 1999; 285: 107-110.
  • 17
    Pfeiffer JK, Kirkegaard K. Ribavirin resistance in hepatitis C virus replicon-containing cell lines conferred by changes in the cell line or mutations in the replicon RNA. J Virol 2005; 79: 2346-2355.
  • 18
    Young KC, Lindsay KL, Lee KJ, Liu WC, He JW, Milstein SL, Lai MM. Identification of a ribavirin-resistant NS5B mutation of hepatitis C virus during ribavirin monotherapy. HEPATOLOGY 2003; 38: 869-878.
  • 19
    Hamano K, Sakamoto N, Enomoto N, Izumi N, Asahina Y, Kurosaki M, et al. Mutations in the NS5B region of the hepatitis C virus genome correlate with clinical outcomes of interferon-alpha plus ribavirin combination therapy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 20: 1401-1409.
  • 20
    Akuta N, Suzuki F, Sezaki H, Suzuki Y, Hosaka T, Someya T, et al. Association of amino acid substitution pattern in core protein of hepatitis C virus genotype 1b high viral load and non-virological response to interferon-ribavirin combination therapy. Intervirology 2005; 48: 372-380.
  • 21
    Donlin MJ, Cannon NA, Aurora R, Li J, Wahed AS, Di Bisceglie AM, et al. Contribution of genome-wide HCV genetic differences to outcome of interferon-based therapy in Caucasian American and African American patients. PLoS One 2010; 5: e9032.
  • 22
    Donlin MJ, Cannon NA, Yao E, Li J, Wahed A, Taylor MW, et al. Pretreatment sequence diversity differences in the full-length hepatitis C virus open reading frame correlate with early response to therapy. J Virol 2007; 81: 8211-8224.
  • 23
    Kurosaki M, Tanaka Y, Nishida N, Sakamoto N, Enomoto N, Honda M, et al. Pre-treatment prediction of response to pegylated-interferon plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C using genetic polymorphism in IL28B and viral factors. J Hepatol 2011; 54: 439-448.
  • 24
    Enomoto N, Maekawa S. HCV genetic elements determining the early response to peginterferon and ribavirin therapy. Intervirology 2010; 53: 66-69.
  • 25
    Nagayama K, Kurosaki M, Enomoto N, Maekawa SY, Miyasaka Y, Tazawa J, et al. Time-related changes in full-length hepatitis C virus sequences and hepatitis activity. Virology 1999; 263: 244-253.
  • 26
    Lee SS, Ferenci P. Optimizing outcomes in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 or 4. Antivir Ther 2008; 13( Suppl 1): 9-16.
  • 27
    Akuta N, Suzuki F, Hirakawa M, Kawamura Y, Yatsuji H, Sezaki H, et al. Amino acid substitution in hepatitis C virus core region and genetic variation near the interleukin 28B gene predict viral response to telaprevir with peginterferon and ribavirin. HEPATOLOGY 2010; 52: 421-429.
  • 28
    Hayes CN, Kobayashi M, Akuta N, Suzuki F, Kumada H, Abe H, et al. HCV substitutions and IL28B polymorphisms on outcome of peg-interferon plus ribavirin combination therapy. Gut 2010; 60: 261-267.
  • 29
    Kurosaki M, Tanaka Y, Nishida N, Sakamoto N, Enomoto N, Honda M, et al. Pre-treatment prediction of response to pegylated-interferon plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C using genetic polymorphism in IL28B and viral factors. J Hepatol 2010; 54: 439-448.
  • 30
    Enomoto N, Sakuma I, Asahina Y, Kurosaki M, Murakami T, Yamamoto C, et al. Mutations in the nonstructural protein 5A gene and response to interferon in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus 1b infection. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 77-81.
  • 31
    Akuta N, Suzuki F, Kawamura Y, Yatsuji H, Sezaki H, Suzuki Y, et al. Amino acid substitutions in the hepatitis C virus core region are the important predictor of hepatocarcinogenesis. HEPATOLOGY 2007; 46: 1357-1364.
  • 32
    Miura M, Maekawa S, Kadokura M, Sueki R, Komase K, Shindo H, et al. Analysis of viral amino acids sequences and the IL28B SNP influencing the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatol Int 2011 Aug 17. doi no.: 10.1007/s12072–011-9307–6.
  • 33
    Miyanari Y, Atsuzawa K, Usuda N, Watashi K, Hishiki T, Zayas M, et al. The lipid droplet is an important organelle for hepatitis C virus production. Nat Cell Biol 2007; 9: 1089-1097.
  • 34
    Funaoka Y, Sakamoto N, Suda G, Itsui Y, Nakagawa M, Kakinuma S, et al. Analysis of interferon signaling by infectious hepatitis C virus clones with substitutions of core amino acids 70 and 91. J Virol 2011; 85: 5986-5994.
  • 35
    Huang Y, Staschke K, De Francesco R, Tan SL. Phosphorylation of hepatitis C virus NS5A nonstructural protein: a new paradigm for phosphorylation-dependent viral RNA replication? Virology 2007; 364: 1-9.
  • 36
    Macdonald A, Harris M. Hepatitis C virus NS5A: tales of a promiscuous protein. J Gen Virol 2004; 85: 2485-2502.
  • 37
    Moradpour D, Penin F, Rice CM. Replication of hepatitis C virus. Nat Rev Microbiol 2007; 5: 453-463.
  • 38
    Blight KJ, Kolykhalov AA, Rice CM. Efficient initiation of HCV RNA replication in cell culture. Science 2000; 290: 1972-1974.
  • 39
    Maekawa S, Enomoto N, Sakamoto N, Kurosaki M, Ueda E, Kohashi T, et al. Introduction of NS5A mutations enables subgenomic HCV replicon derived from chimpanzee-infectious HC-J4 isolate to replicate efficiently in Huh-7 cells. J Viral Hepat 2004; 11: 394-403.
  • 40
    Kohashi T, Maekawa S, Sakamoto N, Kurosaki M, Watanabe H, Tanabe Y, et al. Site-specific mutation of the interferon sensitivity-determining region (ISDR) modulates hepatitis C virus replication. J Viral Hepat 2006; 13: 582-590.
  • 41
    Masaki T, Suzuki R, Murakami K, Aizaki H, Ishii K, Murayama A, et al. Interaction of hepatitis C virus nonstructural protein 5A with core protein is critical for the production of infectious virus particles. J Virol 2008; 82: 7964-7976.
  • 42
    Tellinghuisen TL, Foss KL, Treadaway J. Regulation of hepatitis C virion production via phosphorylation of the NS5A protein. PLoS Pathog 2008; 4: e1000032.

Supporting Information

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Patients and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. References
  7. Supporting Information

Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article.

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
HEP_25826_sm_SuppFig1.tif2028KSupporting Information Figure 1. The correlation between IL28B SNPs (interleukin28B single nucleotide polymorphisms) and HCV viral sequences were investigated by single amino acid comparison analysis (n=89). To do this, whole HCV sequences of TT patients (n=65) and that of TG/GG (n=24) patients were compared. Abbreviations: ISDR, interferon sensitivity-determining region; IRRDR, IFN/RBV resistance-determining region.
HEP_25826_sm_SuppTab1.doc27KSupporting Information Table 1.
HEP_25826_sm_SuppTab2.doc30KSupporting Information Table 2.

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.